|
Dirt Road Junglist posted:This is the way. gently caress yeah that was my jam!
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 05:07 |
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2024 02:01 |
|
njsykora posted:In the UK it was the dominant storage media for the microcomputers of the 80s since floppy disks were too expensive at manufacture
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 06:48 |
|
All the real hipsters were recording albums to Spectrum ROM cartridges anyway.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 07:07 |
|
Hipsters are showing off their wealth and privilege with those ROM cartridges. Real users of the time suffered through data tapes because the price difference was significant. Let me load this software. Oh there was a read error after 20 minutes? Let me rewind, eject, clean the heads with some special fluid and a cotton bud, wait for ithe alcohol to dry out, then retry. Cassettes were the media format of the masses. Not the best format but you took what you could.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 09:20 |
|
PS Audio’s YouTube is the best it’s like a slot machine where you never know if the advice is gonna be reasonable and science-based or stupid and nonsensical
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 11:35 |
|
Alan_Shore posted:Sorry, I didn't realize that your average audio cassette could store data! Please forgive me! Used to back up my presets from my Roland Juno 106 to tape (several tapes, just to be sure), probably bought tapes of different patches as well.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 12:49 |
|
Ok Comboomer posted:PS Audio’s YouTube is the best The only audio youtube channel I watch for actual informational purposes is audioholics since they are huge subwoofer and room correction nerds. Yuns fucked around with this message at 13:20 on Mar 16, 2021 |
# ? Mar 16, 2021 13:18 |
|
Ridicule Audiophiles - or discuss idiotic esoteric media storage and pine for the minidisc
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 13:22 |
|
shortspecialbus posted:Ridicule Audiophiles - or discuss idiotic esoteric media storage and pine for the minidisc I was absolutely not expecting the thread to pine for MiniDiscs but it warms the cockles of my heart. I'm surprised no one mentioned this beauty in my picture. Practically the first MP3 player. 32Mb of storage. Absolutely blew everyone away when I brought it on a school trip. Impossible to use now without a serial port (or you buy a 32Mb CF card. I bought a 64Mb one to try my luck but NOPE)
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 14:04 |
|
Alan_Shore posted:I was absolutely not expecting the thread to pine for MiniDiscs but it warms the cockles of my heart. I think I still have that Sharp somewhere. My first regular MP3 player was the Creative Zen Xtra, which was just a DAC bolted onto a 30gb 2.5” spinner drive. You could technically upgrade the drive, but it was designed to draw very little power, so you needed to make sure the new drive wasn’t too thirsty, or it would get weird read errors. I even painted the removable cover to match my car.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 18:50 |
|
Alan_Shore posted:I was absolutely not expecting the thread to pine for MiniDiscs but it warms the cockles of my heart. I had that Rio. It was a parallel port. The pass through function of the cable so you could keep your printer attached never worked for me so I had to crawl around under my desk each time I wanted to swap.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2021 20:20 |
|
Bloody nightmare it was! Looks like it and USB both came out in 98. So close...
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 05:03 |
|
TTerrible posted:I had that Rio. It was a parallel port. Woof, how slow was that?
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 06:40 |
|
Alan_Shore posted:I was absolutely not expecting the thread to pine for MiniDiscs but it warms the cockles of my heart. Since I'm working from home and I like showing this off better than working, ridicule portablephiles! High res: https://imgur.com/a/jaV9bkp Also, the Sony XA3ES and JB920 are connected with optical, and the remote control has dedicated buttons that control both the CD and MD player at the same time to do perfect recordings. I also used to have a setup that would record SACDs to tape. evobatman fucked around with this message at 13:18 on Mar 17, 2021 |
# ? Mar 17, 2021 11:02 |
|
Dirt Road Junglist posted:Woof, how slow was that? A serious downside to the Rio PMP300 was that it would eat batteries in standby at roughly the same speed as during playback. Flipperwaldt fucked around with this message at 14:00 on Mar 17, 2021 |
# ? Mar 17, 2021 13:54 |
|
Dirt Road Junglist posted:Woof, how slow was that? Dunno about that particular device, but parallel ports could be fairly fast (for the time). In excess of 2MB/sec using EPP or ECP mode. Way faster than a serial port, and also faster than USB 1.1.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 13:56 |
|
evobatman posted:I also used to have a setup that would record SACDs to tape. That is amazing.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 14:40 |
|
evobatman posted:Since I'm working from home and I like showing this off better than working, ridicule portablephiles! That is absolutely beautiful! I have so many tapes from Bandcamp but can't afford to buy a decent walkman. The prices are mad. And what a lovely Sony tower! I have a Yamaha tape deck (K220 that records onto metal) and will try to get the rest of it one day (they have a MD deck). I recently rebought the CD/MD hifi from my youth, the superb Sony DHC-MDX10 with its GROOVE bass, but the cassette deck and CD drive got knackered in transit. MD and optical in work perfectly though. Super nostalgic to input track names by dialling that wheel around...
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 15:06 |
|
Alan_Shore posted:That is absolutely beautiful! I have so many tapes from Bandcamp but can't afford to buy a decent walkman. The prices are mad. And what a lovely Sony tower! I have a Yamaha tape deck (K220 that records onto metal) and will try to get the rest of it one day (they have a MD deck). Thanks! The Sony tower is just a semi, you should see it fully erect! Hope you manage to repair your MDX10, 14 year old me would have absolutely loved to have that!
|
# ? Mar 17, 2021 15:51 |
|
evobatman posted:Since I'm working from home and I like showing this off better than working, ridicule portablephiles! What's that tape walkman on the far-right, middle row? My dad had (Maybe still has) one of those. Cool as heck. I don't own any Sony portable or hi-fi gear but I do own one of their classic radios which still works and I use on the reg:
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 10:44 |
|
Pile Of Garbage posted:What's that tape walkman on the far-right, middle row? My dad had (Maybe still has) one of those. Cool as heck. It's a WM-D6C, a very high quality professional walkman used by reporters and journalists to do recordings. The side effect of all the build quality is that it's great for music too! There's lots to google about it, and you should definitively check if your dad still has his. Belts and rubber parts for the disk drive mechanism are still easily available, and replacing them isn't very hard.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 11:40 |
|
evobatman posted:It's a WM-D6C, a very high quality professional walkman used by reporters and journalists to do recordings. The side effect of all the build quality is that it's great for music too! I'm not certain why my dad had one but given that it was released in 1984 I suspect he had it for recording interviews. He's an editor by trade and in the 80s/90s he was working at a publishing house where along with editing books he also wrote a few about local history. However he has also been a radio DJ doing a weekly show for a local station since the 80s so he might have gotten it from there. Just had a peek at eBay and holy poo poo there's listings of them for over $2k AUD!!!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 13:05 |
|
drat it. If this wasn't stupid money I'd have bought it already because I'm a fashion victim. https://shenzhenaudio.com/collectio...fi-music-player EDIT: now I'm searching ebay for broken Sony WM-1 and a cheap DAP to kludge together my own version. Yuns fucked around with this message at 14:59 on Mar 19, 2021 |
# ? Mar 19, 2021 14:43 |
|
quote:Price: $2,199.00 EXCUSE ME?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 15:09 |
|
Yuns posted:drat it. If this wasn't stupid money I'd have bought it already because I'm a fashion victim. That is insanely better than Sony's sad attempt at the same theme. Shame it's two grand
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 15:09 |
|
just make a decent cassette player you fucks
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 16:07 |
|
When the KEF KC62 came out I commented "they should make one with dual 8s," and they haven't but SVS did which means it costs half as much and doesn't look as nice. It does claim -3dB at 23hz which is respectable. That is awesomely terrible.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 16:18 |
|
Ok Comboomer posted:just make a decent cassette player you fucks You're going to have to build a factory first.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 19:28 |
|
Fantastic Foreskin posted:You're going to have to build a factory first. Panasonic spun up a few new manufacturing lines for all the new 1200/1500C variants It ~could~ be done, not saying it’s sensible
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 19:38 |
|
Yeah Techmoan's done enough videos on modern cassette players to explain why no-one's going to bother with that. At least old Walkmans seem fairly simple to repair for the most part.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2021 19:54 |
|
Did anyone ever use DAT tapes outside of live concert recordings? Back in the 90s saying something came from a DAT master meant it was probably very high quality Of course now I wonder whether the DAT had much to do with it other than tape-flipping issues, perhaps people that could afford to use DAT could also afford better microphones
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 02:28 |
|
DAT was used professionally in studios a lot before hard drives were big enough, it could do lossless dubbing which was a big improvement over 1/4”.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 02:32 |
|
Darko turned comments on his channel back on wonder if somebody told him that keeping them off hurt his engagement metrics
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 04:43 |
|
qirex posted:DAT was used professionally in studios a lot before hard drives were big enough, it could do lossless dubbing which was a big improvement over 1/4”. This. I still have some DATs from before the studio I worked for briefly went all digital. I don't have a machine that can read them, but I've been told they're archival quality (someone in this thread will likely let me know if I'm wrong).
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 04:46 |
|
I mean DAT are still digital. Hard drives have the same operating principles.* *I have no idea how DAT encodes things, but like, magnets and data. Fantastic Foreskin fucked around with this message at 05:34 on Mar 20, 2021 |
# ? Mar 20, 2021 05:26 |
|
Fantastic Foreskin posted:I mean DAT are still digital. Hard drives have the same operating principles.* MP3s are digital too but not lossless.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 06:26 |
|
TOOT BOOT posted:MP3s are digital too but not lossless. DAT is a digital storage medium, which better be loving lossless or it's useless, not a codec.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 14:19 |
|
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 16:04 |
|
There's a new king of DAC SINAD now. WolfX-700, a Chinese audio reviewer, just tested a DAC at 125 dB SINAD at his blog on L7AudioLab. He's under an NDA as far as manufacturer name and model go but expect to see ASR posters dumping their Topping D90 and SMSL S400 and Gustard X16/A18 soon for the new measurement king notwithstanding the fact that there is no audible difference and that even if there were an audible difference it would be gone once pushed through any amp. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-new-king.21444/
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 16:40 |
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2024 02:01 |
|
Good enough for human ears happens a lot earlier than audiophiles would care to recognize. But when you’re convinced that the orientation of your ground cable is audible, you’ve already completely lost perspective. As for DAT vs Minidisc vs CD, there was a lot of arguments back in the 90s about DAT vs Minidisc as a replacement for cassette tapes and their relative strengths and weaknesses. I do still wish minidisc had seen wider adoption, and fully understand why it didn’t. And it really didn’t stand a chance against MP3 players. But I loved their size, and while their strongest functionality is fully replaced by playlists, I do miss physical mix media sometimes. Not enough to deal with it, but I do miss it.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2021 17:49 |