|
This is Zim Olson, This is his website: https://www.zimmathematics.com/ I think he's got something to do with mathematics? and the Bible? There's something in there about free beer? Anyway's he's posting his site all over University LinkedIN pages without any context.  It all feels really timecubey. I'm not a math goon so maybe hes actually a real genius but my heart's telling me no.
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 10:00 |
|
|
Reads like the Bronners soap guy. At least that guy made good soap.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
He’s also just arguing that black people are different than white people therefore equality is not possible and against the laws of the universe. Black /= White, checkmate science
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:05
|
|
|
Your ignorance of Harmonic Cube is demonic. You are educated stupid. It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:09
|
|
|
Flowers for QAnon posted:He’s also just arguing that black people are different than white people therefore equality is not possible and against the laws of the universe. Black /= White, checkmate science black people are not literally physically the same entities as white people. the man's a math genius
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:09
|
|
|
frrancis dec MY MAN frankenstein brain banks on the far side of the moon gently caress me up
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:18
|
|
|
This is literally just timecube: I hope he's still able to achieve his 2019-2021 goals though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:20
|
|
|
Cubesquares are passé, you need to be thinking better. Of a whole new shape. Enter, the DOR: https://web.archive.org/web/20110810213003/http://www.thedor.net:80/
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:26
|
|
|
The giant padlock on that purple jellybean only makes me want to steal it more.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:31
|
|
|
Vice President posted:Cubesquares are passé, you need to be thinking better. Of a whole new shape. Enter, the DOR: https://web.archive.org/web/20110810213003/http://www.thedor.net:80/ okay but this is actually cool
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:39
|
|
|
The_Continental posted:The giant padlock on that purple jellybean only makes me want to steal it more. It’s this kind of attitude that keeps science behind.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 23:56
|
|
|
whats a DOR
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 00:25
|
|
|
Doctor Dogballs posted:okay but this is actually cool Perhaps if it had a mouth-hole
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 00:29
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:whats a DOR The door is a jar.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 00:42
|
|
|
Internetjack posted:The door is a jar. It had bees in it.... doesn't it 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 00:56
|
|
|
came for the time cube, stayed for the DOR. I'm happy to announce to all of you I'm a DOR man now. when a boy grows up he puts down his time cube and unlocks the lock on his see through DOR house and takes out his DOR, and he holds that instead of the timecube when.hes grown up
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 01:08
|
|
|
 DOR
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 01:20
|
|
|
my whole life I been trying to jam a timecube shaped peg into a DOR shaped hole. . . im. f. r. e. e.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 01:21
|
|
|
Where we're going we won't need DORs to see
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 01:29
|
|
|
that DOR website is a pro click
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 01:50
|
|
|
cant believe some lady went and hosed timecube
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 01:53
|
|
|
DOR, whatever it is all about (it's beyond me), might be legit. Math can be strange. Here's a webpage about DOR at a website apparently not owned and controlled by the DOR guy: https://www.goldennumber.net/the-dor Webpages about DOR do seem to be rather thin in the ground. And what happened to the original DOR website? Maybe the guy who made it got... disappeared... By the guv'mint? Or did he stare too long into his crystal DOR and end up... somewhere else?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 02:18
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:DOR, whatever it is all about (it's beyond me), might be legit. Math can be strange. Here's a webpage about DOR at a website apparently not owned and controlled by the DOR guy: Forbidden maths
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 03:05
|
|
|
The_Continental posted:This is literally just timecube: The one turns backwards, it’s different than one now somehow. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 03:07
|
|
|
I wonder what happens if you leave your DOR out of its CRYSTAL PRISON over night. this poo poo's hosed up I want to unlearn about DOR this is too big an truth
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 03:11
|
|
|
Pssshhhh who you gonna listen to though, some guy named fibbin notchy? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 03:14
|
|
|
The_Continental posted:This is literally just timecube: It’s cool how this rear end in a top hat took what is obviously a fairly simple 3D plotter scheme meant to be read by a computer into a high level super abstract math/philosophy problem that skirts all accountability for physics or architectural stability. Like you could teach bias to high school kids dude gently caress off with the unsolvable problem poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 04:55
|
|
|
DOR is cool and pretty, I want one and am DORkosexual now
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 04:57
|
|
|
Oh wait in the about me section Zim just straight up admits he's been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 06:02
|
|
|
Assume every, any, some, and non are pure functions, and calling them without values is the same as calling them with an empty set. With these assumptions, only any contributes to the equation, leaving: any(a) = any(b) Now, the definition of any is not given. It’s naming suggests that it may return any element in the given set and is thus non-deterministic; assume this definition. As such, we cannot guarantee that the equation is true unless a and b are sets of one or more of the same value (ex: a=[1], b=[1,1]). Likewise, the equation may coincidentally be true due to any’s non-deterministic behavior (ex: given a=[1,2], b=[2,3], possible equations may be 1=2, 1=3, 2=2, 2=3). As such, to solve the given equation for equality, with the assumption that a ≠ b, let a=[1] and b=[1,1]. Do I win Gene Ray’s reward? (Note that it has been 14 years since I’ve written anything approaching a proof, so any and or all of the above might be BS, but no more BS than whatever this loon is peddling)
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 06:53
|
|
|
Vice President posted:Cubesquares are passé, you need to be thinking better. Of a whole new shape. Enter, the DOR: https://web.archive.org/web/20110810213003/http://www.thedor.net:80/ Wow, imagine if this never existed.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 07:35
|
|
|
Calculus is all about numbers approaching infinity, but nobody really does a lot of practical work with very high numbers. Say we took a googleplex, which is the highest whole number a machine can store without cryptography, and used another adding machine to square that number, what would that yield? The answer is an excessively long series of 9s, like 999999999999999 etc, one less than the mathematical result. The initial quantum sum is one less than the mathematical answer, and the machine ultimately counts itself as one in the second part of the process. So really in theory the numbers after the 1 could be anything during the first step of the calculation. The quantum value is irrelevant until the number is summed. And that chain of numbers is not encrypted, it doesn’t represent information, so a googleplex squared could actually be anything up to one less than 2 googleplex squared and contain the same quantum value as the known mathematical result before the machine sums it. Because this number can theoretically be anything, we have to conclude that the unknowable value has to have the property of intelligence, that it is of will to exist in some sort of way because the adding machine has already contracted a result. Not random, not cryptographic, but an unmeasurable value that has to exist for some time within the calculation. It has to choose something, intelligently.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 07:54
|
|
|
Can it cook me a fuckin steak?! Ayyyy fuckin why dont you godel escher bach up offa deez nuts there Mr Hofstadter
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 10:28
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:Calculus is all about numbers approaching infinity, but nobody really does a lot of practical work with very high numbers. Say we took a googleplex, which is the highest whole number a machine can store without cryptography, and used another adding machine to square that number, what would that yield? The answer is an excessively long series of 9s, like 999999999999999 etc, one less than the mathematical result. The initial quantum sum is one less than the mathematical answer, and the machine ultimately counts itself as one in the second part of the process. So really in theory the numbers after the 1 could be anything during the first step of the calculation. The quantum value is irrelevant until the number is summed. And that chain of numbers is not encrypted, it doesn’t represent information, so a googleplex squared could actually be anything up to one less than 2 googleplex squared and contain the same quantum value as the known mathematical result before the machine sums it. Because this number can theoretically be anything, we have to conclude that the unknowable value has to have the property of intelligence, that it is of will to exist in some sort of way because the adding machine has already contracted a result. Not random, not cryptographic, but an unmeasurable value that has to exist for some time within the calculation. It has to choose something, intelligently. After ffeding this coded massage to the illuminati main frame i got this translation: Top Secret clearance only THE EVIL PIG SHALL RISE AGAIN 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 12:49
|
|
|
BigBadSteve posted:DOR, whatever it is all about (it's beyond me), might be legit. Math can be strange.  He cut a skylight in half then glued it together (while constructing an aquarium). Then decided to try to make a living off it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 14:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 10:00 |
|
|
munce posted:
drugs good
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 15:06
|
|