|
Voodoofly posted:He is my first readthru. Technically it's tomorrow morning here, now.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:01 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 08:33 |
|
merk: i would still like to request deadline pushed back 1 hour to 4 PST instead of 3 PSTmerk posted:some yellow for your attention
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:02 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:So do you think he's scummy? No idea, he hasn't posted enough to tell either way. But I have no problem voting someone because I think they are a liability to the town without any care in the world as to their alignment. Also I have no idea how you thought his case on you was fine when he has never made a case and keeps saying tomorrow tomorrow?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:04 |
|
reading people now cidrick comes across towny. Like, his push on voodoo is kinda nuts and his d1 content is light, but it's generally good and his evolution on past opinions looks legit. Chili...I don't hate his D1 re-reading it as much as I did then. Being "the other potential lynch that got swung away from" makes him kind of a fulcrum for a lot of opinions, which colors things a bit. I'm hesitant to lynch him knowing that a significant chunk of it is curiosity rather than conviction. Reading wins now. I still really don't like keane for town. Until I go through him thoroughly I don't know if I can espouse this at a level more than gut, but just going through the others I see his posts pop up and they're kinda unsettling, like he's being very surgical about how he's posting.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:09 |
|
Voodoofly posted:No idea, he hasn't posted enough to tell either way. But I have no problem voting someone because I think they are a liability to the town without any care in the world as to their alignment. Nah he had two posts about me, although the second one was sort of a lot like wins "the three people who voted for Jam first are all scum" and not specifically about me. I don't love wins either, he was kind of a "me-too" on spoonsy (although he did take the time to consolidate the points against him) and I think the case he made today is also pretty surface level and non-compelling. At least voodoo clearly is trying to analyze the play around the jam votes, wins is more just saying "look at these bad votes" and not really doing a real read
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:15 |
|
Wins is an easy case. I don't mean that in any way other than he hasn't posted much, his reads tend to be really easy ones, he's only had 2 posts since mid-D1 and they're "here are three scum contingent on a theory that chili is 100% scum", which is...a really bad way to scumhunt? And I know it's really rich coming from me after missing 90% of D1, but I kinda like to see not being around for deadline at least addressed. Wins is using the deadline behavior to shape his unifying theory of everyscum, when he wasn't even there to participate in it. Like, he fits under the same heading as b-minus1, where it's play that doesn't seem at all useful to finding scum, but I dunno if that means he's scum. He's essentially a lurker D2 with a threadbare history. Gonna keep looking. Could vote but doesn't feel *right* right now.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:23 |
|
CCKeane posted:Here's my case on dy. : This post still bugs me a lot. Nobody asked keane to summarize his case on dy. Nobody asked him if he still felt good about his dy vote, making his final "So I'm happy with my vote on dy." seem really shoehorned in. I get making a case to try to get a player lynched, but dy didn't have much heat, and 30 minutes later keane offers to swap to spoonsy: CCKeane posted:Alright I'm going to move to spoonsy if nobody else is around, since it seems like a lot of people aren't around. keane was pushing the idea that dy was scum without pushing people to vote dy. He publicly announced there weren't enough people to do anything without trying to actually rally people. It just seems contrived and formulaic. CCKeane posted:
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:45 |
|
Pander posted:Wins is an easy case. I don't mean that in any way other than he hasn't posted much, his reads tend to be really easy ones, he's only had 2 posts since mid-D1 and they're "here are three scum contingent on a theory that chili is 100% scum", which is...a really bad way to scumhunt? My case is that he is building the case contingent on chili being scum, and then not aggressively pressing to get chili executed. His post about why you are scum is based around chili being scum, but then he ends with saying he'd be okay with your execution. It doesn't make sense. He's set up a situation where it's "If A is true, then B is true", and then casually dropping that that argument is sufficient to pursue B.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:46 |
|
Pander posted:This post still bugs me a lot. [/quote] What? Yes, if Jammy, the person Voodoofly didn't gravel as scum but was voted off had flipped scum I'd be more suspicious of Voodoofly? Where the hell do you get a hard bus from this?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:50 |
|
Also how is posting a case about Dy. Not trying to rally toward a dy. Execution? Are you just deciding that I'm scum and then trying to figure out how my posts are scummy instead of vice versa? Have I accidentally walked through a mirror and found myself in opposite land?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:52 |
|
Pander posted:If I'm scum, I want oracle, assuming the person using it stays anonymous. There really isn't a town reason for not wanting a flip. If someone's so towny you'd want to prevent their lynch, then they'd be so towny that nobody would lynch them until the game's already lost. Behold, Pander posts that he is scum! I am very good at mafia.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:56 |
|
CCKeane posted:My case is that he is building the case contingent on chili being scum, and then not aggressively pressing to get chili executed. His post about why you are scum is based around chili being scum, but then he ends with saying he'd be okay with your execution. It doesn't make sense. I'd also argue you're using a subjective interpretation for "not aggressively pressing to get chili executed". Wins is barely posting today and his only case *was* pretty clear about chili being scum. Your point would be stronger if he had like 10 other posts today that weren't about chili at all, but here the lack of data make the conclusion that he doesn't actually want to see chili get lynched a reach.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:57 |
|
CCKeane posted:What? Yes, if Jammy, the person Voodoofly didn't gravel as scum but was voted off had flipped scum I'd be more suspicious of Voodoofly? Where the hell do you get a hard bus from this? There weren't many posts before yours that actually addressed jam, so it stood out to me. I was trying to figure out who you were responding to when you brought up jammy out of nowhere.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 05:59 |
|
CCKeane posted:Also how is posting a case about Dy. Not trying to rally toward a dy. Execution? Are you just deciding that I'm scum and then trying to figure out how my posts are scummy instead of vice versa? Sort of. I don't like how you read on a gut level, partly meta. Your tone just feels off from what I remember of you as town. So I start from the assumption you're scum, look for poo poo that doesn't smell right, and push you on it to see how you respond. Maybe you make a contradiction, or maybe your answer makes sense. Won't know til I push.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:03 |
|
Pander posted:regarding the bolded, I ask "why"? It makes no sense as scum to set up this logical progression where chili is the focal point of all scummery and not vote him. It *does* makes sense if you're a towny irrationally attached to your case and assume it's not so much that B is contingent on A, but rather that B=A and it's therefore all the same. Buddy, any other words you want to put in my mouth, because I feel like you're not reading my posts, and it's bizzare that you're defending wins so hard here. Maybe chili isn't scum and wins does want him executed! But it's absolutely scummy and bad to set up a chain execution and then not chain the executions in the right order! How is that not scummy to you?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:04 |
|
CCKeane posted:Also how is posting a case about Dy. Not trying to rally toward a dy. Execution? Are you just deciding that I'm scum and then trying to figure out how my posts are scummy instead of vice versa? My issue with your dy case was that it was weak for how long it was, which makes it seem more out up for appearance than effect. Ending it with "I'm happy with voting for dy still" just kinda reads like mild guilt. In a world where nobody was making GBS threads on you for voting Dy, it looks weird.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:06 |
|
Pander posted:Sort of. I don't like how you read on a gut level, partly meta. Your tone just feels off from what I remember of you as town. So I start from the assumption you're scum, look for poo poo that doesn't smell right, and push you on it to see how you respond. My gut is that you are more interested in throwing poo poo at the wall and seeing what sticks than making meaningful contributions. You're like a failed carpenter, Pander.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:07 |
|
CCKeane posted:
You're making bad posts is what I'm saying.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:07 |
|
CCKeane posted:My gut is that you are more interested in throwing poo poo at the wall and seeing what sticks
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:07 |
|
Pander posted:My issue with your dy case was that it was weak for how long it was, which makes it seem more out up for appearance than effect. Ending it with "I'm happy with voting for dy still" just kinda reads like mild guilt. In a world where nobody was making GBS threads on you for voting Dy, it looks weird. It looks weirder to argue that somebody making a case and trying to push an execution toward their scummiest read is a bad thing? IDK man this is super strange and I feel like you're desperately trying to manufacture a case on me.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:09 |
|
CCKeane posted:It looks weirder to argue that somebody making a case and trying to push an execution toward their scummiest read is a bad thing? IDK man this is super strange and I feel like you're desperately trying to manufacture a case on me. so you're just gonna pretend quote:Ending it with "I'm happy with voting for dy still" just kinda reads like mild guilt. In a world where nobody was making GBS threads on you for voting Dy, it looks weird.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:11 |
|
Pander posted:That's literally the definition of scumhunting. Any reason you felt like selectively editting my post to remove the second part where I accuse you of being uninterested in making meaningful contributions?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:11 |
|
Pander posted:so you're just gonna pretend I just said I'm still fine with voting Dy.? This is nothing and it's a normal thing to say?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:12 |
|
CCKeane posted:Any reason you felt like selectively editting my post to remove the second part where I accuse you of being uninterested in making meaningful contributions? CCKeane posted:I just said I'm still fine with voting Dy.? This is nothing and it's a normal thing to say?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:17 |
|
These are all bad posts and I think Pander is scum. His defense of wins here is weird and frankly his posts directed at me feel based on trying to build a case on me than figuring out if I'm scum or not, including cutting off a quote of mine to make my statement appear significantly different in intent. I won't be responding to Pander anymore, it's unfun and I don't think he is town. I think I'm thinking Wins and Pander are scum. Chili could be scum, I guess I'm coming around to b- a bit, but eh. I'm neutral on my dy. read right now, he said something like he was feeling off his game and I can see that, I suppose.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:21 |
|
I cut your quote off because I disagreed with you. It wasn't something I did to misquote you so as to make you seem scummy. I throw poo poo at people to get them to respond, that's how I scumhunt, and I disagree about it's substance. I want the truth.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:25 |
|
Is there a spooky ghost in the thread? I can almost hear something, like a light voice on the wind...
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:27 |
|
Yeeeeeeaaaah Pander not reading great there.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:27 |
|
dy. posted:Yeeeeeeaaaah Pander not reading great there. I really don't think I'm being unduly harsh to him or trying to take him out of context, so ghosting me seems kinda excessive.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:43 |
|
CCKeane posted:I think I'm thinking Wins and Pander are scum. Chili could be scum, I guess I'm coming around to b- a bit, but eh. I'm neutral on my dy. read right now, he said something like he was feeling off his game and I can see that, I suppose. huh. well, thats a thought. i dont know why i didnt consider it before, but pander makes sense as scum with wins and b- of the two i think wins is the flip i'd like to see most w/r/t pander i agree with keane / dy, that whole exchange was filthy
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:49 |
|
i think i had some blinders on with pander. i'll try to look into it more tomorrow as it is pretty late here
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:50 |
|
I feel like I am remembering the last few notes of a song I sung as a child, as it disappears into the fog of long lost memories.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:57 |
|
Fwiw I was thinking about what you said Keane, and I'm sorry if I'm making it unfun for you. I'm having trouble destressing to go to sleep right now and I think it was caused by you saying that. I'm playing mafia again, which I generally havent done much lately, cause I try to enjoy it without getting all stressed about it. I think I'm failing that and will check tomorrow to make sure I don't cross lines and make this a bad experience for you or anyone. This post reads like garbage cause I don't parse my thoughts well on the phone, apologies for that.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 06:58 |
|
did pander ever expand / explain that whole "scum before me in the draft" thing? pander, if you haven't, could you do so?
|
# ? May 27, 2020 07:00 |
|
Pander posted:I'm very confused about how b-minus1 feels about voodoo. He initially said he found voodoo towny, then said he came out looking the worst, then is definitely leaning town. I flip flopped on voodoo after I reread the eod posts and convinced myself that pander and voodoofly were scum and were working together to get another townie lunched after the dayvig. I no longer believe this
|
# ? May 27, 2020 10:43 |
|
I should say, pander could stillbe scum, but I really don’t think voodoo is
|
# ? May 27, 2020 10:44 |
|
Don't want to put b- at -1 just yet, but consider this a phantom vote
|
# ? May 27, 2020 12:31 |
|
I’m probably going to be the lunch today and that’s fine. I’m by btw. I just reread wins and although there isn’t a lot of content, I did find myself agreeing with him more often than not. wins32767 posted:Is Pander my first choice no? But if we can't mobilize Chili, I think we're pretty likely to catch scum with Pander and Hal based on how that swing went down. Hal most especially. It seems like most of us at some point or another have expressed suspicion of hal and pander yet they have received few votes overall. I really think we need to flip one of them.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 12:37 |
|
Motherf*ckin autocorrect. I’m vt
|
# ? May 27, 2020 12:38 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 08:33 |
|
Votecount for Day 2 b-minus1 (4): Dhaes, dy., Cidrick, Hal Incandenza wins32767 (2): CCKeane, Chili Hal Incandenza (1): Voodoofly, b-minus1, Pander (0): Chili, Chili (0): Dhaes, Not Voting (3): Pander, Voodoofly, wins32767 With 10 alive, it's 6 votes to execute. The current deadline is May 27th, 2020 at 6 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 9 hours, 54 minutes.
|
# ? May 27, 2020 13:06 |