|
Neu posted:racism is based on fact. that would be racial realism
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 05:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 16:22 |
|
|
fishmech posted:that would be racial realism for the LAST time do NOT sign your posts THANK YOU
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 06:01
|
|
|
johndis posted:for the LAST time do NOT sign your posts THANK YOU dont sign your posts
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 06:05
|
|
|
das racist http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdWxo3e3Kzk
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 06:34
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ8ViYIeH04
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 07:00
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itsu someone has undoubtedly made this joke already but idgaf
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 07:59
|
|
|
Criticism of Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden is also heavily criticised for orchestrating the September 11 attacks. Critics argue that bin Laden should find ways of expressing his political views that do not cause severe civilian loss of life, such as political debates, press conferences or television advertisements.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2011 08:08
|
|
|
haveblue posted:is it possible to be seriously injured by consuming too much spiciness too fast or will your mouth just hurt like hell for hours i took a shot of tabasco once and my throat seized up 
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 00:54
|
|
|
what is this posted:go back 2 pbs i like this
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 00:54
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i took a shot of tabasco once and my throat seized up lol pussy
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 00:55
|
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:been drinkin' whiskey sours a lot lately if you can find a bar that actually carries rye whiskey, try it with ginger ale pro. as. gently caress. on an unrelated note, i think it's 1943
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 02:42
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i took a shot of tabasco once and my throat seized up whoa. a literal baby posting on the forums. never thought i'd see the day.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 06:49
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_inventions_and_discoveries this has probably already been posted
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 21:29
|
|
|
gonna cause a huge LF argument but the THEL/MTHEL owned
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 21:31
|
|
|
Earl Grey posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_inventions_and_discoveries ahahahahah holy poo poo they put USB flash drives on the list owned, iran, owned
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 21:32
|
|
|
quote:Several of the discoveries included in this list were made by Israelis while staying at overseas research institutes. DOESNT loving COUNT YOU CHEATING BASTARDS
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 21:35
|
|
|
also lollin that there are more entries in 'defense' than in all the sciences combined also economics is not a science
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 21:36
|
|
|
Earl Grey posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_inventions_and_discoveries i work with a mr. lempel and it was ~3 years before i made the connection to LZW, turns out he's the son
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2011 22:00
|
|
|
Earl Grey posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_inventions_and_discoveries  Also this is as good a time as any to remind you all of the supremacy of ICQ.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 04:10
|
|
|
Rational scale to assess the harm of drugs (mean physical harm and mean dependence).svg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rational_scale_to_assess_the_harm_of_drugs_(mean_physical_harm_and_mean_dependence).svg
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 18:08
|
|
|
Tiny Faye posted:Rational scale to assess the harm of drugs (mean physical harm and mean dependence).svg this graph is poo poo but the underlying data comes from a decent source (david nutt)
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 18:13
|
|
|
Rufo posted:this graph is poo poo but the underlying data comes from a decent source (deez nuts)
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 19:09
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Violence_against_women
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 23:30
|
|
deserve got nothin to do with it
|
Nevergirls posted:
icq was really good until they started making GBS threads it up with annoying ads and trying to squash the hacked versions. they shot themselves in the foot like Real Networks did by making their software too annoying to use even if there was some good tech in there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2011 23:36
|
|
|
i'd like to pose a question to anyone reading this: why is there a wiki article on violence against women but not also one on violence against men? i want to make it clear i am totally against violence against women, but as i've become more and more aware of the invisible sexism that men still face in 2010 i'm wondering why there is NEVER a focus on violence against males as a gender. all of the data point to the fact that men over the course of their lives are much more likely to be a victim of violence in general. even in regards to a specific form of violence (domestic violence) where women make up the majority of victims, studies have shown up to 30 percent of victims are men. yet domestic violence is seen pretty much universally as a "women's issue". this is an example of sexism against men. the fact that there is an article on wikipedia for "violence against women" but not one for "violence against men" is another example of a double standard that still privileges women's lives over men. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.81.20 (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 00:36
|
|
|
Nevergirls posted:
AOL has agreed to sell ICQ to Digital Sky Technologies for $187.5 million on April 28, 2010. Lol.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 00:50
|
|
|
axolotl farmer posted:icq was really good until they started making GBS threads it up with annoying ads and trying to squash the hacked versions. so, twitter a couple years from now?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 00:55
|
|
|
icq just slowly became more and more bloated i remember when they added the "chat room" concept but it took you to the web and then was confusing as poo poo and never worked right and nobody was on it or there was yahoo which just worked
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 01:58
|
|
|
Sniep posted:or there was yahoo which just worked I went back to yahoo chat and it is complete crap now. So many bots.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 02:13
|
|
|
yaaHOOOOOOOOO
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 02:17
|
|
|
johndis posted:yaaHOOOOOOOOO haha
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 02:19
|
|
|
Vivian Darkbloom posted:i'd like to pose a question to anyone reading this: why is there a wiki article on violence against women but not also one on violence against men? i want to make it clear i am totally against violence against women, but as i've become more and more aware of the invisible sexism that men still face in 2010 i'm wondering why there is NEVER a focus on violence against males as a gender. all of the data point to the fact that men over the course of their lives are much more likely to be a victim of violence in general. even in regards to a specific form of violence (domestic violence) where women make up the majority of victims, studies have shown up to 30 percent of victims are men. yet domestic violence is seen pretty much universally as a "women's issue". this is an example of sexism against men. the fact that there is an article on wikipedia for "violence against women" but not one for "violence against men" is another example of a double standard that still privileges women's lives over men. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.81.20 (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Same reason there's no white history month. Or Vice President's Day. Move along
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 03:40
|
|
|
Cuddly Coach posted:Same reason there's no white history month. Or Vice President's Day. Move along lol vice presidents day would be awesome "ok class everyone pick your vice president from the hat" "but miss tupppppeeerrrrrrr i was william wheeler LAST year i HATE him he's so boring"
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 03:47
|
|
|
im spiro agnew
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 07:44
|
|
|
I'm dan 'potatoe' quayle
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 09:20
|
|
|
Vivian Darkbloom posted:i'd like to pose a question to anyone reading this: why is there a wiki article on violence against women but not also one on violence against men? i want to make it clear i am totally against violence against women, but as i've become more and more aware of the invisible sexism that men still face in 2010 i'm wondering why there is NEVER a focus on violence against males as a gender. all of the data point to the fact that men over the course of their lives are much more likely to be a victim of violence in general. even in regards to a specific form of violence (domestic violence) where women make up the majority of victims, studies have shown up to 30 percent of victims are men. yet domestic violence is seen pretty much universally as a "women's issue". this is an example of sexism against men. the fact that there is an article on wikipedia for "violence against women" but not one for "violence against men" is another example of a double standard that still privileges women's lives over men. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.81.20 (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC) these are the sorts of people scott adams told to shut up
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 09:41
|
|
|
squirrel break
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 15:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2011 21:02
|
|
|
those are some good squirrels
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 02:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 16:22 |
|
|
squirrels are tree rats
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2011 02:46
|
|
