|
I think beyond Tommu I don’t want to really vote anyone this second lunch thing - ASF seems to be posting more for now and some of it seems very sincere and attentive. Tommu has been around less and less and what they posted to begin with wasn’t very substantive.
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:I don't buy their claim and Did RF even make a claim?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:35
|
|
|
Can we just no lunch already and br content with the 2 dead 1 scum and maybe 1 other scum
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:39
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:It seems a little OP that scum could have a power to just make every day have multiple lunches, like an Anti-Governor more lunches is actually pro-town, just ask anyone in Shine IV anyway, I think ASF outing suspicions of RF having a protective role, then acting as if RF had already claimed might be something close to a scumslip. Scum might be all talking it over how they might not be able to kill binus today if whatever RF is hinting at turns out to be protective. ##vote ASF
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:40
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Can we just no lunch already and br content with the 2 dead 1 scum and maybe 1 other scum Agreed. It’s only d2. ##vote RF everyone else no lunch imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:40
|
|
|
the really interesting thing now will be to see if anyone swoops in to hammer Tommu to save ASF from that possibility 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
tbf if you didn’t deduce RF hinting that he had a protective role you weren’t paying attention, which probably could have been spun into scummy too. That’s a bad point I think, Bif I’m not gonna vote RF rn, binus and I’m honestly baffled you would??
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:44
|
|
|
lol nevermind I remember why, binus
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:45
|
|
|
Uh? I thought RF asking Binus to vote for him and only Binus to vote for him was a pretty clear inference of some kind of protective role after Binus claimed investigative? Like that poo poo was crystal clear to me. I don't believe it, but it seemed obvious. And seemed like an obvious scum play. Claim you can protect Binus, Binus then isn't nk'd and RF gets credit
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:45
|
|
|
That Hal vote came together really quick this morning. I sure hope he was scum. I’m not yet sure what to think about this morning’s convo about RF. It seemed pretty clear to me at the time RF posted that he was hinting at a protective role and it’s somewhat baffling to me that was missed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:45
|
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:Uh? Fuuuuuck. I hadn’t considered this. Why would a passive doc even doc the people who VOTED for them? Isn’t that helping keep alive the people who think most ill of you? I guess the only other way to do it would be to passively doc the people YOU are voting for at day’s end, but then that’s a counter-weight to needing to vote to lynch scum. I dunno maybe I’m gaming the mod again
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:48
|
|
|
Tommu has made one post this game day that I can find and it was a vote on Hum.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:49
|
|
|
IllegallySober posted:Tommu has made one post this game day that I can find and it was a vote on Hum. ##vote Tommu
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:52
|
|
|
I haven't claimed anything but speculating out loud about my role sure helps scum figure out their plan.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:56
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I haven't claimed anything but speculating out loud about my role sure helps scum figure out their plan. I mean I 1. don't believe you 2. thought it was really obvious until Bif was apparently confused Oh also 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 20:00
|
|
|
The day is over. Exactly one person died today. Hal, Town-aligned Sleuth, is dead. Town Sleuth If you are killed at night, the number of scum remaining in the game will be publicly posted. It is now Night 2. Scum, please choose your kill quickly (once discord servers un-gently caress themselves)
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 20:11
|
|
|
(also humalong died earlier but shush)
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 20:12
|
|
|
Retro Futurist, Town-aligned Merciful, was killed at night. Town Merciful Anybody voting you at the end of the day is protected from harm the following night. This also applies if you are executed. You win when there are no longer any scum players alive in the game. Day 3 will begin as soon as I make sure all those anonymous votes aren't in votefinder anymore.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 16:51
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 3 Not Voting (9): A Sometimes Food, Anomalous Amalgam, b-minus1, Bifauxnen, Dancer, IllegallySober, Retro Futurist, Sandwolf, TommuWith 9 alive, it's 5 votes to execute. There is currently no deadline set. mod-approved 10:25 EST
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 16:53
|
|
|
Hash tag not scum
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 16:55
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 3 Not Voting (8): A Sometimes Food, Anomalous Amalgam, b-minus1, Bifauxnen, Dancer, IllegallySober, Sandwolf, Tommu With 8 alive, it's 5 votes to execute. The current deadline is December 10th, 2019 at noon EST -- that's in about 2 days, 1 hour. edit: ok there i fixed the deadline
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 16:55
|
|
|
You fuckos thought you could get rid of me: a town player that easy didnt u.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 16:57
|
|
|
 bogus
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 16:59
|
|
|
Tommu posted:Hash tag not scum lol [b]##vote Tommu[/quote] Nothing's changed. Hell I feel town would have said if they were bulletproof.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:00
|
|
|
Blugh ##vote Tommu
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:00
|
|
|
##vote sandwolf 1) boring case on me built around me not poasting 2) lovely last vote. 3) wolfs dont like sand
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:00
|
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:Blugh Lol what a terrible post. I am town
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:02
|
|
|
A Sometimes Food posted:lol Nothing's changed. Hell I feel town would have said if they were bulletproof. [/quote] Given my exact role: no.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:04
|
|
|
I would like Sober to be the vote that puts me at -3. What do you all think
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:12
|
|
|
Anyway im off 2 the airport bbl
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 17:20
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:I would like Sober to be the vote that puts me at -3. What do you all think I'd prefer Sandwolf at this point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 20:17
|
|
|
but ASF would still be great to test too, of course. Sandwolf posted:tbf if you didn’t deduce RF hinting that he had a protective role you weren’t paying attention, which probably could have been spun into scummy too. That’s a bad point I think, Bif A Sometimes Food posted:Uh? I wondered about those implications too, doesn't mean I spewed about it to the thread or acted like he'd already claimed. And calling it an "obvious scum play" sounds like ASF seriously overplaying his hand. Obvious? Really? If RF had been scum, he'd have left a cop alive just to get town cred as a doctor? Even if the scum think they know how to dodge binus' cop vote zone theyd have to also dodge public pressure to be the ones who cast those votes, and also deal with town reads still coming through even if they succeed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 20:22
|
|
|
wish I'd been able to post that before somebody hammered the way less scummy lookin lurker but yeah, Sandwolf would prolly be better to cop test cause ASF I feel sure enough about even without one. Sandwolf has been way more active and could more easily slip through the net selling himself as just misguided town.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 20:25
|
|
|
oh, one other thing I think you should demand, binus whoever casts the -3 vote on you should also unvote within the same post. Looking a little too close to potential MYLO/LYLO for my tastes rn and don't want no one doing a scumhammer
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
What is the case on me? That I talked about RF’s softclaim? The incredibly basic, straightforward one? Cop basically confirms himself in thread and someone else all of a sudden thinks that person should end the day voting for them? That’s a really annoying piece of obvious logic to be lynched on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:25
|
|
|
In a passive ability game I can’t imagine Steak giving scum a lynchproof ability. Tommu you’re 3P aren’t you
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:26
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:In a passive ability game I can’t imagine Steak giving scum a lynchproof ability. How about you put me at -3 so I can learn your alignment. Sound good to you?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:32
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:How about you put me at -3 so I can learn your alignment. Sound good to you? Oh yes at once sir! I’m happy to do your -3 ish but I can’t make two votes appear from nowhere can I
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:35
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:What is the case on me? That I talked about RF’s softclaim? The incredibly basic, straightforward one? Cop basically confirms himself in thread and someone else all of a sudden thinks that person should end the day voting for them? nah even if you're mischaracterising it that was more what I was on ASF about, you conveniently deciding to hammer Tommu right when ASF was in trouble is what has me looking at you now! You'll note though that I wanted binus to check you instead of ASF though cause I think ASF is scummy enough to just go for it without waiting for cop data. But keep squirmin mate
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 03:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
I decided to hammer Tommu because it was hammer Tommu or let deadline pass. I had been advocating Tommu as a lurker lynch since like d2. If ASF was at -1 I would have hammered him too, honestly, but the difference between the two was ASF was around at deadline and actually giving substantive opinions. Tommu just disappeared all day and still, since then, hasn’t said anything of merit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 03:44
|
|