|
Amnistar posted:Fair on the lack of additional cases outside of SnG. I'm not spending a lot of effort pushing other cases right now because SnG's flip will heavily influence any case I make. As it stands right now I don't like Rarity, Sci and Tpink. i have no real desire to spend time building case on the three of them though, because SnG's flip will heavily define my views on their actions. Capitalisation in Amin’s post is hella suss
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 13:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 02:05 |
|
|
SHALASHASKA HAWKE posted:Capitalisation in Amin’s post is hella suss I'm on the laptop instead of the phone.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 13:08
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:I'm on the laptop instead of the phone. what’s your posting font?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 13:21
|
|
|
Comic Sans Content
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 13:27
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Comic Sans Content
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 13:32
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Comic Sans Content just Sans Content.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 14:11
|
|
|
it’s true I’m as thick as a brick making GBS threads
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 17:32
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I'm not gonna vote him today over Toal or SNG or nothing but Gaspy's moved down a couple tiers on the Lumpenlist that's for sure since fuckin’ when are you so down to vote SNG today? Also, Gaspy is scummy as gently caress, who refuses to answer questions based on their own criteria for finding scum? “Just let me make it up, stfu.” Also, Tommu, can we please get some kind of punishment for lurking? Taste hasn’t made a single game related post, Hawke has barely made a single game related post. Why is this okay.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 17:36
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:since fuckin’ when are you so down to vote SNG today? Since like, the post where I voted him, god
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 17:57
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Hm I guess it isn't actually out of the question for SNG to pull some crazy claim gambit. He did manage to win people over for a surprisingly long time after he D1 dayvidged me just by playing up what a poor confused and scared newbie he was! Bifauxnen posted:Anyway, SNG does seem like a good road to go down today, but I sure am all ears for whatever Toal's saving up for later This reads as hollow and artificial to me, in that order.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:01
|
|
|
6 hours to go, I think SNG is the best option. Would vote Bif or Rarity too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:16
|
|
|
My preferred picks today are Gaspy and Toalpaz
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:22
|
|
|
SNG is a bad option Asphyxious is a good option Let’s execute Asphyxious: loads of people think he’s scummy, but seemingly not quite enough to vote for him at the moment I’ll try to post more, but currently still celebrating my wife’s birthday and drinking through my hangover, should be better during the week, as I’ll be posting instead of concentrating on conference calls
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:22
|
|
|
For the record, Sandwolf didn’t address my case on him at all.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:24
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:Fair on the lack of additional cases outside of SnG. I'm not spending a lot of effort pushing other cases right now because SnG's flip will heavily influence any case I make. As it stands right now I don't like Rarity, Sci and Tpink. i have no real desire to spend time building case on the three of them though, because SnG's flip will heavily define my views on their actions. Sandwolf posted:SNG I glazed over your cases, give me the “attack” version of your case on TPink Sandwolf posted:
Toalpaz posted:That being said, at this point in the conversation even if we miss scum we really need to remove sand navy guy. All of these people are currently pushing that the only reasonable option is to lunch me, even if I'm town, and wont case or engage with others until I'm mislunched and flip. Toal was brazen enough to say it straight out. This is dripping with scum. I'd hate to be speculative but after I flip these three need to be addressed ASAP. Or, because that's NOT the only option, we vote for someone with a greater likelyhood of being scum than 50% of my voter base thinking "poo poo hes likely to be town, lets kill him and see what happens though and I'm not playing til he's gone! *crosses arms*" Epsilon Plus posted:
I agree. This is exactly whats happening, and I fear they are gonna get their wish.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:32
|
|
|
Would be real cool if beet, Hal, Grid and Eps could tell us who they want to vote today
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:36
|
|
|
I mean you admit to being at the kill, and also your jail having no effect. When pressed about the reason why you said it was obvious that Hum was a power role, and scum must have known it was obvious too. I think that was a lie because it isn't obvious hum was a power role, and your whole mythologizing about hum saving you reads like a fake rationalization workshopped at night with your scum team.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:38
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:I mean you admit to being at the kill, and also your jail having no effect. Toal. If I was Scum. I would not say I visited Hum. There is no benefit to that, over the other VTs I coulda just claimed. if Hum wasnt an obvious PR, which I think he was, that doesnt mean I'm scum. And this is too stupid a bunch of hoops Id have to jump through, with no dang support, at all, for me to have a whole scumteam cheering me on. Its ludicrous, and I'd have called a scumbro out for this immediately for jeopardizing the entire game by becoming a polarizing fixture on Day freakin 2. Being completely open and transparent, after YOU said how I'd have to justify all of my actions yesterday, is not scummy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 18:45
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2  sandnavyguy (4): Amnistar, Asphyxious, Sandwolf, Bifauxnen, Rarity (2): SHALASHASKA HAWKE, t a s t e Asphyxious (2): Scientastic, Rarity tpink (1): sandnavyguy Sandwolf (1): Asphyxious Toalpaz (1): Bifauxnen, Rarity, Gridlocked (0): sandnavyguy, t a s t e (0): SHALASHASKA HAWKE, Not Voting (4): Epsilon Plus, Gridlocked, Hal Incandenza, hambeetWith 15 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is August 24th, 2020 at 10 a.m. AEST -- that's in about 5 hours, 53 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:06
|
|
|
sandnavyguy posted:Toal. If I was Scum. I would not say I visited Hum. There is no benefit to that, over the other VTs I coulda just claimed. From the perspective of scum team member who already claimed jailer, you would have to announce your targets anyways to town. Doing the NK gives you plausible deniability, and is a decent play. It also obscures the game by creating fake possible scum team powers.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:14
|
|
|
but if we’re at this stage then I should actually move my vote somewhere it should count, and as gaspy already stated, though I’m concerned they didn’t actually tell us their maxim thing, sandwolf has been willfully blind or twisting my case and posts this entire time. Especially the whole performative, “what was your case again?” Thing. ##vote sandwolf
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:15
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:From the perspective of scum team member who already claimed jailer, you would have to announce your targets anyways to town. Doing the NK gives you plausible deniability, and is a decent play. It also obscures the game by creating fake possible scum team powers. Also you would have no support because of all of the attention on you day one and two. You would taint anyone directly interacting with you in obvious ways. That's why the fact that people aren't picking up your case again, despite all of the attention d1 and d2 is wack to me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:17
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:From the perspective of scum team member who already claimed jailer, you would have to announce your targets anyways to town. Doing the NK gives you plausible deniability, and is a decent play. It also obscures the game by creating fake possible scum team powers. That’s a very very risky strat though and I’m a very cautious player. Hell I didn’t even feel comfortable laying down a vote til near the end of D1. I did t vote for you toal cause I feel you may be a misguided town, but seriously, I’m not that much of a risk taker.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:17
|
|
|
sandnavyguy posted:That’s a very very risky strat though and I’m a very cautious player. Hell I didn’t even feel comfortable laying down a vote til near the end of D1. I did t vote for you toal cause I feel you may be a misguided town, but seriously, I’m not that much of a risk taker. Self-proclaimed meta defences are the worst
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:19
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Self-proclaimed meta defences are the worst Yes but it’s not like anyone’s gonna bring it up for me. My team are the townies trying to mislunch me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:24
|
|
|
toal, respond to this question with a singular gif and no additional text pls are you scum?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:44
|
|
|
##vote toal
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:47
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:For the record, Sandwolf didn’t address my case on him at all. I’m sorry? I didn’t feel it was particularly persuasive since you were trying to stretch one post to fit a pretty insanely specific motivation.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:49
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Self-proclaimed meta defences are the worst It’s 80% of what SNG has done today
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:50
|
|
|
you hate to see it
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 19:52
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:I’m sorry? I didn’t feel it was particularly persuasive since you were trying to stretch one post to fit a pretty insanely specific motivation. really? O Sandwolf posted:Also, to Hawke’s point about “why is no one defending SNG if he’s on a scumteam?” (Which is already a weak argument) there HAVE been several people who have been defending SNG (Rarity) or ignoring it in a discomforting way (Bif). n Sandwolf posted:SNG you did give contingencies but I agree with Amni that you’ve spent a lot more energy trying to convince us not to lunch ya rather than trying to find scum among people voting you, if you feel there are scum pushing your lunch. e Sandwolf posted:Well I wasn't particularly swayed by it SNG but it's not awful. But it's hard for me to take seriously when I think you're scum. P Sandwolf posted:SNG I glazed over your cases, give me the “attack” version of your case on TPink o Sandwolf posted:By your own admission, we should be lunching you! s Sandwolf posted:
t Sandwolf posted:Yeah but SNG if you’ve already demonstrated to not be much of a protective role, so you’re almost more like just a RBer, no? Bolding mine on responses that are disengenuous, baffling, or just a put down. Yeah, I think you've been doing the twist for a long time today. Each of these was a response to an argument I made, intentionally twisting my reasoning to be invalid. your constant rebukes framed as "sorry, but"s are frustrating. and if your plan succeeds and I flip, I want you to be the first of your scum buddies to go, so this post is a useful compendium of the multiple flawed arguments you've made.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
sandnavyguy posted:That’s a very very risky strat though and I’m a very cautious player. Hell I didn’t even feel comfortable laying down a vote til near the end of D1. I did t vote for you toal cause I feel you may be a misguided town, but seriously, I’m not that much of a risk taker. This is BS. The last game I played with you when you were scum, you vigged Bif who in that game was one of the towniest players. It was a big risk and you did it anyway.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:49
|
|
|
Bif, I know you voted SNG. But aside from that, you really didn’t engage with him and the case on him. I find that very strange and inconsistent with how you’re approaching other players. Why the different approach?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:50
|
|
|
Sng same prompt I have to toalpaz
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:55
|
|
|
Scientastic posted:SNG is a bad option Sci, do you believe SNG’s claim and that chain of improbabilities? Why is he a bad option?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:57
|
|
|
If (when) SNG flips scum, I’m likely voting Bif next.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 20:59
|
|
|
Are you disagreeing with how I characterized your scum play last game?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 21:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 02:05 |
|
|
tpink posted:Are you disagreeing with how I characterized your scum play last game? This was in response to taste. But yes. Last time I gemmed and hawed because I was given a big as scum D1 and wanted to take out a townie. My gambit then was a very high risk, but it’s different because I was able to sweep it under the rug as frustration. This is completely different. If you check Cuomo time you can see that I’m very cautious as town. I’m acting the same as Cuomo, not Food. And it baffles me you’d compare the two when I got crap for it all game that game about how I wasn’t acting like I did as town, which uh, I wasn’t. Because I was scum then. This game? I’m town.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2020 21:05
|
|