Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
There's a middle ground between "the foul Hun launched an unprovoked war of conquest upon the peace-loving people of Europe" and "oops all nationalism this was the only outcome!"

No imperial power is blameless but the actual war, as it happened, in our timeline, was provoked by Austria-Hungary and Germany. A-H deliberately tacked ludicrous terms onto their ultimatum to justify an attack on Serbia, and Germany backed them because that justified their attempting to punch France and Russia in the dick. Their was no house of cards. The german government knew exactly what they were getting into and wanted it. France and Russia, while certainly prepared for war, did not deliberately try to provoke it in the way Germany did in 1914.

In the particular case of France and Alsace-Moselle, yes, France had revanchism but there was no grand national plan to take it back. Germany, in contrast, had spent decades planning the next great dickpunch on France. Ironically, Bismarck himself had opposed the annexation in the first place but it was seized both for propaganda purposes* and because the Vosges are a strong defensive position that would funnel fighting into France in the future.

*The idea of Alsace re-uniting with the Fatherland after centuries of french tyranny is pretty much ludicrous. There was practically no pan-german nationalism there and the Reich ended up colonizing it with prussians and beating down the local dialect harder than the notoriously language policing french ever did.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FrangibleCover
Jan 23, 2018

Nothing going on in my quiet corner of the Pacific.

This is the life. I'm just lying here in my hammock in Townsville, sipping a G&T.

shallowj posted:

What’s the relationship between military historians working for actual militaries, and “The Academy”? (am i ignorant to think there’s a distinction?)
Speaking to a very narrow element of the question, the British Defence Wargaming Centre (which is not the Academy) and its predecessors have attached milhists to do analysis of past battles and try to work out rules of thumb along the lines of "You need X many guys to beat Y many guys defending, but if the Y many guys are on a hill that changes to X+Z" and get input numbers that they can then use to get sensible output numbers from the wargames. I would imagine that other national equivalents of the DWC do similar things.

White Coke
May 29, 2015

steinrokkan posted:

The only ones playing geopolitical games were those sneaky Serbs.

I think we're getting away from who the real culprits are: Croatians.

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Yeah if there's one takeaway I got from Sleepwalkers it's that while it obviously doesn't justify a global war that killed tens of millions, it's a miracle that Serbia didn't kick off a global war even earlier with all the dumb bullshit they had been pulling for years.

What sort of dumb, and no doubt hilarious, bullshit were they getting up to?

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Pretty much anyone going to a professional staff college anywhere in the world will at some point have to write a thesis on some element of military history. Quite a few of them end up in this thread.

e: ^^ by 1914 Serbia is a full blown rogue state. It's the reason when Austria said "You gave these terrorists the weapons they used to kill our crown prince" everyone else in the world shrugged and said "yeah, probably"

Alchenar fucked around with this message at 01:27 on Dec 28, 2020

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

shallowj posted:

What’s the relationship between military historians working for actual militaries, and “The Academy”? (am i ignorant to think there’s a distinction?)

Has military history shaped other historical disciplines? Has milhist always been more “applied” than other fields?
It is ubiquitous but despised--to the point where I have been told by more than one person to use euphemisms to describe what I do. I woud probably agree with your last sentence there.

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

ChubbyChecker posted:

Which level infantry units got .50cal mgs or DshKs in WW2? Was there like a platoon of them in regiment or something?

In a US Infantry division during WWII, the battalion weapons company would have a single M2 assigned to the company HQ.

Dismount M2s aren’t particularly common.

Bourricot
Aug 7, 2016



Edgar Allen Ho posted:

*The idea of Alsace re-uniting with the Fatherland after centuries of french tyranny is pretty much ludicrous. There was practically no pan-german nationalism there and the Reich ended up colonizing it with prussians and beating down the local dialect harder than the notoriously language policing french ever did.
To be fair, that's because most of that happened (in France) under the Third Republic. Previous regimes were a lot more lenient with regional languages.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

MrYenko posted:

In a US Infantry division during WWII, the battalion weapons company would have a single M2 assigned to the company HQ.

Dismount M2s aren’t particularly common.

Yeah, the M2 is not a small weapon. Almost five and a half feet long, weighing about eighty pounds without a tripod (which is ~forty pounds), and the ammo isn't exactly small either.

Convenient Gun Jesus video with a size comparison:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmLnwiJRr78

Milo and POTUS
Sep 3, 2017

I will not shut up about the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I talk about them all the time and work them into every conversation I have. I built a shrine in my room for the yellow one who died because sadly no one noticed because she died around 9/11. Wanna see it?

Alchenar posted:

Bombing was of questionable effectiveness (as the thread recently went over) and to get to Sweden you have to fly over a ton of mountains.

And then once you bomb them they go from neutral and selling iron to the nazis to entering the war on Hitler side.

Where was this? I think I missed it.


Didn't the marines get rid of the SAW for the m27 maybe or am I thinking of something else?

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

shallowj posted:

How historically informed are modern militaries? Are some militaries more informed than others...?

I understand that you're talking about officers, but some history is taught even at the boot camp level in the USMC. This is classroom instruction; I don't have exact numbers, but I'd guess you probably get a couple of day's worth of History classes over the course of your boot camp.

Broadly speaking it is self-promoting motivational propaganda bullshit - look at the battles we won! But there are occasional "lessons learned" classes that can be refreshingly introspective even at that level.

Post boot camp you're expected to do "MCI" (Marine Corps Institute) correspondence courses. They're all online now, back in my day they'd send you an actual book. (Doing these courses helps give points towards promotions.) Some are on USMC history, and generally speaking they're pretty decent, roughly equivalent in rigor to a 101-level college History course, and some do get you college credits depending on the subject. I took as many History courses as I could when I was in, mostly because I liked the subject and command liked it if you took an interest in that sort of thing.

There's a pretty decent range of courses available. Most are technical, but there are also foreign languages, regional history and culture, etc.

MrYenko posted:

Dismount M2s aren’t particularly common.

But mounted? Every tank has one. Every halftrack has one. Hell, some trucks have one.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Some halftracks are truly blessed and have four!

Preggo My Eggo!
Jun 17, 2010

HEY GUNS posted:

I have been told by more than one person to use euphemisms to describe what I do.

Care to elaborate? Curious what you might tell somebody about what you do if they're military vs. non-military vs. historian.

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS

Cessna posted:

Hell, some trucks have one.

TK-42-1
Oct 30, 2013

looks like we have a bad transmitter




the long forgotten origins of the bang bus

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

Cessna posted:

But mounted? Every tank has one. Every halftrack has one. Hell, some trucks have one.

Ya, one of the sources I found had a mechanized infantry company having something like seven of them, even before Joe starts welding extras onto everything in sight.

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011





That looks like if the Cobra Commander was low on money.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

"According to Wikipedia" there is a black hole that emits zionist hawking radiation where my brain should have been

I really should just shut the fuck up and stop posting forever
College Slice
In the Canadian Forces we also have history classes about Canada's participation in military conflict, I think it started with the Boer War.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

There's so many little things wrong in this image I can't take it.

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

Yeah, the German soldiers' canteen covers are the wrong color.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Vincent Van Goatse posted:

There's so many little things wrong in this image I can't take it.

Yep, the Harley Davidson 47 'Thunderbikes' with sidecars are misrepresented!

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye


Later adapted into the Bill Murray comedy "Stripes"

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

HEY GUNS posted:

It is ubiquitous but despised--to the point where I have been told by more than one person to use euphemisms to describe what I do. I woud probably agree with your last sentence there.

That's messed up.

White Coke
May 29, 2015

Nebakenezzer posted:

Later adapted into the Bill Murray “comedy” "Stripes"

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

Preggo My Eggo! posted:

Care to elaborate? Curious what you might tell somebody about what you do if they're military vs. non-military vs. historian.
You can't say "military history." You won't get hired. The pervasive assumption is it's all unsophisticated drums-and-trumpets stuff at best. At worst they believe you're right wing or that you approve of what you analyze.

I tell military personnel I'm a military historian. I tell other historians I got my doctorate in the social history of early modern central Europe and right now I am focusing on the microhistory / historical social anthropology of common soldiers from the Germanosphere during the early seventeenth century. This is an understudied group which was hated both then and now; it's a good candidate for history from below because of this; and it's a lot better documented than people used to think. I am interested in violence; subcultures; social interactions; non-state political entites; the history of material objects; and the physical experience of transport before the eighteenth century. I'm interested in the way microhistory and global history. function together.

Lately I've been thinking about social interactions within groups so I have been calling myself a historical social anthropologist more often.

SubG
Aug 19, 2004

It's a hard world for little things.
I like that the kill markers suggest that there are Nazi killbusses out there too (and they only need one more to make ace).

Like not Sd.Kfz. 251s or whatever, those are clearly bus silhouettes.

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

SubG posted:

I like that the kill markers suggest that there are Nazi killbusses out there too (and they only need one more to make ace).

Like not Sd.Kfz. 251s or whatever, those are clearly bus silhouettes.

Those are train silhouettes.

Rodrigo Diaz
Apr 16, 2007

Knights who are at the wars eat their bread in sorrow;
their ease is weariness and sweat;
they have one good day after many bad

This looks like a mad magazine fold in

Edit: actually, where "is* it from?

Rodrigo Diaz fucked around with this message at 05:43 on Dec 29, 2020

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

Rodrigo Diaz posted:

This looks like a mad magazine fold in
It's from a 1973 National Lampoon article about "The Battling Buses of World War II".

Rodrigo Diaz
Apr 16, 2007

Knights who are at the wars eat their bread in sorrow;
their ease is weariness and sweat;
they have one good day after many bad

FMguru posted:

It's from a 1973 National Lampoon article about "The Battling Buses of World War II".

Lol thank you

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


It looks to me that it would get the undercarriage hung up on the hill there if it just kept driving forward.

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

CommonShore posted:

It looks to me that it would get the undercarriage hung up on the hill there if it just kept driving forward.

They are clearly going to ramp off the hill

the paradigm shift
Jan 18, 2006

BalloonFish posted:

In 1914 Russia had seven railway lines leading to the German frontier, none of which were double track (maybe these were the ones which were planned to be doubled which the Germans saw as such a threat to their plans?). These lines had an estimated capacity of 223 trains per day, or 0.25 trains per day per kilometre of border.

There were nine lines leading to the Russian border with Austria-Hungary, five of which were double, with an estimated capacity of 260 trains per day, or 0.4/day/km of front.

By contrast the Germans had 13 doubled lines heading to their Russian border, with a capacity of 660 trains per day, or 1.5/day/km.

What do you mean by trains? As in how many carraiges of soldiers/tons of material would be considered a train.

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund
/pants, closes door

Finally here! Should we talk about drunken waves, tank destroyers or vikings? :allears:

Tias fucked around with this message at 14:47 on Dec 29, 2020

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

Jobbo_Fett posted:

Those are train silhouettes.

Here in the fields of Normandy we meet the bus, the natural enemy of the train. What a great opportunity to observe its behavior in the wild. Let's watch as it drives towards a German railyard...

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


Jobbo_Fett posted:

They are clearly going to ramp off the hill

Got to get some air to drop the bombs.

Tulip
Jun 3, 2008

yeah thats pretty good


Is War in Human Civilization by Azar Gat well-regarded? I started it and so far the intellectuals he's cited uncritically are Napoleon Chagnon, Jared Diamond, Emile Durkheim, and Richard Dawkins, which is setting off a lot of alarms for me.

Fearless
Sep 3, 2003

DRINK MORE MOXIE


Raenir Salazar posted:

In the Canadian Forces we also have history classes about Canada's participation in military conflict, I think it started with the Boer War.

The military history of Canada goes back rather further than that and is taught, particularly given that substantial numbers of regiments claim to perpetuate units that existed as early as the 1700s.

HEY GUNS posted:

You can't say "military history." You won't get hired. The pervasive assumption is it's all unsophisticated drums-and-trumpets stuff at best. At worst they believe you're right wing or that you approve of what you analyze.

I tell military personnel I'm a military historian. I tell other historians I got my doctorate in the social history of early modern central Europe and right now I am focusing on the microhistory / historical social anthropology of common soldiers from the Germanosphere during the early seventeenth century. This is an understudied group which was hated both then and now; it's a good candidate for history from below because of this; and it's a lot better documented than people used to think. I am interested in violence; subcultures; social interactions; non-state political entites; the history of material objects; and the physical experience of transport before the eighteenth century. I'm interested in the way microhistory and global history. function together.

Lately I've been thinking about social interactions within groups so I have been calling myself a historical social anthropologist more often.

This is the lament of the military historian. The number of people who are hired in Canada explicitly as military historians is vanishingly small, and yes military historians are certainly maligned by a lot of their peers for the reasons HEY GUNS has described.

Fearless fucked around with this message at 22:31 on Dec 29, 2020

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

*glances at the White House, which is on fire*

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fearless
Sep 3, 2003

DRINK MORE MOXIE


feedmegin posted:

*glances at the White House, which is on fire*

Yeah but we didn't do it this time

or the last time, really

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply