|
It's an electronic circuit. That poo poo can actually break. I presume my ISP is a cheapskate in that regard, or whatever. That said, one replacement was because they stuck some more of whatever provider information is on there, needed for proper operation, because with the older one, the phone wouldn't hop onto the HSPA network. --edit: Also, SIM format changes. I went to get proper ones, instead of cutting these down to fit whatever SIM slot du jour.
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 18:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 18:33 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:It's an electronic circuit. That poo poo can actually break. I presume my ISP is a cheapskate in that regard, or whatever. That said, one replacement was because they stuck some more of whatever provider information is on there, needed for proper operation, because with the older one, the phone wouldn't hop onto the HSPA network. --edit: Also, SIM format changes. I went to get proper ones, instead of cutting these down to fit whatever SIM slot du jour. I've literally never had a Sim break on me in the 13+ years of having a mobile
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 19:00
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:I've literally never had a Sim break on me in the 13+ years of having a mobile I've broken one before but it was just stupidity (sim tray has room for 2, was replacing one of them and didn't entirely reseat the other one before shoving it back in and ended up scratching it horribly)
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 19:15
|
|
|
D. Ebdrup posted:Sure, and every antivirus company has failed at it so far. kinda what I meant by Holy Grail - a thing everyone's seeking and probably nobody will find
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 19:19
|
|
|
Biowarfare posted:I've broken one before but it was just stupidity (sim tray has room for 2, was replacing one of them and didn't entirely reseat the other one before shoving it back in and ended up scratching it horribly) I've picked one up that was run over and it worked fine. suckers are pretty tough
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 19:22
|
|
|
I've had a SIM die on me before. Now if my e-SIM broke, THAT would be a feat.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 19:26
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:kinda what I meant by Holy Grail - a thing everyone's seeking and probably nobody will find Naaah, you just have to be a virgin.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 20:11
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Naaah, you just have to be a virgin. In this industry, virgins aren't exactly hard to find.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2020 21:11
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/HackingDave/status/1280911103690788865
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 19:20
|
|
|
not sure how infoseccy this is but holy poo poo tiktok wtf https://twitter.com/JoshuaDummer/status/1280877750245453828
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 19:42
|
|
|
Luckily for those with PA gear it seems that this one was fixed in the same versions that fixed the last one, so anyone who's already handled that last one shouldn't have anything to worry about.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 20:05
|
|
|
I don't have the technical background to evaluate this. GNU: A Heuristic for Bad Cryptography.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 20:16
|
|
|
Not a huge fan of the random Furry stuff included in that article. Definitely takes away some of the credibility behind it.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 22:18
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Not a huge fan of the random Furry stuff included in that article. Definitely takes away some of the credibility behind it. yeah, after all, dogs can't use keyboards so you can't trust them to do infosec
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 22:19
|
|
|
Cup Runneth Over posted:yeah, after all, dogs can't use keyboards so you can't trust them to do infosec On the contrary, you can trust what they say precisely because someone had to agree with what they said enough to transcribe it? E: DragonDictate being notable for their "No Doggos" stance.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 22:24
|
|
|
Schadenboner posted:On the contrary, you can trust what they say precisely because someone had to agree with what they said enough to transcribe it? come now, furries don't have any credibility in infosec. would YOU trust a fox in a henhouse?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 22:37
|
|
|
Does anyone have an opinion on running phishing simulations, specifically whether suppressing Gmail's security warnings on messages sent by the simulation is good or bad?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 22:52
|
|
|
droll posted:Does anyone have an opinion on running phishing simulations, specifically whether suppressing Gmail's security warnings on messages sent by the simulation is good or bad? Send it so it appears trusted. You do not want users to learn to always look for a machine learning applied "this might be phishing" banner, instead of looking at warning signs like the body of the message, wording, what it's asking for, mouseovering domains, looking at email domains, etc.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 22:55
|
|
|
That makes total sense, so simple. Thank you.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2020 23:02
|
|
|
I don't know why it never occurred to me, but one thing syzkaller does is make it easier for people to discover potential security issues, as is demonstrated by this FreeBSD use-after-free leading (local) kernel execution privileges, which was found by found by syzkaller on March 19th, fixed on the same day, and between March 21st and March 26th earned theflow0 $10000 by chaining it with a webkit exploit to jailbreak the PS4. This also comes after Andy was mistreated by members of the PS4 community for not releasing a "proper" 0day - to the point that he basically quit, because he didn't want to put up with their petty entitled behavior.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2020 10:47
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:I don't have the technical background to evaluate this. GNU: A Heuristic for Bad Cryptography. Don't touch anything gnu and security is good advice
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 17:06
|
|
|
... oops https://twitter.com/thezedwards/status/1281579595301482497
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 17:17
|
|
|
They didn't go with "fappymae", I am dissapoint.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 17:20
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1281634348639244288 Meh. Deleted but said that an Amazon company-wide email went out requiring TikTok be removed from any device which accesses their corporate email account. e: Other source: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1281639684691636224 Diva Cupcake fucked around with this message at 18:33 on Jul 10, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 18:09
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1281634348639244288 Seems like ordinary prudence, honestly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 18:31
|
|
|
why the gently caress hasn't vine come back, anyway? there's obviously demand
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 19:25
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:why the gently caress hasn't vine come back, anyway? there's obviously demand We have tiktok now which i am told is like vine but not owned by white supremacists?
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 19:54
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:We have tiktok now which i am told is like vine but not owned by white supremacists? no, just owned by the chinese government
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 19:56
|
|
RFC2324 posted:We have tiktok now which i am told is like vine but not owned by white supremacists? Well it's owned by China's own brand of white supremacists I guess.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 19:57
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Well it's owned by China's own brand of white supremacists I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 20:11
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:why the gently caress hasn't vine come back, anyway? there's obviously demand vine is now owned by twitter who want people to just use twitter instead, and the creator of vine went on to make byte which is basically the same thing again but hasn't taken off because tiktok already took the vine demographic
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 20:11
|
|
|
Amazon update: https://twitter.com/kellymakena/status/1281693734682398721
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2020 22:04
|
|
|
What's so special about Apple's T2, that it's considered entirely uncrackable/unhackable? This comes from a (hilarious) news article about the newest MacBook's displays breaking, if you just just have a shim, just slightly thicker than electrical tape, over the webcam. In the comment section, everyone's going like "T2!", saying that the webcam and microphone are routed over that security chip and therefore everything's safe. (The activation LED is apparently directly hooked up to the webcam's power supply, so if you enable it, it will go on. The same time, there's apparently a security paper that talks about this and how you can enable the camera for a tiny fraction of time only to take an image, which makes the LED barely blip.)
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 10:37
|
|
|
Can you post the article please? I do love having a big lol at Apple and their lovely QA now.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 10:39
|
|
|
It's this one: https://www.macrumors.com/2020/07/10/apple-macbook-camera-cover-warning/ Seems the slightest amount of pressure on the display, after creating a rather tiny foam pivot point, will break the display unit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 10:52
|
|
|
So that's been an issue for a couple of generations now that we have seen. I've seen some companies ban the use of any camera blockers other than black tape. On another note. There is an abundance of easy to obtain camera jacking scripts that don't enable the LED....
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 10:58
|
|
|
I assume they only work properly with older Macbooks? The claim was that in the newest models, the LED is looped into the power supply of the camera, so when powering it up for use, the LED is forcibly going on.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 11:02
|
|
Combat Pretzel posted:I assume they only work properly with older Macbooks? The claim was that in the newest models, the LED is looped into the power supply of the camera, so when powering it up for use, the LED is forcibly going on. Dunno. I've not tested it on the newer ones actually.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 11:16
|
|
|
I'm guessing on some of the older ones they're single-frame grabs that then turn off too. IIRC newer macbooks will hold power on the LED for a while longer to prevent this
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 11:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 18:33 |
|
Biowarfare posted:I'm guessing on some of the older ones they're single-frame grabs that then turn off too. IIRC newer macbooks will hold power on the LED for a while longer to prevent this Just gotta hope your camera is always in your peripheral vision and you are paying attention I guess
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2020 11:38
|
|