|
Rodinal is my go to developer but I make my own Rodinal out of Panadol. You can go really far down the black and white rabbit hole and make all your own chemicals from scratch and it's good and fun. Hell, if you don't want to commit to buying developer you can make Caffenol out of instant coffee, washing soda and vitamin C.
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 23:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 15:34 |
|
|
here kid, have a picture
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:12
|
|
|
YCIAPOS: Your Chaff is a Piece of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:14
|
|
|
HAIL eSATA-n posted:here kid, have a picture  
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:16
|
|
|
that is some legit smooth bokeh
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:21
|
|
|
we doing plant macro?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:27
|
|
|
MFT is really quite capable at bokeh for the sensor size (deliberately weird focus, i was trying out a stack)
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:29
|
|
|
qirex posted:we doing plant macro? noice
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:30
|
|
|
look out, it's the fuzz
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:31
|
|
|
not macro, but also pretty good bokeh
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:32
|
|
|
lol im a very serious instagram artist
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:48
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:lol that’s a pleasant picture to look at
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:54
|
|
|
I'm the bokeh
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 03:55
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:that’s a pleasant picture to look at the orb is the real show 
Beeftweeter fucked around with this message at 04:09 on Mar 18, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 04:06
|
|
|
 what do you think it wants from us
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 04:17
|
|
|
Macro huh? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 04:21
|
|
|
drat nice claw
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 04:28
|
|
|
 it’s an action shot. I don’t think it’s noteworthy at all but it’s one of her favourite shots from the shoot so I suppose that’s worth something. but it is a photo, and apparently it’s a box ticked off her bucket list, so, ya never know what photos can bring to someone’s life lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 04:38
|
|
|
its a decent one, she looks happyechinopsis posted:it’s one of her favourite shots from the shoot this is all that really matters anyway, especially if you're working for a client
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 04:49
|
|
|
yeah exactly this time I divide my shots roughly into usable and non usable and then send low res copies of everything usable and she tells me what are her favourites and some are the same but some just aren’t which is interesting from the perspective of the alternative where I narrow them down and maybe miss shots she loves
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2023 05:46
|
|
|
Got a new camera today, a Minolta V2, fixed 45mm rangefinder, parallax correction and a party trick of getting 1/2000th out of a leaf shutter
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2023 10:16
|
|
|
Megabound posted:Got a new camera today mate if you think that's new, sorry, but I think you got swizzed
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2023 10:35
|
|
|
here is a picture of my son I think it's a nice photo of him. and imo that's some bokeh for real. when you've got a depth of field that thin, you need to nail the eyes with the focus. because his eyes arent on one plane, only the front eye is in focus, but it seems to work. if the focus is off it's very obvious, you can only use this lens if you nail the focus. the camera does the heavy lifting here lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2023 10:42
|
|
|
also did a shoot with a woman who does pin-up that was an experience. never shot with someone who was basically a professional before. she knew all the poses for going for a traditional pinup look, and holy poo poo her attention to detail and she had two dresses that were loaned to her by some online retailer or something, and they give her loads of stuff, and they wanted some photos so I did some and then she posted the picture and credited me and then they posted the picture and credited her but not me, so now I feel like a moron for giving away high quality work lol. but it was good experience, although I took like 500+ pictures and roughly HALF of them are good workable photos. ridiculous levels of choice for trying to work out which photos to focus on. she's happy with them. which is good. it bodes well for the future of my photography. it occurred to me today that I used to have a decent level of concern that I was wasting someone's time, that we'd get out there, I'd fumble around, and end up delivering some fail images.. well what occurred to me today is that I don't have that worry anymore. I am very confident that if you give me half an hour with a person I can get a handful of images they will be happy with and even a couple maybe they really like. went and did another shoot with this person. it was also a trial to see if the sun sets in a particular beach where I live and it does NOT lol. this image is good because the sun raised the blacks for me  I even beeftweeted it up myself. made sure I used every millimeter of the histogram. no blacks left unturned  perhaps this isn’t really interesting or noteworthy but the young woman was real tired after giving some presentation today and having stayed up till 5am preparing, and she really didn’t have the same energy that she had the other night. in the end I got a lot less usable shots, because her face didn’t come to the party. lol. so for future reference when you’re modelling (and lmao just tonight I offered to model for a facebook group of photographers) you have to be on your A game. echinopsis fucked around with this message at 13:43 on Mar 19, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2023 11:03
|
|
|
qirex posted:we doing plant macro? this has a real wet cherry blossom vibe that I dig
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2023 13:44
|
|
|
Megabound posted:1/2000th out of a leaf shutter mankind’s hubris will be its downfall.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2023 13:46
|
|
|
beeftweeter I have some good news I've worked out I can compensate for highly raised blacks by increasing the saturation/vibrance carefully the only thing I don't like about raised blacks is that it can feel like I'd added a grey wash to the image, and increasing the colour carefully I can overcome that, and then end up with an image that really hits the heart AND the mind
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2023 21:58
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:beeftweeter I have some good news that is good news serious suggestion: have you tried playing with the curves? not just luminosity, there's overall rgb chroma and individual r/g/b curves also. it's something i almost never neglect to do because it can honestly be the difference between a good photo and a great one, imo. at first r/g/b individually probably isn't necessary, but luma and overall chroma is usually a must i think
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2023 23:43
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:but luma and overall chroma is usually a must i think idk if I can do that with lightroom, and yeah I can use another tool for the odd photo but I can’t ditch lightroom for it’s catalogue features but yeah never looked at them
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 00:05
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:
also one of the photos I took, these were the settings. perhaps someone would tweak it bit but it didn’t need it to look good. sunsets just are that valuable
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 00:09
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:also one of the photos I took, these were the settings. perhaps someone would tweak it bit but it didn’t need it to look good. sunsets just are that valuable imo play around with some more points on there. if you like the lifted black look then you can still achieve that but with an actual black point set afaik though you can't do luma only with lightroom, the "white" option seems to be rgb to me. i know you can do it with photoshop though
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 00:30
|
|
|
quote != edit heres an eggy 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 00:31
|
|
|
How do I lighten up this George pic in a better way than just using the auto adjust?
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 00:48
|
|
|
tried a macro thing
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:02
|
|
|
PokeJoe posted:How do I lighten up this George pic in a better way than just using the auto adjust? lighter how? something like this?  (some tweaking on the curves + lower contrast) it really isn't a dark photo per se, it's just that the highlights and shadows are a bit uneven e: from there tweaking the contrast again 
Beeftweeter fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Mar 23, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:04
|
|
|
(before someone says "thats not different") https://i.imgur.com/lMtS6sF.mp4
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:07
|
|
|
Achmed Jones posted:tried a macro thing i'm not sure i have any specific advice since i've never dealt with the subject but i'd try to maximize contrast somehow. it's not really clear what the subject actually is e: lol i am very sorry achmed Beeftweeter fucked around with this message at 02:02 on Mar 23, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:10
|
|
|
oh it is an old radio's cloth speaker cover. i was just doing an abstract thing with it. not very successfully i suppose! here's a phone shot of the whole thing 
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:20
|
|
|
hah well there you go. it also looks like little bees  i wouldn't say it was unsuccessful in that case, i had assumed you were just shooting bees again ...which would have been apparently unsuccessful. but they're not bees! so don't worry about it. lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 15:34 |
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:lighter how? something like this? I guess more like the 2nd one
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 01:36
|
|