|
It's not in the patch notes but a dev post further down the thread says it's fixed.
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 07:12 |
|
|
hopeandjoy posted:I don't see any notes about adjusting the AI under female-dominated religions, so it seems issues with matrilineal marriage are still a thing. https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/ck3-dev-diary-42-1-1-patch-notes.1428193/?prdxDevPosts=1
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:04
|
|
|
Dwesa posted:Filter for dev responses only, it shows several responses on this topic That response is interesting. I suppose it didn’t even occur to me that “dynastic survival” is the game mechanic and not a thing characters care about. The patch note re: text explaining that your knight personally didn’t kill so many people was funny. It will unfortunately change the way I think about my knights, as I view them as murder machines.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:13
|
|
|
My king kicked the bucket and my realm got divided under his two daughters. Inherited almost 2k gold and all the MAA so I should be fine. Kinda sucks that I get -10 opinion just because I'm a woman ruler. Is there no way to fix this under Christianity? I don't want to start a new faith, I like that the pope gives me money all the time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:16
|
|
|
Trevor Hale posted:That response is interesting. I suppose it didn’t even occur to me that “dynastic survival” is the game mechanic and not a thing characters care about. Yeah, same. That said, it should make playing with gender inverted rules feel better as a player, which is the most important thing imo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:18
|
|
|
Highlighting some really good stuff in those patch notes I haven't seen others mention:quote:- Winning a Great Holy War as the attacker now refills all the levies and garrisons in the counties taken From the replies: quote:Yes the [issue where Crusaders constantly converted to Islam] should be gone. Excited to give it a spin later. PittTheElder fucked around with this message at 16:23 on Sep 28, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:21
|
|
Yes, it's like a lava lamp.
|
Great patch notes, but it seems I'll still be setting realms with equal rights to male preferential inheritance if that dev post is anything to go by.quote:- Sternly told the AI that when it's trying to support the player, it shouldn't try to retreat just because the enemy is coming right at it (except if it hasn't yet arrived at the player's location) Hell yeah.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:26
|
|
|
quote:- The AI now only wants to spend money on recruiting guest claimants that have claims on bordering realms Border gore sinners REPENT!
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:30
|
|
|
Didn't see anything about the clan government/lay clergy 'low noble' button giving cities to clan rulers instead of republican rulers. Once you got the wrong kind of ruler for cities you couldn't fix it by revoking anymore. This made cities make no money or levies. On a related note, in my last game me and my vassals, and fellow vassals would randomly flip between being clan or feudal. I just have no clue what makes you either because I wasn't muslim. Found this good fix in bugfixes: quote:- Titles with title-specific succession laws (E.G., Male Preference) that match your realm law are no longer considered separate when calculating partition splits, so they'll no longer always go to your primary heir unless the law is actually distinct from your realm laws
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:30
|
|
|
man, this patch is gonna own. strong mongols, vikings that don't grab random pieces of coastline everywhere, a dynasty tree that you can actually move around what more could you actually want
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:44
|
|
|
Katana_Warrior posted:man, this patch is gonna own. strong mongols, vikings that don't grab random pieces of coastline everywhere, a dynasty tree that you can actually move around Universities that provide an education?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:51
|
|
|
Tournaments would be nice!
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 16:54
|
|
|
Katana_Warrior posted:what more could you actually want Agreed it looks a great patch, but I didn't see anything about it letting you see a character's approval of a third party.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 17:44
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Universities that provide an education? They do?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 17:50
|
|
|
CK patch notes are always fun. quote:
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 17:51
|
|
|
quote:- The Renown gain from alive dynasty members is now capped at 2/month (100 alive members) This one was well deserved, it was way too easy to get 100+ renown per month in the mid-late game just by having thousands of dynasty members. Seems to encourage you actually spreading your dynasty around to other independent realms, and should make it more tempting to push your relatives claims, even if they might not end as a direct vassal.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 17:56
|
|
|
quote:- Children can no longer start a literalist debate I kind of like these though.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 17:58
|
|
|
e: awwww I just realized this patch wasn't actually live.Broken Cog posted:This one was well deserved, it was way too easy to get 100+ renown per month in the mid-late game just by having thousands of dynasty members. Seems to encourage you actually spreading your dynasty around to other independent realms, and should make it more tempting to push your relatives claims, even if they might not end as a direct vassal. Yeah and this has actually been super fun to do, particularly in the tribal start. But then the AI's inability to manage it's realm usually means they collapse super quickly to internal rebellion and get devoured immediately. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:13
|
|
|
quote:A Head of Faith will no longer forsake their religion if your spouse is charming enough
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:17
|
|
|
quote:The Pope can no longer publicly accept cannibalism Gotta love paradox
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:18
|
|
|
 ck patch notes give dwarf fortress patch notes a run for their metaphorical moneye: wait, that means the Pope can still secretely be a cannibal lmao. loving Borgias...
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:18
|
|
|
PittTheElder posted:e: awwww I just realized this patch wasn't actually live. Tomorrow sometime
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:20
|
|
|
Getting to the end of my first CK3 ironman run, starting as Dynasty Doukas in the Byzantine Empire (duke-level). I got really lucky with a couple of things in the game. Once I was able to create the Kingdom of Pontus, the Byzantine Emperor granted me a huge duchy. Of course, this came with it's own set of problems as that vassal was strong as poo poo and I had to appease him by putting his extremely lovely self on my council (and none of his heirs were ever any better, so lots of negative events from some 5 skill councilor). Later on, I became easily the largest and most powerful vassal, which meant I could serve on the council whenever I wanted either by hook or demand (and later by feudal contract). The Emperor struck out west and conquered West Francia in one holy war and then granted me every county he got. Unfortunately for him, I was just finishing a claim throne scheme and that additional power allowed me to be Emperor with little problem. Since then, my only real opponent was the Arabian Empire, but we were too closely matched for them to come stepping, so I just waited until they had some internal strife and snatched up all the holy sites while they were distracted. Also, for some reason, they were very reticent to create MAA regiments. Shitload of levies that would just get slaughtered by my professional armies. Started my own religion once I had the Pope cut down to size and had most of Europe under my rule. That made it really easy to have the religion supplant all the other christian ones. The feast tenet is really strong, but also has caused a majority of my rulers and vassals to die of being too fat. At least they die doing what they love. Unless there is some really drastic change, this will have been my most successful run in terms of territory expansion in either CK3 or CK2.   in case you're wondering, I'm 2 vassals over my limit atm.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:21
|
|
|
for a second there I thought the indian subcontinent had succesfully revived Paganism 
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:22
|
|
|
Trevor Hale posted:The patch note re: text explaining that your knight personally didn’t kill so many people was funny. It will unfortunately change the way I think about my knights, as I view them as murder machines. Aww, same. I was imagining a game of Dynasty Warriors playing out every in every battle. 1.1 patch looking real solid CK3 1.1 Patch Notes posted:- Added ethnicities for East African, South Indian and Slavic, and Arctic/Circumpolar Anyone dive enough into the DNA or character modeling systems to know what "ethnicities" means in this context? This was under the "Art" heading and I know those groups have their own cultures groups, so I assume this has something to do with character looks, right? Side question I seriously doubt anyone will know: Does CK3 have a robust enough portrait system to like, invent new ethnic looks whole-cloth? When CK2 added new portraits they were all done individually and by hand, obviously. I'm wondering if it's easier to add new ethnic groups in CK3 -- which would rule and I hope they tweak and differentiate lot of them as time goes on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:23
|
|
|
I'm still sad that they are keeping the inheritance the same. I don't want to keep murdering family members.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:30
|
|
|
anything in the patch notes about making the Feast sound effect less awful?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:31
|
|
|
quote:Fixed excommunication being available for faiths with Communion but non-spiritual heads Didn't realize this wasn't intended. Still seems like Communion is super strong due to indulgences. edit: oh here's another neat one: quote:You can now manage the focus of your children even if they're landed, as long as you're their liege GoodluckJonathan fucked around with this message at 18:35 on Sep 28, 2020 |
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:32
|
|
|
Trevor Hale posted:That response is interesting. I suppose it didn’t even occur to me that “dynastic survival” is the game mechanic and not a thing characters care about. I will simply continue to think of my knights as one man armies
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:32
|
|
|
quote:
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:33
|
|
|
Does being a Catholic allow you to push your second sons into the clergy (and thus disinherit them)?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:35
|
|
|
I am incredibly hyped for this patch. I was just playing a bit again over the weekend and feeling pretty bummed about several things that are about to be fixed, including the world not developing and becoming a walkover because nobody but me would upgrade castles.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:35
|
|
|
Is there a way to see what the exact sources of my renown, prestige and piety gain are? E.g. you have say 5 renown gain and click it and it says "sources: 2x independent kings, 70 dynasty members, 4 barons" etc
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:36
|
|
|
on the plus side I'm stoked about the AI being taught to dislike border gore as it should 
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:36
|
|
|
OctaMurk posted:Is there a way to see what the exact sources of my renown, prestige and piety gain are? E.g. you have say 5 renown gain and click it and it says "sources: 2x independent kings, 70 dynasty members, 4 barons" etc Tool tip on your renown in the header
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:42
|
|
|
OctaMurk posted:Is there a way to see what the exact sources of my renown, prestige and piety gain are? E.g. you have say 5 renown gain and click it and it says "sources: 2x independent kings, 70 dynasty members, 4 barons" etc you hover over the particular thing you want a breakdown until the tooltip goes solid than you can see exact amounts.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 18:56
|
|
|
How does the update work with games in progress? In any case I am glad I got to the primogeniture era before this, my title succession law abuse was out of control. I mean at this point the empire is stable enough that I could blow all the prestige making all the titles electoral but that's 
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 19:09
|
|
|
Josef bugman posted:I'm still sad that they are keeping the inheritance the same. There are some changes in there that should stop primary heirs losing so many counties - I'm hoping murder may be less necessary.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 19:11
|
|
|
oh the kidnap ruler strat got super nerfed, people posted the at war case but it's also been penalized across the board lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 19:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 07:12 |
|
|
Josef bugman posted:I'm still sad that they are keeping the inheritance the same. Are you not using the other coping mechanisms for partition? Or is it needing coping mechanisms you dislike? If it's the first, you can also use one or more of 1) disinheriting 2) celibacy perk 3) marrying off your children later in life so they don't have as many kids 4) conquering territory you can hand off to your kids so they get less of the ancestral lands 5) not forming new kingdoms/empires (only applies when you've moved away from confederate partition) Failing those, IME it tends to be fairly easy to press your claims on your siblings, so long as you keep the oldest most developed holdings. If it's the latter, then I don't have many good recommendations. The ERE and the Czechs have early single heir inheritance, but that rather limits the playing area. ...Hope that was actually helpful, and not just telling you stuff you already knew.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2020 19:21
|
|