|
ahahah naw I'm still here, lurking. Keep on posting you brave idiot goon
|
# ? Jan 1, 2020 12:35 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 02:45 |
|
My new year's resolution was to only read good stuff, like incredibly gay moomin/snufkin fanfic, but I accidentally read one of the honor harrington posts and yeah I'm gonna need plenty of missiles in 2020. My brain is broken.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2020 13:47 |
|
Kchama posted:I see everyone's New Year's Resolution was to abandon the Mil-Scifi Fiction thread. Not so, my ability to make poor life decisions is as strong as ever.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2020 14:51 |
|
out of the names of all the myriad ship's boats in the age of sail, Weber sure did fall in love with the word pinnace
|
# ? Jan 2, 2020 01:38 |
|
FuturePastNow posted:out of the names of all the myriad ship's boats in the age of sail, Weber sure did fall in love with the word pinnace Hey, there's also cutters! Which are the same thing but slightly bigger and with actual engines. Anyways, it's time for... On Basilisk Station Chapter Sixteen Hello all! I am here to share with you all my New Year's Resolution... To never finish tormenting you even as the year 2020 ends! Let's get right into this! quote:Scotty Tremaine hit the powered adjustment button and stretched hugely as the purring motor moved the copilot's seat back from the pinnace's console. He rotated his shoulder joints, grimacing as he worked the stiffness from them, then rose. Oh boy it's about Tremaine, who everyone loves! Also, it's really jarring the sudden comparison to 'pre-space jumbo jets'. It's such an odd in-universe reference. Also, jumbo jet passages are actually pretty spacious when you don't have five hundred people seated in one. quote:"How's it going?" What an interesting scene. ... Okay, that was sarcasm. And then we get to a bit that Weber clearly thought was super funny, but definitely isn't. If I have to suffer the Treecats, then so do you posted:Lieutenant Commander Santos stepped into the briefing room and paused behind the captain's chair. Honor was busy perusing the latest data on planetary power usage and didn't hear her come in, but she looked up at the sound of a sudden, juicy crunch. Useless treecat worship. THis never ends. Oh wait, actual plot-related stuff! Snipping a bunch of chatter so this isn't such a long post. Cardones has good reason to be wary posted:"Problem, Ma'am?" Cardones sounded a trifle wary, and Honor smiled. And it's time for more drama! Oh boy! I'll preserve it because it's at least character stuff. Character Stuff posted:"Skipper?" It was Santos, her voice soft, and Honor flushed. She'd forgotten the engineer's presence, and she castigated herself silently for betraying her concern over McKeon in front of one of her other officers. She made herself turn to Santos, hiding her chagrin. 'It had never occured to Honor to wonder if she was All Good In The Universe', which she clearly is'. End of Chapter posted:And important, Honor decided. It spoke well for any officer that one of his juniors would speak up for him, especially when it was the junior who stood to gain the most if he fell short of his commanding officer's standards. More than that, Santos's remarks reinforced her own judgment that McKeon was grappling with something inside himself, something that even the engineer didn't fully understand. I'd find all this a lot more interesting if the story hadn't already made it clear just exactly is McKeon's problem, and it's just petty jealousy.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2020 04:56 |
|
I'm reading To Honor You Call Us, and tbh, this feels like the sailing ships in space, USN edition, that David Weber wanted to write but was too dumb to pull off. It's an Aubrey Marturin book but in space. But unlike the Drake version of the same idea, it's a lot more, I dunno, rote and predictable. I wouldn't say it's bad, and its definetly good for Kindle Unlimited, but honestly I might be bumping it up a few notches because I finished all the RCN books forever ago and the recent Weber read along has been painful. Also the space ships arent bizarrely two dimensional and it's much more....submariney. It doesnt have the charm of Drake's solar sails and weird hyperspace, though. You got Alcubierre drives and jump drives, including the thing where ships take a few minutes to reboot after jump and it inexplicably makes people sick. It's not exactly an original work but it hasn't made me set it down in disgust yet. Larry Parrish fucked around with this message at 03:52 on Jan 3, 2020 |
# ? Jan 3, 2020 03:50 |
|
Excuse me, the treecat worship is perfect and I wouldn't have it any other way. I like how it's a cat/parrot fusion and loves making a mess and being terrible.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 11:58 |
|
StrixNebulosa posted:Excuse me, the treecat worship is perfect and I wouldn't have it any other way. I like how it's a cat/parrot fusion and loves making a mess and being terrible. It gets much more irritating as time goes on and retroactively spoils it forever. Weber can't keep a thing good for long!
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 21:59 |
Kchama posted:Also, it's really jarring the sudden comparison to 'pre-space jumbo jets'. It's such an odd in-universe reference. Also, jumbo jet passages are actually pretty spacious when you don't have five hundred people seated in one. This is a perennial problem with sci-fi in general. Working with analogies is a really easy way to get a concept across to people, but the only way an analogy can work is if it is something that the audience is familiar with - and when the work is set 2100 years in the future, the reference is jarring. You see this quite often with famous people - unless you've already established in-universe historical personalities, you're most likely to refer to Napoleon or Einstein - people who should be fairly obscure outside of their narrow field by this point. Also, the passages in a jumbo jet might be spacious if nobody's sitting in them - as long as you haven't filled the thing with weapons, sensors, and another drive system - all of which a pinnace is explicitly stated to possess.
|
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 22:18 |
|
at least einstein makes sense. like newtonian physics are named for newton, so hes still well known and will probably remain that way. ecluid also. maybe einstein will turn out to be completely wrong but it seems like a safe bet that he'd still be known in the future
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 22:46 |
|
20th century physicist Einstein, who laid the foundation for all modern starcraft, didn't kill himself.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 22:54 |
He'd still be known and referenced, but I highly doubt that he'd continue to be the stereotypical "smart guy" in the year 4000 - just like we don't use Archimedes for that purpose.
|
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 22:56 |
|
Gnoman posted:He'd still be known and referenced, but I highly doubt that he'd continue to be the stereotypical "smart guy" in the year 4000 - just like we don't use Archimedes for that purpose. I figure the easy way to do this is to come up with a name of whomever worked out faster than light travel then use that, easy enough to establish and remember if you call it the 'Bob Drive' and keep referring to it.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2020 23:58 |
|
If I remember right, a pinnace has no less than four propulsion systems: an impeller for faster spaceflight (but not the good kind of impeller than can make a hyperspace sail), thrusters for slow speed maneuvers, turbines for atmospheric flight, and a counter-grav so it can hover and land vertically. It also has laser guns, an inertia compensator so the impeller doesn't gib its passengers, and is made of "battle steel". This is all apparently powered by batteries because Weber later establishes that fusion reactors can't be miniaturized (since he makes a big deal about the space-fighter LACs having fission powerplants). These systems are crammed into something the size of a C-5 but shaped like the Space Shuttle. Now a lot of that never made sense to me, because the Manticoran recon drones are powered by miniature fusion reactors, but maybe those are even bigger than a pinnace. Also once you've invented antigravity propulsion, your civilization has reached the end of the sublight tech tree and you won't need thrusters or turbines ever again. FuturePastNow fucked around with this message at 00:39 on Jan 4, 2020 |
# ? Jan 4, 2020 00:28 |
|
To be fair, the thrusters might be pretty tiny. I am imagining a couple of glorified fire extinguishers strapped to the outside of the hull to allow for cold gas maneuvering to dock without doing... whatever the gently caress tidal force mangling gravity manipulation drives might do to solid objects in immediate proximity.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 00:47 |
Patrat posted:I figure the easy way to do this is to come up with a name of whomever worked out faster than light travel then use that, easy enough to establish and remember if you call it the 'Bob Drive' and keep referring to it. There's a few scientists like that in this setting, and several setting do just that. FuturePastNow posted:If I remember right, a pinnace has no less than four propulsion systems: an impeller for faster spaceflight (but not the good kind of impeller than can make a hyperspace sail), thrusters for slow speed maneuvers, turbines for atmospheric flight, and a counter-grav so it can hover and land vertically. It also has laser guns and is made of "battle steel". This is all apparently powered by batteries because Weber later establishes that fusion reactors can't be miniaturized (since he makes a big deal about the space-fighter LACs having fission powerplants). These systems are crammed into something the size of a C-5 but shaped like the Space Shuttle. There's distinct reasoning for all four drives, most of which show up in this book. As for power, Book 8 suggests that they're powered by the turbines, an internal fusion plant, or by thermal power converters. The big advantage of fusion plants was that they could power the new gunboats for years without the bulky fuel storage a fusion plant requires.
|
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 00:48 |
|
FuturePastNow posted:If I remember right, a pinnace has no less than four propulsion systems: an impeller for faster spaceflight (but not the good kind of impeller than can make a hyperspace sail), thrusters for slow speed maneuvers, turbines for atmospheric flight, and a counter-grav so it can hover and land vertically. It also has laser guns, an inertia compensator so the impeller doesn't gib its passengers, and is made of "battle steel". This is all apparently powered by batteries because Weber later establishes that fusion reactors can't be miniaturized (since he makes a big deal about the space-fighter LACs having fission powerplants). These systems are crammed into something the size of a C-5 but shaped like the Space Shuttle. Gnoman posted:This is a perennial problem with sci-fi in general. Working with analogies is a really easy way to get a concept across to people, but the only way an analogy can work is if it is something that the audience is familiar with - and when the work is set 2100 years in the future, the reference is jarring. I did some poking around, and recon drones are approximately half the mass of a modern jumbo jet's takeoff capacity, so recon drones can't be that big. Also if pinnaces are the size of jumbo jets and eying various sizes of stuff in the Honorverse, then they shouldn't be big enough to have any room, as they're much too small to have the four engines and weapons plus a hundred crew. Also I'll be doing the next chapter soon.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 00:58 |
|
iirc the setting doesnt have true anti gravity reactionless drives, but 'countergrav', which isnt a reactionless drive despite affecting velocity without the use of newtonian motion. somehow. maybe they deploy parachutes but just call it that because its cool
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 01:27 |
|
My favorite scifi FTL travel method is the "bloater driver" dreamed up by Harry Harrison.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 01:48 |
The only thing of his I ever read were the Stainless Steel Rat books, but looking it up, that's hilarious.
|
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 02:04 |
|
ON BASILISK STATION Chapter 17 We’re about halfway through with the book! The Haven plot basically hasn’t moved at all, with Haven more or less in holding pattern until Honor finds their stuff. ”Hey you guys love Tremaine, right?!” posted:
Hey it’s a very rare scene break that also indicates a change in PoV! There should be more of these! Also I wish Weber would stop with the obscure (in the sense that people who don’t research/belong to the military) terminology with that 1/c there. I know what it means, but it’s still irritating. Also Yammata is probably suppose to be ‘Yamata’. ”It looks like you were right about the most obvious thing ever” posted:"It looks like you were right, Honor." Dame Estelle Matsuko's face was distinctly unhappy on the com screen. "There's something there, anyway, and whatever it is, it certainly isn't legal. The entire Mossyback Range is off limits, and so is the Mossyback Plateau." “I understand that reference.” Anyways time for a scene and POV change that has no indicator whatsoever! We go next to the raid on the drug lab, because it’s obviously a drug lab. ”slithered” posted:Major Barney Isvarian, Medusan Native Protection Agency, slithered forward through waist-high knobs of shemak moss and tried to ignore the chemical stench of its sap. His mottled fatigues and body armor weren't as good as the Corps' reactive camouflage, but they blended well with the monotonous background. The hugely out-sized insects that served Medusa as "birds" swooped and darted above the moss, and he made himself move even more slowly to avoid startling them. Unlikely though anyone was to be looking this way and notice a sudden eruption of bugs from the moss, it was still possible, and he had no intention of blowing this operation now. Go, he said quietly, and then very loud vehicles started moving in. I know they’re very far away but it’s just a funny contrast. ”The rest of the assault” posted:Isvarian held his glasses steady as the mounting roar of turbines swept up from behind him. It was faint, at first, little louder than the distant wind, but it grew by leaps and bounds as the skimmers roared forward at over nine hundred kilometers per hour. They exploded over Isvarian's perch in a wave of man-made thunder, battering him with turbine wash, and made one screaming pass above the outlaw base. Two of them killed velocity with savage power, going into a perfect hover directly above the buildings, and the other four peeled out to the sides, spreading to encircle the base before they grounded and popped their hatches. Everything explodes, and bad stuff happens, and Yammata’s name is revealed to be Hiro Yammata so it has to be Yamata. Tsk, Weber, tsk!! ”Boom” posted:"Holy Mother of—!" I’m not sure how I’d picture this rifle at all, to be honest. Though I imagine Honor would have a good enough idea what it is thanks to her extensive firearms knowledge that only first mentioned in like two books as opposed to the narration’s obliviousness. ”The Gun” posted:"See this?" Dame Estelle's voice asked from beyond the pickup's range. ... It seems strange that this is within their manufacturing capability as they are said to be very primitive. The fact that it took so many advances means it shouldn’t be at all. Also I like how of course someone is an expert in firearms built 2000 years ago. ”If it jumped their ability 1500 years then it wasn’t in their manufacturing capability” posted:"So at least the design had to come from someone off-world." Honor's voice was equally harsh, and Dame Estelle nodded. So that’s the chapter. It’s a bit of a long one, but it... almost advanced the plot? Like, they know about the drug lab but we’ve known for chapters that they were suppose to find it, so it’s just catching up to what we know. I feel like Weber is really bad at multi-PoV stuff because he generally only uses it to spoil what the protagonist is going to find out soon.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 03:24 |
Kchama posted:
This is a Ferguson (one S) rifle. The Medusan weapon is essentially this, but with a chest brace instead of a stock. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ODhQmE2OqY As for it being within their ability to manufacture, guns are a funny thing. The manufacture of gunpowder doesn't require anything beyond Stone Age technology, while you can make a pretty serviceable firearm with pretty basic metallurgy. The Medusan tech base is given as "starting to smelt wretched iron and crude steel", so they have good enough metal. The problem is that a gun like a Ferguson would require pretty tight manufacturing tolerances that weren't attainable on Earth until the 15th or 16th century. Muskets would be quite plausible for local manufacture, but the Ferguson is a bit too far if you want somebody to believe that the Medusans are be manufacturing them themselves.
|
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 03:34 |
|
Gnoman posted:This is a Ferguson (one S) rifle. The Medusan weapon is essentially this, but with a chest brace instead of a stock. That's basically what I was getting at. While it's plausible the Medusans could make lovely guns (though these seem to be actually relatively solid guns considering their accuracy and range), the idea that they have the manufacturing ability for that kind of gun goes way beyond "barely", since it involves a lot of techniques that someone with no gun manufacturing experience would have the equipment or knowledge to make. It would be instantly obvious instead of 'barely out of their ability'. If you have to say it's 1500 years too advanced for them, then you're way past 'barely'.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 03:38 |
You're pretty much right - the Ferguson is an excellent rifle by loose-powder standards, but is well beyond the reach of a Bronze Age culture like this one. Given what we see in a chapter or two, it is pretty obvious that this was a goof of the author, not a (completely comprehensible) in-universe oversight by the Havenites.
|
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 03:44 |
|
Patrat posted:To be fair, the thrusters might be pretty tiny. I am imagining a couple of glorified fire extinguishers strapped to the outside of the hull to allow for cold gas maneuvering to dock without doing... whatever the gently caress tidal force mangling gravity manipulation drives might do to solid objects in immediate proximity. What happens when a pinnace's impeller is activated while inside the boat bay of a warship is actually an important plot point in a later book in the series this kills the battlecruiser
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 03:45 |
|
Gnoman posted:You're pretty much right - the Ferguson is an excellent rifle by loose-powder standards, but is well beyond the reach of a Bronze Age culture like this one. Given what we see in a chapter or two, it is pretty obvious that this was a goof of the author, not a (completely comprehensible) in-universe oversight by the Havenites. Pretty sure Weber just wanted his cool historical guns and didn't think about what it'd mean for the setting. This is absolutely not the last time a Cool Historical Gun is wedged into the plot. ... Though the next example is possibly dumber because apparently they still have 20th century guns in the 40th century. Kchama fucked around with this message at 03:51 on Jan 4, 2020 |
# ? Jan 4, 2020 03:48 |
|
Smuggling works two-ways, my friends. Amoral merchants gun-running weapons to the natives in return for
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 04:08 |
I know no one cares about these Safehold posts, but I promised KChama, so have another one! Safehold Chapter II We get a cinema jump cut to "Royal Palace, Tellesberg, Kingdom of Charis" Weber posted:"Father, you know as well as I do who's really behind it!" Meet Cayleb. We're going to be spending a lot of time with him. He and his father are currently discussing how the corrupt priests from the previous chapter are interfering with the rightful birthright succession. We, the readers, know the evil Tahdayo is paying the archbishops for fraudulent claims. The irony is, of course, that these characters are a king and a prince, two positions that usually owe their prominence to...divine right. Now before people start yelling and posting about Enlightenment philosophers, remember that this world has been set up by authorial contrivance to be as backward and superstitious as possible. Characters will start questioning the religious beliefs and scientific impositions of the "archangels", but as far as I can recall no one ever questions the monarchy's executive powers. Charis does have a parliament (but I literally had to google to remember it and don't remember it doing anything of import). Again, it's Space Britain because that's the only kind of society Weber is ever interested in. I'm going to elide the exciting political discussion. Narhman, Hektor, Erayk, and Zherald are currently opposing the Kingdom of Charis. Haarahld looks out the window and sees all the trade ships in the bay. Weber posted:"That's the reason we're not going to find many friends," Haarahld told his son, jutting his bearded chin at the merchant shops thronging the Tellesberg waterfront. "Too many want what we have, and they're foolish enough to think that if they league together to take it away from us, their 'friends' will actually let them keep it afterward. And at the moment, there's no one who feels any particular need to help us keep it." So I want to point out that "over a third [of the ships in the bay] were the bigger, heavier ... galleons which served Safehold's oceanic trade". Wouldn't these foreign nations trading with Charis have a vested interest in keeping them open for business? As far as I know Charis doesn't have colonies to have mercantilist adventures with. Charis isn't a nation of gold miners or textile producers, their strength is their merchantry, which...requires customers and friends to trade with. I would imagine countries with strong economic ties to Charis would have a vested interest in keeping the trade routes open, no? Anyway, this isn't important for this book but I'm quoting it for later. Weber posted:"Sharleyan is already half on our side," Cayleb pointed out. This is foreshadowing for later when Charlene, who is totally smokin hot, marries Caleb to join her elite armies to Caleb's bomb-rear end fleet and a later character to battle the Dumb Fake Jesus Sword Guys. Anyway, we get back to the real meat of the plot, which is that Tadeo is bribing the priests to gain rulership of some place called Hanth. Evil Bribemans? In a Weber book? posted:"Tahdayo has no legitimate claim to Hanth! Even if that ridiculous lie about his grandmother's being Earl Fraidareck's [gently caress these awful names] bastard daughter had an ounce of truth in it, Hauwerd would still be the rightful heir!" As it turns out, our heroic royals know that the Church is a corrupt piece of poo poo taking bribes. Tadeo, of course, is a poor ruler who wants to exploit the commoners for money, unlike our good monarchs here who are afraid of what is going to happen to their people and can sympathize with the average Charisian they never interact with. Weber's villains are never compelling posted:"Nor the fact that he's going to begin looting Hanth the instant he's confirmed as Earl," Haarahld agreed, his expression hard. "And I won't be able to protect 'his' people from him, either. Not when the whole world knows I was forced to accept him by Church decree. Any attempt I make to rein him in will be the same as openly defying the Church, once his agents in the Temple get done telling the tale to the Vicars, and many on the Council will be prepared to automatically believe them." There's some chattering about how the Temple won't move against Charis immediately, but the Charisian fleet can beat the entire league unless their ally Gorjah betrays them. Weber posted:"Gorjah's never been all that happy with our treaty," Haarahld pointed out. "His father was another matter, but Gorjah resents the obligations he's found himself saddled with. At the same time, he recognizes the advantages of having us for friends rather than enemies. But if Hektor can work on him, convince him that with Corisande and Emerald both prepared to support him..." Caleb then realizes something else is on his father's mind. Weber posted:"Your mother is dead, Cayleb," he said softly. "She was my left arm and the mirror of my soul, and I miss her counsel almost as much as I miss her. Nor will I get any more heirs, and Zhan is barely eight years old, while Zhanayt is only two years older, and a girl child. If my enemies truly wish to cripple me, they'll take away my strong right arm as I've already lost the left." That ends the chapter. It's kind of amazing how in Weber's writings political marriage between two monarchs always deepens into love, and never ends with them gritting their teeth and loving out a child and then fooling around on the side like many real monarchs in history. It's also amazing how despite all the linguistic drift causing silly names, the characters speak in remarkably modern English with none of the poetics or grandeur you would expect out of the mythical True Just King. "Slash lizard" and "sand maggot" are just bad and manage to draw and quarter any attempt at solemnity the scene had. Really, though, this is just setting up Weber's triumph of the technologically advanced monarchy - the best form and most deserving of government - against a strawman church who doesn't deserve to rule because they don't have the right bloodlines and are badmen. Join me next time as Weber takes any form of dramatic tension behind the woodshed and executes it!
|
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 05:06 |
|
Kchama posted:ON BASILISK STATION Chapter 17 I noticed you bringing this up a lot and I thought it was weird because although I remember a lot of terrible stuff I didn't remember major technical issues like that. I finally decided to go dig out my physical copy that for some reason I haven't gotten rid of and all the scene transitions are pretty clearly marked with extra whitespace. I think this is probably an issue with whichever electronic version you're using, so unfortunately it's one thing we can't blame Weber for.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 05:12 |
|
blackmongoose posted:I noticed you bringing this up a lot and I thought it was weird because although I remember a lot of terrible stuff I didn't remember major technical issues like that. I finally decided to go dig out my physical copy that for some reason I haven't gotten rid of and all the scene transitions are pretty clearly marked with extra whitespace. I think this is probably an issue with whichever electronic version you're using, so unfortunately it's one thing we can't blame Weber for. What made me think it was intentional was that sometimes there would be extra whitespace or * * * but then way too much it'd just launch into the next scene without any indicator. This is the official BaenCD copy, so Baen's not fully off the hook. TheGreatEvilKing posted:I know no one cares about these Safehold posts, but I promised KChama, so have another one! I care. And I think you do a better job at the Let's Read than I do. I feel like I should copy how you do it more but at the same time there just... isn't that much to talk about beyond summarizing. Safehold's a lot dumber, too. Also the linguistic drift is amazing because he only uses it for people's names and nothing else. Also I'm going to be frank and say that Weber's ENTIRE STYLE of writing is consistently destroying dramatic tension. He will constantly have a scene set up dramatic tension, and then the next chapter be from another POV that explains in detail everything that the other side doesn't know, and make it so clear that it's obvious what's going to happen next. Or, in amazing form, he'll have the explanations BEFORE we get to the chapter where we learn the heroes don't know what the previous chapter just explained in detail.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 06:15 |
Kchama posted:I care. And I think you do a better job at the Let's Read than I do. I feel like I should copy how you do it more but at the same time there just... isn't that much to talk about beyond summarizing. Safehold's a lot dumber, too. You're doing fine, don't feel like you need to change. The problem of doing a Let's Read of any of Weber's works is that you're absolutely right there's not much there. The prose is banal and uninteresting at best, characters are stock archetypes to pander to wish fulfillment fantasies (I've ranted enough about this), the plots are drearily similar and uninteresting, and there's absolutely no depth to it all. Weber's political commentary is about as subtle as Terry Goodkind's 20 page rants on Objectivism But With Justified Coercion and doesn't offer any insight into the systems it's critiquing. This isn't like Patrick Rothfuss where if you disengage your brain it seems kind of deep but crumples under scrutiny, this is a thin patina of unappealing garbage over an empty core. Unfortunately, while the books are poorly constructed there is little shock value to be derived from them. You don't have crap like Goodkind's literal rape pits or Ringo's Waffen-SS worship where you can point to the awful poo poo happening and make fun of it. It's all a dull, unexciting mediocrity. The puzzle of Weber isn't "why is this so bad", the puzzle is "why does this poo poo sell" and I think that's the question we're all trying to answer in this thread.
|
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 08:01 |
|
What competition is there in this space, though? Aside from David Drake and Elizabeth Moon, that is. Like, most of the rest of the authors we've discussed are much, much worse than (solo) David Weber.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 08:55 |
|
Marko Kloos and the poor mans war guy are pretty good. Palladium Wars is a lot better than Frontlines though, which just kind of kept going nowhere. You've got Expeditionary Force, too, which unfortunately is also just kind of going nowhere. Uhh. Evan Currie wrote a bunch of mil SF, but its very predictable and cheesy. I hate Weber though because it's like hes enjoying writing these books as much as I do reading them. Aka not at all, and as some kind of self flagellation
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 10:12 |
|
TheGreatEvilKing posted:You're doing fine, don't feel like you need to change. He does try to make jokes but they are the most mild not even worth a Sensible Chuckle stuff out there. The Treecat stuff might be amusing in a cute-cat way if it wasn't for how Treecats become more and more important with each book. Also, the next book actuallyhas Literal Rape Pits, so you're going to be in for a treat there! Like, the entire next book is full of Shock Value Stuff and it's amazingly terrible.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 11:01 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:iirc the setting doesnt have true anti gravity reactionless drives, but 'countergrav', which isnt a reactionless drive despite affecting velocity without the use of newtonian motion. somehow. maybe they deploy parachutes but just call it that because its cool There's a difference between reactionless drives and just propellant less drives. The setting drives are propellant-less, but they're still not perpetual motion machines like true reactionless drives would be. (Which is fine, and I put this down as a good point for Weber. True reactionless drives always amazed me, because here you have a drive which brazenly breaks all manner of natural laws, which should not be a thing in SF.) Kchama posted:That's basically what I was getting at. While it's plausible the Medusans could make lovely guns (though these seem to be actually relatively solid guns considering their accuracy and range), the idea that they have the manufacturing ability for that kind of gun goes way beyond "barely", since it involves a lot of techniques that someone with no gun manufacturing experience would have the equipment or knowledge to make. It would be instantly obvious instead of 'barely out of their ability'. To be fair, I always imagined the Medusan weapons as to be some sort of slightly fancier muskets anyway, since I have zero knowledge about foreign rifles and nether bothered to look up what a "Ferguson" is. I just assumed Weber made the name up, since it is what I would have done in his place! TheGreatEvilKing posted:
Yeah, now that you're mentioning it, Weber seems to go with the "Anglican Church, but in Space!"-angle here. With the building conflict between Charis and the official church and all that. Me, I was instead reminded of how the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire after a certain point became to see themselves as the true protectors of Christianity, and that the pope should now do as they say. Hilarity ensued! I feel this would have been a better fit for the growing conflict, but apparently Weber is addicted to shoehorn in Britain into his works regardless of how much sense it makes. Kchama posted:Also I'm going to be frank and say that Weber's ENTIRE STYLE of writing is consistently destroying dramatic tension. He will constantly have a scene set up dramatic tension, and then the next chapter be from another POV that explains in detail everything that the other side doesn't know, and make it so clear that it's obvious what's going to happen next. Or, in amazing form, he'll have the explanations BEFORE we get to the chapter where we learn the heroes don't know what the previous chapter just explained in detail. This is what finally killed Honor Harrington for me. I can take a lot of schlock, but this here got so bad I started to notice I suddenly could predict every single plot point of the following books. And when my dense head got penetrated by the realization that the big bad I was reading about would be effortlessly defeated in the next book, I just stopped. Because what was the point? I already knew how it was going to end. And if I want to read about boring politics even though I know how the entire sordid affair ends, I can just read a history book instead.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 13:02 |
|
i guess i dont know what the difference is. the closest thing I can think of to a propellant less drive would be an RCS system (except is not a drive because it doesnt modify velocity) and ionocraft (the atmosphere is the propellant, it just doesn't carry it on board)
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 13:20 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:i guess i dont know what the difference is. the closest thing I can think of to a propellant less drive would be an RCS system (except is not a drive because it doesnt modify velocity) and ionocraft (the atmosphere is the propellant, it just doesn't carry it on board) I've read this up on Wikipedia to minimize error on account of me being dumb, but the difference is: A drive without propellant can just be an open system, which means it still interacts with the rest of the universe, just by using fields like gravity or electromagnetism instead of shooting out stuff. An Ion Drive shooting out ions is still a propellant-driven system, for example. A gravity-assist slingshot or one of those monstrous impeller drives of Weber are not. NASA's Alcubierre Drive or Star Trek's Warp Drive are both examples for propellant-less, but open drive systems, too. And as examples for closed-system, propellant-less drives that could be interpreted as being reactionless: That weird made-up drive system Aurora-ships run on, the EM-drive and basically every crack-pot idea some random person came up with over the last two centuries. Turns out it's kind of hard to generate propulsion if your device doesn't interact with the outside world! Edit: Ironically, both your examples use propellant and are therefore not propellant-less systems, sorry!
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 14:09 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:i guess i dont know what the difference is. the closest thing I can think of to a propellant less drive would be an RCS system (except is not a drive because it doesnt modify velocity) and ionocraft (the atmosphere is the propellant, it just doesn't carry it on board) Usually "reactionless drive" just means "a drive that affects velocity without expelling reaction mass". A lot of the time, yes, this means the author just waves their hands and the velocity comes out of nowhere. Gravity-generator drives also count -- you could argue that the reaction mass in that case is "the rest of the universe", but it's not actually getting sucked through the drive and fired out the back, it's "reactionless". A real-world example is the electrodynamic tether, which works by pushing against the magnetosphere of a nearby planet. Libluini posted:Ironically, both your examples use propellant and are therefore not propellant-less systems, sorry! By "RCS" they may have meant "reaction wheels", which do not use propellant (until they reach spin saturation and you need to use the gas-jet RCS to hold the vehicle stable while you despin them).
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 14:20 |
|
ToxicFrog posted:Usually "reactionless drive" just means "a drive that affects velocity without expelling reaction mass". A lot of the time, yes, this means the author just waves their hands and the velocity comes out of nowhere. Gravity-generator drives also count -- you could argue that the reaction mass in that case is "the rest of the universe", but it's not actually getting sucked through the drive and fired out the back, it's "reactionless". A real-world example is the electrodynamic tether, which works by pushing against the magnetosphere of a nearby planet. There seems to be a disagreement of definitions going on here, according to my sources a reactionless drive is not "reaction mass less", but instead it is supposed to mean that the drive doesn't react with forces outside its own system. But it could be that I'm unfair here, as many SF-authors also get this wrong and confuse a reactionless drive with one that is just propellant-less. The source of the confusion seems to be that a propellant-less drive can be both reactionless and not, while a propellant-driven system can by definition not "reactionless", since by the very act of expelling reaction mass, it interacts with the outside world and is therefore not a reactionless drive. This then leads to people conflating propellant-less with reactionless, since "it makes sense". On the other hand, an electrodynamic tether would also not be a reactionless drive, as the magnetosphere of the nearby planet is outside the drive. The EM-drive, which works by "pushing" against the inside of itself (very simplified explanation here) is a better example. It also doesn't work and is maybe founded on misinterpretation of measurement errors, see my comment about true reactionless drives not being possible. quote:By "RCS" they may have meant "reaction wheels", which do not use propellant (until they reach spin saturation and you need to use the gas-jet RCS to hold the vehicle stable while you despin them). That's interesting! Wikipedia only told me about the type of RCS that uses thrusters, and I didn't look any deeper.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 14:56 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 02:45 |
|
Libluini has the right of it. To be a “reactionless drive” something has to violate the principle of the conservation of momentum, and thus implicitly Newton’s laws of motion. “Exchanges momentum with something outside itself” isn’t enough to qualify. Nor is it particularly noteworthy- under that definition my legs would be reactionless drives.
|
# ? Jan 4, 2020 15:31 |