Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
John_A_Tallon
Nov 22, 2000

Oh my! Check out that mitre!

notwithoutmyanus posted:

I have to say when I saw this I found it hilarious. Literally the most wasteful option. I mean there are even actual Bitcoin mining warehouses around the US that do try to focus on renewables but instead someone went "gently caress this earth let's mine some bitcoin"

It may be interesting to compare the damage these butt mining operations do to the environment to the damage that ELF terror targets like SUV dealerships do.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Arsenic Lupin
Apr 12, 2012

This particularly rapid💨 unintelligible 😖patter💁 isn't generally heard🧏‍♂️, and if it is🤔, it doesn't matter💁.


https://twitter.com/MikeDorning/status/1399792424856207374

It's looking like cyberattacks may put pressure on the government to regulate cryptocurrency simply to make anonymous ransoms more difficult.

Big Beef City
Aug 15, 2013

Arsenic Lupin posted:

It's looking like cyberattacks may put pressure on the government to regulate cryptocurrency simply to make anonymous ransoms more difficult.

That is not in any way "what it's looking like", no.

buglord
Jul 31, 2010

Cheating at a raffle? I sentence you to 1 year in jail! No! Two years! Three! Four! Five years! Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah!

Buglord

Arsenic Lupin posted:

https://twitter.com/MikeDorning/status/1399792424856207374

It's looking like cyberattacks may put pressure on the government to regulate cryptocurrency simply to make anonymous ransoms more difficult.

Correct me if I’m misremembering but wasn’t there a GBS thread where goons were able to look at unsecured wifi camera feeds and people were noticing how shockingly bad security is around really important things? I vaguely remember something about a hydroelectric plant in South America basically leaving the digital door unlocked.

PookBear
Nov 1, 2008

buglord posted:

Correct me if I’m misremembering but wasn’t there a GBS thread where goons were able to look at unsecured wifi camera feeds and people were noticing how shockingly bad security is around really important things? I vaguely remember something about a hydroelectric plant in South America basically leaving the digital door unlocked.

yeah, a lot of stuff was just straight up typing in the right address in your browser to see the camera feeds

Spatial
Nov 15, 2007

Arsenic Lupin posted:

https://twitter.com/MikeDorning/status/1399792424856207374

It's looking like cyberattacks may put pressure on the government to regulate cryptocurrency simply to make anonymous ransoms more difficult.
regulating to protect people is good, but on other hand criminals are making mega money which is also incredibly good, so it's impossible to make a decision here if you're the government

e: lol

Spatial fucked around with this message at 20:57 on Jun 1, 2021

nomad2020
Jan 30, 2007

PookBear posted:

yeah, a lot of stuff was just straight up typing in the right address in your browser to see the camera feeds

You could google search parts of the address string and basically search by manufacturer that way it was so bad.

Fame Douglas
Nov 20, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

buglord posted:

Correct me if I’m misremembering but wasn’t there a GBS thread where goons were able to look at unsecured wifi camera feeds and people were noticing how shockingly bad security is around really important things? I vaguely remember something about a hydroelectric plant in South America basically leaving the digital door unlocked.

I remember a thread dedicated to watching some guy work in an office through his unsecured surveillance camera on another forum back in 2006 or so.

They even invented a name for him.

Solar Tornado
Aug 9, 2016

A true fool keeps on fighting, even when there is no more glory to be gained

Fame Douglas posted:

I remember a thread dedicated to watching some guy work in an office through his unsecured surveillance camera on another forum back in 2006 or so.

They even invented a name for him.

Nowadays it'd be another struggling twitch channel

John_A_Tallon
Nov 22, 2000

Oh my! Check out that mitre!

Arsenic Lupin posted:

https://twitter.com/MikeDorning/status/1399792424856207374

It's looking like cyberattacks may put pressure on the government to regulate cryptocurrency simply to make anonymous ransoms more difficult.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-31/meat-is-latest-cyber-victim-as-hackers-hit-top-supplier-jbs is the actual article, instead of some guy's Twitter feed

tehinternet
Feb 14, 2005

Semantically, "you" is both singular and plural, though syntactically it is always plural. It always takes a verb form that originally marked the word as plural.

Also, there is no plural when the context is an argument with an individual rather than a group. Somfin shouldn't put words in my mouth.

B-b-but I’m literally unable to read a news article unless it leads with

BREAKING:

jokes
Dec 20, 2012

Uh... Kupo?

tehinternet posted:

B-b-but I’m literally unable to read a news article unless it leads with

BREAKING:

WATCH: Bitcoin slams USD in new adTV spot

Wifi Toilet
Oct 1, 2004

Toilet Rascal
BRB, gonna go fill up some 55 gallon drums with beef.

Zil
Jun 4, 2011

Satanically Summoned Citrus


Wifi Toilet posted:

BRB, gonna go fill up some 55 gallon drums with beef.

Yum, fermented meat.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




catspleen posted:

Oh yeah lol I just completely misread/my brain inserted something mildly competent or realistic like GWh

Several orders of magnitude up.

The BTC blockchain burns about 115 TWh of power a year right now.

drunken officeparty
Aug 23, 2006

Arsenic Lupin posted:

https://twitter.com/MikeDorning/status/1399792424856207374

It's looking like cyberattacks may put pressure on the government to regulate cryptocurrency simply to make anonymous ransoms more difficult.

Some nerd created a “bit coins” 10 years ago and now it made me unable to get my car inspected for a few weeks earlier this year.

LanceHunter
Nov 12, 2016

Beautiful People Club


PookBear posted:

yeah, a lot of stuff was just straight up typing in the right address in your browser to see the camera feeds

Yeah. A lot of really poor security wasn't exploited nearly as badly as it could have been, because why would you want to bother with shutting down a local hospital or a slaughterhouse company? Those targets are too small for nation-states who want to cause trouble, and don't have the kind of prestige XXX_H4X0R_T34M_420_XXX is looking for when they are doing cracks. But now that cryptocurrency has provided a clear way to make money off these kinds of hacks, we are seeing them proliferate.

WillPac
Aug 4, 2009

Rags to Riches

Liquid Communism posted:

Several orders of magnitude up.

The BTC blockchain burns about 115 TWh of power a year right now.

I lurk this thread frequently to understand the anti-Bitcoin perspective, and I have to say I was surprised to see Nic Carter's writing referenced.

Did you read the whole article? Nic is a well-known Bitcoin advocate and ironically the article is a good read for the open-minded skeptic.

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

It's several pages of "well, this number is bad, but it's not really that bad" because of a bunch of nonsense.

"If you are one of the tens of millions of individuals worldwide using it as a tool to escape monetary repression, inflation, or capital controls, you most likely think that the energy is extremely well spent." That's...questionable. And the links aren't to cites that demonstrate the claim. (most of the links are to Venezuela, which is lololololol)

"Many journalists and academics talk about Bitcoin’s high “per-transaction energy cost,” but this metric is misleading. The vast majority of Bitcoin’s energy consumption happens during the mining process." Yes, and? Mining butts and using it are one and the same, you idiot, because the blockchain requires it. That's a fundamental misunderstanding or a dishonest rhetorical sleigh of hand.

The rest is ideological claptrap.

Klyith
Aug 3, 2007

GBS Pledge Week

WillPac posted:

I lurk this thread frequently to understand the anti-Bitcoin perspective, and I have to say I was surprised to see Nic Carter's writing referenced.

Did you read the whole article? Nic is a well-known Bitcoin advocate and ironically the article is a good read for the open-minded skeptic.

Like the bit where he says that mining in central china is mostly produced with hydropower, and then a big coal mine shutting down lowered the global hashrate by 1/3?

Yes, very good info produced by a bitcoin advocate that turned out to be bullshit. Just less bullshit than rando twitter info that was produced by putting completely imaginary numbers on a chart.

Code Jockey
Jan 24, 2006

69420 basic bytes free

kw0134 posted:

"If you are one of the tens of millions of individuals worldwide using it as a tool to escape monetary repression, inflation, or capital controls,


uh

repression and capital controls such as "don't spend money on child pornography and assasination"?

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

Code Jockey posted:

uh

repression and capital controls such as "don't spend money on child pornography and assasination"?
Shhh, you're supposed to focus on the like the five people in Venezuela who is sticking it to Maduro by using buttcoin (remember that Maduro tried launching his own rival crypto) and conflating with economic liberalism everywhere.

Also ignoring all the multiple reasons why buttcoin finds itself in the news for unflattering reasons.

it's a quote from a bitcoin apologist

Rectal Death Adept
Jun 20, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
i like how there can be "open minded" skeptics on bitcoins at this point.

It has proven to be useless for it's intended purpose. It has proven to be extremely wasteful for no reason because it is useless. The only thing you can argue is that bitcoin will be worth money because people want to gamble with it.

Are the terawatts of power being completely wasted for no reason supposed to be justified in some way? Justified so completely that doing literally nothing with it is preferable to literally anything else?

It sure can't be because of Bitcoins utility or the specifics behind it's intended purpose because it objectively loving sucks at all of it and 100 different cryptocurrencies do everything better than bitcoin by design because they weren't rough draft white paper proof of concepts.

If you think cryptocurrency has merit then one of the last ones you would pick is Bitcoin and if you are trying to figure out what merit bitcoin has because it's Worth Money then you are doing it wrong.





However, buy bitcoin because it's the preferred coin of dumb money

Rectal Death Adept fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Jun 1, 2021

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Code Jockey posted:

uh

repression and capital controls such as "don't spend money on child pornography and assasination"?
Joe Biden's going to take all your money and spend it on those people. If you do not immediately buy my deflationary asset, you are demonstrating that you support Joe Biden, and probably also the cops.

ymgve
Jan 2, 2004


:dukedog:
Offensive Clock

Code Jockey posted:

uh

repression and capital controls such as "don't spend money on child pornography and assasination"?

dont slander bitcoin


theres no proof that any actual assassination has been paid for in bitcoin, its scams and feds all the way down

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

WillPac posted:

I lurk this thread frequently to understand the anti-Bitcoin perspective, and I have to say I was surprised to see Nic Carter's writing referenced.

Did you read the whole article? Nic is a well-known Bitcoin advocate and ironically the article is a good read for the open-minded skeptic.

in your own words, what is "good" about bitcoin?

WillPac
Aug 4, 2009

Rags to Riches

punishedkissinger posted:

in your own words, what is "good" about bitcoin?

I'm not personally huge into Bitcoin, but I do think that there's a place for a trustless settlement system that isn't run by a central authority.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

WillPac posted:

I'm not personally huge into Bitcoin, but I do think that there's a place for a trustless settlement system that isn't run by a central authority.

why?

Big Beef City
Aug 15, 2013

WillPac posted:

I'm not personally huge into Bitcoin, but I do think that there's a place for a trustless settlement system that isn't run by a central authority.

For what goal?

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

Let me know when you get a trustless settlement system, because as it stands there's a poo poo ton of trust and centralization between trusting the exchanges and the centralization of mining power.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

he said hes only invested a little in bitcoin

WillPac
Aug 4, 2009

Rags to Riches

For me personally, it's a bit philosophical. The internet has connected all of us globally in a way that was never possible before, and these days we can communicate with virtually anybody, in any location.

Ultimately, I believe there should be a method to transfer monetary value to one another that reflects this new reality. For me, Bitcoin represents a settlement system that is run by its own participants that can transfer value to virtually anybody, in any location.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

WillPac posted:

For me personally, it's a bit philosophical. The internet has connected all of us globally in a way that was never possible before, and these days we can communicate with virtually anybody, in any location.

Ultimately, I believe there should be a method to transfer monetary value to one another that reflects this new reality. For me, Bitcoin represents a settlement system that is run by its own participants that can transfer value to virtually anybody, in any location.

so does venmo? and you dont risk an exchange straight stealing it from you.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



WillPac posted:

For me personally, it's a bit philosophical. The internet has connected all of us globally in a way that was never possible before, and these days we can communicate with virtually anybody, in any location.

Ultimately, I believe there should be a method to transfer monetary value to one another that reflects this new reality. For me, Bitcoin represents a settlement system that is run by its own participants that can transfer value to virtually anybody, in any location.
Why Bitcoin in particular? All these other cryptocurrencies seem to do everything Bitcoin purports to do much better - still wasteful, but far less so - with the one difference being "they do not make established hodlers richer in fiat-denominated figures".

Shumagorath
Jun 6, 2001
"trustless" """settlement"""

jokes
Dec 20, 2012

Uh... Kupo?

WillPac posted:

For me personally, it's a bit philosophical. The internet has connected all of us globally in a way that was never possible before, and these days we can communicate with virtually anybody, in any location.

Ultimately, I believe there should be a method to transfer monetary value to one another that reflects this new reality. For me, Bitcoin represents a settlement system that is run by its own participants that can transfer value to virtually anybody, in any location.

Just use venmo? Or any online money thing?

bitcoin isnt the only "money, but internet" out there

spunkshui
Oct 5, 2011



WillPac posted:

For me personally, it's a bit philosophical. The internet has connected all of us globally in a way that was never possible before, and these days we can communicate with virtually anybody, in any location.

Ultimately, I believe there should be a method to transfer monetary value to one another that reflects this new reality. For me, Bitcoin represents a settlement system that is run by its own participants that can transfer value to virtually anybody, in any location.

So where do you see the guy that’s printing 5 billion dollars of new tether a month in all of this vision of yours?

I guess it wouldn’t be a currency of the Internet if it wasn’t a huge scam.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

you need like a massive farm to have any chance of mining a bitcoin now right?

Tenchrono
Jun 2, 2011


You can get a little centralization, as a treat.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WillPac
Aug 4, 2009

Rags to Riches

Nessus posted:

Why Bitcoin in particular? All these other cryptocurrencies seem to do everything Bitcoin purports to do much better - still wasteful, but far less so - with the one difference being "they do not make established hodlers richer in fiat-denominated figures".

Again, I'm really not a big Bitcoin guy, but I'm happy to share my opinion.

Long story short, I believe that the energy consumed by the Bitcoin network is what gives the virtual "coin" value. Anyone can make a proof-of-stake coin and print the coins at the money machine in hopes that others will find it valuable later on. Proof-of-work is different because it requires significant physical infrastructure in the real world (ASIC machines, energy costs, warehouse rent, etc.) and those real world ties are what gives it value to me.

In my ideal world, I would prefer if all of the hash power were more evenly distributed throughout the world and that all energy came from renewable sources. I also think there is only room for one proof-of-work blockchain and that should be Bitcoin as they already have the infrastructure set up.

I also accept that's just my perspective and opinion and I respect those that see no value in Bitcoin as well.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply