|
Can I pay them extra not to get the NFT? And also not to watch Spider-Man?
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 18:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:31 |
|
|
Paladinus posted:Can I pay them extra not to get the NFT? And also not to watch Spider-Man? one weird trick to get both of those for free! movie companies hate him!
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 18:16
|
|
|
Is this an NFT? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BFqrbLJCZM
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 18:21
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:they're not the same (animation versus static image), so it'd just constitute violation of intellectual property rights - assuming that owning the nft actually means owning said IP, which would require some other document it's an nft, you aren't actually buying the episode or any legal device related to the episode you're just buying a token-with-the-hash-of-a-json-file-which-contains-a-url-pointing-to-the-youtube-video-written-on-it
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 18:41
|
|
|
EorayMel posted:Is this an NFT? hmmm... quality is a bit high
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 18:42
|
|
|
EorayMel posted:Is this an NFT? no but this post-it is 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 18:45
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:no but this post-it is gonna make an nft of this image of a piece of paper with a url to a video
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 19:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/liveoverflow/status/1465376602276220937
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 20:12
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:anyway does anyone have any idea what the legal concept is behind buying this episode? i went to the bit.ly link and it told me nothing except that somehow at the time of writing it has 211 owners. are you supposed to be entitled to a cut of whatever revenue it might make, or be able to decide in any way on how this IP is used, or is it simply another case of "idiot people are expected to be willing to pay massive amounts of money for this for no remotely sensible reason whatsoever, so you'd better get in on it right now if you want to get rich"? a percentage of streaming revenue will be distributed to owners... ...in the form of a fractional percentage of ownership of other NFTs in case that isn't an attractive enough offer, there's also "possibility" that they might give away one Bored Ape to one of the episode 1 owners, and a further "possibility" that they may give away more valuable and established NFTs to owners further down the line, and a "possibility" that they may advertise your business or your NFTs in the show I'm sure the word "possibility" was chosen very carefully to avoid implying any actual guarantee that they'll do any of that
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 20:28
|
|
|
\U+006C \U+006F \U+006C
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 21:18
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:so it'd just constitute violation of 
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 21:23
|
|
intellectual
|
what is the function of "&style->fontsize"?
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 21:35
|
|
|
atlas out here buying nfts
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 21:36
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:it's an nft, you aren't actually buying the episode or any legal device related to the episode to wit: Main Paineframe posted:a percentage of streaming revenue will be distributed to owners...
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 22:52
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:please enjoy the full first episode of this official nft cartoon Is this what a stroke feels like?
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2021 23:56
|
|
|
Boxturret posted:
who the hell is spending $600 on these. i still dont get it
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 00:59
|
|
|
i was at a dinner with some nft people this weekend. i basically kept my mouth shut but they were unsurprisingly discussing it purely in terms of how much they could expect to sell it for in the future. it could be screen grabs of color swatches and it would be exactly the same to them
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 01:16
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:
There's no way to know exactly what's going IPwise without looking at the ToS associated with the entity sending this poo poo out, but yeah it being a nonexclusive license revocable upon the grantor's discretion wouldn't surprise me. Transfer of IP rights would entail an additional contract or something that can be construed as a contract. That reminds me I ought do a deep dive on IP rights associated with NFTs (lol) someday. I'm sure there's some mordant commentary on it out there.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 01:29
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:who the hell is spending $600 on these. i still dont get it the people who made them. they're selling them to themselves for increasing amounts of eth tokens to raise the price so that the asset appears to have value
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 01:40
|
|
|
Truman Peyote posted:i was at a dinner with some nft people this weekend. i basically kept my mouth shut but they were unsurprisingly discussing it purely in terms of how much they could expect to sell it for in the future. it could be screen grabs of color swatches and it would be exactly the same to them have those people actually flipped any for a profit? why buy a secondhand one instead of just waiting for lazy lions to pump out more nfts and getting a new one
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 01:48
|
|
|
i assume some people have, but the play is just to sell them to themselves or other people in a circle to pump up the price to the point where news sites will uncritically write articles about how nfts are selling for hundreds of thousands of dollars in the hope it brings in a bunch of suckers to sell their jpegs to
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:00
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:have those people actually flipped any for a profit? why buy a secondhand one instead of just waiting for lazy lions to pump out more nfts and getting a new one everyone knows the first edition trading cards are worth the most!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:26
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:have those people actually flipped any for a profit? why buy a secondhand one instead of just waiting for lazy lions to pump out more nfts and getting a new one no, they were all circlejerking about how much they had gone up in value. one commented that it wasn't real value because they hadn't sold, but they wanted it to go higher, and weren't sure what point they would decide was right. i would describe their facial expression while delivering this as a mix of shame and anxiety but i'm sure they would disagree
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:27
|
|
|
Truman Peyote posted:no, they were all circlejerking about how much they had gone up in value. one commented that it wasn't real value because they hadn't sold, but they wanted it to go higher, and weren't sure what point they would decide was right. i would describe their facial expression while delivering this as a mix of shame and anxiety but i'm sure they would disagree i saw some bitcoiners a little while ago who were excited that like, verifone announced it would support being able to pay with bitcoin, and the exchange basically went like: "woo finally some way to use my bitcoin!" "what!? diamond hands bro!!!" and then the conversation awkwardly petered out with the first guy shamed into submission for having the gall to want to use the internet money to buy goods and services instead of just hold it forever as some kind of loving death cult ritual
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:31
|
|
|
Truman Peyote posted:i was at a dinner with some nft people this weekend. i basically kept my mouth shut but they were unsurprisingly discussing it purely in terms of how much they could expect to sell it for in the future. it could be screen grabs of color swatches and it would be exactly the same to them the color swatch nfts already exist, by the way
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:46
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:why buy a secondhand one instead of just waiting for lazy lions to pump out more nfts and getting a new one its pretty much that, right? last time i looked like a month ago there were only 2.7M "ape" NFTs on opensea. now:  for all the complaining coiners like to do about inflation and "printer go brrr" memes, they seem to have whole heartedly embraced engaging in it themselves
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:50
|
|
|
once again it's the history of finance in fast forward
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 02:59
|
|
|
drk posted:its pretty much that, right? last time i looked like a month ago there were only 2.7M "ape" NFTs on opensea. are these all actually existing nfts that people have paid $60+ in gas to produce because oof
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:29
|
|
|
fisting by many posted:are these all actually existing nfts that people have paid $60+ in gas to produce because oof iirc someone mentioned that they figured out a way to defer the cost of minting the NFT's so the person buying them has to pay it instead (presumably by just not doing anything on the blockchain unless they absolutely have to) also i think you can mint all ten thousand for $60 rather than $60 each but that probably depends
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:33
|
|
|
there's so many slight variations then variations on those variations  then some just go all bitcoiin  then there's weird meta ones  and there's thousands of each of these at least these ones are only worth a few dollars
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:39
|
|
|
hey we can make scarce digital goods! how about 7 million apes? there was an off topic teams thread at work about “should we get paid in crypto?” that was intended as a joke but you know coiners and each person replying mentioned 1-3 different new coins like “no, stonky has too many fees they should do bortcoin or uwutoken” from everyone else and there were like at least 100 different crypto things mentioned in 5 minutes and it’s like way to illustrate the benefits of fiat, dudes [they were all dudes]
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:43
|
|
|
qirex posted:hey we can make scarce digital goods! how about 7 million apes? well that just means that your company should make their own coin to pay you in then the employees can trade it for which ever coin they want and hey, if the coin does well and goes to the moon they could fire you all and just live off the moon money
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:48
|
|
|
the "paid in crypto" people seem like an even less useful and much more dire version of the people who thought it was cool to get linux running on a toaster 20 years ago what i'm trying to say is in 20 years we'll all be paid in bespoke incompatible coins that stop getting security updates after a year and pining for the days when you could get non-"smart" money
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:54
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vkE7zokbRU&t=517s
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 03:55
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:the "paid in crypto" people seem like an even less useful and much more dire version of the people who thought it was cool to get linux running on a toaster 20 years ago it’s going to be even worse in america because between the unregulated late stage capitalism and the 19th century nightmare of financial technology we’ll get to see the shitcoin meets company scrip equivalent of a nation struggling to understand how chip and pin works thirty years after everyone else has outright deprecated magnetic strip transactions
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 04:19
|
|
|
i cannot wait to be paid in CompanyCoin that can only be used to purchase Company goods in the Company town. wait.....
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 05:22
|
|
|
Mercury_Storm posted:i cannot wait to be paid in CompanyCoin that can only be used to purchase Company goods in the Company town.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 05:25
|
|
|
it has significant historical precedent, until the fed got in the way
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 05:25
|
|
|
drk posted:its pretty much that, right? last time i looked like a month ago there were only 2.7M "ape" NFTs on opensea. Give 7 million coiners 7 million apes and they’ll eventually re-enact the history of finance
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 05:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:31 |
|
|
i miss the mouse
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2021 06:02
|
|