|
hbag posted:currently trying to figure out how to switch drives in doom emacs d:/ for example works from anywhere, like // works in linux. EDIT: Shameful snipe so here's something from the blog post about a vulnerability that was found in rebar3 just now. Whatever MononcQc is called on here posted:<MononcQc> what the hell where are ssl opts configured in our stack https://twitter.com/mononcqc/status/1396823090290638848 Andohz fucked around with this message at 17:04 on May 25, 2021 |
# ? May 25, 2021 17:01 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 03:03 |
|
Andohz posted:d:/ for example works from anywhere, like // works in linux. might have misread my post i mean in doom emacs, not the console i am trying to open a file on another drive doing k:/ just tells me that it doesnt exist it's a remote drive, btw - my files on it are at K:\private\hbag
|
# ? May 25, 2021 17:08 |
|
hbag posted:might have misread my post I tried doing it in doom emacs before posting and for me it worked going SPC-f-f and then writing c:/ (in the minibuffer) changed it from D:/Dropbox/org to C:/ I guess it's something to do with being a remote drive?
|
# ? May 25, 2021 17:20 |
|
Andohz posted:I tried doing it in doom emacs before posting and for me it worked going SPC-f-f and then writing c:/ (in the minibuffer) changed it from D:/Dropbox/org to C:/ god probably even symlinking it doesnt work loving rotting ill try it with a local drive to see if that works e: yep local drives work fine
|
# ? May 25, 2021 17:21 |
|
Try SPC-u-s-b to check the power, maybe something fucky
|
# ? May 25, 2021 17:29 |
|
Andohz posted:d:/ for example works from anywhere, like // works in linux. i'm sure both erlang users are absolutely upset
|
# ? May 25, 2021 17:35 |
|
hey, mononcqc posts here, and he'll prolly tell the other guy too! how rude
|
# ? May 25, 2021 17:35 |
|
hbag the solution is to not use emacs. ever. please. it's not worth it. seriously don't intentionally throttle yourself, you have a gui, install vscode. it's a genuinely good text editor.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 18:21 |
|
Kazinsal posted:hbag the solution is to not use emacs. ever. please. it's not worth it. terminal based text editors being good is linux users' "big lie"
|
# ? May 25, 2021 18:44 |
|
you should know at least one terminal based text editor well enough to ssh into a machine and edit some config files. that editor can be emacs if you really want. but just remember, if you ever find yourself writing even a single line of elisp, know that you are willfully wasting your time
|
# ? May 25, 2021 18:50 |
|
either way hbag is going on wsl to use emacs on windows, but i think we all know this is a gateway drug to visual studio code.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 18:57 |
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:either way hbag is going on wsl to use emacs on windows, but i think we all know this is a gateway drug to visual studio code. Sublime is the actual gateway drug to VSCode. Just you, the code, and the millions of extensions sparking dangerously.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 18:59 |
|
yeah this isn't 1978 and we aren't writing self-modifying text editor macro packages for lisp machines. learn the five or six keys you need press in order to do config changes in vi/vim and that's all you should ever need to do with a text editor in an ssh session pretty sure there's an sshfs extension for vscode too so you should be able to use an actual editor for working on any box that has network connectivity
|
# ? May 25, 2021 18:59 |
|
Kazinsal posted:pretty sure there's an sshfs extension for vscode too so you should be able to use an actual editor for working on any box that has network connectivity oh boy, do i have some things to tell you about vscode. (vscode is the heroin to the opium you are describing, running most of the editor on the remote host transparently).
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:01 |
|
i have used vs code i just like doom emacs i do not like vanilla emacs that poo poo sucks
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:08 |
|
if doom emacs is not a doom clone where you shoot your files to delete them I will be severely disappointed
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:20 |
|
akadajet posted:terminal based text editors being good is linux users' "big lie" emacs being great is a lisp lie told to people who like just a little more lisp I don't disagree, it's a great editor, but the learning curve is so steep it might as well be a circle
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:22 |
|
The Fool posted:if doom emacs is not a doom clone where you shoot your files to delete them I will be severely disappointed it's not, because that would be cool and this is linux we're talking about
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:25 |
|
Learn vim Install vim plugin in vscode That's it. That's all you need.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:29 |
|
shoeberto posted:Learn vim
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:30 |
|
you can skip the learn vim part
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:31 |
|
shoeberto posted:Learn vim that sounds awful why would you do that to yourself?
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:31 |
|
You know what, just don't learn a single editor and go hard on low-code. Drag and drop that login page into being.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:32 |
|
I will go way out of my way to not edit a file in a terminal config management, git pull, scp, remote editing, or even just straight up redeploying the server are all things I’d rather do than directly edit a file on a server.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:37 |
|
Vim navigation is good for reducing RSIs.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:37 |
|
Boiled Water posted:that sounds awful why would you do that to yourself? i do that too. i guess vanilla vscode must have shortcuts for vim like functions? the ones i use the most are multiline edit, selection find/replace, delete/copy whole line, move to end of words, etc
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:39 |
|
shoeberto posted:Vim navigation is good for reducing RSIs. its true, chords are terrible
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:47 |
|
Also I hate having to constantly move between mouse and keyboard when writing code, vim navigation is good for that too.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:49 |
|
emacs peeps i have known have almost universally had to get wrist braces and poo poo except for the emacs dudes at current lispjob i guess it's that they just lisp all day for the job anyways so their macros are better than normal peep macros
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:50 |
|
Issuing a fatwa against vim haters.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 19:55 |
|
Armitag3 posted:You know what, just don't learn a single editor and go hard on low-code.
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:01 |
|
akadajet posted:it's not, because that would be cool and this is linux we're talking about this exists though it's not emaxs https://www.cs.unm.edu/~dlchao/flake/doom/chi/chi.html
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:12 |
|
i guess its for procs not files but close enough
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:13 |
|
somebody else took that and turned it into a kubernetes thing where you can shoot objects to delete them from the cluster
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:14 |
|
necrotic posted:somebody else took that and turned it into a kubernetes thing where you can shoot objects to delete them from the cluster now that is something I can get behind
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:23 |
|
doom emacs is emacs but with vim keybindings sorta like evil mode but uh different idfk
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:31 |
|
The Fool posted:now that is something I can get behind boom https://github.com/leosunmo/doomernetes
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:36 |
|
honestly really disappointed to find out that "doom emacs" isn't a text editor with the super shotgun
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:39 |
|
Kazinsal posted:honestly really disappointed to find out that "doom emacs" isn't a text editor with the super shotgun
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:54 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 03:03 |
|
AnimeIsTrash posted:Issuing a fatwa against vim haters. Inshallah they won't exit
|
# ? May 25, 2021 20:59 |