|
As a fair warning to newcomers or anyone whose never joined the Discord. We're really into Butts.
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2021 23:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 15:14 |
|
|
what is the butt discord link? e: also the BF1 resurgence allowed me to play air assault for the first time and I was able to be turret for the entire round of battlefield again. i used to love shooting down planes on 1942 in the little radar dish AA on Battle of Berlin. its just so relaxing Captain Beans fucked around with this message at 02:07 on Aug 5, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 01:57
|
|
|
Captain Beans posted:what is the butt discord link? https://discord.gg/eXjk7tYW
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 02:47
|
|
|
Anyone want BFV? Quote for a Twitch Prime key I guess
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 02:51
|
|
|
Am I reading this right? In BF1, the assignment to unlock the "pin down" perk requires 35 kills with the Trench Fleur, which is a dlc-only melee weapon. Is this secretly a DLC-exclusive perk?
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 03:42
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:Am I reading this right? In BF1, the assignment to unlock the "pin down" perk requires 35 kills with the Trench Fleur, which is a dlc-only melee weapon. Is this secretly a DLC-exclusive perk? Yes basically. It's also a garbage perk
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 03:57
|
|
|
Upgraded my PC and I'm super impressed by BF1 at ultra. Wonder how Bfv will hold up when it's installed
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 09:19
|
|
|
BFV looks super pretty on ultra. I just wish it was better. I don't hate playing it, it's just, ehh. I go back to playing 1 and 4 a whole lot more.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 09:21
|
|
|
Looking over the specs for 2042, it looks like both my new laptop and year old PC will run everything on medium. But since it's BF I will likely set everything to low anyway because my reflexes need every advantage 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 15:11
|
|
|
Supaflywallace posted:Upgraded my PC and I'm super impressed by BF1 at ultra. Wonder how Bfv will hold up when it's installed BillyJoeBob posted:BFV looks super pretty on ultra. I just wish it was better. I don't hate playing it, it's just, ehh. I go back to playing 1 and 4 a whole lot more. BFV is technically a better looking game than BF1 but it's art direction is severely lacking compared to BF1 and looks worse/blander to most people
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 16:10
|
|
|
BFV was so bad people shut the gently caress up about fixed recoil patterns being “superior”. I’m now panicking that my 8700k may not be enough for BF6 and it seems the supply of 9900k’s at a decent price may have disappeared.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 17:13
|
|
|
bfV just felt cheap to me in the same way that cod cold war feels cheap, something about the polish/movement just feels off
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 17:15
|
|
|
EA CEO flat out said Battlefield is going to be a software as a service kind of game now, which I think is what everyone had figured out already with the Portal announcement. https://www.ign.com/articles/ea-ceo-you-should-think-of-battlefield-as-a-service
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 17:19
|
|
|
moist turtleneck posted:bfV just felt cheap to me in the same way that cod cold war feels cheap, something about the polish/movement just feels off From the little I've played, I like that you slide around more, going prone or ducking behind cover, like Titanfall without going full on double jumping wall run
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 17:28
|
|
|
Inspector Hound posted:From the little I've played, I like that you slide around more, going prone or ducking behind cover, like Titanfall without going full on double jumping wall run It also didn't help that they homogenized the gently caress out of the guns and their attachments, to the point where it felt like more than half of the players were just running around with an assault rifle with a red dot on top. Firefights really didn't have much of a WWII feel to them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 17:52
|
|
|
VulgarandStupid posted:BFV was so bad people shut the gently caress up about fixed recoil patterns being “superior”. Recoil in BFV is not entirely fixed but yeah. Also your 8700K is going to be perfectly fine. The 8700K at 1080P is within 3-4% average FPS performance and identical 1% lows to the 9900K in BFV. Modern Frostbite really likes to have more than 4 threads (the 8700K is 6C/12T) see the 7600K struggling to hit 60FPS 1% lows 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 17:54
|
|
|
Perestroika posted:It also didn't help that they homogenized the gently caress out of the guns and their attachments, to the point where it felt like more than half of the players were just running around with an assault rifle with a red dot on top. Firefights really didn't have much of a WWII feel to them. I think both BF1 and BFV were worse because of DICE's timidity about messing with the gun palette formula. All of the SMGs in BF1 disrupts the historical atmosphere – bolt actions being standard with an emphasis on a variety of weird jury-rigged gadgetry and melee weapons would've been more interesting IMO. Likewise, in the WW2 setting, people have cultural associations of guns to factions. I think they missed a chance to use constrained gun choices per faction but a greater variety/choice of tactical squad call-ins and class specializations. They just weren't willing to depart from the full-auto-heavy, universal weapon pool design of BF3/BF4.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 18:58
|
|
|
It's battlefield, not Beyond the wire
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 20:58
|
|
|
Eastbound Spider posted:It's battlefield, not Beyond the wire If you played 1942/BF:V/BF2 you'd remember that they used to have faction-specific weaponry which I think contributed to the atmosphere of those games. I'm not saying the games should be simulations, just that there are pop-cultural conceptions of these historical wars that they didn't capitalize on
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 23:00
|
|
|
Nitevision posted:If you played 1942/BF:V/BF2 you'd remember that they used to have faction-specific weaponry which I think contributed to the atmosphere of those games. I'm not saying the games should be simulations, just that there are pop-cultural conceptions of these historical wars that they didn't capitalize on I always thought it was really fun to kill an enemy and pickup their kit to use against them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 23:08
|
|
|
SpartanIvy posted:I always thought it was really fun to kill an enemy and pickup their kit to use against them. i always feel like a boss whenever I take out a medic that just killed my teammate and then take their kit to revive the dude that the medic just killed same feeling as when I am out of ammo and follow around a friendly support that refuses to resupply me till they get killed, and then take their kit to do their own drat job for them
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2021 23:11
|
|
|
Nitevision posted:If you played 1942/BF:V/BF2 you'd remember that they used to have faction-specific weaponry which I think contributed to the atmosphere of those games. I'm not saying the games should be simulations, just that there are pop-cultural conceptions of these historical wars that they didn't capitalize on Right, but it’s weird to lay that at the feet of BF1/BFV, when it has been ages since any BF title took that approach. And at least where BF1 is concerned, who cares? The game unambiguously has atmosphere in spades, and the pseudo diesel-punk exploration of late 19th and early 20th century weapons is at least as interesting as any “pop-cultural conception” would have been. The gameplay isn’t remotely “authentic,” but it certainly never feels like everyone is using reskinned M16’s instead of a bizarre collection of early automatics/wacky experimental weapons/actual era appropriate military weapons/etc. The huge number of experimental/underplayed weapons actually parallels modern BF titles - they also have a penchant for filling out their weapon rosters with guns that weren’t adopted or had incredibly tiny production runs. Mind you, I love psuedo-realistic shooters, but I wouldn’t ever expect a Battlefield title to be Verdun/Red Orchestra. It’d be cool if they’d taken a stab at it, but it’s extremely weird to seemingly fault them for not being a radically different style of game than BF has ever been. LGD fucked around with this message at 04:58 on Aug 6, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 04:45
|
|
|
I'd prefer a balanced playing field over factional weapons tbh. It's been ages so I might be wrong but I vaguely remember BF3 starting you with the M16 (pretty much the best gun in the game until it got nerfed) on one side while the other side's starting weapon wasn't nearly as good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 06:16
|
|
|
Yami Fenrir posted:I'd prefer a balanced playing field over factional weapons tbh.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 06:24
|
|
|
LGD posted:Right, but it’s weird to lay that at the feet of BF1/BFV, when it has been ages since any BF title took that approach. And at least where BF1 is concerned, who cares? The game unambiguously has atmosphere in spades, and the pseudo diesel-punk exploration of late 19th and early 20th century weapons is at least as interesting as any “pop-cultural conception” would have been. The gameplay isn’t remotely “authentic,” but it certainly never feels like everyone is using reskinned M16’s instead of a bizarre collection of early automatics/wacky experimental weapons/actual era appropriate military weapons/etc. The huge number of experimental/underplayed weapons actually parallels modern BF titles - they also have a penchant for filling out their weapon rosters with guns that weren’t adopted or had incredibly tiny production runs. Yeah, I loved BF1, I think they did a great job on the atmosphere. I think I just disagree that the gameplay differentiated itself as much as the setting did. Like melee weapons were a huge deal in WW1 and they lovingly modeled all that poo poo in the game, but when 1/3 of your enemies have some insane prototype SMG, the interesting gameplay aspects of the setting fall over toward the full-auto gameplay that's ultimately not that different from the BF3 blueprint. I think you see this problem to some degree in both BF1 and BFV. People in this thread are rightly excited for 2042 because the modern setting means more technological gadgetry with fun gameplay possibilities than those previous games had. That's a sign that they had transposed the gameplay formula for a modern setting onto those historical games imo. They innovated in superficial ways (BF1's great setting and atmosphere) and small ways (BFV's spotting system, squad revives, fortifications) but I'm willing to think BF2042 will be the best game of the last three because it won't be jamming the BF3 gameplay formula into a setting where it makes less sense. I realize DICE probably couldn't have risked more innovation thanks to shareholders and deadlines, it's just a line of critique that I find interesting. People seem to forget that BF3 really inaugurated the era of Battlefield being super-fast-paced. BF2 for example had a strategic layer that mattered and mostly huge maps where team coordination and transport vehicles made a much bigger difference than 2010s Battlefields where everyone's sprinting around on amphetamines gunning for headshots. The minute-to-minute gameplay of BF2 was arcadey, but players moved slower, guns were less accurate, and your squad leader was much more important. It hasn't always been like BF3 onward.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 07:05
|
|
|
BF2 was great and felt really slow. My memories come from being a teen though
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 07:38
|
|
|
i bought bf2 at best buy when i was like 12 or 13 and got home only to find that one of the discs in the case was broke. i went back to exchange it and was refused. ever since, i have born an eternal enmity against best buy and battlefield 2Nitevision posted:
also i feel bad repeatedly shilling Hell Let Loose itt but if you miss this slightly more expansive/strategic approach, well... yeah. game good Fuligin fucked around with this message at 08:01 on Aug 6, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 07:57
|
|
|
I just checked and I have service stars with 134 different guns. Just shows how serviceable almost every gun is in BF1.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 09:13
|
|
|
Stupid question but how do yall handle joining the same server with a larger group? Particularly in BF1 it's a bit of a pain playing with a couple friends because every single server is 64/64 with a bunch in queue until the servers that are like 5/24 and down. As far as I can tell it doesn't put everyone in your squad in the queue until the leader gets into the server so I end up having to tell my friends which one to click on and queue for. I was trying to play this with a friend last night who completely ragequit and uninstalled the game because we kept having issues getting into servers, then when we did it turned out he didn't have the DLC maps I guess despite it not really showing that the server runs DLC maps. This guy plays a lot of COD and didn't seem to understand why it's so much easier to queue up with a squad of people in a P2P shooter  I don't really know how they could improve it in 2042 but I do hope it at least puts everyone in your squad in the same queue when you join a full server.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 14:31
|
|
|
depending on the size of your group, join lower pop servers and they will usually seed pretty quickly
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 15:27
|
|
|
rap music posted:depending on the size of your group, join lower pop servers and they will usually seed pretty quickly Yeah that's probably the best idea, at least at that point we're in a game. Doesn't matter anymore because it looks like I'll be queuing alone moving forward lol eh 
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 15:35
|
|
|
BF4 gave me a dumb QR code again, this time with a partial (?) list of maps . Looks like Valparaiso, Caspian Border, a few good WWII ones, and Yespleaseshahr Canals included from the start "Battlefield as a service" is absolute A1 terrifying corporate speak, but I've been playing this game for years so I honestly might as well indenture myself to it
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 15:46
|
|
|
Can’t you form a party in BF1 at the main menu, then queue together?
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 18:30
|
|
|
RCarr posted:Can’t you form a party in BF1 at the main menu, then queue together? You can but from what I can tell the other people in my squad don't get queued until I as the host get into the server. It's not a big deal at all my friend was just being unnecessarily precious about his time but I just wanted to know how people typically did it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 19:13
|
|
|
RCarr posted:Can’t you form a party in BF1 at the main menu, then queue together? Yes and no. A.) The other people have to appear online within origin and be able to be seen and invited. B.) as said above you have to be in the squad, get INTO the server and only then does it prompt them to join said server. If you sit in a 10 person deep queue they just sit there with their thumb up their rear end going "Huh whats going on" Dead Like Rev fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Aug 6, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 19:28
|
|
|
remembered why i like battlefield games https://i.imgur.com/Kjyqp9c.gifv
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 20:04
|
|
|
Ragdoll is nice but I want full on gore, guts and brains and everything going everywhere. Its fuckin war not fortnite (which should also have detailed gore effects) https://i.imgur.com/Qec25D6.mp4 codo27 fucked around with this message at 21:34 on Aug 6, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 21:28
|
|
|
codo27 posted:Ragdoll is nice but I want full on gore, guts and brains and everything going everywhere. Its fuckin war not fortnite (which should also have detailed gore effects) I see way too many people trying to live after putting C4 on a tank and then dying for no gain. An honorable death. Also this gets me mad at BF5 because of what they did to parachutes. You couldn’t even survive jumping off that big iron bridge unless you hit water.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 21:31
|
|
|
Kibayasu posted:I see way too many people trying to live after putting C4 on a tank and then dying for no gain. An honorable death. For a tank C4 kill, any man would give his only begotten son codo27 fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Aug 6, 2021 |
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 21:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 15:14 |
|
|
Kibayasu posted:Also this gets me mad at BF5 because of what they did to parachutes. You couldn’t even survive jumping off that big iron bridge unless you hit water. what?? thats awful
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2021 21:54
|
|
