|
they introduced a subscription for $100/year which enables a stash that lets you stash infinite items (but actually it just deleted them), and lets you host private servers. in kinda a secfuck, it's not really private. anyone in your friends list can join, and then anyone in their friends list can join them, and online everyone is at most 5 steps removed or somesuch so basically it's a public server anyway. lmao fake edit: oh also, i think they leaked a bunch of private info of a lot of their subscribers recently too? maybe that was something else but i think it was fallout real edit: no that was earlier than april actually
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 17:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 01:20 |
|
|
buying a subscription would also allow you to somehow visibly tag your character as a premium account, which led to any such characters being mobbed by gankers on discovery and calls for premiums to build defendable enclaves to keep the poors out
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 17:48
|
|
|
Truga posted:fake edit: oh also, i think they leaked a bunch of private info of a lot of their subscribers recently too? maybe that was something else but i think it was fallout wasn't their zendesk support system getting popped?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 19:42
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Fallout 76 got rushed out to try to get a bite of the MMO pie, and they really screwed the pooch on that. It should've just been another Single Player game. I'm convinced that Fallout 76 started out as an internal project to graft multiplayer onto the Fallout 4 engine and after they got a demo with like one quest line working some executive decided they needed to monetize their efforts. edit: they already have an MMO which is popular because it is good
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 20:26
|
|
|
fallout 76 was created to be monetized from the start and they added the multiplayer to prevent offline play so people have to go thru the Bethesda store
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 20:27
|
|
|
it can't possibly have started out as a single player game, it doesn't have anything that TES players want
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 20:31
|
|
|
i always interpreted it as a confused, rushed answer to "holy poo poo look at how much money fortnite is making, why isn't that our money???"
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 21:07
|
|
|
it’s bad, op.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 21:31
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:it was the best wasn't chromehounds by From Software? Because I watched a dark souls speed run (yes yes, I know) and I'm pretty sure the guy used the same bug or similar to overflow something and get like 99999 homeward bones from a vendor
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2020 23:34
|
|
|
i was randomly attacked by dozens of tigers and lit on fire by hackers in red dead 2 online recently thanks for reading and good night
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 06:14
|
|
|
Fallout 76 was an attempt to fill some space between releases by farming out Fallout, like New Vegas, but it didn't go as smoothly as New Vegas because they picked a less talented developer and gave them an even shittier job to do.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 06:33
|
|
|
new vegas is so good
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 06:36
|
|
|
sounds like it's time for secfuck thread 18.5
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 10:55
|
|
|
No just keep it on topic
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 12:15
|
|
|
redleader posted:sounds like it's time for secfuck thread 18.5 -stay on topic, stay on topic!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 14:00
|
|
|
Dive dive dive! Hit your burners, pilot!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 17:42
|
|
|
D. Ebdrup posted:Dive dive dive! Hit your burners, pilot! we got another 15 posts to change our shorts
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 17:56
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/hackerfantastic/status/1222249024196997121?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 18:00
|
|
|
Unpleasant vulnerability in OpenSMTPD
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 18:15
|
|
|
it’s called OpenSMTPD because it exposes open shells to the internet
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 18:41
|
|
|
Raere posted:it’s called OpenSMTPD because it exposes open shells to the internet more like open shaking my turd piss dongus, amirite
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 18:49
|
|
|
so OpenSMTPD just exists as a kind of "gently caress you" to postfix?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 19:03
|
|
|
Pile Of Garbage posted:so OpenSMTPD just exists as a kind of "gently caress you" to postfix?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 20:04
|
|
|
D. Ebdrup posted:It replaced sendmail. 2013, lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 20:06
|
|
|
PCjr sidecar posted:2013, lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 20:10
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:new vegas is so good https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgkD1scIkKw
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 20:11
|
|
|
this is kind of signature detection bad 101 you‘re already able to load and execute code, and if you xor a signature’d thing you change the signature
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 20:46
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:this is kind of signature detection bad 101 Yup, I'll want to see how it'll do under their future sandboxing solution for Defender.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 20:54
|
|
|
nice domain name on that box tho
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 21:05
|
|
|
D:
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 22:51
|
|
|
It's clumsy but it's much better from a security perspective than just not requiring TFA on devices that don't support it like lots of other websites do.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 22:55
|
|
|
that's how icloud/itunes accounts used to work iirc, and still work for legacy devices that don't support the modern auth method
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 22:56
|
|
|
I like it better than the 'app password' method that goog and ms use
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 22:57
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:that's how icloud/itunes accounts used to work iirc, and still work for legacy devices that don't support the modern auth method yep, this still happens on the apple tv 3
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
I think my work RSA key worked sort of like that in like 2008, you had to append the generated key (which cycled on the hard key) to your pin instead of the key being generated off the pin itself like the soft keys
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 23:16
|
|
|
what would be the risk in appending the 2fa token to the password like that and lopping it off when checking it? bad handling of the password before truncating? user not putting the 2fa code in and submitting a partial pw?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 23:30
|
|
|
The Fool posted:I like it better than the 'app password' method that goog and ms use app passwords are more a substitute for OAuth delegated access
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2020 23:42
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:what would be the risk in appending the 2fa token to the password like that and lopping it off when checking it? bad handling of the password before truncating? user not putting the 2fa code in and submitting a partial pw? mystes fucked around with this message at 00:45 on Jan 30, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2020 00:42
|
|
|
Not a gently caress-up, just a usability degradation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2020 02:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 01:20 |
|
|
Older versions of Cisco Anyconnect do this too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2020 02:26
|
|