Amnistar posted:

without rereading the thread my opinion of Rarity is:

I don't know I haven't read anything they've posted.

Yami Fenrir posted:

But you're throwing Shade at AC over voting them?

I don't like that whatsoever.

You know what that says to me?

That you don't even try to discern AC's motives behind voting them.

Really looking more and more like scum amni here.

Yami Fenrir posted:

But you're throwing Shade at AC over voting them?

Grandicap posted:

Maybe I played it up a bit, but the incredulity and pride are definitely there.

Amnistar posted:

yea, reread the thread, still nothing about rarity tyhat jumps out at me as scum.

Amnistar posted:

Not because they voted rarity, but because they voted for the vote leader based on "new" posts, in an attempt to differentiate themselves from others which is a thing scum do to make it seem like they're not bandwagoning.

Idle Amalgam posted:

we aren't THAT diametrically opposed.

Bifauxnen posted:

Amnistar posted:

remember to make sure at least one of them is actually on your scum team!

Idle Amalgam posted:

Is this you realizing that we are of one mind, sound in judgment, and belief?

Because if so... good.

I think Amni is trying to force this suspicion on AC.

Even if rarity x hal looks eyepop bad to me, Amni's insistence on AC seems overdone.

##vote amni

Bifauxnen posted:

Quoting this cause it'd be so hilarious if this is scum distancing banter, wish I could be bothered to find whichever game Amni made the "you would totally say this as scum just to be smug later" argument against Sci so I could quote that too

Yami Fenrir posted:

My current thoughts on the matter is that Amni is overextending in an attempt to protect a scumbro, which is exactly what he did in the last game I modded.

I think I'd still rather prefer a Rarity lunch because that hal push stinks something fierce and technically there is a chance that Amni's just tunneling, my gut says otherwise though.

Bifauxnen posted:

Yeah I'm feeling a whole Rarity/Amni/Grandi probability cloud rn

Amnistar posted:

Bah, nothing alike. That was the deciding point of the game, not day 1.

Amnistar posted:

Scum are, in general, very concerned with trying to convince their *accusers* that they are wrong about finding scum. Town are more concerned with finding scum. Complaining that I'm not interacting with your defense further cements your alignment as scum.

Hal Incandenza posted:

I think "I don't remember Rarity" is very fake sounding despite the size of the game, rarity has been around every major thing to happen (is so much as major stuff happens D1)

Hal Incandenza posted:

I think "I don't remember Rarity" is very fake sounding despite the size of the game, rarity has been around every major thing to happen (is so much as major stuff happens D1)

Rarity posted:

Six posts in a row and not a single read in any of them, would vote

Amnistar posted:

Please vote for scum player ApostateCourier.

And note their move to a vote leader because "recent activity".

Squiggly is potential scum because of their unvote.

IcePhoenix posted:

has anyone posted about how they don't like this post yet? I don't like this post.

Grandicap posted:

Second is AC


This is such shade for no goddamn reason. I didn't read posts before I entered the game, I am actively reading all posts past my entry into the thread. Seeing that many unread posts while not being in the game for less than 24 hours is disheartening. But this isn't a defense of my choice, it's the back handed reference to an event that has long since past and been rectified. It's the restoking of suspicion on me for reasons. This post is oozing with scum-mind. The calling out Keane is weird too. This response is to:


The vitriol doesn't seem warrented.
Alice: "Hey, what do you think about this situation?"
Bob: "gently caress off, why weren't you listening when I thought about things before?"

The Rarity take has legs, I think Rarity's Hal vote is based on bad reasoning, but I don't feel like it is coming from a bad place. Has legs might be a bad turn of phrase, but I don't this AC is scummy for thinking it is the better phrasing, maybe?

IcePhoenix posted:

has anyone posted about how they don't like this post yet? I don't like this post.

apostateCourier posted:

Rarity's recent posting has a real "uh oh pressure is on better make content happen" vibe. 6 posts without a read on D1 isn't as damning as you want it to be and dropping six quotes in one post makes it look like you're doing way more work than you are.

##vote Rarity

Hal Incandenza posted:

I think "I don't remember Rarity" is very fake sounding despite the size of the game, rarity has been around every major thing to happen (is so much as major stuff happens D1)

IcePhoenix posted:

regarding the current conversation as well this seems like a weird seed to try and plant a backup plan to get people to put votes on someone who's been annoying enough for people to vote them out but is unfortunately probably town because of said annoyance

Bifauxnen posted:

Yeah I'm feeling a whole Rarity/Amni/Grandi probability cloud rn

b-minus1 posted:

I would add ac to that group as well

apostateCourier posted:

Are you asking because you are unsure yourself or...?

apostateCourier posted:

yea, I ask a bunch of seemingly inane questions because I have nonverbal learning disorder which means implied meanings often slide right by me

CCKeane posted:

Maybe you already said, but I either cannot or will not read threads, and I'll leave it to you dear reader to figure out which it is stop writing post, post to thread, play M*A*S*H theme on repeat.

b-minus1 posted:

I would add ac to that group as well

b-minus1 posted:

I would add ac to that group as well

Yami Fenrir posted:

Why's that?

Two of those are are hard opposed to AC.

Idgi.

Amnistar posted:

Naw, it's drawing connections. I.E. if AC is scum, then unvoting Squiggly makes me suspicious of Squiggly.

IcePhoenix posted:

That's fine but also doesn't really invalidate my point at all