|
CoupleBeersNoBeers posted:beep beep thhpbpbpbpbpbpbpb
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 06:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2023 12:39 |
|
|
The Coyote's name of Wile E. is obviously a play on the word "wily." The "E" was said to stand for Ethelbert in one issue of a Looney Tunes comic book; but only one issue, where its writer hadn't intended to create canon.[5] The Coyote's surname is routinely pronounced with a long "e" (/kaɪˈoʊtiː/ ky-oh-tee), but in one cartoon short, To Hare Is Human, Wile is heard pronouncing it with a diphthong (/kaɪˈoʊteɪ/ ky-oh-tay).
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 08:02
|
|
|
diptongo
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 08:03
|
|
|
dip thong purple city
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 08:04
|
|
|
 alert the presses haha holy crap you can goonsay like every other sentence from that article "Numerous impromptu online support groups have sprung up over the years among devoted fans who miss the original Taco Doritos flavor formula. Reincarnations and relaunches of the Taco Doritos, including the recent "Back By Popular Demand" campaign, did not recreate the original Taco flavor. The Taco chips included in the Zesty Taco/Chipotle Ranch "Collisions" bags were very close to the original," 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 14:56
|
|
|
Wile E. Coyote has made two appearances in Family Guy. In I Never Met the Dead Man he appears riding in a car with Peter; when Peter runs over the Road Runner and asks if he hit anything, Wile E. says no and to keep going. In PTV, he appears in a flashback when Peter claims he had a mail-order operation, which turns out to be none other than ACME. He offers a store credit when Wile E. claims a refund for a giant sling shot that "slammed me into a mountain". Ms. Coyote then comes in telling her husband Wile E. to hurry up.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 15:01
|
|
|
Hi - I came to this page trying to learn about the nature of Stewie's communication. From my own watching of the show it seems like other people (eg. the mother character) have a partial but incomplete understanding of what Stewie says (except for the dog who seems to fully understand). Am I correct? Anyway, if someone more knowledgeable could expand on this subject this article would benefit a lot. Manning (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC) There use to be a section but I removed it cause it was an unsourced OR mess. Like many animated shows, there is inconsistency on who can understand him. CTJF83Talk 10:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC) I appreciate that, but the article first and foremost needs to be written for the benefit of people like myself who genuinely do not understand the topic and come here to learn. I've also never encountered this "inconsistent understanding" aspect before (but I don't watch a lot of animated shows either). If it could be improved that would be great. Also the article on Brian Griffin seems to have a decent explanation. Cheers Manning (talk) 10:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Well it'll be hard for us to write anything that is well sourced and isn't OR. For example, in "The Cleveland–Loretta Quagmire" Brian Griffin implies that Stewie can only be understood by family members and those close to the family but in early episodes it is hard to tell which family members can understand him and in Petergeist the librarian can understand him, so see all the conflictions? CTJF83Talk 17:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC) @Manning - I too have wondered about who can understand Stewie. Clearly Brian can. I think the whole 'evil genius' role and the way he talks to the rest of the family, and their apparent lack of understanding or the way Lois just placates him, means they just hear baby talk, but we can understand what he's truly thinking. Plus the schemes or adventures he gets up to are jsut his imagination. I'm sure one could test these hypothesis out; but I lack the complete box set/time - but have plenty of motavation :o) IHSCarlett 11:45, 21 September 2009 (BST) When this was in the article, it was subject to constant re-editing based on each editor's interpretation. The basic rule is Stewie often is not understood by others because he is a baby. This cannot be made more specific because who can understand Stewie changes at the convenience of the writers, and why is seldom made clear. I would favor either: just using that basic statement without embellishment unless a reliable source is found, or leaving it out altogether until a reliable source is found Reminder: Family Guy is a work of fiction—there is no single correct interpretation to ambiguous story elements. / edg ☺ ☭ 11:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC) I go for leave it out all together. I eliminates the large amount of OR that will be added. CTJF83Talk 18:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC) I believe it was Love Blactually where they actually made a gag mention of Loretta being close enough outside of the immediate family for him to be understood. Of course it was a gag. But I very much agree to leave it out. --HELLØ ŦHERE 18:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC) In the end of one episode it is discovered that the Griffans are being watched by some futuristic space people. One of them says "Any Questions?", and another says "Can they understand the baby?" Its inconsistant and gives the story flexibility. Sometimes it apeares as if Lois and others have no idea what he is saying and other times they carry on full conversations. Brian however has no trouble understanding stewie.69.233.195.133 (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC) I came to wikipedia today to find out about this topic - to find out which characters understand Stewie or at least whether or not that is consistent. It's depressing to me that I have to come to the discussion page to find out anything about this, and marks an aspect that I dislike about wikipedia. Can't you agree that it's a good idea to say somewhere on the page that it's inconsistent and make small comment about the usual case...? Quite plainly people visit the wikipedia page with this type of question in mind - completely redacting any mention of a (mildly) controversial topic makes the wikipedia experience worse for everyone. Ronald ugh@treasurelondon.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.24.236 (talk) 22:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC) A lovely sentiment, but it belies a misunderstanding about what Wikipedia is NOT supposed to be; specifically, it is not a collection of every single piece of information in existence. For these aspects of fine detail about the show, fan-forums are a more appropriate venue; specifically I would recommend the FG Wikia. DP76764 (Talk) 22:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC) http://familyguy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page CTJF83 chat 23:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC) No, it doesn't in any way, shape, or form. The fact that it is a common question means it's notable, and notable facts are included. The only reason we haven't included it is the lack of reliable sources. Don't use policy to beat down on people pointing out flaws in Wiki. — trlkly 13:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 15:14
|
|
oh hey the right thread got dat wmd posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-neutral_pronoun
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 16:01
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:the only thing japanese people hate more than japanese otakus is american otakus in nippon The entire country is one giant 24/7 anime con!! Squee!!!  *Eikaiwa school collapses with english speaking employees unpaid for weeks now made homeless*
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 16:47
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neoceratias_spinifer.JPG
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 19:36
|
|
|
Dolomite posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neoceratias_spinifer.JPG  that is a ballin' fish
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 20:25
|
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:
not when you get done with it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 20:57
|
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:
bet you wanna mash up his gonads real bad dont you pervert
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 21:11
|
|
|
got dat wmd posted:oh hey the right thread
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 21:27
|
|
|
basically everything from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Female_ejaculationquote:All's I know is I have been having ejaculations ( call it what you want)since I was 18 and I'm 44 now. It does not smell, stain and from what I have been told taste like urine. I dont belive it is urine. I empty my bladder before intercoursw. Still acheive a large amount and it can at times eject across the room.---- quote:my experience: it does exist,but not in a over exagerated way like a hose spraying,I have had sexual relationships and to be honest have never really reach orgasim like i have with my new parthner.....i was so surprised at what happened to me....it was no way anything to do with urine!and i know trust me...all i know is that i got so wet with him,i said how thats never happened to me before?.........so i guess its either the guy knows how to make this happen or something or maybe were perfect piece together....its clear and odurless and makes the sex better anyway.I t it didnt exist but because i experienced it,thats why im on this page. quote:Is it just me OR does tis need a picture if not while happening the of Skenes gland labeled like File:Skenes gland-english.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markstar (talk • contribs) 04:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC) quote:Not trying to sound like a voyeur or anything, but since there's a video tape of a male ejaculating on the male ejaculation page, shouldn't some one volunteer to do a taping on the female ejaculation page? quote:So I was thinking that this article needs a photo depicting actual female ejaculation (and not urniation), and not just footage taken from common pornography -- of course this would be STRICTLY for scientific purposes. quote:an article this big needs a picture. perhaps one with pubic hair to lessen pornography accusations. 99.20.100.127 (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC) quote:If we need photographic proof I would be more than willing submit some of my own personal footage and/or photos. I can also say from personal experience that it tastes like water with a hint of cucumber juice, unless unusually high amounts of Vitamin B are present in the system in which case it tastes like water that has had bleach added to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.114.129 (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC) quote:Having completed a introductory study of feminism myself, I feel that the issue of female ejaculation is one of importance for feminist theory. No issue more profoundly highlights the collision between androdgynous and essentials feminism (those who argue men and women are totally equal, versus those who argue that attempts to give women the same features of men are misguided as they exist within a 'male identified' society. The fascination within pornography with female ejaculation also makes for an interesting feminist debate as it can be linked with the 'debasement' and sexualisation of women that has been recently documented in Natasha Walter's latest book 'Living Dolls'. For these reasons I feel feminism is importantly tied to the issue of female ejaculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.216.211 (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC) quote:The sperm upsuck mechanism doesnt appear to be accepted by the majority of the establishment yet. Once the basic process of sperm and egg were found the previous ancient knowledge was dissmissed as primitive and uneducated, labelling female ejaculation mere shamefull bed wetting to be avoided at all costs. Prior to this shamefull labelling perhaps there was some real intelligent evolution by accidental squirters whose off spring became more prevalent. Squirting by other animals is not known (as far as I know). These are just my thoughts as far as I know, if there is no supporting evidence I wouldn't mind researching it myself! ;-). quote:A review of the evidence for orgasm in nonhuman primates with the author's own evidence from the digital stimulation of female chimpanzees suggestings that something akin to interspecies orgasm occurs in chimps (this apparently was not a reciprocal arrangement). Though this research will probsbly be most remembered for the original data collected (and the original data collection method) actually the most bizarre part of this paper is the author's suggestion that female orgasm evolved to stimulate male ejaculation. Few theories on the function of female orgasm have flown in the face of such counter evidence as this one, but I actually heard the first author present it at a national meeting in great seriousness and with a straight face.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 22:17
|
|
--173.75.45.2 (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:basically everything from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Female_ejaculation finger-bangin' chimps for science.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 22:27
|
|
|
Roadrunner and Coyote own and if you dont agree just get the gently caress out
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 22:34
|
|
|
CoupleBeersNoBeers posted:beep beep Replace the yospos rules thread with this 1. Road Runner cannot harm the Coyote except by going "beep, beep." 2. No outside force can harm the Coyote—only his own ineptitude or the failure of Acme products. Trains and trucks were the exception from time to time. 3. The Coyote could stop anytime—IF he were not a fanatic. (Repeat: "A fanatic is one who redoubles his effort when he has forgotten his aim." —George Santayana). 4. No dialogue ever, except "beep, beep" and yowling in pain. 5. Road Runner must stay on the road—for no other reason than that he's a roadrunner. 6. All action must be confined to the natural environment of the two characters—the southwest American desert. 7. All tools, weapons, or mechanical conveniences must be obtained from the Acme Corporation. 8. Whenever possible, make gravity the Coyote's greatest enemy. 9. The Coyote is always more humiliated than harmed by his failures. 10. The audience's sympathy must remain with the Coyote. 11. The Coyote is not allowed to catch the Road Runner.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 22:55
|
|
|
Cuddly Coach posted:Replace the yospos rules thread with this was going to do some find and replace with apple and microsoft but lost interest...
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 23:19
|
|
|
seriously what does that coyote eat when hes not chasing the road runner?? i mean its not like that bird is his only source of food obviously so why does he even keep trying?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2011 23:21
|
|
|
johndis posted:seriously what does that coyote eat when hes not chasing the road runner?? i mean its not like that bird is his only source of food obviously so why does he even keep trying? thats the joke
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 05:28
|
|
|
johndis posted:seriously what does that coyote eat when hes not chasing the road runner?? i mean its not like that bird is his only source of food obviously so why does he even keep trying? acme sells everything but coyote food, hth
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 05:44
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:acme sells everything but coyote food, hth they probably sell that too except you open the tin and it's actually a silly snake spring joke
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 06:19
|
|
|
mr_jim posted:not when you get done with it.  seriously did nobody get this joke
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 06:35
|
|
|
Coffee Quack posted:they probably sell that too except you open the tin and it's actually a silly snake spring joke 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 12:37
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:
i did, it was a good one
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 14:02
|
|
|
http://ang.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starcraft_II
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 18:25
|
|
|
http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 18:42
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 20:51
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page now do the one where everything is like the sweedish chef bork bork bork
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 22:35
|
|
|
daft punk railroad posted:http://ang.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starcraft_II * SteorraCræft
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2011 23:26
|
|
|
mean ol prof getting you down about verifiability? vandals keeping you from getting those grades, fear not, intrepid student, hand-picked and groomed wikipedia articles are available to you, some as recent as 2009. What are you waitiing for, the library to open? http://schools-wikipedia.org/
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 03:37
|
|
|
Please note that Wikipedia's policies are that content has to be verifiable and based on recognised reliable sources. We have not included references and sources in this selection, but you can check them at Wikipedia online if you have any questions.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 03:43
|
|
|
This selection is a part of a larger collection at Wikipedia, which we commend especially for older children.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 03:53
|
|
|
daft punk railroad posted:http://ang.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starcraft_II hwæt
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 05:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 05:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 05:43
|
|
|
Cuddly Coach posted:i wanna write articles for dikipedia
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 16:55
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamer A girl gamer is any female who regularly engages in playing video games.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 18:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2023 12:39 |
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cousin_marriage#Cousin_marriage_userbox_created from the ~12,000 word page on cousin marriage
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2011 19:19
|
|
