|
Dare even came back recently. Jeff will probably be in the green by next monkeu season.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 01:41 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 13:06 |
|
im genuinely unsure if the guh ad is meant to be a joke banner or not. probably both.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 02:49 |
|
guh seems to be a "real" thing, so either it's an ironic ad for a real bitcoin or genuine
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 03:01 |
|
Vivian Darkbloom posted:
Zamujasa looked into it a little while ago and the way it works is pretty great: Zamujasa posted:i looked into this in the gray thread () is it an obvious scam, incredibly stupid, or both? it's impossible to tell!
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 03:25 |
|
Ok but what about drying strawberries and epoxying your ports?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 03:29 |
|
🚫🫐⁉️
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 04:37 |
|
Boxturret posted:guh seems to be a "real" thing, so either it's an ironic ad for a real bitcoin or genuine oh yeah guh is absolutely real (real stupid). the whole "number go up, money go down" makes me think its ironic tho
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 05:44 |
|
what even is irony in 2021?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 05:46 |
|
dead
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 05:57 |
|
Zamujasa posted:oh yeah guh is absolutely real (real stupid). the whole "number go up, money go down" makes me think its ironic tho but apparently that's how it works?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 06:13 |
|
i dont see how reducing the amount everyone owns would lead to an equivalent increase in value though
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 06:57 |
|
ymgve posted:i dont see how reducing the amount everyone owns would lead to an equivalent increase in value though look all they need is _one_ musk tweet
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 06:59 |
|
ymgve posted:i dont see how reducing the amount everyone owns would lead to an equivalent increase in value though it's simple, there are 100 guhcoins worth a total of $1000, so each on is worth $10. you say that now 1 guhcoin is equal to .5 guhcoins and therefore each guhcoin is worth $20, so a number went up therefore good guh
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 07:05 |
|
they're just changing the units to make the numbers look different, it's like when that one chinese exchange was starting to catch the governments attention for their high transaction volume so they came up with the brilliant idea of moving the decimals over a bit and pretend they were dealing with pennies
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 07:09 |
|
but it all hinges on everyone agreeing that price is measured as a fraction of the market cap, and that the latter magically stays constant though the number of units go down it would make more «sense» (from a scam perspective) to have something where the number of coins you own go up, then hope the price doesn’t react quickly enough
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 08:12 |
|
I know I've said this before, but all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about quantum computing makes me imagine a bunch of stiff old men in lab jackets sitting around an IBM sub basement deciding whose crypto they were going to steal today.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 09:42 |
|
ymgve posted:but it all hinges on everyone agreeing that price is measured as a fraction of the market cap, and that the latter magically stays constant though the number of units go down i imagine smart contracts make this extra stupid somehow, possibly because your naive trading site queries the smart contract to determine how many coins (user) owns and how many coins there are total (because, remember, market cap is a very important number to these people) and then Math Happens smart contracts seem like something absolutely ripe for novel scams but i guess the problem is you have to inflate their value before they're really useful
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 10:03 |
|
https://twitter.com/silvermanjacob/status/1404128170127806465
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 11:53 |
|
I mean if you say it's a pump it's still a pump right?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 12:12 |
|
I buy my crypto on the dump when I say you pump we pump
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 13:29 |
|
I was expecting that to be a blatant hoodwink, but apparently they never actually told the suckers which coin to buy, so no harm no foul?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 14:26 |
|
KnifeWrench posted:I was expecting that to be a blatant hoodwink, but apparently they never actually told the suckers which coin to buy, so no harm no foul? You know if anyone was paying attention they would've assumed a coin themselves
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 14:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/dandolfa/status/1404431931698290688
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 15:14 |
|
don't think this has been posted: what if dns but it's crypto!? https://unstoppabledomains.com/ hmm ok looks like a regular registrar... ok kinda vague... ah lol ok that's why:
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 16:34 |
|
so it's just a url shortener but for 1HitLerDidNothingWrongggggghJewfv, cool
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 16:43 |
|
Boxturret posted:so it's just a url shortener but for 1HitLerDidNothingWrongggggghJewfv, cool But made by the modern-day monster.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 16:46 |
|
Boxturret posted:so it's just a url shortener but for 1HitLerDidNothingWrongggggghJewfv, cool it's not even that as i understand it. they've literally established their own DNS roots separate from ICANN and are issuing domains under them using crypto or some poo poo. essentially useless for anyone on the whole internet. i love how this bit from their website glosses over things:
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 16:51 |
|
itchyandscratchy
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 16:53 |
|
a url shortener except that the shortened url doesn't work
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:12 |
|
well it would work if fully hosed your poo poo up enough to force their alternate roots, then it would work. however then they'd also be resolving every other single TLD so your google.com would probably become a Moroccan gambling site?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:15 |
|
This has to have been designed to prevent law enforcement from sinkholing botnet domains with the assumption the FBI won't just kick in the door on unstoppabledomains.com itself.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:24 |
|
i get the feeling they're going to push a client-side component to make the split-root thing work (only way they can resolve their bs non-domains without breaking the rest of the internet). i guess that's why it's being cross-promoted with that shite Brave browser. honestly that kind of DNS mangling is rife for exploitation and bypasses a lot of rebind attack protections.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:28 |
|
it's people. bitcoin is people!
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:51 |
|
Gazpacho posted:it's people. bitcoin is people! duh, how do you think hyperbitcoinziation works?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:56 |
|
I liked it better when it was called namecoin and died
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 17:59 |
|
be your own bind9
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 21:51 |
|
Boxturret posted:it's simple, there are 100 guhcoins worth a total of $1000, so each on is worth $10. you say that now 1 guhcoin is equal to .5 guhcoins and therefore each guhcoin is worth $20, so a number went up therefore good remember when bitcoiners were talking about how since there's only ever 21 million bitcoins then that means the sum total value of every single speck of matter in the entire universe is 21 million bitcoins, so really the value of one bitcoin is unimaginably huge? i assume it works like that
|
# ? Jun 14, 2021 23:15 |
|
Boxturret posted:so it's just a url shortener but for 1HitLerDidNothingWrongggggghJewfv, cool this would be funny if it were a joke, unfortunately though here is the issue Brave's founder put on git that got neonazi wiki infogalactic added to the list of built-in search engines alongside google, bing etc https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/issues/5475 people noticed ~2 years later and it finally got pulled
|
# ? Jun 15, 2021 00:05 |
|
the guy who inflicted javascript upon the world is... a piece of poo poo???
|
# ? Jun 15, 2021 00:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 13:06 |
|
text editor posted:this would be funny if it were a joke, unfortunately though here is the issue Brave's founder put on git that got neonazi wiki infogalactic added to the list of built-in search engines alongside google, bing etc i'm not really sure why anyone would care that the nazi browser has a nazi search engine, let alone remove it 2 years later
|
# ? Jun 15, 2021 00:19 |