Chris Knight posted:

lol I was joking to my boss a couple weeks ago about how we could point ChatGPT at our sites and have it do chatbot answers instead of regular search, and welp

Poopernickel posted:

Don't promote / introduce an idea unless you're OK with the idea becoming true.

infernal machines posted:

if it weren't a significant potion of my job to deal with the end results of this poo poo i would probably be a lot more ambivalent about it

rotor posted:

Chris Knight posted:

lol I was joking to my boss a couple weeks ago about how we could point ChatGPT at our sites and have it do chatbot answers instead of regular search, and welp

rotor posted:

Cybernetic Vermin posted:

i 100% respect the opinion that things would have been better had none of this been created, but given we're past that ill cheerlead hamfisted public education and the applications i care about (largely summarized as enabling human communication on human terms)

mystes posted:

Can't you not actually "point chatgpt" at your site though?

Shame Boy posted:

or that guy who was masturbating himself to death

infernal machines posted:

wait, what?

Chris Knight posted:

lol I was joking to my boss a couple weeks ago about how we could point ChatGPT at our sites and have it do chatbot answers instead of regular search, and welp

infernal machines posted:

we should create the torment nexus was clearly a joke!

mystes posted:

is that actually possible? Or do you just mean you identify a single article that seems relevant first and then feed it to chatgpt or something?

The Fool posted:

they used a library to load an index, then used gpt-3 to answer questions on that index

e: https://gpt-index.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html

The Fool posted:

one of the hackathon projects last week was pointing chatgpt at our internal wiki

infernal machines posted:

wait, what?

Shame Boy posted:

a few months ago i posted a reddit post i found where a guy had chatgpt simulating his incredibly niche fetish so well he couldn't pull himself away from it and hadn't eaten or talked to his family for like 18 hours

e: yeah ok here it is

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/zg4zts/i_just_spent_13_hours_tricking_gpt_into_writing/

The Fool posted:

they used a library to load an index, then used gpt-3 to answer questions on that index

e: https://gpt-index.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html

quote:

Context:

• LLMs are a phenomenonal piece of technology for knowledge generation and reasoning.
  

Carthag Tuek posted:

hmm seems tweets stopped embedding



they load on the site tho, but there are requests to https://twitter.com/i/csp_report that reply like

code:

{
    "errors": [
        {
            "message": "Your current API plan does not include access to this endpoint, please see https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api for more information",
            "code": 467
        }
    ]
}

so i guess they rolled something untested to production again lol

GenJoe posted:

i think they ported the chatgpt model to the openai api and you can call it programatically now (and the cost is actually super reasonable iirc)

El Mero Mero posted:

Man it's gonna be waffleimages 2.0 for the forums when twitter finally kicks the bucket. I wonder if there's some sort of screenshot script that could be run that would convert tweets from an embed into something archivable for the forums.

bob dobbs is dead posted:

google and amazon seem like actual profitable ongoing concerns

El Mero Mero posted:

Man it's gonna be waffleimages 2.0 for the forums when twitter finally kicks the bucket. I wonder if there's some sort of screenshot script that could be run that would convert tweets from an embed into something archivable for the forums.

exe cummings posted:

yeah a lambda running puppeteer could both scrape the forums and create screenshots from embeds. with an admin login it could even edit posts and replace the embed. is it worth the compute cost? probably not

Carthag Tuek posted:

ya i asked in one of the support threads back when elon bought twitter but idk if theyre doing it

infernal machines posted:

i would bet that they are not doing it.

also, do you really think it's a good idea to go loving around directly in post tables? in the database comprised at least 50% of undocumented bitfields?