|
A5H posted:O MA LAWD That was the best thing to wake up to
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 25, 2024 00:15 |
|
Incredible. This could be my new favorite Ferrari.
|
![]() |
|
hello beautiful ![]()
|
![]() |
|
It looks OK but how does a V12 front engine car have a 47:53 weight distribution? Does it have a live axle rear? I'm not really warmed up to the idea of an AWD Ferrari anyway.
|
![]() |
|
Throatwarbler posted:It looks OK but how does a V12 front engine car have a 47:53 weight distribution? Does it have a live axle rear? I'm not really warmed up to the idea of an AWD Ferrari anyway. Engine set pretty far back and big heavy rear diff/gearbox?
|
![]() |
|
A5H posted:O MA LAWD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMu2L3fm5DE I would drive the gently caress out of this... then find more gently caress to put back into it so I could continue driving it.
|
![]() |
|
The hottest wagon.
|
![]() |
|
The 612 has a manual transmission but there's nothing in the video or pictures showing a manual transmission for this one. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
That thing is ugly. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
GRRRRRRR![]()
|
![]() |
|
McMadCow posted:That thing is ugly. You are wrong.
|
![]() |
|
This is amazing. It's like someone went into my head and designed a ridiculous theoretical dream car. Given the position of the front seat, it looks like the back seat would actually fit a (small) person. I finally have an answer to that stupid "if you could have any one car..." question.
|
![]() |
|
Holy poo poo ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Throatwarbler posted:The 612 has a manual transmission but there's nothing in the video or pictures showing a manual transmission for this one. Like the California and the 458, it's DCT or nothing.
|
![]() |
|
A5H posted:O MA LAWD (first thing I thought of) Or maybe a Mazda RX8
|
![]() |
|
The front end is like someone stuck a Ferrari grille on a 350Z and whacked it with a crowbar for half an hour...
|
![]() |
|
The back looks like an elise with one set of tail lights to me, but that isn't a bad thing at all.
|
![]() |
|
McMadCow posted:That thing is ugly. It has a really fat rear end, I think it's ok from every angle except profile. Not a very sexy roof line. Better than the Panamera though. e: or the front either. It's not horrendous, but really not very attractive. Synonamess Botch fucked around with this message at 23:10 on Jan 21, 2011 |
![]() |
|
Its hideous and all of you that think otherwise are broken
|
![]() |
|
I think a car that is this divisive is far more fun than one that's generally received as good.
|
![]() |
|
Y'all are crazy!
|
![]() |
|
That car is ugly as gently caress.
|
![]() |
|
That Ferrari is the three door hatch of my dreams. I know what I'M buying when I win the lottery.
|
![]() |
|
It's the prettiest "family" super car.
|
![]() |
|
Love the new Ferrari but I thought the back was a bit too 'swoopy', so...![]() It's a shame I suck at photoshop.
|
![]() |
|
Fayez Butts posted:Love the new Ferrari but I thought the back was a bit too 'swoopy', so... Too prius-y, too big.
|
![]() |
|
A5H posted:O MA LAWD Cover up the front end and you have an elongated Mazda hatchback. It's not HIDEOUS but it's far from gorgeous. It's ... well... interesting?
|
![]() |
|
Dschingis Khan posted:Cover up the front end and you have an elongated Mazda hatchback. It looks like a 2 door Panamera with the canopy pushed back.
|
![]() |
|
I don't think it's quite Panamera bad, but it is not a pretty car.
|
![]() |
|
It's not a pretty car but I absolutely adore it. I love shooting brakes. I actually like 4 seat Ferrari's too, especially the 456. They're perennially bad sellers and depreciate horribly. Since they're not going to sell many, it makes sense to make the styling divisive. Since they will depreciate at an incredible rate I can picture myself owning one at some point in my life. It's the perfect dream daily driver!
|
![]() |
|
Forgive my car ignorance, but what exactly defines a shooting brake? Is it like a hatch-ified coupe, or do they have a more specific design cue like the (relatively) squared off roofline or something?
|
![]() |
|
japtor posted:Forgive my car ignorance, but what exactly defines a shooting brake? Is it like a hatch-ified coupe, or do they have a more specific design cue like the (relatively) squared off roofline or something? It is in fact a "hatch-ified" coupe with a squared off rear end. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting-brake allonblack fucked around with this message at 11:11 on Jan 22, 2011 |
![]() |
|
Phangor posted:GRRRRRRR A buddy of mine mentioned that it has flatworm eyes. I think he's right. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
redscare posted:Its hideous and all of you that think otherwise are broken ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Fayez Butts posted:Love the new Ferrari but I thought the back was a bit too 'swoopy', so... Best analogy for the FF I can come up with is an inverted mullet.
|
![]() |
|
The new Pagani: http://www.gtspirit.com/2011/01/23/magazine-shots-completely-reveal-2012-pagani-huayra/ So disappointing !
|
![]() |
|
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
|
![]() |
|
It's got jowls. Jowls!
|
![]() |
|
The gently caress is a 'Huayra'? Whatever it means, what a stupid looking front-end. The rear is alright I guess. It all kinda seems to busy, like I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to focus my eyes on and they keep drifting back to that stupid front which doesn't help anything. edit- If you look at the concept drawings, they're brilliant looking. What happened...
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 25, 2024 00:15 |
|
You're all ugly, that Ferrari is gorgeous.
|
![]() |