|
Sandwolf posted:p sure he won his first in lylo so y’know we could rush Biaga or whatever
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:43 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 17:07 |
PMush Perfect posted:Don't be obtuse. that was a joke, Pmush
|
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:45 |
the person he defeated in lylo was me, Biaga already referenced it this game
|
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:46 |
|
Sandwolf posted:p sure he won his first in lylo so y’know we could rush Biaga or whatever what
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:50 |
|
oh
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:50 |
|
Sandwolf posted:that was a joke, Pmush
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:51 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:I disagree with Sqiggly's sus on amoeba for the reason of amoeba "not wanting to tie a vote down" in jest or otherwise, and find it odd that Squiggly didn't put down a serious vote on amoeba (assuming Sqiggly is serious about the sus as alluded to by the statement about killing joke phase). I think ##vote Squiggly is valid as much as a light case could argue on such a slow D1. Italics mine. You were vote #5 on Squiggs, just before me. Dick Bastardly posted:SNG's is clearly a joke vote. Obama me toos a vote but claims to believe that Squiggs is actually scum which is slightly better than Ceyton's vote. ##vote Dick
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:56 |
|
JOHN CENA posted:what is this Thanks for pointing this out btw
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:56 |
|
I have the rare, and momentary, positive k/d in mafia. I accept the futility of my existance.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2020 22:57 |
|
Biaga posted:First post after my vote I was actually vote 4 but nice try, your vote immediately proceeded me calling out squiggly’s scummy behaviour, I admit I should have voted for him then rather than after you but that’s just how I played it, I too am fairly new to this, or out of practice anyway. Attempted to counter accuse is also pretty scummy behaviour if i remember correctly.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:41 |
|
ObamaAkbar. posted:Attempted to counter accuse is also pretty scummy behaviour if i remember correctly.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 00:47 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:I also don't like this! This isn't OA's first game, I don't buy this "hmm, if I remember correctly, OMGUS is scummy " thing. I guess ObamaAkbar has played before but I am not really recalling... Also my motivator isn't working great, someone help me find the scum thanks
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:11 |
Hal Incandenza posted:I guess ObamaAkbar has played before but I am not really recalling... It’s probably one of: Biaga, OA, PMush, or Ceyton I think Pmush is being weird here
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:46 |
##vote PMush
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:47 |
|
I'd be down to vote either DB, SNG, or Biaga, who I can't come up with an acronym for.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 01:54 |
|
zzyzx posted:I'd be down to vote either DB, SNG, or Biaga, who I can't come up with an acronym for. Think you and I fall into the same realm.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:23 |
zzyzx’s acronym is CDX
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:41 |
|
cmon mox
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:44 |
|
wrong thread lol livewatching wrestling will do that
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:45 |
|
ObamaAkbar. posted:I was actually vote 4 but nice try, your vote immediately proceeded me calling out squiggly’s scummy behaviour, I admit I should have voted for him then rather than after you but that’s just how I played it, I too am fairly new to this, or out of practice anyway. You did, but my vote was not influenced by you. It was entirely influenced by his continued attacks on me and amoeba in the days previous. I think you and i just came to the same decision at the same time. Yes, you might have been 4th, but I was 3rd. You voted 2 minutes after I did. Taking your own logic, I think I have a stronger argument that my vote influenced you over your statement influencing me. The fact that 4 of your 5 posts in day 2 have been directed at accusing me is a lot more scummy than me attempting to counter accuse. See, I can make brash and unreasonable assumptions too. I just have the ability to accept that I was thrown off by Squig's revelation and that I am still a little lost on who to accuse at this point.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 02:45 |
|
Sandwolf posted:zzyzx’s acronym is CDX Will not vote for Sandwolf today.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 04:08 |
|
##vote DB
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 04:10 |
|
Ceyton posted:Italics mine. You were vote #5 on Squiggs, just before me. ##vote Dick [/quote] The difference is I thought squiggly could be scum for making contradictory statements (their reason for sus on amoeba being incongruent with their own play, specifically not voting someone they just sussed in a serious way.) You literally said Squiggly could be town but who cares because they are annoying. That is empirically anti-town behavior.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 04:32 |
|
##unvote
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 04:34 |
|
the quote is messed up but the "admittedly voting..." part is my quote and the part preceding it is Ceyton's (for clarification)
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 04:35 |
|
##vote ceyton (revoting to fix the whole quotation error tomfoolery)
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 04:38 |
|
Biaga posted:You did, but my vote was not influenced by you. It was entirely influenced by his continued attacks on me and amoeba in the days previous. I think you and i just came to the same decision at the same time. Yes, you might have been 4th, but I was 3rd. You voted 2 minutes after I did. Taking your own logic, I think I have a stronger argument that my vote influenced you over your statement influencing me. The fact that 4 of your 5 posts in day 2 have been directed at accusing me is a lot more scummy than me attempting to counter accuse. I think quibbling about the vote order when there was still 3 votes to hammer after mine hardly matters, I wasn’t influenced by your vote so much as I already felt he squiggly was scum and your post reminded me that yes I should put a vote to that suspicion, still well clear of a hammer and with plenty of time for them to come and defend themselves. Based on our interactions now I’m actually turning away from you being scum tbh, I still highly suspect DB however.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 06:04 |
|
Thinking about this on the way to work, nobody seems to be asking why Amoeba was targeted, if what people have said about his usual posting is true then he wasn’t the biggest threat. I’m sticking with the theory that it was attempted misdirection by scum based on his last post. This means that DB, who immediately jumped on the theory that Amoeba was onto something and is now laser focused on Ceyton for no real reason other than he voted for Squiggly with a weak justification on D1, is my prime suspect. ##vote Dick
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 07:12 |
don't like the vote on dick or any of the votes on dick sooOooo
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 08:00 |
|
And I don’t particularly like any of the votes on Ceyton, whether reversed or not.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 10:07 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:The difference is I thought squiggly could be scum for making contradictory statements (their reason for sus on amoeba being incongruent with their own play, specifically not voting someone they just sussed in a serious way.) I don't think what you said and what I said are all that different. They're both effectively "I publicly acknowledge it's a weak case, but I'm hopping on this bandwagon anyway LOL". Besides you also doing the thing you're accusing me of, it's specious reasoning anyway. It's impossible to have a firm logical case against anybody on D1. Whether it's said out loud or not, every D1 vote carries an assumption of "yeah it's flimsy justification, and balance of probabilities is that I'm railroading an innocent townie, buuuuut..." The difference between you and me is that you came blazing out of the gate after me on D2, using this as your primary argument.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 13:41 |
|
Ceyton posted:I don't think what you said and what I said are all that different. They're both effectively "I publicly acknowledge it's a weak case, but I'm hopping on this bandwagon anyway LOL". No, the actual difference to anyone who is reading the game is this: I gave a reason why I thought Squiggly was scum based on their style of posting. You literally threw your hands in the air and said "well, idk if squiggs is scum or not, but it doesn't matter because I want to policy vote them for being annoying". Of the two, your vote is worse by at least one order of magnitude.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 14:08 |
|
and forgive me for trying to figure a logical reason why scum would kill amoeba. yeah, totally scummy of me to take a flipped towns advice and re-read who they thought might be suspicious.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 14:12 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:and forgive me for trying to figure a logical reason why scum would kill amoeba. yeah, totally scummy of me to take a flipped towns advice and re-read who they thought might be suspicious. Except amoeba didn’t say anything that most people werent already thinking, that it was possible that scum participated in the rushed lunch. It seems incredibly unlikely to me that they would kill him based on that one post unless it was to make us think a certain way.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 14:44 |
|
thanks obama
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 14:48 |
|
the NK could've been random. I don't know what scum would want me to think by reading amoeba again, but in doing so, I made a connection. If there's a better case for sus than mine on ceyton I'll consider it.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 15:02 |
ObamaAkbar. posted:Except amoeba didn’t say anything that most people werent already thinking, that it was possible that scum participated in the rushed lunch. It seems incredibly unlikely to me that they would kill him based on that one post unless it was to make us think a certain way. *buzzer* wrong
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 17:27 |
I have personally been on at least four scum teams recently where we made at LEAST one (1) NK decision based on who was saying bad things we didn’t like during the day. I don’t know why amoeba was killed but DB looking into amoebas suspicions is as townie as it gets. Ceyton and Obama appear to be on the same team though.
|
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 17:28 |
|
Or you and DB are on the same team... seriously what amoeba said was barely anything. I also don’t really care what you say previous scum teams have done because it could be entirely made up nonsense for all we know.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 18:02 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 17:07 |
|
Sandwolf posted:I have personally been on at least four scum teams recently where we made at LEAST one (1) NK decision based on who was saying bad things we didn’t like during the day. I don’t know why amoeba was killed but DB looking into amoebas suspicions is as townie as it gets. Ceyton sparks my suspicion, so I think it safer to vote for him over Obama. He feels more like he is lashing out to prove his innocence, especially with that rapid refocus to dick. Regardless, feel more comfortable testing ceyton and following up with obama is needed - but I think he is townie.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2020 18:03 |