|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:
for now
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 18:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 01:58 |
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:eh those red lines dont prove anything. it does look bad, but kerning is art, not science. you cant beep boop your way to the "correct" kern no professional did the kerning for a backwards vertically offset E. i am saying it looks like garbage, are you saying that you think it looks good?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 18:33
|
|
|
After they appeared as guests on the Sonny & Cher show in early 1974, a producer for CBS was impressed by the brothers' stage presence and offered them their own variety hour on the network for the summer slot.[6] The Hudson Brothers Show[7] aired Wednesday nights on CBS from July 31, 1974 to August 28, 1974.[8] The show was so successful that CBS devised The Hudson Brothers Razzle Dazzle Show, which aired on Saturday mornings, from September 7, 1974 to August 30, 1975, in a half-hour format.[8] The group's television exposure resulted in the brothers becoming teen idols.[8] Although stated above & incorrectly accepted as fact, The Hudson Brothers NEVER appeared on Sonny & Cher in early 1974. The ONLY appearance by The Hudson Brothers on Sonny & Cher was the October 31, 1976 episode of The Sonny & Cher Show, which was AFTER their summer replacement show in 1974.[9]
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 18:37
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:eh those red lines dont prove anything. it does look bad, but kerning is art, not science. you cant beep boop your way to the "correct" kern Isn't the point that the serif on the E lines up with the straight line on the X? Setting it so they were the exact same distance apart would look way, way worse than doing it that way (obviously just not being cute with the typography was never an option)
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 18:43
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:no professional did the kerning for a backwards vertically offset E. i am saying it looks like garbage, are you saying that you think it looks good? no it does look like garbage, but the red lines are irrelevant. the difference between the mid-E and the low-X serif distances arent the reason like how a lowercase v goes under a capital T, it's not the same kern to the left or right cause the v or T might not be symmetrical. its not a mathematical function, but a judgment call by an artist goddamnedtwisto posted:Isn't the point that the serif on the E lines up with the straight line on the X? Setting it so they were the exact same distance apart would look way, way worse than doing it that way (obviously just not being cute with the typography was never an option) omg lol yea they clearly lined up the upper E/X serifs like that was the formula for good typography Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 20:06 on Mar 18, 2022 |
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 20:03
|
|
|
anyone who cares about making nicely typeset documents is these days doing it in something like indesign. 𝓛𝓐𝓣𝓔𝓧 is for stupid dorks who think that there's a mathematical equation that defines how letters should be arranged on a page, and it's just as dumb as thinking you can come up with a mathematical formula to make beautiful paintings. they want to believe that you can optimize everything into one correct solution and then apply that everywhere. it's an attitude you encounter a lot in engineering and it's so tedious and frustrating. point to consider: when was the last time you saw a XƎ⊥∀˥ document that wasn't using the default configuration, or something very similar to it? have you ever seen, say, a poster done in ℓαтєχ? a restaurant menu? an infographic?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 20:16
|
|
|
there's a nice tex package that changes the font to i think adobe utopia which i used on literally ever tex document i made in college, went a long way to make things look like i didn't use tex
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 20:41
|
|
|
i was talking with an engineer once about sketching and drawing, since that is something designers are good at (at least until they become directors. lol) and engineers are...generally not. he commented that he liked the way i could draw, and said "i think if i could learn to draw one thing really well, that would be enough for me. like if i could draw, you know, a really good martini glass that looked like glass, or something, then i'd consider myself a good artist." that was like 10 years ago and i'm still baffled by it today. what an incredibly bizarre way to think about art.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 20:49
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:point to consider: when was the last time you saw a XƎ⊥∀˥ document that wasn't using the default configuration, or something very similar to it? thats like 100% of the latex documents ive seen in ten years e: thats not true, that guy with the trebuchet definitely used defaults, but aside from him i dont think ive seen a lot of defaults recently
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 21:02
|
|
|
i feel like there must be some survival bias(?) in there. like if it looks obvs like lovely latex, its lovely latex, but if you cant tell its latex, who knows what it is?
Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 21:10 on Mar 18, 2022 |
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 21:08
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:i was talking with an engineer once about sketching and drawing, since that is something designers are good at (at least until they become directors. lol) and engineers are...generally not. haha nice i am really good at skulls. i mean i can draw most things fairly well, but skulls is my main competence. i just get more into it for some reason
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 21:10
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:have you ever seen, say, a poster done in ℓαтєχ? Why yes, I have been to an ACM conference or 2. Institutions make matching templates for their posters and their presentation slides.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 22:06
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:i feel like there must be some survival bias(?) in there. like if it looks obvs like lovely latex, its lovely latex, but if you cant tell its latex, who knows what it is? "how often have you seen something created in latex that doesn't obviously look like it was created in latex" is a pretty obviously unanswerable question
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 22:08
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:"how often have you seen something created in latex that doesn't obviously look like it was created in latex" is a pretty obviously unanswerable question vv: misunderstood your post then; my bad Elysiume fucked around with this message at 04:01 on Mar 19, 2022 |
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2022 22:36
|
|
|
yes i was agreeing with them
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 01:59
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:haha nice BARONS PORTRAIT ARTIST
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 02:40
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:i feel like there must be some survival bias(?) in there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 02:51
|
|
|
Ellie Trashcakes posted:Also sagebrush is an insufferable know-it-all true but we are all nerds here or at least i am
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 02:53
|
|
|
Jabor posted:Good strategy, lets the recruiter tweak your resume to tailor it for the position. word for editing, pdf for sending ya goose
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 03:32
|
|
|
Carthag Tuek posted:true but we are all nerds here
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 03:39
|
|
|
Ellie Trashcakes posted:I am a dork, and not one to put on airs i'm in this post and i like it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 03:55
|
|
|
Ellie Trashcakes posted:Also sagebrush is an insufferable know-it-all It's true. I do know all (in certain fields)
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 04:26
|
|
|
Ellie Trashcakes posted:I am a dork, and not one to put on airs i always thought dork was fancier than nerd
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 04:40
|
|
|
dork > nerd > geek
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 06:55
|
|
|
haveblue posted:dork > nerd > geek
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 07:02
|
|
|
hail ctan
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 10:07
|
|
|
Ellie Trashcakes posted:Also sagebrush is an insufferable know-it-all til he is also a draw-it-all
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 22:06
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:It's true. I do know all (in certain fields) seems like you missed epistemology
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 22:23
|
|
|
Highballs are popular in Japan, often made with Japanese whisky as a haibōru (ハイボール)
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2022 23:46
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/punished_picnic/status/1505423900921970689?t=lq-aNOCNdaSH1qYc2U6Jlw&s=19
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2022 16:15
|
|
|
the arson was excusable, they were trying to stop a dangerous invasive species
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2022 17:02
|
|
|
Indecent exposure is not a real crime. If you're naked and doing something gross and sexual and offensive, then it's sexual harassment. Otherwise you're just being naked and there's nothing wrong with that
|
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2022 17:50
|
|
|
do we need to watch out for you being naked around playgrounds?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2022 00:05
|
|
|
qsvui posted:do we need to watch out for you being naked around playgrounds? "i'm not indecent! i'm not indecent!" i continue to insist as i slowly shrink and transform into a registered sex offender
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2022 00:08
|
|
|
Midjack posted:"i'm not indecent! i'm not indecent!" i continue to insist as i slowly shrink and transform into a registered sex offender lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2022 00:13
|
|
|
Relevant https://twitter.com/snep__ebooks/status/1504319115456139264
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2022 04:36
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:Indecent exposure is not a real crime. If you're naked and doing something gross and sexual and offensive, then it's sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is a tort.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2022 02:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2022 04:45
|
|
|
41% of Ukrainians had a "good" attitude towards Russians (42% negatively),[14] while in general 54% of Russians had a positive attitude towards Ukraine, according to an October 2021 of the country's population. This has likely changed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2022 05:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 01:58 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2022 08:23
|
|
