|
Klyith posted:
The only one I ever remember/need to use is the bookmark star *
|
# ? Oct 28, 2020 22:26 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 01:58 |
|
I’m afraid if I start using them, they’ll just vanish in some future usability update.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2020 03:39 |
|
I've been trying out Mozilla VPN, and sometimes it feels like my internet is slower with it turned on? Is it the VPN, or just my normal internet being lovely?
|
# ? Oct 29, 2020 22:09 |
|
SgtSteel91 posted:I've been trying out Mozilla VPN, and sometimes it feels like my internet is slower with it turned on? I think you just answered your own question 😛
|
# ? Oct 29, 2020 22:10 |
|
WattsvilleBlues posted:I think you just answered your own question 😛 Yeah, it always comes back to Comcast
|
# ? Oct 29, 2020 22:12 |
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:This is what I use with Violentmonkey: I use Stylish with this: code:
|
# ? Oct 30, 2020 04:40 |
|
SgtSteel91 posted:I've been trying out Mozilla VPN, and sometimes it feels like my internet is slower with it turned on? Sounds like this is something you can easily check yourself? Do an internet speed check (using e.g. fast.com) with the VPN on, and one with the VPN turned off, and compare the results.* For what it's worth, I also use Mullvad's VPN service (which is what the "Mozilla VPN" is really just reselling) and I do sometimes get slightly slower speeds with it than without. Not really on the level where it's noticable during daily browsing, though. * I should note that internet speed tests give you a look at your download and upload rate, but not other factors that might contribute to perceived "internet slowness", such as DNS resolution time. I'm not sure what the easiest way to check something like that would be, though.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2020 11:40 |
|
Big Witch Hat posted:(though I need to get around to disabling some of those because a certain green-on-black theme burns my eyes). I noticed that I get a split second of the old layout if I use a userscript for applying styles. also, I get the split-second-of-old-style thing too, except I don't use any userstyles it's a bummer, but not enough to bother looking into why it happens...
|
# ? Oct 30, 2020 19:12 |
|
SgtSteel91 posted:I've been trying out Mozilla VPN, and sometimes it feels like my internet is slower with it turned on? VPNs are almost always slower because they add more hops, very rarely they are faster because they have better peering with backbone networks or evade torrent throttling by your isp.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2020 03:02 |
|
There are also the rare cases where the "local" server at the exit node is faster than your actually local one - github in europe springs to mind. Something about data shaping on 4g mobile networks also apparently responds better to the single stream of vpn data, but I suspect that to be mostly theoretical. But yeah as a rule of thumb, sending all your traffic via a third party will make things slower. The best you can hope for is for it to not be noticeable.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2020 05:15 |
|
Ayin posted:you don't like amberpos? I think I'd like it if it was actually amber. #00FF00 on #000000 on an LCD isn't pleasant at all for me though. For user styles, I noticed I don't get the split second thing with Stylus, so I use that.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2020 09:05 |
|
Ublock origin seems to be losing the war against twitch. What usually happens is every month or so you got ads for a bit then it went back to blocking them. It seems like it's been not working for a while now.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2020 11:49 |
Jippa posted:Ublock origin seems to be losing the war against twitch. What usually happens is every month or so you got ads for a bit then it went back to blocking them. It seems like it's been not working for a while now.
|
|
# ? Nov 1, 2020 12:08 |
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:I'm pretty sure Twitch has switched to using EXT-X-DISCONTINUITY which is built into the HTTP Live Streaming RFC which means unless the video player chooses not to implement that part of the specification, ads are basically always going to get through? Well that sucks.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2020 12:16 |
|
Jippa posted:Ublock origin seems to be losing the war against twitch. What usually happens is every month or so you got ads for a bit then it went back to blocking them. It seems like it's been not working for a while now. It's blocking twitch ads for me today, although it didn't yesterday. Last month's wave did take longer to counter for some reason, but I figure that's the cat and mouse nature of this sort of thing. Sometimes the cat wins for a while.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2020 00:42 |
|
Freakazoid_ posted:It's blocking twitch ads for me today, although it didn't yesterday. Last month's wave did take longer to counter for some reason, but I figure that's the cat and mouse nature of this sort of thing. Sometimes the cat wins for a while. It blocks the pre roll ads for you? Click on a few streams.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2020 01:01 |
|
People keep finding workarounds for the ads and Twitch is patching them fast They're even blocking the stream outright in some cases now if they detect userscripts are trying to kill their ads
|
# ? Nov 2, 2020 01:22 |
|
Perplx posted:VPNs are almost always slower because they add more hops, very rarely they are faster because they have better peering with backbone networks or evade torrent throttling by your isp. Computer viking posted:There are also the rare cases where the "local" server at the exit node is faster than your actually local one - github in europe springs to mind. Something about data shaping on 4g mobile networks also apparently responds better to the single stream of vpn data, but I suspect that to be mostly theoretical. Okay, that makes sense I've been trying to play online games with the vpn turned on, but that's been causing it to get connection errors Maybe Mozilla VPN isn't the right one to game with
|
# ? Nov 2, 2020 03:42 |
|
repiv posted:People keep finding workarounds for the ads and Twitch is patching them fast Cool, an arms race.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2020 04:17 |
It's not like none of us didn't know this is exactly what would happen as soon as it was announced Amazon was buying Twitch. It is so predictable, you can practically set your watch by it.
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2020 12:33 |
|
I just upgraded to 82.0.2 on Fedora and now Gmail is reporting my account is "temporarily unavailable" but I can't find a report of a Gmail outage anywhere. Anyone else seeing this? I can still get to Gmail on Firefox on my phone. Edit: I had to delete my mail.google.com cookies. Weird. Knormal fucked around with this message at 22:36 on Nov 2, 2020 |
# ? Nov 2, 2020 21:07 |
|
Jippa posted:It blocks the pre roll ads for you? Click on a few streams. It took a few tries but yeah I found a couple channels where ads got though today, plus one channel that had one ad I managed to skip when I refreshed the page. I have also heard twitch is going full hitler behind the scenes, banning their partners if any of them have copyrighted audio on their streams, even in old highlights. 2020 still has some time to gently caress around I guess.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 00:43 |
|
Freakazoid_ posted:It took a few tries but yeah I found a couple channels where ads got though today, plus one channel that had one ad I managed to skip when I refreshed the page. It's more that the RIAA is getting really serious about dmca poo poo on twitch. It loving sucks.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 00:45 |
|
The stupidest thing is they're just telling streamers their archived content is infringing, without telling them which content, so the only safe thing for them to do is completely wipe all of their VODs
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 01:01 |
|
youtube-dl got DMCA'd too. https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 02:05 |
Vanagoon posted:youtube-dl got DMCA'd too. It's also interesting that YouTube Premium offers downloading of the videos, and it's even more curious that RIAA would argue that Youtube/MPEG DASH, which is a mechanism for saving bandwidth and an alternative to RTMP for live streaming, is made to circumvent access controls supposedly relating to copyrighted material, when it is also used for completely legitimate archiving of liberally licensed videos. It's especially interesting, since RIAA appears to cite a case which involves a German company circumventing RTMPE (which is encrypted - unlike Youtube/MPEG DASH, which only gets encrypted because the website defaults to HTTP over TLS, which you can opt out of using). RIAA also seems to think this decision in a regional court in Germany applies to all of the European Union, which I'm not sure is something American lawyers should be giving legal advice on. BlankSystemDaemon fucked around with this message at 10:58 on Nov 3, 2020 |
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 10:50 |
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:There's quite a bit of FUD circulating about this, and while I'm definitely not a lawyer, I'm not completely convinced it even is a DMCA, and isn't just carefully-phrased to make it appear as one. It is a DMCA notice, ie the thing that an ISP can be sent and take action on to remove all liability from themselves. It's not the normal DMCA of "this is our content and you need to remove it", but that's not the only thing the DMCA has options for. Like, way back when the MPAA was DMCA'ing the DeCSS code, this was the same operating principle. It's an incredible reach of one with some incredibly dubious theory, that would be unlikely to result in a court deciding that youtube-dl is infringing software and the RIAA is owed recompense by yt-dl's authors (and potentially Github if they refused the DMCA). But by deleting youtube-dl's repo off github, MS removes themselves from the equation entirely. The youtube-dl people could send a counter-claim, which would allow MS to restore the repo and maintain no liability. But part of a counter-claim involves "this is who I am, here's how to reach me, come sue me". The RIAA would probably do just that even though they'd probably lose (but maybe not, they'd venue shop like gently caress and there are a lot of new neo-con Trump judges). Even if the EFF and other people are promising legal aid, that's committing the next few years of your life to some major stress.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 15:18 |
|
Is it too much to hope for Microsoft/github to stand by their users here and deliberately reject the takedown?
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 15:42 |
Klyith posted:It is a DMCA notice, ie the thing that an ISP can be sent and take action on to remove all liability from themselves. It's not the normal DMCA of "this is our content and you need to remove it", but that's not the only thing the DMCA has options for. Like, way back when the MPAA was DMCA'ing the DeCSS code, this was the same operating principle. Dylan16807 posted:Is it too much to hope for Microsoft/github to stand by their users here and deliberately reject the takedown?
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 16:30 |
|
in where Big Company still doesn't understand what general purpose computers are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUEvRyemKSg this is almost 9 years old and it's only been getting more relevant as time goes on lmao
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 17:07 |
Speaking of the Microsoft/Github thing: https://twitter.com/t3rr4dice/status/1320660235363749888 Truga posted:in where Big Company still doesn't understand what general purpose computers are BlankSystemDaemon fucked around with this message at 18:54 on Nov 3, 2020 |
|
# ? Nov 3, 2020 18:51 |
|
IIRC one of the big problems with the youtube-dl repo is one or more of their cli usage examples used big name artist videos. Something like "for example, here's how you'd use this command to download this Taylor Swift video". Makes it harder for them to argue the tool wasn't written to rip copyrighted music when it's literally in the readme.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2020 02:04 |
|
The source is off of Github but the software's still freely available from their site, there was even an update last weekend. Just manually install the new version and the built-in update functionality even works again. https://youtube-dl.org/
|
# ? Nov 4, 2020 05:34 |
|
Splinter posted:IIRC one of the big problems with the youtube-dl repo is one or more of their cli usage examples used big name artist videos. Something like "for example, here's how you'd use this command to download this Taylor Swift video". Makes it harder for them to argue the tool wasn't written to rip copyrighted music when it's literally in the readme. They're going to have to remove the code that bypasses youtube's rolling cipher so the repo will be pretty much useless.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2020 07:32 |
|
dis astranagant posted:They're going to have to remove the code that bypasses youtube's rolling cipher so the repo will be pretty much useless. Can't someone, y'know, just fork it and put it back in?
|
# ? Nov 6, 2020 10:54 |
|
dis astranagant posted:They're going to have to remove the code that bypasses youtube's rolling cipher so the repo will be pretty much useless. The rolling cipher is not encryption of anything, and the RIAA is making a big deal about it because they got one regional court in Germany to believe that obfuscating a URl is encryption. That's all it is, hiding the true video and audio URLs and the special string that needs to be attached to the url to get them. And most of the time yt-dl doesn't even use the bypass code. It just executes the javascipt that came with the page, exactly the same as the browser does. The code to "bypass", aka undo the idiotic rot13-level obfuscation, is only used as a fallback. Siliziumleben posted:Can't someone, y'know, just fork it and put it back in? Yes, just not on github's hosting.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2020 15:37 |
Klyith posted:The rolling cipher is not encryption of anything, and the RIAA is making a big deal about it because they got one regional court in Germany to believe that obfuscating a URl is encryption. The rolling cipher RIAA mention is Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP, a technology made by MPEG and very closely related to Apples HTTP Live Streaming protocol.
|
|
# ? Nov 6, 2020 17:49 |
|
EDIT#2 Okay, nevermind that last nevermind, it's not fixed... Going to post my original question again. Alright so, I don't know if this is the right place to ask (is there a better place to ask?), but if I can be done I'm guessing it will be done with Stylish or similar which is Firefox related. So lately Google has been messing with their Google Doc's margins, this has messed up a lot of my older docs that were formatted in such a way to use the full screen space on the monitor/screen, I thought by changing the margins of the page setup within Google docs ie. to landscap/tabletmode or whatever might address this, but it still doesn't use the screen space appropriately when viewed outside of editing mode, weirdly enough zooming out (90%, 80%, etc.) does fix this, but then makes everything small, so not a solution for me. Is there some CCS I can do with Stylish or similar that can "stretch or pull" these margins out, to not leave so much dead empty space? Im_Special fucked around with this message at 08:23 on Nov 19, 2020 |
# ? Nov 19, 2020 00:00 |
|
They brought youtube-dl back to github: https://github.blog/2020-11-16-standing-up-for-developers-youtube-dl-is-back/
|
# ? Nov 19, 2020 21:46 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 01:58 |
|
Does anybody know of an extension that lets you 'lock' or 'protect' a tab so that it can't be closed with the normal commands (ctrl-w / middle click / click on the X) until you unlock it? edit: Pinning a tab is similar in that it turns ctrl-w into ctrl-tab, but it doesn't do what my setup needs unfortunately. NihilCredo fucked around with this message at 15:10 on Nov 22, 2020 |
# ? Nov 22, 2020 15:03 |