|
Simiain posted:Seems heavily implied that one of the dalmations, Genghis, is pregnant at the end, and that Perdita and Pongo are the pups. This would seem to have incestuous implications for Dalmations lore going forward but, hey, maybe thats how dog-breeding works? Pretty sure that is exactly how Dalmatian breeding works.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 05:14 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 20:28 |
|
Google Butt posted:is it a bad or good movie. cgis dogs sound like an auto fail
|
# ? May 31, 2021 06:08 |
I just watched it and Emma stone carried, could have been worse
|
|
# ? May 31, 2021 06:14 |
|
Google Butt posted:is it a bad or good movie. cgis dogs sound like an auto fail It's a soulless husk of a movie with some occasional good performances and a costume design department the size of the GDP of a minor nation. Personal frustration. This movie thoroughly suffered from the aqua-man thing where outside wide shots were CGI even when they didn't need to and look garbage. The ending confrontation especially looks awkward and flat as gently caress. It's incredible that this is the Disney that made the Mandalarion two years ago.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 06:35 |
|
Golden Retrievers are the real bad guys. The happy dumb act isn’t fooling me.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 06:48 |
|
Maybe the real bad guys are the friends we made along the way. - M. Night Shyamalan
|
# ? May 31, 2021 12:56 |
|
The MSJ posted:If you the want the most up to date rear end in a top hat Cruella, watcch the episodes of Once Upon A Time she was in. There’s a sequel series to the original movie called 101 Dalmatian Street that also is pretty forthright with Cruella being a huge rear end in a top hat. https://youtu.be/47PXqnfoNfU (The series itself wasn’t good enough to watch if you weren’t in the target demographic. Catchy opening though.)
|
# ? May 31, 2021 13:01 |
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:The point is to tell a new story, but a new story that exists in an established universe with a known character. It's the most 2021 poo poo you've ever seen. We can't just make up somebody, we have to find an already existing character. And we can't just have them be evil, they have to have some redeeming qualities. If these two impulses conflict in any way, just handwave that away, because, gently caress it, there's loving money to be made. I think it's just that wanting to kill cute dogs is so irredeemable to modern day audiences, way more than wanting to kill people, that there was no way to actually have the character end up as the same character in the original movie. She's literally 100% a good guy in this movie. She does nothing bad at all in the whole film lol.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 15:31 |
|
I mean Disney totally could have actually gone for humanizing the dog killer and then pull the rug out from under the audience, but that would have required an actual artistic ambition. I mean they try to establish some sort of moral conflict but even that falls flat because at worst Cruella is a dick to her friends and the duchess by comparison is a complete monster wearing a skin-suit.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 15:59 |
I mean the baroness is literally a serial killer and cruella can't even murk a fake dog, sad
|
|
# ? May 31, 2021 17:30 |
|
The MSJ posted:If you the want the most up to date rear end in a top hat Cruella, watcch the episodes of Once Upon A Time she was in. That show was once on my watch list but I never got around to it and had since forgotten about it. How is it? Is it worth watching now?
|
# ? May 31, 2021 18:43 |
|
mcmagic posted:I think it's just that wanting to kill cute dogs is so irredeemable to modern day audiences, way more than wanting to kill people, that there was no way to actually have the character end up as the same character in the original movie. She's literally 100% a good guy in this movie. She does nothing bad at all in the whole film lol. Yet people keep bringing up that she is a dog killer in the movie. It's like with Joker. Lots of 'this is a love letter to incels and we are gonna have a mass shooting because of movie!!!!" comments back then. I was honestly expecting people losing their poo poo instead over the One Gay Character (TM by Disney).
|
# ? May 31, 2021 19:03 |
|
Cruella is a lot of fun, but would be way better if it was the same movie but not about Cruella de Vil. The second hour also drags a bit. But it's The Devil Wears Prada on crack, and I mean that as a compliment. It does enough of its own thing well enough to not bother me, not unlike Maleficent. At this rate, I wouldn't even complain if Disney just gave all of their villains the Wicked treatment. So far their success rate is streets ahead of the straight live action remakes. If they can pull it off with imo arguably the two most irredeemable villains on the roster, the rest should be ezpz. At least these movies do something different. Jolo posted:Nina West would kill it as Ursula. She co hosted a Drag Queen Christmas show I went to a while back with Monet XChange and she was excellent. Ginger Minj is my pick, she got dem pipes.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 19:42 |
|
esperterra posted:At this rate, I wouldn't even complain if Disney just gave all of their villains the Wicked treatment. So far their success rate is streets ahead of the straight live action remakes. If they can pull it off with imo arguably the two most irredeemable villains on the roster, the rest should be ezpz. At least these movies do something different.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 19:45 |
|
esperterra posted:Ginger Minj is my pick, she got dem pipes. I'm definitely buying a ticket.
|
# ? May 31, 2021 23:29 |
|
There was a 101 Dalmatians cartoon on Disney's One Saturday Morning block back in the 90s and I'm wondering why they never put it on Disney+. I wonder how it holds up.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2021 06:11 |
|
So...Jupiter's Legacy is not getting a second season, and got the cancelled hammer. Not surprised!
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 03:33 |
|
Desperado Bones posted:So...Jupiter's Legacy is not getting a second season, and got the cancelled hammer. But Netflix then orders a series about the villains.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 04:51 |
|
Desperado Bones posted:So...Jupiter's Legacy is not getting a second season, and got the cancelled hammer. I'm surprised they had the guts to do that. Show was a complete disaster.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 05:32 |
|
The MSJ posted:But Netflix then orders a series about the villains. And anime too!!! It's gonna be hilarious if both flop too.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 05:35 |
|
On a whim for the last week we watched what turned out to be nothing but mirthless garbage Please don't be us and skip the following ... All those Conjuring movies moreso any of the Annabelle movies Fast and tge Furious present(wtf?) Hobbes and Shaw We never seen any of the FF movies but I don't want to find out they are worse this was torture We did see one great movie by mistake God bless you HBO for having Troll 2 the movie devoid of trolls
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 07:45 |
|
Hobbs & Shaw does feel a lot like Dwayne Johnson pulling a Sandler to go on an expensive vacation with some friends, but gently caress me if it isn't an excellent 4K HDR showcase. Statham's stubble looks so sharp
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 07:49 |
|
It made me angry that one John Wick director and Elba could make such a boring slog with no tension. I'm similar when dragged to see Transformers I'll just start yelling "no tuttoro/Goodman get outta here! Your better than this!"
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 07:54 |
|
Hobbes doesn't work without Calvin.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 14:30 |
|
The idea of watching Hobbes and Shaw and having absolutely no context for anything or anyone is incredibly funny.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 15:47 |
|
AccountSupervisor posted:The idea of watching Hobbes and Shaw and having absolutely no context for anything or anyone is incredibly funny. I can't imagine from what little character development the movie had that seeing the others would enhance the understanding at all. Rock plays a supercop of some sort and Jason is a baddie but not like a real baddie, baddie and his sister is a super cop. What nuance am I missing? They all seem as durable and superhuman as Captain America.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 17:07 |
|
Junkie Disease posted:I can't imagine from what little character development the movie had that seeing the others would enhance the understanding at all. You can understand the plot just fine but the characters have been gradually turning into absurd cartoons over the course of like three or four movies so there's a progression there you're missing. Like, when you've seen the previous films it makes total sense that Hobbs would just jump out the window of a skyscraper, it's totally natural to the type of ridiculous character he's become.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 17:13 |
|
You arent missing any nuance really. Even as F&F fan I didnt care for the movie. Its just pretty much made specifically as a response to the fandoms desire to see a team up movie with those two characters based on their chemistry and history in previous movies. You have to be pretty into the style and general tone of those movies to enjoy it so going in with no idea as to how that franchise operates now is pretty funny. My guess is you probably would not enjoy any of the modern F&F films.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 17:13 |
|
I thought Bo Burnham - Inside was really great. I'm not usually into musical comedy but this was clever.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:00 |
|
Is the Highlander series worth watching? I was going to watch a few of the movies again and never saw the show. It's on peacock and I thought it was pretty well liked back in the day.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:30 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is the Highlander series worth watching? I was going to watch a few of the movies again and never saw the show. It's on peacock and I thought it was pretty well liked back in the day. I love it, but i have a lot of nostalgia wrapped up in the movie and show as well. It's very of its time.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:37 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is the Highlander series worth watching? I was going to watch a few of the movies again and never saw the show. It's on peacock and I thought it was pretty well liked back in the day. It has been uh I guess decades now since I last watched it but it was memorable enough for me that I thought about revisiting it recently (but never got around to it). It's campy but I always thought Adrian Paul was great in it and all the flashbacks to different places and eras was always fun. The fight choreography is pretty good for a 90's tv show. The show was solid imho right up until one of the leads left at the end of the 5th season.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:40 |
|
Kingtheninja posted:Is the Highlander series worth watching? I was going to watch a few of the movies again and never saw the show. It's on peacock and I thought it was pretty well liked back in the day. The acting is pretty decent but I think it really just boils down to how much you enjoy the immortals scheming against one another culminating in mediocre sword duels convention. If you like that conceit and can stomach the 90s feel, it's pretty good. E: also I agree with the above poster that Adrian Paul is really great in the role. He's an actor I really would have liked to see get more work. I read once that he was in the running for Bond but it went to Pierce Brosnan. Paul would have been a great Bond in the latest gen films I think. He's got that same dark charisma that Craig has.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:40 |
|
There's zero chance I would have watched Lodge 49 without this thread's recommendation, so thanks! The way it treats some obviously supernatural happenings as mundane is really cool. There's some mystical element, but it's just background to the characters' stories. I just finished the first season, but I expected the lodge members to be a secret cult but no, they really are just ordinary, genuine people. I watched Odd Thomas which was a good plot held back by just the worst acting. Anton Yelchin was allegedly able to act (RIP), but here it sounds like he's trying and failing to sound like a pulp detective? And his girlfriend's attempt at that was even worse. Afterwards I saw it's based on a novel by Dean Koontz, and I haven't read any of his work but the character of Odd Thomas felt completely like a Mary Sue.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:44 |
|
FLIPADELPHIA posted:E: also I agree with the above poster that Adrian Paul is really great in the role. He's an actor I really would have liked to see get more work. I read once that he was in the running for Bond but it went to Pierce Brosnan. Paul would have been a great Bond in the latest gen films I think. He's got that same dark charisma that Craig has. I always felt so bad that Adrian Paul's career never really took off and after the Highlander show ended he just went on to do a couple lovely Highlander TV movies and a bunch of other dreck. Dude had range and a whole lot of actual martial art skills in addition to being a legit hunk. Maybe he was a jerk irl or something. drat ok I need to rewatch this show again
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:48 |
|
The show's first season(or maybe first two seasons?) is actually very high quality t.v. for the time because they filmed a bunch of it in Paris. It has a unique look to it because of the setting.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 18:57 |
|
Basebf555 posted:You can understand the plot just fine but the characters have been gradually turning into absurd cartoons over the course of like three or four movies so there's a progression there you're missing. Like, when you've seen the previous films it makes total sense that Hobbs would just jump out the window of a skyscraper, it's totally natural to the type of ridiculous character he's become.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 19:43 |
|
LifeLynx posted:There's zero chance I would have watched Lodge 49 without this thread's recommendation, so thanks! The way it treats some obviously supernatural happenings as mundane is really cool. There's some mystical element, but it's just background to the characters' stories. I just finished the first season, but I expected the lodge members to be a secret cult but no, they really are just ordinary, genuine people. The commercials I thought he was just some lazy scammer who conned his way into living in a retirement community or something.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 20:24 |
|
LifeLynx posted:There's zero chance I would have watched Lodge 49 without this thread's recommendation, so thanks! The way it treats some obviously supernatural happenings as mundane is really cool. There's some mystical element, but it's just background to the characters' stories. I just finished the first season, but I expected the lodge members to be a secret cult but no, they really are just ordinary, genuine people. The way I've described it to others is if Twin Peaks was set in Southern California and no one really cared about the mysteries. Which is probably not a great way to get people to watch, but there really isn't a good comparison. It was nice seeing a show with mysterious elements but not having that be the focus.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 21:06 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 20:28 |
|
There is no way i'm gonna watch FF stuff that has Vin in it. Fool me once Witch hunter!
|
# ? Jun 3, 2021 23:52 |