Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Yolomon Wayne
Jun 10, 2014

You call it "The Big Bang", but what really happened is
Grimey Drawer

Velius posted:

Another day, another Der Shovel post about terrible teammates. Man, if only one player could make a difference by being even slightly better than average. That’d be cool.

Would indeed be cool, but is not entirely the case in teamgames.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!
You can't win all of your games, but you can win well over half of them. It gets old seeing the same three or four people post about how bad their teams are, when you can look up their stats and see that they're performing about as well in game as the average player and winning about as much as the average player. If you want better teams you can improve yourself or play in a division with above average players.

Der Shovel posted:

some kind of bar for entry to ranked would be nice to eliminate the bots and functionally braindead.

Setting a barrier to entry for ranked makes you win less, since the opponent you're matched against will be better on average. It doesn't change the dynamic either, if you ban everyone sub 50% it just changes from 47% players throwing the match by dying early to 53% players throwing the match by dying early. You see the same thing if you play early season rank 5 matches.

The really bad players in ranked also play hundreds of games in the sub rank 10 bracket, so you can avoid them by going to rank 5 pretty early in the season. Even if you don't, they make it much easier to keep your star.

Blindeye
Sep 22, 2006

I can't believe I kissed you!

Yolomon Wayne posted:

Would indeed be cool, but is not entirely the case in teamgames.

Yeah :smith:

Darkrenown
Jul 18, 2012
please give me anything to talk about besides the fact that democrats are allowing millions of americans to be evicted from their homes

wdarkk posted:

It’s not too bad, just roll in coop until you get t6 cruisers that you can annihilate.

Do you have any tips? Even against them I sometimes get a few cits for like 3-4k damage but that's not killing anything fast.

E: I especially enjoy that due to the steep dive bombing mechanic that if you turn your camera to see your crosshairs you cannot see flak spawning in front of you
E2: loving done! 1 CL kill with rockets, killed a BB with Secondary fire, and rammed 2 more BBs. What utter trash.

Darkrenown fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Jul 26, 2020

Yolomon Wayne
Jun 10, 2014

You call it "The Big Bang", but what really happened is
Grimey Drawer

James Garfield posted:

You can't win all of your games, but you can win well over half of them. It gets old seeing the same three or four people post about how bad their teams are, when you can look up their stats and see that they're performing about as well in game as the average player and winning about as much as the average player. If you want better teams you can improve yourself or play in a division with above average players.

So if everyone can win over half their games, that doesnt work out.
It sthe same thing i keep hearing from streamers "everyone on your team is potato so you must carry".

Yes, everyone is the hero, so we have 12 v 12 solo warriors who think they must win alone and then get 3 dead DDs at the 5 minute mark.
Game over.
No matter how good you are, you cant salvage that.
THOSE are the games people complain about, not the one you lose fair and sqaure.
The ones where there is 100% and absolute *proof* that its the teams fault, the ones where you score 250k and a kraken and 3 caps and still lose, and then some armchair admiral rolls up to tell you its your fault entirely and you should git gud.

Hegel Exercises
Apr 25, 2019

Too fair to worship, too divine to love...

Getting to the coal point where I can get a ship :woop:

Yoshino or Thunderer?

Or Marceu I guess.

CitizenKain
May 27, 2001

That was Gary Cooper, asshole.

Nap Ghost

Hegel Exercises posted:

Getting to the coal point where I can get a ship :woop:

Yoshino or Thunderer?

Or Marceu I guess.

Thunderer is probably the best choice. Although the Marceau was tempting since I like DDs. But it’s hard to argue with a super accurate BB with 18” guns.

Thinking on the Kagero, what I think it needs is 12km torps, even if they aren’t quite as damaging, it really needs some space. I’m spoiled with the Skane and having such long range torps.

toadee
Aug 16, 2003

North American Turtle Boy Love Association

Yolomon Wayne posted:

So if everyone can win over half their games, that doesnt work out.
It sthe same thing i keep hearing from streamers "everyone on your team is potato so you must carry".

Yes, everyone is the hero, so we have 12 v 12 solo warriors who think they must win alone and then get 3 dead DDs at the 5 minute mark.
Game over.
No matter how good you are, you cant salvage that.
THOSE are the games people complain about, not the one you lose fair and sqaure.
The ones where there is 100% and absolute *proof* that its the teams fault, the ones where you score 250k and a kraken and 3 caps and still lose, and then some armchair admiral rolls up to tell you its your fault entirely and you should git gud.

The literal best players in the world top out at about 72-75% solo win rate. At the absolute best, a quarter of games are not winnable for anyone. Complaining about them is like complaining that rain exists or how annoying it is that you have to sleep every night.

Hegel Exercises
Apr 25, 2019

Too fair to worship, too divine to love...

toadee posted:

The literal best players in the world top out at about 72-75% solo win rate. At the absolute best, a quarter of games are not winnable for anyone. Complaining about them is like complaining that rain exists or how annoying it is that you have to sleep every night.

Venting is cathartic. :shrug:

Hazdoc
Nov 8, 2012

Muscovy Ducks are a large tropical breed, famous for their lean and extremely flavorful meat.

Hazduck!

~SMcD

Hegel Exercises posted:

Venting is cathartic. :shrug:

the problem becomes when that venting ends up leaking out and people start wondering why they get chat bans

I've never gotten chat banned and I definitely tell people who are being dumb that they're being dumb, but I also only do so after they start it, or I instead rephrase it as advice, not criticism.

and yes, seeing the same complaints about bad teammates gets old very fast, I'm only interested in the extraordinarily potatoey of potatoes, or the ones who say hilarious poo poo in chat to justify their errors. Its very painful to see the one making a fool of themselves be the goon, not the other way around

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Yolomon Wayne posted:

So if everyone can win over half their games, that doesnt work out.
It sthe same thing i keep hearing from streamers "everyone on your team is potato so you must carry".

Yes, everyone is the hero, so we have 12 v 12 solo warriors who think they must win alone and then get 3 dead DDs at the 5 minute mark.
Game over.
No matter how good you are, you cant salvage that.
THOSE are the games people complain about, not the one you lose fair and sqaure.
The ones where there is 100% and absolute *proof* that its the teams fault, the ones where you score 250k and a kraken and 3 caps and still lose, and then some armchair admiral rolls up to tell you its your fault entirely and you should git gud.

Every account can't have a win rate above 50%, but the average warships player is terrible and being better than the average warships player gives you a win rate above 50% so pretty much any person should be able to get a win rate above 50%. Most of the people with thousands of games and bad win rates are there because they make no attempt to improve (which is hard to understand when you're going to play thousands of games, especially given that this is a game about shooting boats and "improve" translates to "shoot more boats").

You can't win every game and nobody will complain if you post a screenshot of a 250k kraken loss and say your team was bad, but if the only thing you do is blame your team for losing it doesn't get you anywhere. Especially not if you complain about poo poo teams making you lose when looking up your account indicates that you do about as well as the average player and win about half the time. There is a certain parallel with the 7000 game 43% players here.

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




The Shokaku is bonkers in this Ranked season. There's very few DD's and loads of Battleships. I driled 6 Citadels into an Odin on a single run just flying around him in circles. Assuming your team doesn't totally collapse you'll break 100K damage a game meaning you'll probably keep your star on losses.

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Yeah I bitterly regret getting rid of my Shokaku for ranked. The T8 carriers I have are the Kaga, Saipan and Graf Zeppelin. Out of those three only the Kaga feels anywhere decent to play, and doesn't have the alpha capability of the Shokaku in these types of games.

Blinks77
Feb 15, 2012

RN heavy cruisers are.... bad.

Short ranged, thinly armoured and the guns don't hit near as hard as they need to in order to make up for it. I can usually find a good niche for most any line but these things? The entire time i'm playing them it's "but why though?"

wdarkk
Oct 26, 2007

Friends: Protected
World: Saved
Crablettes: Eaten

Blinks77 posted:

RN heavy cruisers are.... bad.

Short ranged, thinly armoured and the guns don't hit near as hard as they need to in order to make up for it. I can usually find a good niche for most any line but these things? The entire time i'm playing them it's "but why though?"

Pretty sure this is how most people feel about them.

CitizenKain
May 27, 2001

That was Gary Cooper, asshole.

Nap Ghost
I feel like they should have at least given them smoke like the light cruisers, at least then they'd have something. They are pretty much like IJN cruisers, just usually with worse torps.

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Tier 8 destroyers are brutal.

So much radar, constant CVs. It's insanely hard trying to accomplish anything in these games.

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




CitizenKain posted:

I feel like they should have at least given them smoke like the light cruisers, at least then they'd have something. They are pretty much like IJN cruisers, just usually with worse torps.

I find it's the range that's really crippling. Everyone out ranges you at tier so you need to sneak up and island hug and that puts you in bad place. The Devonshire and Surrey I could hold to a reasonable 60-68% WR but I'm sub 50 in the Albemarle just now. You're T8 with a 15.7 km range, decent HE but AP that produces a lot of overpens. There are almost no situation where I would rather be in the Albemarle rather than the Baltimore that does all it can do and more (except torps obviously).

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007

what.

Der Shovel posted:

Tier 8 destroyers are brutal.

So much radar, constant CVs. It's insanely hard trying to accomplish anything in these games.

Im on the Benson and I know what you mean. You've got to be constantly aware that if you're within 10km of a cruiser and even some Battleships you're liable to be detected. Never mind the constant CV sweeps.

When you combine that with then coming up against tier 9 and 10 DD's that just erase you with their guns its insanely frustrating. Especially since i only ever seem to get 3+ destroyer games at the moment.

Velius
Feb 27, 2001

serious gaylord posted:

Im on the Benson and I know what you mean. You've got to be constantly aware that if you're within 10km of a cruiser and even some Battleships you're liable to be detected. Never mind the constant CV sweeps.

When you combine that with then coming up against tier 9 and 10 DD's that just erase you with their guns its insanely frustrating. Especially since i only ever seem to get 3+ destroyer games at the moment.

There’s nothing really wrong with the benson; what you’re describing is general dd play considerations at high tier. Please don’t take Der Shovel as an authority on these things. I’ll try and give you some general suggestions though:

1. Be aware of your concealment range compared with the enemy dds. This is probably the most important single thing. If they outspot you, you’ll need to figure out ways to avoid being forced to use smoke at disadvantaged times. A good approach (pardon the pun) is to use islands near cap circles to hide behind, especially in smaller cap circle maps, and when they’re contested push in to spot. If you have the concealment advantage do the opposite, and try and keep your concealment range clear of islands and use cap circles to indicate if the enemy dd is approaching; in that case try and either back toward them or keep angled to maintain separation.

2. Don’t forget you have guns and torps. Benson isn’t the highest DPM destroyer but it’s solid. You’ve got good torpedoes, great smoke, and good guns particular up close. Don’t waste the smoke, do your best to avoid attracting early cv attention that forces you to blow it pointlessly. If you’ve got escorting cruisers split it with them. I use smoke pretty infrequently even in gunboat dds if it makes more sense to provide spotting and split enemy fire.

3. At the start of the match count the radar ships, and keep an eye on the mini map. If you’re facing Soviet radar it can usually be endured, since in many cases they get 2-3 shots total. Try and play with your speed, don’t immediately boost out of smoke when you get radiates, instead back up, stop, move up, try and throw off their aim. If it’s us radar I’d be more inclined to bail, but if you can throw off their aim do so.

4. Your first job in a dd is to survive. Your value goes up as the round progresses. Early on the red team generally knows where you’ll be and they’ve got radar ready. Late game you could be anywhere, radars are used up or on cool down, or they’re behind islands. Don’t waste your hp charging into a cap immediately, it’s frequently better to spot, hold your smoke, and get an early torp salvo aimed at where their heavy ships are going. Then once their ships have committed and are permaspotted by other ships, smoke up and start shooting.

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Velius posted:

There’s nothing really wrong with the benson; what you’re describing is general dd play considerations at high tier. Please don’t take Der Shovel as an authority on these things.

I didn't even mention the Benson, you weirdo. Or is there some part of "it's brutal to play a T8 destroyer right now with all the radar and CVs in games" that is massively wrong in your opinion?

Shaman Tank Spec fucked around with this message at 14:30 on Jul 27, 2020

toadee
Aug 16, 2003

North American Turtle Boy Love Association

It's not always going to work vs unicums, but when radared, a lot of times this is what I will do:

Assuming Im starting from stop:

1) Go to full power for about 8 seconds, this is long enough to show them a smokestack of me going forward
2) Hit full reverse - now, if you started off as far from them as you should be, their first shot should go well past you
3) If it's a Des Moines, I will immediately go full neutral throttle, they will probably lead backward or forward, so they will miss their next shot. If its something with a longer reload, I will go neutral, show them neutral smokestack, then reverse again and they will miss forward
4) Now I will go full throttle, at this point their aim is all messed up and they will likely underlead the next shot
5) At this point, it depends how far you are from them, if you're near the edge of radar/cover, then just go for it, if not, and you're a good distance away, full reverse again perhaps

The more people on the flank that can shoot at you, the less this works, so, again, be aware of the totality of threats and plan accordingly. Don't feel like you have to do everything at once, and hang back from caps until an opportunity presents. Your win rate in DDs will shoot up tremendously if you just adopt the strategy of "wait until the DD on this flank fucks up in front of me, then kill it".

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



toadee posted:

Your win rate in DDs will shoot up tremendously if you just adopt the strategy of "wait until the DD on this flank fucks up in front of me, then kill it".

Yeah this is good advice in my experience. Of course maybe don't have to take it as far as the Shimakaze shooting 20km torps from A1 but rushing into caps is a sure-fire suicide these days.

toadee
Aug 16, 2003

North American Turtle Boy Love Association

Der Shovel posted:

Yeah this is good advice in my experience. Of course maybe don't have to take it as far as the Shimakaze shooting 20km torps from A1 but rushing into caps is a sure-fire suicide these days.

I start almost every DD game going into a cap actually, I just don't ever really intend to take it unless it just stays uncontested. Doing this flushes out a shitload of overeager DD hunters, helps identify who is on the flank, and often gets them to overextend and die early.

Gwaihir
Dec 8, 2009
Hair Elf
That's also why backing in to caps is important so that you can instantly escape when the MINE MINE MINE MINE crew reveals itself, vs being stuck making a giant loop like a big idiot and losing most of your health or your life. Typically a radar cruiser that wants to radar a cap will hit it the INSTANT they have coverage on the cap (when it's being contested) and no further, so when you can just jet out of the circle immediately that's enough to break vision.

CitizenKain
May 27, 2001

That was Gary Cooper, asshole.

Nap Ghost

Gwaihir posted:

That's also why backing in to caps is important so that you can instantly escape when the MINE MINE MINE MINE crew reveals itself, vs being stuck making a giant loop like a big idiot and losing most of your health or your life. Typically a radar cruiser that wants to radar a cap will hit it the INSTANT they have coverage on the cap (when it's being contested) and no further, so when you can just jet out of the circle immediately that's enough to break vision.

I've been learning to do that recently, and it sure helps. Especially in something with good turret angles like a Jutland, since I can still drop a few shots while zipping out.
With French DD's I like just brushing the edge of the cap to see who bites, and hoping that I can zip away fast enough.

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Yeah, backing into caps and facing an easy escape route is one of the first lessons I learned, but I'm still struggling. It might just be that the Öland is a tricky bote to play, but I feel weak in almost every situation. Going toe to toe with enemy destroyers is tough because the guns aren't amazing, I don't have a lot of utility, and my torpedoes hit for so little that I can't really even yolo anyone that gets too close.

I've also tried to play the Lightning, but that thing also has its own problems. Insanely bad AA, short ranged torpedoes and no heals. I've had some success sniffing out DDs who figured they were safe in their smokescreens with hydro, and occasionally blapping people with torps, but I still think I'm not getting the thing.

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




The Lightning is pretty good and getting good in it really helps when the Jutland and Daring are pretty straight upgrades on it.

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Der Shovel posted:

Yeah, backing into caps and facing an easy escape route is one of the first lessons I learned, but I'm still struggling. It might just be that the Öland is a tricky bote to play, but I feel weak in almost every situation. Going toe to toe with enemy destroyers is tough because the guns aren't amazing, I don't have a lot of utility, and my torpedoes hit for so little that I can't really even yolo anyone that gets too close.

I've also tried to play the Lightning, but that thing also has its own problems. Insanely bad AA, short ranged torpedoes and no heals. I've had some success sniffing out DDs who figured they were safe in their smokescreens with hydro, and occasionally blapping people with torps, but I still think I'm not getting the thing.

Oland is designed for torping from longer range (but as with anything, you hit more the closer you are). The guns are pretty good for tier 8 so if someone repairs a flood you can try to set them on fire, but you have to be careful using guns since you have no tools to survive while shooting in the open.

Lightning is a smoke gunboat. Torpedoes aren't your main weapon, and all but about four DDs in the game (all of which are in the EU tree) have insanely bad AA so it's not really a weakness. Even the DDs with the best AA will still die to a CV unless it eats an astronomical quanitity of flak. You have good enough concealment that in the absence of a CV, you can try to play aggressively early and take out the enemy DD before you smoke up and farm damage.

Darkrenown
Jul 18, 2012
please give me anything to talk about besides the fact that democrats are allowing millions of americans to be evicted from their homes
I met a sov BB model called "Al Sov Rossiya", tier 9. Never seen or heard of it, new coal ship maybe?

Hegel Exercises
Apr 25, 2019

Too fair to worship, too divine to love...

Part the Wave 3 Azure Lane tie in. From what I understand its a base hull Sovetsky Soyuz.

Is there any room in the clan by chance? The pubbie one I'm in was getting way too sweaty. Like I'll do some casual clan battles but I was also low-key carried a few of the matches and I'm an extremely aggressively average player. I'm not doing a mandatory 3 hour training room session. Girl bye.

Also this video has been helping me cope with ranked. Play it in the queue anytime I take Big Mammy out. A drat love letter to this ship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwrckyOSEns&t=302s

Hegel Exercises fucked around with this message at 02:23 on Jul 28, 2020

CitizenKain
May 27, 2001

That was Gary Cooper, asshole.

Nap Ghost
I remembered today that I'd bought a Minotaur at some point in the past, and I don't know why. I've played 6 games in it, and disliked everyone of them, so why keep it. Its a worse Neptune, in a game where being a thin skinned ship is a death sentence with the number of high tier rail-gun style ships.

FatCow
Apr 22, 2002
I MAP THE FUCK OUT OF PEOPLE

Hegel Exercises posted:

Part the Wave 3 Azure Lane tie in. From what I understand its a base hull Sovetsky Soyuz.

Is there any room in the clan by chance? The pubbie one I'm in was getting way too sweaty. Like I'll do some casual clan battles but I was also low-key carried a few of the matches and I'm an extremely aggressively average player. I'm not doing a mandatory 3 hour training room session. Girl bye.

Also this video has been helping me cope with ranked. Play it in the queue anytime I take Big Mammy out. A drat love letter to this ship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwrckyOSEns&t=302s

If there isnt we'll boot someone inactive. Apply and drop a note in discord.

Hazdoc
Nov 8, 2012

Muscovy Ducks are a large tropical breed, famous for their lean and extremely flavorful meat.

Hazduck!

~SMcD

Hegel Exercises posted:

Part the Wave 3 Azure Lane tie in. From what I understand its a base hull Sovetsky Soyuz.

Is there any room in the clan by chance? The pubbie one I'm in was getting way too sweaty. Like I'll do some casual clan battles but I was also low-key carried a few of the matches and I'm an extremely aggressively average player. I'm not doing a mandatory 3 hour training room session. Girl bye.

Also this video has been helping me cope with ranked. Play it in the queue anytime I take Big Mammy out. A drat love letter to this ship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwrckyOSEns&t=302s

theres room and plenty of inactive goons to boot if there isnt

NTRabbit
Aug 15, 2012

i wear this armour to protect myself from the histrionics of hysterical women

bitches




Jagged a 2100 base xp 100k torpedo damage game in Yugumo with 4 hits on a Shokaku launched just before it sank me, which followed not long later by 2300 base xp games in Fletcher and Lo Yang with lots of kills/caps/fires/torp hits finally netted my Odin. The Yugumo game saved me from having to grind out 120 cits/fires on US/French BBs, which was the easiest option left.

NTRabbit fucked around with this message at 14:48 on Jul 28, 2020

toadee
Aug 16, 2003

North American Turtle Boy Love Association

CitizenKain posted:

I remembered today that I'd bought a Minotaur at some point in the past, and I don't know why. I've played 6 games in it, and disliked everyone of them, so why keep it. Its a worse Neptune, in a game where being a thin skinned ship is a death sentence with the number of high tier rail-gun style ships.

In what strange world of yours is Minotaur, which is a strictly better Neptune, worse than Neptune?

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



CitizenKain posted:

I remembered today that I'd bought a Minotaur at some point in the past, and I don't know why.

Agreed. The Minotaur was my first T10 and it's also my least played. Maybe I should try playing it as a radar Mino instead of smoke Mino even though it's suboptimal for solo randoms, but at least it might be a bit more fun.

Then again, maybe if I went back to it now that I know a bit more about playing cruisers, I might get better results out of it v:confused:v

E:

James Garfield posted:

Oland is designed for torping from longer range (but as with anything, you hit more the closer you are). The guns are pretty good for tier 8 so if someone repairs a flood you can try to set them on fire, but you have to be careful using guns since you have no tools to survive while shooting in the open.

Yeah, I think the problem is ultimately that I don't know how to use torps effectively. I tend to miss a lot more than I hit, which combined with the low damage Swedish torps, means I don't just do that much damage in my Öland. And of course this is another problem that becomes larger as I go up tiers, because ships are faster and more maneuverable, and players generally start having a clue so you can't just land max range torps on a full broadside König aynmore.

quote:

You have good enough concealment that in the absence of a CV, you can try to play aggressively early and take out the enemy DD before you smoke up and farm damage.

Is the Lightning's smoke really that good for damage farming? It's got such a short duration that I figure it's better to use it to disengage when poo poo hits the fan, or to finish off a DD who is in hydro range / otherwise detected.

Shaman Tank Spec fucked around with this message at 15:31 on Jul 28, 2020

Hegel Exercises
Apr 25, 2019

Too fair to worship, too divine to love...

FatCow posted:

If there isnt we'll boot someone inactive. Apply and drop a note in discord.

Will do, once my cool down period is up.

I'm down for clan battles/divving up, but I mainly like the bonus materials and the Friday mission things :kiddo:

Der Shovel posted:

Is the Lightning's smoke really that good for damage farming? It's got such a short duration that I figure it's better to use it to disengage when poo poo hits the fan, or to finish off a DD who is in hydro range / otherwise detected.

My understanding is that you smoke up, set a few fires, reposition and repeat. I really like the RN DD's. They're such spectacular assholes if you can pull it off right. I think only Jutland and Daring get the improved AP but don't neglect shooting AP at broadside ships if you can, the damage adds up and the quick smokes let you reposition really easy. I know I can mulch things pretty effectively in the Daring if they give me a flat surface.

Oh I also find that being a mid to late game DD hunter is satisfying, not many can outgun you and the hydro lets you avoid torps.

Hegel Exercises fucked around with this message at 15:39 on Jul 28, 2020

toadee
Aug 16, 2003

North American Turtle Boy Love Association

Radar Mino sucks now. There's a billion other things out there that will spot DDs and your AA is dogshit so not having smoke to avoid being harassed by planes is essential. Also because of planes, firing behind islands becomes trickier.

Just take smoke, move to a spot where someone is going to push within 15km of in the midst of doing a turn out, pop smoke, and instantly you have 30-40k of AP damage. Do that 4 times and you have 120-160k and a couple kills, every game. Minotaur just shits damage, it can't look at another ship for more than 4 seconds without doing at least 8k.

Der Shovel posted:

Is the Lightning's smoke really that good for damage farming? It's got such a short duration that I figure it's better to use it to disengage when poo poo hits the fan, or to finish off a DD who is in hydro range / otherwise detected.

You farm damage by looking at a target, when it DCPs, either from one of your torps or something else, wait 5-10 seconds, pop a smoke, light a fire or two, then move away. Instant 20k damage on a BB.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



toadee posted:

You farm damage by looking at a target, when it DCPs, either from one of your torps or something else, wait 5-10 seconds, pop a smoke, light a fire or two, then move away. Instant 20k damage on a BB.

Hmm, definitely worth trying. I guess it's time to slap on the +fire chance flags! Cheers for the tip!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply