Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Oneiros posted:

cocktailpeanuts 7 hours ago [–]

good for them.
honestly, Uber got "hype pressured" into this whole "self driving car" madness because they didn't want to be disrupted by Google, but they were really fighting a phantom that didn't exist. In other words, Google did a really great job trolling Uber into losing focus.
Uber model is great and they should focus on helping people make more money and create jobs

did not realise it was opposites day

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Oneiros
Jan 12, 2007



josh04 posted:

did not realise it was opposites day

every single thing in that post is wrong and it's honestly impressive

Qwertycoatl
Dec 31, 2008

the article itself for this one is very hn.txt, the comments even more

quote:

ncmncm 2 hours ago [–]

If they built the Great Pyramid in the advertised 20 years, that means placing a 2.5-ton block every 4th minute, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. If they stopped at sundown, it's every 2 minutes. If they broke half the year to farm, that's one each minute. But let's guess they had enough surplus to work year-round; so, 2 minutes.

Suppose they took 600 years, instead; then it's one per hour.

Which is harder to imagine, cutting, moving, lifting and placing 30 blocks in every waking hour for 20 years, or placing one per waking hour, non-stop, for 600 years? Each seems less possible than the other.

I don't know of any firm evidence for when any of the pyramids were built. We can guess that the bent and red pyramids were built first, but they could just as easily be poor copies attempted a thousand years later, or ten.

There is a fluorescence technique to discover when a cut limestone face that has been covered for centuries was last exposed to sunlight, but I don't know of it being used on any Great Pyramid block. One would not expect Egyptologists to advocate for such a test, because only two outcomes are possible: they were far enough off to be embarrassed; or not, and it was useless. (Either way, better not.)

They built these things with perfectly straight, slanting tunnels a few inches wide running from inner chambers almost to the surface, for no known reason. Some people say they point at certain mythologically important stars on equinoctal days, but I have not been able to get confirmation of that.

One thing well established is that none of them were tombs. When somebody finally battered their way into each, maybe 4300+ years later, all the chambers were empty and unmarked. (Except one has an empty stone box in it big enough to be a coffin or bathtub.)

There are lots of examples of 20-, 30-, 60-ton basalt boxes cut from living rock with perfect right-angled inside corners, and moved through funerary complex tunnels barely big enough. Take off the (10-ton) lid and they're empty. It's anybody's guess what they were for.

Chris Knight
Jun 5, 2002

me @ ur posts


Fun Shoe
jfc

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:
I don't even. I should forward this to the archaeology profs, they'd be delighted.

Cripes.

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

Oneiros posted:

cocktailpeanuts 7 hours ago [–]

good for them.
honestly, Uber got "hype pressured" into this whole "self driving car" madness because they didn't want to be disrupted by Google, but they were really fighting a phantom that didn't exist. In other words, Google did a really great job trolling Uber into losing focus.
Uber model is great and they should focus on helping people make more money and create jobs

lol self-driving cars is the only way uber could ever pretend to earn a profit

trad taxi fleets are vastly more efficient and barriers to entry are low

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
bayek built the pyramids

fritz
Jul 26, 2003

the hackers are talking porn


onemoresoop 6 days ago [–]

You’re the deepthroat defender, I don’t know who’s weirder. I continued this out of politeness by the way, I don’t find you very worthy of conversation, I just thought I would open an idiot’s eyes
reply

alexandriao
Jul 20, 2019


fritz posted:

the hackers are talking porn


onemoresoop 6 days ago [–]

You’re the deepthroat defender, I don’t know who’s weirder. I continued this out of politeness by the way, I don’t find you very worthy of conversation, I just thought I would open an idiot’s eyes
reply

who else read that as "one more scoop"

fritz
Jul 26, 2003

dntbnmpls 14 hours ago [–]

> Retrospective law does not exist in civilised societies.
They exist in "civilized" societies when it suits their interests. The most famous being the nuremburg trials.
Edit: In case the downvoter truly didn't know ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_trials#Criticism
reply

SRQ
Nov 9, 2009

Breakfast All Day posted:

one, consumption needs to be louder, edgier, and self driving. two, whenever consumption isnt happening, all the people need to ask "why aren't i consuming right now?". three

jeff bezos died on the way to his home planet.

Chris Knight
Jun 5, 2002

me @ ur posts


Fun Shoe

fritz posted:

deepthroat defender
the sexiest Lego set

orly
Oct 2, 2005

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23361987

quote:


ChuckMcM 7 hours ago [–]

It is hard to convey how "sustainable" this feels to me. For the first time, humans have gone into orbit in a spacecraft that was designed from the ground up to be a commercial venture.
All of the NASA missions prior to this have an ambience of "uneconomical but useful". Even the shuttle, which was supposed to be this cost effective space truck, turned out to be not even close.

And the last thing I'm feeling is the amazement at how much technology has evolved to get us to this point. I imagined as a child that the Apollo program would lead to a factory of rockets that launched people to orbit, to the Moon, and even to Mars on demand. And seeing what SpaceX has done to get to this point, it is clear to me that was never even close to possible. The Russian program is great in that way. It shows what that path might have looked like. And yes we could have refined the making of F1 engines, the construction of boosters, and just pushed that, but that leads to a steady state that is below what you need to run a program like this with a net positive economic outcome.

So very impressed guys, congratulations!

Not a coincidence that the most elon / vc bootlickign comment is at the top except for dang's post

Internet Janitor
May 17, 2008

"That isn't the appropriate trash receptacle."
government spends money: uneconomic, unsustainable. subsidies! boo, hiss

private enterprise does work under government contract: profitable, sustainable. the clear path forward to a golden era

SRQ
Nov 9, 2009

the space shuttle got expensive because congress is dickwads, not because nasa is unsustainable or dumb.

afaik

mrmcd
Feb 22, 2003

Pictured: The only good cop (a fictional one).

godzillabrennus 7 minutes ago [–]

Elon Musk will have cities on planets names after him for generations to come.
The legacy he leaves will be greater than that of Ghengis Kahn, Ceasar, or Alexander the Great



Senpai notice me!!!!

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

SRQ posted:

the space shuttle got expensive because congress is dickwads, not because nasa is unsustainable or dumb.

afaik

the shuttle was extremely dumb and expensive for intrinsic reasons

it was just a bad design

congress canceling the shuttle without any finished replacement, and then canceling the in-progress replacement, was also dumb

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

the cancelled in progress human launcher replacement was a terrible design by politician and should’ve been canceled

solid rocket boosters should not be used for human launch

Malcolm XML
Aug 8, 2009

I always knew it would end like this.
manned spaceflight is a waste of time in general

Maximo Roboto
Feb 4, 2012

Accelerationism by Accel Partners:

bobbydroptables 0 minutes ago [–]

You and I have very different definitions of "sustainable". Absolutely nothing about the modern global economy is "sustainable" for the planet. Infinite growth is not a realistic goal. We need to start putting a sustainable planet above a sustainable income statement.

Setting that aside, failing startups are actually great for the average Joe. You've basically sucked off enormous amount of capital from naive but rich investors and transferred it to the employees and local businesses where the company is based. Even consumers can benefit if prices are subsidized.

Failing businesses also teach lessons about dumb capital and dumb managers. Smart capital and smart managers usually take notes.

It's basically win-win all around except for whichever rube is holding the shares when the house of cards collapses, which, as I said some people have more money than sense.

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

PCjr sidecar posted:

solid rocket boosters should not be used for human launch

lol guess what the shuttle-replacement-replacement program still relies on?

you got it: shuttle SRBs originally manufactured decades ago

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

Maximo Roboto posted:

Accelerationism by Accel Partners:

bobbydroptables 0 minutes ago [–]

You and I have very different definitions of "sustainable". Absolutely nothing about the modern global economy is "sustainable" for the planet. Infinite growth is not a realistic goal. We need to start putting a sustainable planet above a sustainable income statement.

Setting that aside, failing startups are actually great for the average Joe. You've basically sucked off enormous amount of capital from naive but rich investors and transferred it to the employees and local businesses where the company is based. Even consumers can benefit if prices are subsidized.

Failing businesses also teach lessons about dumb capital and dumb managers. Smart capital and smart managers usually take notes.

It's basically win-win all around except for whichever rube is holding the shares when the house of cards collapses, which, as I said some people have more money than sense.

i am not accustomed to hn posters being right about something

although s/local businesses/landlords/

Arcteryx Anarchist
Sep 15, 2007

Fun Shoe
it’s a win for anyone in the situation that was making cash and can float the unemployment time

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

Notorious b.s.d. posted:

lol guess what the shuttle-replacement-replacement program still relies on?

you got it: shuttle SRBs originally manufactured decades ago

utah defense contractors don’t get paid for boosters out of the warehouse these are newly manufactured (same old design with another segment)

not like the orbital using the 50 year old russian moon shot motors

but SLS will never launch people so it doesn’t matter

Notorious b.s.d.
Jan 25, 2003

by Reene

PCjr sidecar posted:

utah defense contractors don’t get paid for boosters out of the warehouse these are newly manufactured (same old design with another segment)

nah they're still using original manufactured equipment in the "new" SRBs

i'm sure rocketdyne and boeing can find a way to make an SRB manufactured using old parts cost more than a totally-new one, don't worry they'll still get their pound of flesh

PCjr sidecar posted:

but SLS will never launch people so it doesn’t matter

it's gonna have to if they want boots on the moon, and they say they do

as with all NASA things it seems like 99% hope and 1% actual belief

Arcteryx Anarchist
Sep 15, 2007

Fun Shoe
NASA is like real life Venture Brothers season 1 vibes :smith:

bob dobbs is dead
Oct 8, 2017

I love peeps
Nap Ghost

Arcteryx Anarchist posted:

it’s a win for anyone in the situation that was making cash and can float the unemployment time

post a material amount of investment, peeps are getting paid in cash

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
a congressional budget cycle isn't enough time to run a space program, in the absence of a new cold war space race nasa's funding isn't consistent and reliable enough to put people back on the moon. probes and landers that require near-zero money after launching is the best they're realistically capable of. even the iss would have gone the way of skylab if not for the russians picking up the slack.

the grift comes out of that, there's no point building something that'll make you bank in long-term contracts when the money won't stick around long enough for the contracts to appear.

fritz
Jul 26, 2003

nsajko 5 hours ago [–]

A glaring ommision in the article is how it fails to mention that King was himself of socialist and anti-war persuasion.
reply

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

The government is a PAAS business. They have various customers, both direct B2C, like you and me, and B2B relationships with other companies that run business on their platform. Either way the customers pay quarterly or yearly for the services through a system called taxes.

Political activists and are a type of white /gray hat hacker who seeks to demonstrate exploitable flaws in the platform and may benefit through bug bounties from backers or through getting advantageous features implemented. Lobbyists are a kind of social engineer that also wishes to influence feature decisions.

Legislators are a type of software developer. Their job is complicated by the lack of adequate test and simulation environments, and the presence of competing interests who frequently oppose the suggested features or implementation decisions but whose approval is often needed for the PR to garnish approval.

mystes
May 31, 2006

mawarannahr posted:

The government is a PAAS business. They have various customers, both direct B2C, like you and me, and B2B relationships with other companies that run business on their platform. Either way the customers pay quarterly or yearly for the services through a system called taxes.

Political activists and are a type of white /gray hat hacker who seeks to demonstrate exploitable flaws in the platform and may benefit through bug bounties from backers or through getting advantageous features implemented. Lobbyists are a kind of social engineer that also wishes to influence feature decisions.

Legislators are a type of software developer. Their job is complicated by the lack of adequate test and simulation environments, and the presence of competing interests who frequently oppose the suggested features or implementation decisions but whose approval is often needed for the PR to garnish approval.
Think of america as a network instead of a system, the hackers have seized control of the domain controller and other critical systems but they haven't compromised all systems or prevented admins from kicking them out.

Arcteryx Anarchist
Sep 15, 2007

Fun Shoe

mawarannahr posted:

The government is a PAAS business. They have various customers, both direct B2C, like you and me, and B2B relationships with other companies that run business on their platform. Either way the customers pay quarterly or yearly for the services through a system called taxes.

Political activists and are a type of white /gray hat hacker who seeks to demonstrate exploitable flaws in the platform and may benefit through bug bounties from backers or through getting advantageous features implemented. Lobbyists are a kind of social engineer that also wishes to influence feature decisions.

Legislators are a type of software developer. Their job is complicated by the lack of adequate test and simulation environments, and the presence of competing interests who frequently oppose the suggested features or implementation decisions but whose approval is often needed for the PR to garnish approval.

read another book learn another domain

SRQ
Nov 9, 2009

Arcteryx Anarchist posted:

NASA is like real life Venture Brothers season 1 vibes :smith:

who is the rusty venture who puts on a face of ego and self-assurance to disguise his deep deep self hate and self awareness is life is a failure and a sham

SRQ
Nov 9, 2009

SRQ posted:

who is the rusty venture who puts on a face of ego and self-assurance to disguise his deep deep self hate and self awareness is life is a failure and a sham

it's u op

Arcteryx Anarchist
Sep 15, 2007

Fun Shoe

SRQ posted:

who is the rusty venture who puts on a face of ego and self-assurance to disguise his deep deep self hate and self awareness is life is a failure and a sham

Elon Musk

alexandriao
Jul 20, 2019



Or as he is right now, "ol' Musky"

SRQ
Nov 9, 2009


it works, right down to the inheritance.

mystes
May 31, 2006

dgzl 1 minute ago


I think people are missing a few big points.

1) It's extremely difficult being a cop

2) It's extremely terrifying being a cop

3) It's extremely unpopular being a cop

It boggles me every time I hear people say cops need "stricter requirements" and "less pay" but never hear anyone volunteering to join the force and make real change. Look around, how many white knights want to be a cop?

The videos from Thursday/Friday night Minneapolis shape my framework for these riots, not the supposed abuse to protesters and reporters. IMO, given the circumstances, the cops overall have been very civil while taking an onslaught of verbal and even physical abuse. And don't get me wrong, I'm not ignoring police abuse and brutality.

power botton
Nov 2, 2011

hahah what an ending.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Xik
Mar 10, 2011

Dinosaur Gum

mystes posted:

not the supposed abuse to protesters and reporters.

mystes posted:

And don't get me wrong, I'm not ignoring police abuse and brutality.

Can't even be consistent within the same paragraph.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply