|
spankmeister posted:what's faker do anyway generates fake names, addresses, etc
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 21:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 01:10 |
|
|
i thought he played league
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 21:26
|
|
|
haveblue posted:now torrenting aws_leak_complete.zip (1/572657853287) Security by no one having enough disk space to contain the leaks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 21:29
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:wonder what this white house open source security meeting is going to be like. I would love to hear Oracle's suggestions https://blog.google/technology/safety-security/making-open-source-software-safer-and-more-secure/
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 21:41
|
|
|
haveblue posted:now torrenting aws_leak_complete.zip (1/572657853287) information wants to be free, man
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 22:06
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:information wants to be free, man should always have been obvious that the second part to that is "unless we invest heavily in stopping it now".
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 22:15
|
|
|
duz posted:generates fake names, addresses, etc ah that's what I thought (because I know about the python and ruby versions) but I had no idea stuff like that was used so widely
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2022 22:18
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:ah that's what I thought (because I know about the python and ruby versions) but I had no idea stuff like that was used so widely I've found it incredibly useful for generating huge datasets for a dev environment that "feel" realistic. It's way safer than trying to anonymize prod data. Too often I've worked on dev stuff that has like 10 rows in it and then falls over in prod with 100k rows.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 00:08
|
|
|
Update; the story was *slightly* overblown: https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2022-002/ Disclaimer: I work for AWS.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 03:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 03:23
|
|
|
Adhemar posted:Update; the story was *slightly* overblown:  we owned aws 🥶🥶😶🌫️😰😨😨😱🤯🤬🥵
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 03:26
|
|
|
was their cloud formation bit something else or related to this? im not too knowledgeable about aws
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 03:27
|
|
|
FalseNegative posted:I've found it incredibly useful for generating huge datasets for a dev environment that "feel" realistic. It's way safer than trying to anonymize prod data. Too often I've worked on dev stuff that has like 10 rows in it and then falls over in prod with 100k rows. I'm sad that TEST environment will no longer have Joey Jo Jo, Joey Jo Jo Jo, Banana Fofana and Mr. Fahrenheit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 03:36
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:lol. that's a great way to ensure no one uses your app lol they'll just mandate its use to enter banks and grocery stores like singapore does. really the only surprise is that it took this long to reach into the cookie jar; no government in the world will ever decline access to this kind of granular data on its citizens.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 03:47
|
|
|
~Coxy posted:I'm sad that TEST environment will no longer have Joey Jo Jo, Joey Jo Jo Jo, Banana Fofana and Mr. Fahrenheit. it me. Lana
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 05:47
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:was their cloud formation bit something else or related to this? im not too knowledgeable about aws Separate, here’s the bulletin for that one: https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2022-001/
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 09:26
|
|
|
yeah that’s also been *slightly* exaggerated
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 09:37
|
|
|
not really a “security fuckup”, and more “scary as gently caress” https://twitter.com/christopherjm/status/1481866343104360450?s=21 i’ve been watching the news on ukraine closely these last few weeks
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 14:35
|
|
|
Good Sphere posted:be afraid and expect worse words to live by
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 15:13
|
|
|
I just discovered an IT person’s regular account in BUILTIN\Server Operators that never, ever should have elevated access because they do not know what the gently caress they are doing in any capacity. This was likely granted over a decade ago when this company’s IT was a lot more wild west in operation, well before my time. It’s me, I’m the sec fuckup for not auditing the default domain groups beyond domain/ent/schema years ago.  e: at least I didn’t accidentally pull an “put a snowflake API key into a GitHub repo and then make it public” like a dipshit developer did a couple of weeks ago! devmd01 fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Jan 15, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2022 15:33
|
|
|
we recently discovered at one of our customers the Domain Computers group is a member of Domain Users. im not 100% sure if that has any security implications but it is certainly a brain-gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 05:49
|
|
|
that might have been a really awful hack to work around improperly scoped policies
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 06:05
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:that might have been a really awful hack to work around improperly scoped policies our theory is that it was a lovely workaround for when they changed the context in which GPOs are retrieved: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/ms16-072-security-update-for-group-policy-june-14-2016-7570425d-d460-3003-b2ac-a464c874725d edit: we'd like to fix it but have no idea what it might break lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 07:06
|
|
|
turns out macos 10:13 can have a full screen ad that you cant stop w keyboard or mouse i had to kill it with ssh wtf
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 09:16
|
|
|
Pile Of Garbage posted:edit: we'd like to fix it but have no idea what it might break lol one way to find out...
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 09:17
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:turns out macos 10:13 can have a full screen ad that you cant stop w keyboard or mouse pls expound
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 09:42
|
|
|
they're saying that macos is a full-screen ad and they had to kill -9 init to kill it
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 10:10
|
|
|
what process name is the OS itself 🤔
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 10:12
|
|
|
cool terminal user that is similar to Neo
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 10:13
|
|
|
Crime on a Dime posted:what process name is the OS itself 🤔 ive never used macos but apparently its based on unix or some poo poo and im p sure if you kill init it will at least kernel panic or something
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 10:22
|
|
|
get a Mac. try it out
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 11:32
|
|
|
For reference, macOS's main process is known as launchd. It has process ID 1, and is the parent process to everything other than the kernel itself (process id 0, name kernel_task). Force quitting launchd will stop your mac until a restart at best and may lead to it becoming unusable without a system reinstall in some cases. Force quitting kernel_task will stop your mac entirely. Or maybe it's impossible. I'm not sure and I have no intention of finding out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 11:58
|
|
|
has anyone said launchdeez nuts? but also neat that was informative
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 12:08
|
|
|
Quackles posted:For reference, macOS's main process is known as launchd. It has process ID 1, and is the parent process to everything other than the kernel itself (process id 0, name kernel_task). ... force quitting a task should not brick your system, come on mac you can do better than that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 12:12
|
|
|
bold and italics.. can't argue with that
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 12:22
|
|
|
meant to use fixed for computer proper-nouns. post rejected
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 13:05
|
|
|
Pile Of Garbage posted:meant to use fixed for computer proper-nouns. post rejected 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 13:28
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/bleepincomputer/status/1482031475985993731
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 15:47
|
|
|
Carbon dioxide posted:... force quitting a task should not brick your system, come on mac you can do better than that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 15:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 01:10 |
|
|
Chris Knight posted:stop using "brick" to mean "the os stopped running so I had to power it off" they're talking about this bit: Quackles posted:Force quitting launchd will stop your mac until a restart at best and may lead to it becoming unusable without a system reinstall in some cases. which definitely fits within the colloquial meaning of "bricked"
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2022 15:52
|
|
