|
merk posted:Only thing I've seen so far too: ##vote Token Female. Nah, It will all make sense.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 15:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 21:21 |
Token Female posted:Nah, It will all make sense. not the most relieving response. I agree JX and Tokes responses are weird.
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 16:18 |
|
The person I most hope is town is Sandwolf because it was Tom Tucker and him that I had the strongest town reads on and whose takes made sense to me in my first game, and I felt he was encouraging to me when I wasn't sure how I was doing. So I recognize I need to be on my guard I guess about taking that read into this game no matter if he is town or scum, and trust my own takes rather than being led. But since he is probably the person I think could best sucker me as scum, I hope he is town.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 16:48 |
|
Asiina posted:aw man I missed it So you are voting me for being around at a certain time and not the other. My defense is I was around last night and busy before that
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 17:55 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:So you are voting me for being around at a certain time and not the other. My defense is I was around last night and busy before that That’s weird because you’ve been typing nonstop in the scum chat
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 17:56 |
|
Sandwolf posted:not the most relieving response. I agree JX and Tokes responses are weird. Why are they weird?
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 18:02 |
DGK2000 posted:Why are they weird? Tokes is weird because it seems like it’s trying to engage with the question while purposefully dodging any information be pulled from their response. The follow-up cagey response by having “information” was worse. Jen X’s weird because it’s just a weird phrasing. The forced use of “our side” struck me particularly.
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 18:14 |
|
Sandwolf posted:Tokes is weird because it seems like it’s trying to engage with the question while purposefully dodging any information be pulled from their response. The follow-up cagey response by having “information” was worse. Thanks. I haven't played with Tokes in like, 8 years and I've never played with Jen. You explained your reasoning well imo.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 18:22 |
There it is, I’m Town, DGK signed off on it
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 19:17 |
|
Sandwolf posted:There it is, I’m Town, DGK signed off on it Maybe a little too well
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 19:26 |
Deadbeat Dad posted:Maybe a little too well Oh poo poo! The jig is up DGK! Scram!
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 19:59 |
|
I see the points about tokes bit as always wouldn't scum NOT try to be so cagey and difficult? What is tokes gaining from these exchanges as scum
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 21:24 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:So you are voting me for being around at a certain time and not the other. My defense is I was around last night and busy before that C'mon, that's nonsense. I'm voting you for not having any content and instead of commenting on any of the existing content or providing your own, you were instead talking about the mechanics of the word puzzle. It's not like my content game or all the hot hot responses were 15 pages back.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 22:15 |
|
DGK2000 posted:The first player to publicly decode this message will receive a small boon I still don’t know how people worked this out.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 22:17 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I see the points about tokes bit as always wouldn't scum NOT try to be so cagey and difficult? What is tokes gaining from these exchanges as scum The cagey response is a town tell. I agree. ##unvote; ##vote Jen X
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 22:25 |
|
Token Female posted:Nah, It will all make sense. That’s not entirely reassuring
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 22:35 |
|
Tokes do I need to stay on you or what Slowly developing better day 1 reads (lol)
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 23:28 |
|
hambeet posted:I still don’t know how people worked this out. Simplest way to start is to go in assuming it’s a 1 for 1 encryption. The first word is 3 letters and one of the most common 3 letter words in the English language is “the” so that works for a start. Then you can take those 3 letters and fill them in through the rest of the cryptogram. Same with “a”. Then you keep going from there.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 23:31 |
|
Token Female posted:Nah, It will all make sense. I know we're still technically in joke, but this is not an answer that spawns any real confidence
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 23:32 |
merk posted:The cagey response is a town tell. I agree. ##unvote; ##vote Jen X why Jen X then?
|
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 23:41 |
|
Sandwolf posted:why Jen X then? Sandwolf posted:Tokes is weird because it seems like it’s trying to engage with the question while purposefully dodging any information be pulled from their response. The follow-up cagey response by having “information” was worse. uhhhh ##vote sandwolf
|
# ? Jul 5, 2020 23:59 |
|
But merk wasn't responding to or quoting Sandwolf?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:04 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I see the points about tokes bit as always wouldn't scum NOT try to be so cagey and difficult? What is tokes gaining from these exchanges as scum This is just WIFOM isn't it? merk posted:The cagey response is a town tell. I agree. Really? Seems pretty weak to make an alignment call based on it.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:08 |
|
Jen X posted:uhhhh This strikes me as opportunistic. sandwolf’s asking what makes a vote on you preferable, not what could cause it. ##vote Jen x for this and the odd post addressed elsewhere
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:10 |
|
Rather preferable given the stated line of reasoning
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:12 |
|
Mr. Humalong posted:gently caress around and find out. wellity wellity wellity
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:21 |
|
Asiina posted:So let's not waste this D1, even if it's extra long. It looks like Somber put a lot of work into this flavour, which is very cool, and so I don't want it to be a lurky game. Hal because he's played more games than anyone else and therefore is probably the best at being scum.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:21 |
|
Is there gonna be a lot of these secret message things? I want a small boon too.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:25 |
|
I got something small for you right here
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:27 |
|
t a s t e posted:This strikes me as opportunistic. sandwolf’s asking what makes a vote on you preferable, not what could cause it. Your vote seems a bit opportunistic as well. I just think it's way too easy to pin a vote on Jen X there as a bad response (because it is) and vote her for it. Like, if she tried to dress it up and make it seem like some hidden OMGUS vote because of her pointing out what she thought was hypocrisy from Sand that's one thing, but I think she legitimately thinks Sand was hypocritical there even if I don't necessarily agree with it. (I'm also trying to branch away from voting people with OMGUS-y replies/votes in general because that led me astray last game.) The "our side" phrasing from Jen is the worst thing about her posts but even then it's something I can see someone on either "side" saying. ##vote Tokes because I don't understand her tone as others have pointed out. At the very least she sounds like some ominous 3P.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:48 |
Jen X posted:uhhhh people have made the other points but additionally, it felt like he was setting up a dichotomy of “either Jen X or Tokes” - which felt scummiest to me
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:50 |
|
Sandwolf posted:people have made the other points but additionally, it felt like he was setting up a dichotomy of “either Jen X or Tokes” - which felt scummiest to me I suppose it would be hypocritical to not give you the benefit of the doubt interpretation-wise, fine ##vote taste "strikes me as opportunistic" is bullshit
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 00:57 |
|
merk posted:The cagey response is a town tell. I agree. ##unvote; ##vote Jen X ##vote merk This is the same lazy as poo poo play he's had the last couple of his scum games and I'm not cool with it. He has enough to press people but is taking the lazy way out.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 01:05 |
|
merk posted:--- merk posted:The biggest weakness of my town game is letting past games influence alignment reads of a current game. These aren't meta cases; they're just reactions to players I've played with before who I usually read as scummy (in this game: Sandwolf, DBD, Fisk). I really really really try to go into every game without any previous game bias, so this content game question is not a fun one for me. merk posted:Hello, I'm also starting this game late, but it won't me I lose right away hopefully. In reverse order, these are his game posts. The most 'content' he has is talking about his town game in a weird way in regards to being asked who he hopes isn't scum. This is not a player who is town.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 01:08 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Hal because he's played more games than anyone else and therefore is probably the best at being scum.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 02:44 |
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 02:59 |
|
I still like my Hal vote and don't want to move it yet, although I wish other people would comment on whether they think it's anything. I agree with taste and it is opportunistic and Jen's OMGUS on him is a bad reason for a vote, but I dunno this feels like real emotion right now? Jen's reason is a bad reason, but I don't know if it's a scummy reason. I could probably get behind a merk vote. Also if nothing else, would vote a lurker at deadline. Chic's having a rough weekend and may replace out, so I'd choose pera or yuming who only have 3 and 4 posts.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 03:03 |
|
@Asiina, it didn't bother me that Hal didn't participate in "content game" or rather, come in fashionably late with some post trying to force content for the hell of it if it felt past due to him. I don't think I would've responded at the point where he entered the thread either. I feel okay about him actually. The only thing that intrigues me is this reply in regards to Tokes: Hal Incandenza posted:I see the points about tokes bit as always wouldn't scum NOT try to be so cagey and difficult? What is tokes gaining from these exchanges as scum Why do it in the first place though? If there is no benefit as scum, what's the benefit of doing it as town? That's why I got a weird 3P vibe from it.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 03:16 |
|
Jen X posted:I suppose it would be hypocritical to not give you the benefit of the doubt interpretation-wise, fine I mean, the alternative is you misinterpreted a simple and obvious post I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt your OMGus non withstanding
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 03:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 21:21 |
|
Jen X posted:I suppose it would be hypocritical to not give you the benefit of the doubt interpretation-wise, fine t a s t e posted:I mean, the alternative is you misinterpreted a simple and obvious post Hm. I didn't mind it with Sandwolf but Jen making back to back votes on two people that gave reasons on why she seemed scummy (whether you agree or not) is something to be noted, especially when you give no ~real~ reason as to why you vote each person who commented on you or voted you. And by reason I mean, it's obvious you think their reasons are bullshit, I get it, but you vote them without context for anybody else but you. Are you implying that Sandwolf's posts/taste's posts are knowingly wrong/misguided from their pov and that means they're scum?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2020 04:04 |