|
Strategic Tea posted:I'd be wary of this because the head of goons in Eve is absolutely up for doxxing teenagers and ironically-not-ironically acting like that makes him an IRL intelligence officer. The mittani quit afaik
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2023 23:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 00:17 |
|
|
welp, rip :jensen: More positively on Eve, I think the lore was that too many warp drives so close together caused
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2023 23:24
|
|
|
sebmojo posted:The mittani quit afaik In-game, where he was mostly a figurehead. Very little of the job actually required him to log in to the game so giving up the position is meaningless if he just rules from jabber/discord. I didn't really keep up with eve much after that but I know some "SA Goons™" formed their own corp because of it. For the folks that missed the drama, Mittani is a sex pest. He defended a known pedo for several years and booted anybody that criticized him for it "for causing drama." His local kink community put out warnings not to let him get physically close at events.
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2023 03:06
|
|
|
 pretty sure that wasnt on the spreadsheet
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2023 05:58
|
|
|
My 20 million year moving average of BTC shows the price holding steady
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2023 07:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/coffeebreak_YT/status/1636410606461894659 same guy who sued the ftx celebrity spokesmen suing meetkevin, graham stephan among others
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 09:54
|
|
|
Is shaq still in hiding
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 10:03
|
|
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:Is shaq still in hiding
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 11:59
|
|
|
CannonFodder posted:I know you mean "staying out of the public eye" but I got a little giggle thinking about a 7'1" man that has been on TV for 30 years (I went and checked, he was drafted to the NBA in 1992) trying to hide behind a tree or wearing a costume to go incognito. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 12:03
|
|
|
 and also  This is good for buttcoin
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 12:06
|
|
|
Lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 12:53
|
|
|
That's an amazing picture. But like, can you just avoid a lawsuit in the US indefinitely by being physically unreachable in terms of being served the papers? That seems somewhat exploitable for people who might be rich enough to just hide inside a large property and have other people do their shopping for them.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 13:04
|
|
|
PurpleXVI posted:That's an amazing picture. For a certain period of time, sure. In practice, they're required to try and serve you personally several times, and if they document that you're unreachable after several reasonable attempts, the judge will typically authorize papers being left at your home or place of business, or sent through certified mail. Failure to acknowledge these will get you a default judgement.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 13:19
|
|
|
It's not like he has anything to be afraid of. This is America. Doing commercials for products you don't know anything about that are harmful to the public is what we should all aspire to do with our lives. None of these people are going to be liable for anything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 13:37
|
|
|
PurpleXVI posted:That's an amazing picture. The head of scientology tried to do this iirc, and after a while the judge ruled that his efforts to avoid being served showed that he knew there was a lawsuit against him and it could proceed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 13:50
|
|
|
Why not put service on Ethereum? You could send a contract with 2 functions, acknowledge and ignore. Ignore would simply do the same thing as acknowledge.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 14:43
|
|
|
A lotta yall still dont get it. Paper holders can use multiple summons juices on a single defendant. So if you have 1 astro summons and 3 summons juices you can create 3 new summons.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 16:47
|
|
|
Dr. Fraiser Chain posted:My 20 million year moving average of BTC shows the price holding steady okay how about your 10^10^10^10^10^1.1 quettasecond moving avg?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 16:52
|
|
|
zedprime posted:Why not put service on Ethereum? You could send a contract with 2 functions, acknowledge and ignore. Ignore would simply do the same thing as acknowledge. I thought ooki dao voted on whether to acknowledge a served notice and that the vote was used to prove they received it, but I might be misremembering.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 17:01
|
|
|
CannonFodder posted:A lotta yall still dont get it. Paper holders can use multiple summons juices on a single defendant. So if you have 1 astro summons and 3 summons juices you can create 3 new summons. lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 17:09
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:I thought ooki dao voted on whether to acknowledge a served notice and that the vote was used to prove they received it, but I might be misremembering.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 17:32
|
|
|
CannonFodder posted:A lotta yall still dont get it. Paper holders can use multiple summons juices on a single defendant. So if you have 1 astro summons and 3 summons juices you can create 3 new summons. One weird trick lawyers don't want you to know!
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 18:08
|
|
|
i don't know how i really feel about the celeb endorsements. on the one hand.. don't listen to celebs, they probably don't use the items they promote anyways.. on the other.. they probably should have known better. those youtube promoters though.. feel like they definitely should have some blame for this. it's unfortunate that they're only being used because of FTX and not because of other scams.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 19:28
|
|
|
Strong Sauce posted:i don't know how i really feel about the celeb endorsements. on the one hand.. don't listen to celebs, they probably don't use the items they promote anyways.. on the other.. they probably should have known better. At the end of the day it mostly comes down to if they tried to give you specific financial advice. I suspect that some of the social media people are a lot more open to that particular accusation than Matt Damon calling you a pussy for not buying crypto in general.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 19:32
|
|
|
Cyrano4747 posted:At the end of the day it mostly comes down to if they tried to give you specific financial advice. yeah it would strike me as likely celebs had lawyers involved who made sure that their endorsement was generic and non-actionable, but social media influencers would have done stupid poo poo that said, it is likely that celebs have real money to go after and social media influencers do not
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 19:58
|
|
|
There are a ton of ads that say things like 'man i love investing in this brand of financial vehicle!'
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:07
|
|
|
jokes posted:There are a ton of ads that say things like 'man i love investing in this brand of financial vehicle!' Are you talking about tiktok and youtube influencer types, or actual advertisements on TV? Because the rules around what you can do re: endorsements are pretty firm and it's rare to find anyone crossing that line in an actual broadcast advertisement. You can tell people they should put their 401k with Schwab all day long, and you can even tell them they should buy all the crypto and NFTs they can get their hands on, but the second you say "you should buy THIS stock/bond/monkey jpeg" you get into some really deep waters, really fast. edit: and yes, lots of people play a bit fast and loose with this calling it an editorial or whatever, see: Jim Cramer. I still can't quite figure out how the "this program is totally not financial advice, OK, now let me give you half an hour of financial advice" disclaimer is OK, but then I'm not a lawyer or a money surgeon or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:12
|
|
|
look as long as you say "this is not financial advice" at some point during your financial advise you're safe from any repercussions
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:18
|
|
|
Boxturret posted:look as long as you say "this is not financial advice" at some point during your financial advise you're safe from any repercussions "These are not drugs, do not ingest them" I say as I pull five kilos of cocaine, a pound of marijuana, and a full blotter of LSD out for my discerning customers to peruse. "By the way, the weed is some really good poo poo, so if one was to smoke it they'd go for a loving wild ride. But don't do that. Anyways that'll be $50 for an 8th but believe me it's worth it. For non-smoking, not-getting-high purposes only."
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:20
|
|
|
Find me a jury that will determine Jim Cramer is anything but schadenfreude entertainment with his hit rate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:21
|
|
|
Cyrano4747 posted:"These are not drugs, do not ingest them" I say as I pull five kilos of cocaine, a pound of marijuana, and a full blotter of LSD out for my discerning customers to peruse. "By the way, the weed is some really good poo poo, so if one was to smoke it they'd go for a loving wild ride. But don't do that. Anyways that'll be $50 for an 8th but believe me it's worth it. For non-smoking, not-getting-high purposes only."
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:23
|
|
|
zedprime posted:Find me a jury that will determine Jim Cramer is anything but schadenfreude entertainment with his hit rate. The better question would be: "Would I have made more money by doing exactly the opposite of what he suggested?" At some point the advise is so bad that shorting anything he endorses would make you more cash.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:24
|
|
|
zedprime posted:Jim Cramer is taking huge bong rips of poison ivy and going to the hospital in this analogy. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:38
|
|
|
Professional Financial Stuntman in a controlled environment. Do Not Try at Home.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:40
|
|
|
Methylethylaldehyde posted:The better question would be: "Would I have made more money by doing exactly the opposite of what he suggested?" At some point the advise is so bad that shorting anything he endorses would make you more cash. You can do that. https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/blog/inverse-cramer-etf-is-live
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:52
|
|
|
Web3 is just reverse robin hood. Literally just 'how can we make something inefficient and expensive and designed only to siphon money from people.'
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 21:26
|
|
|
I just pulled up to the thread and saw some posts about blitzball, is everything okay?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 21:32
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:yeah it would strike me as likely celebs had lawyers involved who made sure that their endorsement was generic and non-actionable, but social media influencers would have done stupid poo poo crypto is one of the few areas where I’d expect the Venn diagram of “stupid enough to say actionable things,” “wealthy enough to be worth suing,” and “does not have/listen a lawyer before speaking” has significant overlap in the middle.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 22:53
|
|
|
why did you post a picture of a tree?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 23:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 00:17 |
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:why did you post a picture of a tree? Dont be obtuse John Cena is in the picture as well
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 23:22
|
|
