|
Voodoofly posted:I believe that one is just called the Southern Cross Southern Cross is a constellation, not a star. One of its stars is called Mimosa, which I think is pretty fun.
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 12:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 22:20 |
|
|
Lotus Aura posted:Seems like trying a bit too hard to play off the start of day scumclaim as a joke, but also getting too defensive about it in general. ##Vote AtLow this seems kinda like overexplaining your vote tho. especially when its a thing that's already been pointed out
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 13:37
|
|
|
Steak why are you pretending to be a rational person
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 14:32
|
|
|
Hal Insandenza posted:Steak why are you pretending to be a rational person Agree. ##vote Steak
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 14:41
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Why did you include this part? This makes you look way too defensive about joke claiming, which makes me think maybe it wasn’t a joke claim after all. Basically I had a whole thing planned where my next posts were going to be about the scumchat thing and then the "I am playing the role I was given because I got a PM that says 'Mafia'" thing, but when I went to put the next part in after my seriouspost I realized that lapsing back into the bit would not, in fact, make my posting any better or more interesting So I tabled the bit but I still wanted to call out that it was supposed to be going somewhere, I just wasn't going to finish it because I wound up seriousposting about Somberbrero acting like I was playing the game  And yeah, saying "I'm going to stop doing something but I need people to know why I was doing it!" is definitely defensiveness, so I see why that's what would come through All this said... Lotus Aura posted:Seems like trying a bit too hard to play off the start of day scumclaim as a joke, but also getting too defensive about it in general. ##Vote AtLow Repeating someone else's points and appending a vote to them is not scumhunting, it is putting on the appearance of scumhunting while not actually being helpful or contributing to the case at hand
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 14:49
|
|
|
That’s my AT-LOW
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 14:55
|
|
|
merk posted:Agree. ##vote Steak lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 14:56
|
|
|
Mr. Steak posted:lmao Ahhh the binus approach
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 15:48
|
|
|
u know what, im gonna put my money where my mouth is ##vote lotus
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 16:14
|
|
|
I don't see how "overexplaining" is a bad thing. I'd rather do that than not explain at all, personally. But whatever, you do what you wanna do Steakums.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 16:16
|
|
|
Lotus Aura posted:I don't see how "overexplaining" is a bad thing. I'd rather do that than not explain at all, personally. But whatever, you do what you wanna do Steakums. nice, thank u for understanding how d1 works
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 16:20
|
|
|
Lotus does have a weird avatar
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 16:57
|
|
|
AT-LOW posted:Repeating someone else's points and appending a vote to them is not scumhunting, it is putting on the appearance of scumhunting while not actually being helpful or contributing to the case at hand I don't mind the rest of this AT-LOW podt, it is genuine enough, if overwrought, but I don't like this point. I don't think it's fair interpretation of Lotus' vote.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 17:07
|
|
|
I like lotuses avatar, it looks like an old magic card. Wow so cool..
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 17:17
|
|
|
AT-LOW posted:s given because I got a PM that says 'Mafia'" thing, but when I went to put the next part in after my seriouspost I realized that lapsing back into the bit would not, in fact, make my posting any better or more interesting This literally has never stopped me before
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 17:19
|
|
|
At-low feels a little self conscious with that post but he doesn’t seem nervous. Also I like his style. Lotus’ post is overexplained but I still kinda get it. So I’m gonna ##vote Hal
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 17:57
|
|
|
I disagree that Lotus' post is over-explained, for what that is worth.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 18:03
|
|
|
Yeah I'm not sure I buy a one sentence post as over explanation
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 18:06
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Yeah I'm not sure I buy a one sentence post as over explanation What do you buy? A bunch of bananas at 69¢ a pound?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 18:22
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:What do you buy? A bunch of bananas at 69¢ a pound? 4011.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 20:07
|
|
|
Sazankurosu
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 20:23
|
|
|
##vote toalpaz If jokephase is over, let's just vote scum and be done with it. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 20:51
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:What do you buy? A bunch of bananas at 69¢ a pound? Nice
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 21:00
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:At-low feels a little self conscious with that post but he doesn’t seem nervous. Also I like his style. Look who’s scared
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 21:44
|
|
|
Mr. Steak posted:nice, thank u for understanding how d1 works Thank you for reminding me. ##vote Steak This is more that I don’t want to vote either lotus or at low than anything.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
I’d vote sand too
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
P. Sure I'm in the same boat as voodoo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2021 22:11
|
|
|
Hal Insandenza posted:Look who’s scared Hal’s intimidating me!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 00:02
|
|
|
Voodoofly posted:This is more that I don’t want to vote either lotus or at low than anything. i understand voting for me, but this justification/distancing i don't understand. you are voting me primarily because you don't want to vote for someone at like -5 votes? that's kind of a weird thing to say
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 00:08
|
|
|
i dont like this setting up of a vote trichotomy when nothing of the sort exists. basically nobody has voted anybody yet
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 00:08
|
|
|
actually, im pretty sure voodoo just got caught in his last scumgame (that i played in) for voting "just to get a vote down" rather than voting for scum. this reeks of that same thing. ##vote voodoo
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 00:11
|
|
|
I think it's peculiarly interesting that both Sandwolf and Voodoo posted to the effect of not being interested (at the moment) in voting for either AtLow or myself and then voted for a 3rd individual seemingly spontaneously. These both came after we'd segued into being more serious and in both cases were for an individual neither one had indicated any suspicions for at all. Further to that, quickly checking reveals Sandwolf only mentioned Hal once as a joke in response to a thing RF posted whereas Voodoo addressed two things about Steak that were both related to past games.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:23
|
|
|
That said, I also think it's also peculiarly interesting that Steak noticed Voodoo's vote was more akin to voting for the sake of voting but doesn't seem to even remotely care at all about Sandwolf doing functionally the same thing. I think the reason that didn't catch Steak's attention (it's literally not even mentioned) was because... it was a vote for Hal and not Steak. It was a lot of setup to explain his vote for Voodoo, but spread across 3 posts and it just serves to obfuscate that it's basically an OMGUS.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:23
|
|
|
Looks like Votefinder's down right now so I can't say for sure, but I think Voodoo's the only person currently voting for Steak. Moreover he's the only person who appears to have done so in a way that could be perceived as a serious vote. There's no setting up of a "vote trichotomy" at any point before, during, or even since Voodoo voted for Steak. Steak's response basically reads like he's weirdly shook by it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:23
|
|
|
Or to put it in short: Steak probably scum, Hal/Voodoo probably not, Sandwolf could go either way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:24
|
|
|
[quote="Lotus Aura" post="513747379"] I think Voodoo's the only person currently voting for Steak. Moreover he's the only person who appears to have done so in a way that could be perceived as a serious vote. There's no setting up of a "vote trichotomy" at any point before, during, or even since Voodoo voted for Steak. i dont think you understood what i meant. it doesnt matter how many people are voting for me, what matters is voodoo's stated reason for voting me. or, i guess more specifically, voodoo's weird unnecessary justification for voting me
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:54
|
|
|
Lotus Aura posted:I think Voodoo's the only person currently voting for Steak. Moreover he's the only person who appears to have done so in a way that could be perceived as a serious vote. There's no setting up of a "vote trichotomy" at any point before, during, or even since Voodoo voted for Steak. i dont think you understood what i meant. it doesnt matter how many people are voting for me, what matters is voodoo's stated reason for voting me. or, i guess more specifically, voodoo's weird unnecessary justification for voting me
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:55
|
|
|
is it just me? is what voodoo said perfectly normal actually?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 01:59
|
|
|
Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Mr. Steak posted:is it just me? Oh my god it finally happened
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 02:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 22:20 |
|
|
Steak you voted lotus and at low today, two people I least want to vote. But yes I’d vote anyone who had a vote on them as well, not sure who else was up other than Hal with only 1 vote. I also think sands vote on Hal sucked. Hence I’d vote him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2021 04:26
|
|