|
quote:Which States Are Leading In The Race To Get Their Populations Vaccinated? One dose:  Fully vaccinated: 
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2021 16:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 01:43 |
|
|
System Metternich posted:organisation chart of the state government of Vorarlberg, Austria: Almost like a Swiss watch.
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2021 16:21
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:Almost like a Swiss watch. Vorarlberg actually wanted to leave Austria and join Switzerland because of cultural and language ties, but the Swiss refused them entry in a referendum because they were to poor. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2021 17:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2021 18:19
|
|
|
Kennel posted:Haha, I looked at the data and all of the yellow 1974 car incidents refer the same case:
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2021 20:41
|
|
|
Watch it be a 12 year old driving a riding lawnmower around a parking lot
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2021 21:10
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:One dose: I'm...not sure I see the problem with these? They're not real intuitive on first glance, but they get the data across (other than the fact that it's hard to eyeball specific percentages).
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 05:06
|
|
|
Yeah they're not bad. Horizontal scale should really be 0..100% though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 08:22
|
|
Yes, it's like a lava lamp.
|
PittTheElder posted:Yeah they're not bad. Horizontal scale should really be 0..100% though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 12:11
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Why, for propaganda purposes? That would be more meaningful when there is a better spread, perhaps in two months. It means that when they publish this same chart in a few months they'll need to use a different scale on the x axis which makes comparison more difficult. The whole purpose of vaccination is to get as close as possible to 100%; I agree that showing that on the scale would be the most useful in most cases.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 13:14
|
|
|
I'm sure that style of graph wouldn't be so bad if it was animated. But as it stands I just want to see where Wisconsin is and I gave up in both graphs, which isn't a good sign for readability.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 13:54
|
|
|
aas Bandit posted:I'm...not sure I see the problem with these? They're not real intuitive on first glance, but they get the data across (other than the fact that it's hard to eyeball specific percentages). I posted them because the size of the circles really doesn't accurately represent state population size. And I get why that is, but I still think it's funny.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 17:11
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:What if you were to wear a suit made of needles containing doses of the vaccine?? My models have shown this to be theoretically 100% effective. Are the needles pointing in or out?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 18:18
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I posted them because the size of the circles really doesn't accurately represent state population size. And I get why that is, but I still think it's funny.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2021 21:49
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Are the needles pointing in or out? Whichever is more effective. Albino Squirrel posted:Is the circle size supposed to represent pop size or number of vaccinations given? Obviously related but slightly different. The size of the circle is supposed to represent population size. And I don't think that Delaware circle would be that large in comparison with that California circle.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 01:55
|
|
|
It looks like the circles represent population size down to about 3 million and then they hit a minimum. So about 15 states are shown too big. But since they're still being shown as "the smallest" it's not too bad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 02:41
|
|
|
While it could be said for plenty of things, I do think there should be some sort of licensing for using circles in your graphs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 08:46
|
|
|
  And yet you published it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 08:51
|
|
|
poo poo data on both axes and they still couldn’t whip it into line. Sad! Platystemon has a new favorite as of 09:00 on Mar 22, 2021 |
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 08:57
|
|
|
Memento posted:
I wonder if the data is available. I'd like to find the r2 of the inverse - my guess is it's close enough to 0.14 as to make no difference.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 10:53
|
|
|
You could express the exact opposite visual message by just flipping the diagonal line
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 11:02
|
|
|
Pull out the two leftmost points and you'll get a pretty different regression line.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 13:06
|
|
|
And bear in mind the economic freedom index is a hacky ad hoc sorting of countries in a manner that suits the arguments made by a lovely libertarian think tank.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 13:28
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:poo poo data on both axes and they still couldn’t whip it into line. I only just now read the y- axis... racism as defined by self-reported neighbor preference is beyond parody
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 13:46
|
|
|
Does that include people who'd prefer not to live next to anyone of any race?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 15:50
|
|
|
Also funny how the one country being pointed out there is the UK, in the "high economic freedom, low racism" section. You know, the UK that's been in the news a lot recently for how not-racist they are.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 16:56
|
|
|
Western Europe as a whole has learned that the right answer to "are you a huge racist?" is "no, of course not". We even have gotten good at recognizing the subtle ways of asking. This just means we know how to act politically correct, not that we aren't ginormous racists.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:17
|
|
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:Also funny how the one country being pointed out there is the UK, in the "high economic freedom, low racism" section. You know, the UK that's been in the news a lot recently for how not-racist they are. They figure that Poles, Bulgarians, Albanians, Irish etc. are the same race as themselves so it's not racism.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:19
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Western Europe as a whole has learned that the right answer to "are you a huge racist?" is "no, of course not". We even have gotten good at recognizing the subtle ways of asking. This just means we know how to act politically correct, not that we aren't ginormous racists. I'm not racist, but
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:20
|
|
|
Nenonen posted:I'm not racist, but ...I believe that Islam and Slavic culture are existential threats to Western civilization?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:22
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Western Europe as a whole has learned that the right answer to "are you a huge racist?" is "no, of course not". We even have gotten good at recognizing the subtle ways of asking. This just means we know how to act politically correct, not that we aren't ginormous racists. Except travellers/roma/anyone who you think might be at all related to either of those. hoooly poo poo you'd have loving goebbels saying "steady on mate" the way people treat travellers over here.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:30
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Western Europe as a whole has learned that the right answer to "are you a huge racist?" is "no, of course not". We even have gotten good at recognizing the subtle ways of asking. This just means we know how to act politically correct, not that we aren't ginormous racists. Yeah exactly. Things like the Implicit Association Test seem like a far better measure, but of course you can't just scrape that data off the internet on the cheap and use it to make up whatever conclusion you want.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:49
|
|
|
Nenonen posted:They figure that Poles, Bulgarians, Albanians, Irish etc. are the same race as themselves so it's not racism.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:50
|
|
|
European racism is advanced and uncanny in the area of how to hate specific races specifically, but absolute amateur hours on the covering it up side.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 17:54
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Except travellers/roma/anyone who you think might be at all related to either of those. I saw this posted somewhere else and it seemed about right 
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 23:17
|
|
|
Why would you ever need that many decimals on an r^2 value? I am rather unclear on how sig fig propogation to r^2 works, but I'm still pretty sure nobody's sitting around going "hmm, you've got a 0.14364, that's ok but if you could bring that up to a 0.14366 then we'd really be talking."
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 23:25
|
|
|
Karia posted:Why would you ever need that many decimals on an r^2 value? I am rather unclear on how sig fig propogation to r^2 works, but I'm still pretty sure nobody's sitting around going "hmm, you've got a 0.14364, that's ok but if you could bring that up to a 0.14366 then we'd really be talking." People with... interesting ideas about the statistical significance of correlation may have skewed ideas about the significance of numbers in general.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 23:32
|
|
|
Karia posted:Why would you ever need that many decimals on an r^2 value? I am rather unclear on how sig fig propogation to r^2 works, but I'm still pretty sure nobody's sitting around going "hmm, you've got a 0.14364, that's ok but if you could bring that up to a 0.14366 then we'd really be talking." it's because they just slammed the numbers into excel and copied out whatever it came up with into their hot take tweet. at no point do they need to have any understanding of any part of that process, or apply any reasoning or analysis
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 23:32
|
|
|
edit:  Karia posted:Why would you ever need that many decimals on an r^2 value? I am rather unclear on how sig fig propogation to r^2 works, but I'm still pretty sure nobody's sitting around going "hmm, you've got a 0.14364, that's ok but if you could bring that up to a 0.14366 then we'd really be talking." Lazy copy/paste out of some program like Excel is frequently the answer.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 23:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 01:43 |
|
|
Memento posted:I saw this posted somewhere else and it seemed about right I didn't think Finnish Air Force 1918-1944 was that focused on gypsies, huh.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2021 23:39
|
|