|
Progressive JPEG posted:there’s dozens of email companies whose entire selling point is “in your country and not US based”, so even that’s commoditized at this point if australia is reading it they’re giving it to canada, new zealand, the uk, and the us.
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 17:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 23:22 |
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:Fish Microwaver would be a good username if we ban bloodandsoil1488 on sight, we ought to ban fishmicrowaver on sight as well
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 17:35
|
|
|
Midjack posted:if australia is reading it they’re giving it to canada, new zealand, the uk, and the us. lucky for you we can't read
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 17:38
|
|
|
Bulgakov posted:placing my last week’s fish dish at the focal point of a crater sized antenna dish so that a buncha outer space radio waves might eventually heat it up within the next billion years arecibo special
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
SIGSEGV posted:if we ban bloodandsoil1488 on sight, we ought to ban fishmicrowaver on sight as well fishmechrowaver
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 18:43
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:arecibo special you might have slight technical issues putting something into focal point of main arecibo dish
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
i have had some coworkers over the years who make this one rice dish that has some bits of fish in it, but it smells really good because it has lots of delicious spices in it e: "fishmechrowaver" lol Lutha Mahtin fucked around with this message at 19:16 on Nov 30, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 18:46
|
|
|
Midjack posted:fishmechrowaver
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 18:50
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:you might have slight technical issues putting something into focal point of main arecibo dish don't gently caress up my joke ☹️
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 18:51
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:you might have slight technical issues putting something into focal point of main arecibo dish i appreciate this
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 20:01
|
|
|
klafbang posted:You are very wrong. Sure, you should probably not host your mail on a Raspberry Pi in a closet or whatever, but there are very good reasons not to go with the classical big cloud email providers. lol @ dumb anti-American laws designed to promote terrible local alternatives.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:10
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:lol @ dumb anti-American laws designed to promote terrible local alternatives.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:lol @ dumb anti-American laws designed to promote terrible local alternatives. CLOUD act is the dumbest law right after that one where if a us serviceman is taken to The Hague the us will invade
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:lol @ dumb anti-American laws designed to promote terrible local alternatives. there are so many things wrong with the opinions you choose to have that just starting to address them would guarantee a v18.4 thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:there are so many things wrong with the opinions you choose to have that just starting to address them would guarantee a v18.4 thread dumb loving euro: "Well I lost all the patient data to Russian hackers, but its ok because reddit says the US government would look at it if I used aws" (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:there are so many things wrong with the opinions you choose to have that just starting to address them would guarantee a v18.4 thread shaggar doesn't have their own opinions, they just care desperately about everyone else's and keep a detailed spreadsheet to maximize their contrarianism
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:51
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:lol @ dumb anti-American laws designed to promote terrible local alternatives. the only law anyone was even talking about is the cloud act, which was enacted by the congress of the united states of america and signed into law by president donal trump
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:52
|
|
|
I assumed there were laws preventing euros from using office365 and not just some clown saying euros shouldn't use office 365 because hes an idiot
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:some clown saying euros shouldn't use office 365 because hes an idiot when did you say that
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 21:55
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:when did you say that lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2019 22:59
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:having had immediate experience with european space agency, i have to say that while the bureaucracy taking place is often gargantuan (primary point of comparison - nasa), everything works in order and as intended, with redundant redundancy mechanisms and audit trails to the level of who microwaved a fish in kitchen 4a in poland on last wednesday at 3:12am We also have the silly Galileo failure from earlier this year with ESA featuring prominently on the chart of blame: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/08/galileo_satellites_outage/
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 09:18
|
|
|
lol i got a mess of what claimed to be yahoo 2fa codes via sms from a mess of random numbers but don't know what scam they're even trying to run cause I never had a yahoo account  o well
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 09:28
|
|
|
Data sovereignty is theoretically very important but it's not very well implemented and generally pushes people into dramatically worse technical solutions with fear mongering. That has been my experience.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 11:40
|
|
|
EssOEss posted:We also have the silly Galileo failure from earlier this year with ESA featuring prominently on the chart of blame: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/08/galileo_satellites_outage/ harsh but fair, i've primarily been exposed to research side of esa
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 12:52
|
|
|
abigserve posted:Data sovereignty is theoretically very important but it's not very well implemented and generally pushes people into dramatically worse technical solutions with fear mongering. That has been my experience. The solution to "data soverignty" is to secure your own data with encryption you control. Who cares if sensitive patient records are stored in AWS if they are strongly encrypted?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:The solution to "data soverignty" is to secure your own data with encryption you control. Who cares if sensitive patient records are stored in AWS if they are strongly encrypted? it's a lot easier to write and enforce policy that lacks nuance
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 21:23
|
|
|
also i am willing to bet it is safer not to upload your stuff on aws if you are not really sure your fancy encryption schema works and has no holes in it on the other hand what difference does the location of the data make if state level actors can and will hack another country's data centers anyway?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 21:31
|
|
|
Penisface posted:also i am willing to bet it is safer not to upload your stuff on aws if you are not really sure your fancy encryption schema works and has no holes in it it's easier, cheaper, and less risky to send a normal request to your established law enforcement contacts at AWS than it is to hack some kraut provider
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 21:35
|
|
|
Germany is part of SSEUR so maybe their intelligence already has access and can pass it along.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
taqueso posted:Germany is part of SSEUR so maybe their intelligence already has access and can pass it along. with the caveat that that kind of request is now going by two countries' intelligence bureaucracies instead of just one, presumably introducing a bunch of opportunities for delay or non-compliance
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:it's easier, cheaper, and less risky to send a normal request to your established law enforcement contacts at AWS than it is to hack some kraut provider i think the working assumption is that law enforcement has a dedicated ip address to ssh into, any and all "requests" will be retroactively parallel-constructed when there is a need to cover someone's rear end
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 22:14
|
|
|
Penisface posted:i think the working assumption is that law enforcement has a dedicated ip address to ssh into, any and all "requests" will be retroactively parallel-constructed when there is a need to cover someone's rear end
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 22:28
|
|
|
Who knew that parallel processing had such connotations
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2019 22:29
|
|
|
That explains the police's race conditions.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 00:35
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:The solution to "data soverignty" is to secure your own data with encryption you control. Who cares if sensitive patient records are stored in AWS if they are strongly encrypted? 1000% agree, and every time I've raised this with the relevant security stakeholders they look at you like a deer in the headlights
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 00:39
|
|
|
Hollow Talk posted:That explains the police's race conditions. Nice
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 01:23
|
|
|
abigserve posted:1000% agree, and every time I've raised this with the relevant security stakeholders they look at you like a deer in the headlights Ensuring all data is encrypted at rest and in transit is a wonderful thing that for some reason everyone is terrified of and or clueless about implementing. I wonder if there are easy resources for implementing to just point people at and be like.. do that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 04:43
|
|
|
ZeusCannon posted:Ensuring all data is encrypted at rest and in transit is a wonderful thing that for some reason everyone is terrified of and or clueless about implementing. key management sucks, that's why
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 04:59
|
|
|
encryption at rest is either (1) very strong but also incredibly limiting in ways that affect every client of your system or (2) little more than a precaution of last resort against primitive data disclosures like stealing a drive if only the end-user has keys, then nobody else can access the data without their intervention. that’s fine if your service is like icloud, basically just distributed storage for opaque app data that the user might request occasionally. but it’s a lot trickier for medical records or a ticketing service or an inventory system or anything else where you or third parties sometimes have legitimate needs to access the data of a particular user and where tossing the data if the user forgets their password or loses their device or whatever is not actually acceptable if your service can decrypt the data it stores then you’re solidly in “eh it’s probably better than not encrypting it” territory
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 05:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 23:22 |
|
|
rjmccall posted:encryption at rest is either (1) very strong but also incredibly limiting in ways that affect every client of your system or (2) little more than a precaution of last resort against primitive data disclosures like stealing a drive It's worth noting that in the context of data sovereignty, that primitive "a foreign government has access to the drive" is literally the attack you're worried about.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2019 06:06
|
|
