|
The_Franz posted:it's a display for sneakers, because this guy needs to show off that he spent $400 for $1.50 worth of canvas and rubber and a $398.50 logo badge Don't forget the 32 cents for the child / slave labor to slap together canvas, rubber, and laces.. and maybe some LEDs if they're for the kiddies Also don't forget with the new cheesgrater that if you don't put the top cover on just right you blow the cooling solution to hell and could damage built in wifi Also, behold the world's first $30,000 cheese grater: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYhcM0fhgC8&t=828s Binary Badger fucked around with this message at 02:29 on Dec 16, 2019 |
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 02:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
id say that based on the results, its more of a cheese lesser
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 02:31
|
|
|
instead of quoting all of you re: mac pro i'm just going to say agreedo on all counts
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 03:25
|
|
|
currently using carbon copy cloner (rsync with lipstick) to dump poo poo off an apfs volume with bad blocks has rsync always sucked this hard? it seems to be able to process only a certain number of file per second. doesn't really matter how small the files are, it doesn't go any faster, and it doesn't seem to be multithreaded (like, say robocopy). at this rate it's actually going to take longer than if i just DD the entire volume to another disk
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 03:45
|
|
|
Raluek posted:if they were in stock 5 minutes ago when you posted this, they arent now. really quote:Happy Mac / Sad Mac scarves back in stock: vintage Mac ROM from a Power Mac 5200 knit into a scarf. The ROM has hardcoded images in it. Comes with code by @qrs to make an image out of a ROM with a command line script for the exact wrap length of the scarf. https://knityak.com i think i would actually bully a dweeb wearing a Mac ROM scarf
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 04:19
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:currently using carbon copy cloner (rsync with lipstick) to dump poo poo off an apfs volume with bad blocks been a while but try ditto unless you're looking for rsync features though I mean what do you need apart from your /home folder anyway don't dd in this age of apfs unless you want things to be not working
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 05:19
|
|
|
i didn't dd because it's a 1tb drive with only 120gb used, it seemed like a waste, and more importantly i can't guarantee the drive geometries are the same because one is an ssd the rsync+lipstick thing is just to get a bootable device out the other end because i don't have access to the backups and with bad blocks on the device i'm not entirely sanguine about it not making GBS threads itself or killing time machine i did anticipate copying 1/10th of the data would not take longer then the theoretical full DD though, i was wrong. e: so CCC used to use ditto back in the mists or time and evidently changed to rsync for ~reasons~ infernal machines fucked around with this message at 05:37 on Dec 16, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 05:24
|
|
|
Roosevelt posted:really don’t worry I’m used to it
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 07:21
|
|
|
Agile Vector posted:id say that based on the results, its more of a cheese lesser
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 12:16
|
|
|
lord funk posted:instead of quoting all of you re: mac pro i'm just going to say agreedo on all counts but we all said diff things
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 14:54
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:it's a display for sneakers, because this guy needs to show off that he spent $400 for $1.50 worth of canvas and rubber and a $398.50 logo badge perhaps this analogy could be applied to the mac pro, makes u think
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 15:18
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:it's a display for sneakers, because this guy needs to show off that he spent $400 for $1.50 worth of canvas and rubber and a $398.50 logo badge *ace Ventura voice* this is a lovely room of child slave labor
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 15:43
|
|
|
kids with access to an Apple Watch can ask Siri on the Watch to text or call a number on the paired iPhone, regardless of whether the number is whitelisted or not
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 15:53
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:has rsync always sucked this hard? yes
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 16:02
|
|
|
I’m the parent covering my child in screens then trying to restrict their access to screens
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 16:03
|
|
|
lol nm. Apple parental restrictions are bad
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 16:10
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:kids with access to an Apple Watch can ask Siri on the Watch to text or call a number on the paired iPhone, regardless of whether the number is whitelisted or not what if adults do it tho
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 16:12
|
|
|
graph posted:yes worth knowing
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 16:15
|
|
|
robocopy/teracopy is insanely better in every way
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 17:30
|
|
|
robocopy is incredibly good and i just assumed rsync, despite being OSS, would not suck rear end and would have some basic parity with the windows tools
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
rsync is clownshoes yakety sax level application
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:11
|
|
|
the best part is, it seems very likely CCC moved to rsync from the much better performant ditto because they wanted to turn their simple drive copy tool into some mutant backup application, for whatever reason. so now you can do tons of ridiculous bullshit you have no reason to do as long as time machine exists, but spend $55 to do it, and the one thing you might use the app for is dog slow.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:15
|
|
|
rsync is over 20 years old and here's a quote from its author on why it existsquote:The rsync algorithm was developed out of my frustration with the long time it took don't rip on rsync cause people are using it for poo poo it's not made to handle
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:kids with access to an Apple Watch can ask Siri on the Watch to text or call a number on the paired iPhone, regardless of whether the number is whitelisted or not it seems like a child should not have an Apple Watch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:don't rip on rsync cause people are using it for poo poo it's not made to handle i will apologize for absolutely nothing
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:robocopy is incredibly good and i just assumed rsync, despite being OSS, would not suck rear end and would have some basic parity with the windows tools "I didnt think it would be this bad" is basically open sores in a nutshell.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
the goal of rsync is that if you already have a mirror somewhere and you want to update it, it will do as little copying possible. to do that it has to read the entire file on both sides and check whats different about it. if you just want to copy files and stomp on the existing junk use something else
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:33
|
|
|
there's nothing about rsync that can't be done multithreaded, it just doesn't support it natively for some reason. All the OSS solutions just ad a python wrapper that break the jobs up, so it's clearly trivial to do, but for whatever reason the makers of CCC didn't do that. The upshot being using rsync as is winds up being much slower than say robocopy for the same task, because it's going to look at every file sequentially e: this is 100% on the CCC guys for picking the worst way to implement a tool for the job. since the program was ostensibly a drive duplication tool, you know there are going to be tons of tiny files in say logs or god help you, cached chrome data in the user profile, that will take literally hours to transfer because it's going to inspect them in the slowest manner possible, transferring almost nothing because individually they're tiny, but it can still only do so many file ops per second infernal machines fucked around with this message at 18:54 on Dec 16, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:47
|
|
|
rsync doesn't support it natively because it was designed and built for an extremely network-IO-bound application that would gain 0 benefit from multithreading. local to local with rsync is more a thing you can do than something you should expect to work well also, and i'm not sure this is relevant because idk if linux was the original target, rsync is from 1996 when linux didn't really have threads yet e: yeah i dont think anyones disagreeing with me
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:57
|
|
|
i'm certainly not. otoh, rsync is like og robocopy, except in the intervening years MS saw fit to improve performance by adding native multithreading. for whatever reason that's not a thing anyone maintaining rsync wants to do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 18:59
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:rsync doesn't support it natively because it was designed and built for an extremely network-IO-bound application that would gain 0 benefit from multithreading. local to local with rsync is more a thing you can do than something you should expect to work well right. the real problem here is that rsync has been promoted as a tool for synchronizing files when it really shouldn't be used for most file synchronization tasks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:00
|
|
|
I just drag folders to the network drive using windows explorer and it just works, op
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:34
|
|
|
so is this iphone se 2 thing actually real? my 6 holds a charge for 2 hours and loses gps after 2 seconds so I was just about ready to give in. but if there's a normal size phone coming that's a total different thing I'm not used to the strange world of apple rumors so I don't know if this might be true or is definitely bullshit
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:35
|
|
|
nrook posted:so is this iphone se 2 thing actually real? my 6 holds a charge for 2 hours and loses gps after 2 seconds so I was just about ready to give in. but if there's a normal size phone coming that's a total different thing have some local dweeb swap the battery out for a new one and keep on using it
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
nrook posted:so is this iphone se 2 thing actually real? my 6 holds a charge for 2 hours and loses gps after 2 seconds so I was just about ready to give in. but if there's a normal size phone coming that's a total different thing
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:43
|
|
|
wait you can actually buy se today? gently caress I'm doing that right now
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:52
|
|
|
i mean, not from apple (although sometimes they show up in the refurb store), but on swappa or gazelle or whatever theyre like 100 smackers
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 19:58
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:apfs volume with bad blocks why bad blocks? i know you said 120gb/1tb used and the destination is a ssd but it sets off alarms in my head to access the filesystem on a failing disk instead of cloning it with gnu ddrescue (not dd_rescue) probably from a linux system since the kernel wont undestand the filesystem and nothing can try to automount it apfs is checksummed right? so if the disk is cloned minus the unreadable parts, which would be filled with whatever was on the disk before (hopefully 0), what happens when macos tries to read a block and the checksum doesnt match? i/o error?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 20:25
|
|
|
KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:i mean, not from apple (although sometimes they show up in the refurb store), but on swappa or gazelle or whatever theyre like 100 smackers i think theres about a 10% chance the se will get ios 14, fwiw (though i am being pessimistic to set myself up for a pleasant surprise if i am wrong)
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 20:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 10:24 |
|
|
graph posted:i will apologize for absolutely nothing we know
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2019 20:27
|
|
