|
the first movie looked at the human/replicant stuff way more artfully, which is why the rehash of that same question was so boneheaded the second time around. Turns out those memories of ships burning off the tannhauser gate were just pre-renders, roy!
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 05:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 09:19 |
|
|
Schremp Howard posted:Weirdly I feel like doing reverts is the one time I don’t like the triggers of the dual shock 4 and prefer the shoulder buttons from the PS2. Having it as a solid button felt better I think. But other than that I have no complaints. I still play two/three/thug pretty regularly and can run through them like nothing, but there’s enough of a learning curve (or maybe the stat adjustments?) that I can’t just immediately dominate the remake. It’s fantastic. If you want to see what having max stats is like, in the online multiplayer your stats are maxed out if they aren’t already. Unless I misunderstood what hours meant by ‘Stat adjustments’, but I assumed you were wondering if the learning curve or not having max stats was the reason you weren’t dominating already.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 05:40
|
|
|
Bladerunner felt like a visual or cinematic poem, if that makes sense. That didn’t carry over to 2049 for me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 05:42
|
|
|
Thanks for the Tony Hawk help y'all!
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 05:43
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:Bladerunner felt like a visual or cinematic poem, if that makes sense. That didn’t carry over to 2049 for me. If BR was a poem about the tension of being a cat lying in wait for prey, 2049 is a 6 year old missing the point and asking when this dumb book gets to the action.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 05:46
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:If BR was a poem about the tension of being a cat lying in wait for prey, 2049 is a 6 year old missing the point and asking when this dumb book gets to the action. lmao this is just nonsense
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 05:55
|
|
|
Tell me, Will; are you the poet, or the book?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:04
|
|
|
The scene in 2049 where he cuts that woman open just to watch her die...I've never known why it needed to be there so badly, but it makes me think twice about watching the movie again.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:06
|
|
|
Arist posted:lmao this is just nonsense at least it's visually alluring nonsense, it deserves credit for the visuals.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:09
|
|
FAUXTON posted:it's blade runner fanfiction, plotwise. In the first movie, Deckard running off with Rachel was basically a "happily ever after" thing, not some unresolved mystery. The question of Deckard being replicant was supposed to be unanswered as an artistic device. Nah, it's a sequel to Bladerunner: The Final Cut, which was the original director Ridley Scott doing what he wanted to do with the movie without the studio interference and inferior special effects that marred the original film. It's not actually a sequel to the original inferior cinematic release. It's really worth seeing. It also really cleaned up the lighting on the home version which alone makes the original movie far more watchable.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:15
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:the first movie looked at the human/replicant stuff way more artfully, which is why the rehash of that same question was so boneheaded the second time around. Turns out those memories of ships burning off the tannhauser gate were just pre-renders, roy! I don't get the impression that you understood this film, or even the original for that matter
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:35
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:The scene in 2049 where he cuts that woman open just to watch her die...I've never known why it needed to be there so badly, but it makes me think twice about watching the movie again. You...don't? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:55
|
|
|
drat y’all REALLY gonna make me watch a whole Bladerunner just so I can see who is dumb and who is smart and who is Beanpole
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:57
|
|
|
I should probably get around to watching br2049
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 06:58
|
|
|
The first movie is legitimately one of the best films ever made. Just perfect in its storytelling and hugely influential to everything that came after. If you're planning to play CP2077 then you might as well see what kicked off the entire genre. And most importantly, it's under 2 hours long! Editing people, it's good.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:01
|
|
|
Bautista's was my favorite character
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:01
|
|
|
BeanpolePeckerwood posted:You...don't?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:02
|
|
|
I feel that every Hollywood director who makes a movie over the universally accepted human cinematic attention span of Exactly Two Hours should be forced to begin their film discussing why they are so great, so cool, so interesting that they are not beholden to good editing and should insist on wasting your time instead of getting on with it!
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:04
|
|
|
BeanpolePeckerwood posted:I don't get the impression that you understood this film, or even the original for that matter If "understanding" is thinking there's artful mastery in spending the bulk of the movie watching ryan gosling go full qanon over his own fake backstory then I'm fuckin' dying to hear your interpretation
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:05
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:Bautista's was my favorite character Bautista being actually a good actor is kinda impressive seeing as how every other WWE actor turned out to be He’s also in Dune
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:05
|
|
|
I was underwhelmed by Blade Runner (the orig) until I saw it in a theatre. I mean obviously most movies are a better experience that way, but it makes a huge difference for that particular one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:06
|
|
|
Jared Leto is the worst part of that movie.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:06
|
|
|
exquisite tea posted:I feel that every Hollywood director who makes a movie over the universally accepted human cinematic attention span of Exactly Two Hours should be forced to begin their film discussing why they are so great, so cool, so interesting that they are not beholden to good editing and should insist on wasting your time instead of getting on with it! Just @ Scorsese next time
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:07
|
|
|
lunar detritus posted:Jared Leto is the worst part of that movie. he's like inverse sean bean, every movie he's in dies
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:08
|
|
|
The worst part of BR2049 is that it's 90 minutes of story stretched across 165, a problem which is efficiently solved by removing Jared Leto.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:08
|
|
|
Bust Rodd posted:drat y’all REALLY gonna make me watch a whole Bladerunner just so I can see who is dumb and who is smart and who is Beanpole i'm beanpole
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:10
|
|
|
if you didn't go into the movie knowing K was a replicant based solely on the fact that they cast ryan gosling for him then lmao
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:11
|
|
|
exquisite tea posted:The first movie is legitimately one of the best films ever made. Just perfect in its storytelling and hugely influential to everything that came after. If you're planning to play CP2077 then you might as well see what kicked off the entire genre. the final cut specifically is the one worth watching
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:13
|
|
|
Bust Rodd posted:Just @ Scorsese next time I went to wikipedia just now and even Gangs of New York, the kind of sweeping historical epic that I associate with the more indulgent side of Scorsese, is 167 minutes long. Meanwhile loving Avengers Endgame is over 3 hours. lmao comic book movies are trash.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:15
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:if you didn't go into the movie knowing K was a replicant based solely on the fact that they cast ryan gosling for him then lmao what the gently caress are you on about
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:17
|
|
|
BitBasher posted:Nah, it's a sequel to Bladerunner: The Final Cut, which was the original director Ridley Scott doing what he wanted to do with the movie without the studio interference and inferior special effects that marred the original film. It's not actually a sequel to the original inferior cinematic release. It's really worth seeing. It also really cleaned up the lighting on the home version which alone makes the original movie far more watchable. I dont think any fans of the original film are arguing that point on behalf of the awful theatrical cut  I do agree all the ties to the original feel weirdly fan fictiony, like retconning Rachel from being 'just' an android who is nevertheless capable of love into literally The Robot Virgin Mary feels really hackneyed, and it's made worse by the fact that you can almost feel how much the director enjoys K's personal problems before sighing and filming the scene of blind Jared Leto rambling about whether Deckard is a replicant or not.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:17
|
|
|
I have seen every single Marvel movie except for endgame and honestly only remember the Spider-Mans and Ragnarok. I sort of remember Iron Man but that movie came out twelve years ago. Oh I guess I remember Black Panther but only for the CGI rhinos and how insanely mad I was that they put in a white CIA agent as one of the good guys, I couldn’t loving believe it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:20
|
|
|
Yeah that's basically a huge problem with BR2049, the whole arc of the first film was Deckard coming to realize how unimportant EVERYTHING was and so rewriting him into one half of the Replicant Messiah was, *rolling hands motion* missing the point.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:20
|
|
|
there was a time (still is a time??) where the theatrical cut of Blade Runner was the only one that was streaming in Australia. what the gently caress lead them to that decision.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:23
|
|
|
i'd watch a trashy remake of the theatrical cut, or something in that style, if it was built that way from the ground up
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:26
|
|
|
lunar detritus posted:Jared Leto is the worst part of that movie. That part was intended for David Bowie but he was unavailable for obvious reasons.  BitBasher posted:Nah, it's a sequel to Bladerunner: The Final Cut, which was the original director Ridley Scott doing what he wanted to do with the movie without the studio interference and inferior special effects that marred the original film. It's not actually a sequel to the original inferior cinematic release. It's really worth seeing. It also really cleaned up the lighting on the home version which alone makes the original movie far more watchable. The only shot I disagreed with was the go-go dancers in the hockey masks, the lighting on that is still whack. If you want to go nuts on Blade Runner read Future Noir, the author was on set covering the production for a magazine and got insane access to everything while there, and has gone on to basically make a career of knowing more about Blade Runner than anyone else in history. Midjack fucked around with this message at 07:30 on Sep 11, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:27
|
|
|
I watched the theatrical cut of Blade Runner for the first time after like a decade of watching the director's cut and that voiceover was loving hilarious. It was like watching the RiffTrax version of the movie.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:27
|
|
|
it's real bad
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:28
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:I watched the theatrical cut of Blade Runner for the first time after like a decade of watching the director's cut and that voiceover was loving hilarious. It was like watching the RiffTrax version of the movie. It’s dumb as hell.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 09:19 |
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:I watched the theatrical cut of Blade Runner for the first time after like a decade of watching the director's cut and that voiceover was loving hilarious. It was like watching the RiffTrax version of the movie. I don't know if its apocrypha but they say Ford was so vehemently against the bad narration he did it as badly as possible but they still used it
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2020 07:32
|
|