|
Bloody posted:where do i get pictures printed well? presumably not, like, shutterfly? i've had photos (not mine lol) done at shutterfly and the results were always good 
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 18:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 04:07 |
|
|
i got some stuff printed via amazon photos a couple times because it was free and the results were really not too bad. from what i've read most of the print services are pretty similar in quality that said i usually do prints at a university lab because mrs still has access and i can completely control the result
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 18:11
|
|
|
I was happy with mpix in the past
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 19:33
|
|
|
I found my photos I got printed much darker than on screen which isn’t an issue per se just need to do a trial run with smaller cheaper print and adjust to taste
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 19:45
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:I found my photos I got printed much darker than on screen which isn’t an issue per se just need to do a trial run with smaller cheaper print and adjust to taste they are automatically adjusting the contrast because yours are typically very washed out you need to set an actual black point to avoid this
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 19:46
|
|
|
like think of it this way: a typical contrast range is 0-255, with 0 being black and white being 255 if you compress that range to something like 15-200, of course it's going to look weird when it's printed
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 19:49
|
|
|
backlit images are always going to appear a bit brighter than a print
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 20:20
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:they are automatically adjusting the contrast because yours are typically very washed out nah it’s even from when before I used to improve the contrast and including printing rodtronics stuff etc it’s this: bellows lugosi posted:backlit images are always going to appear a bit brighter than a print
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2023 20:46
|
|
|
In saying that you also need to work with your printer to get what you want out of it. Your screen is certainly not calibrated to your printers settings so if you're doing fine art you need to put in some effort.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 00:06
|
|
|
Megabound posted:you need to put in some effort. im gonna stop you right there
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 01:12
|
|
|
i was worried for a second
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 05:26
|
|
|
 this is a photo I took in 2008 its unremarkable. as are most of the photos I took then. I had one of those HORRIBLE kit lenses that go from lke 18-50 or something. that lens is so poo poo, I cna easily imagine a lot of people buying one of those eos 700,000D with that lens, and being nothing but disappointed with the results. I am sure that lens has actually turned more people off real photography more than anything I was lucky enough to buy mine second hand because it came with a 55-200 and even though at 200 its at like f/5.6 at least you start to get a taste of the compression and take photos that look real "real photography" this is a photo of a national politician, so I don't feel weird sharing it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Peters I took this on that same camera at 200mm  echinopsis fucked around with this message at 10:09 on Feb 28, 2023 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 10:05
|
|
|
can't decide if i want to get a 100mm macro to replace my broken 100mm macro or a 70-200mm f2.8 to cover 100mm and also the rest of a pretty nice range for hiking. i don't shoot that much macro, but it is a lot of fun when i do
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 15:00
|
|
|
my research from the lens' respective flickr groups is that while both take good dog photos, the macro is most used for pictures of insects and of matches being lit and the 70-200 for pictures of trains and of women's arses
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 15:03
|
|
|
big scary monsters posted:my research from the lens' respective flickr groups is that while both take good dog photos, the macro is most used for pictures of insects and of matches being lit and the 70-200 for pictures of trains and of women's arses
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 15:06
|
|
|
well now you see why i can't decide
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 15:09
|
|
|
if only there were one lens perfect for frogs and pawgs
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 15:14
|
|
|
HAIL eSATA-n posted:i have three 24"x36" framed prints from deviantart lol holy poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 17:03
|
|
|
never tried it here at home but when we were in the uk over christmas i made some prints at boots using their little self service kiosk and they came out nicely. they also sell ilford film there which owns.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 17:05
|
|
|
President Beep posted:holy poo poo. i got the sizes wrong but it was $222 in 2014 for two 20x30" framed prints and a 16x40" framed print, delivered   
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 17:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 20:50
|
|
|
wanna bracket and stack some exposures of that elephant
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 21:02
|
|
|
photographer uses Patience on Elephant It's not very effective...
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 21:40
|
|
|
HAIL eSATA-n posted:photographer uses Patience on Elephant Normally I just use elephant tranquilizers to get a good night's sleep, but today I have my camera out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2023 21:49
|
|
|
i love a good sleepy cat.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 02:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 04:33
|
|
|
KidDynamite posted:i love a good sleepy cat. a good cat
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 05:15
|
|
|
I really liked the sky here, and of course this kind of thing never looks as good as it does in real life but can't help but feel there are some nice colours and gradients to pull out of it I was trying some circular masks with lots of feathering to try to get all the ranges of colours that come out when exposure changes anyway. photos. god the darker black looks awful next to the raised blacks   https://mega.nz/file/jdonnZjR#E5OswRXY0z3OK5l3dBWMvlhpn9btfM367vvTKQ6r8b8
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 09:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 09:55
|
|
|
very apPIERing picture echi
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 10:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 10:05
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/-fQGPZTECYs
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 10:16
|
|
|
poo poo I love this guys aesthetic  I know it’s overdone for the rest of you mfs but spose that’s the glorious beauty of subjectivity one day I’ll have the guts to remove half the picture
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 18:50
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:poo poo I love this guys aesthetic what should we call this, mavicacore?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 18:53
|
|
|
qirex posted:what should we call this, mavicacore? he wishes
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 19:03
|
|
|
qirex posted:what should we call this, mavicacore?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 19:05
|
|
|
i feel like this would be better if you adjusted the luminosity curve so that more details underneath the dock were visible. looks like a gray void
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 19:07
|
|
|
qirex posted:what should we call this, mavicacore? "film" shooters stop taking pictures of brake lights challenge 2023
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 19:09
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:i feel like this would be better if you adjusted the luminosity curve so that more details underneath the dock were visible. looks like a gray void  I enjoy teh void
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 19:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 04:07 |
|
|
imo those isolated object pictures work best when they're super sharp and have bold color/contrast. just saw this as an awesome example of that
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2023 19:40
|
|