New around here? Register your SA Forums Account here!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $10! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills alone, and since we don't believe in shady internet advertising, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Young Freud
Nov 25, 2006

Corny posted:

Man for how public the Israelis are, I bet the Saudis are screaming on an order of magnitude much greater than the Israelis behind closed doors.

No doubt trying to get the Pakistanis to deliver those nuclear bombs quicker now.

"gently caress the delivery systems, just get the nukes here, we'll rig up some Chinese stuff because the Russians don't like us for Syria."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sausage.

Smellrose
I wonder if the final common ground between the US and Iran was the realization of exactly how much this would piss off the Saudis.

superaielman
Mar 16, 2006

You can't harm me. Are you a fucking ass? Do you not know who I am? He must not know who I am.

ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:

I wonder if the final common ground between the US and Iran was the realization of exactly how much this would piss off the Saudis.

Wouldn't surprise me. Prince Alwaleed bin Talal has made the opinion of the Saudis very clear, and the US very clearly doesn't care.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-22/iran-is-playing-obama-says-savvy-saudi-prince.html

Senjuro
Aug 19, 2006

Apologies if it's been answered before or if it's not the place to ask but I feel like I'm missing something basic here. If I understand correctly you only need to enrich uranium to about 3-5% for it to work as reactor fuel and yet Iran has enriched to up to 20% while claiming that they have no weapons program. So what's the use of enriching above 5% if you don't plan on making a bomb?

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

quote:

A grim-faced Netanyahu, who had strongly opposed any easing of economic sanctions against Iran – in a rift with Israel's main ally, the United States – told his cabinet his government would not be bound by the Geneva deal.

He repeated a long-standing Israeli threat of a possible military assault against Iran – even as a member of his security cabinet acknowledged the interim accord limited that option.

"What was achieved last night in Geneva is not a historic agreement, it was a historic mistake," Netanyahu said.

"Today the world has become a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world took a significant step towards obtaining the world's most dangerous weapon."

"Israel is not committed by this agreement. The regime in Iran is committed to destroying Israel. And Israel has the right and the obligation to defend itself by itself from any threat," Netanyahu said.

"I would like to make clear, as the prime minister of Israel: Israel will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability."

But Israeli Civil Defense Minister Gilad Erdan, a security cabinet member, said the deal "makes it much more difficult, in the diplomatic sphere, to talk about a military option."

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said the Geneva deal was Iran's "greatest diplomatic triumph" since its 1979 Islamic revolution, and predicted an arms race could result among Sunni Arabs who also feel wary of Shia Iran.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

Senjuro posted:

Apologies if it's been answered before or if it's not the place to ask but I feel like I'm missing something basic here. If I understand correctly you only need to enrich uranium to about 3-5% for it to work as reactor fuel and yet Iran has enriched to up to 20% while claiming that they have no weapons program. So what's the use of enriching above 5% if you don't plan on making a bomb?

They can use 20% enriched uranium in their research reactor we helped them build (or their new one in Arak which will probably be operational next year) to produce isotopes for medical and industrial uses, though they could also produce plutonium with it.

Senjuro
Aug 19, 2006

eSports Chaebol posted:

They can use 20% enriched uranium in their research reactor we helped them build (or their new one in Arak which will probably be operational next year) to produce isotopes for medical and industrial uses, though they could also produce plutonium with it.

I see. So is there a certain percent that one can confidently say that anything above it has no other use expect for weapons?

coffeetable
Feb 5, 2006

TELL ME AGAIN HOW GREAT BRITAIN WOULD BE IF IT WAS RULED BY THE MERCILESS JACKBOOT OF PRINCE CHARLES

YES I DO TALK TO PLANTS ACTUALLY

Senjuro posted:

Apologies if it's been answered before or if it's not the place to ask but I feel like I'm missing something basic here. If I understand correctly you only need to enrich uranium to about 3-5% for it to work as reactor fuel and yet Iran has enriched to up to 20% while claiming that they have no weapons program. So what's the use of enriching above 5% if you don't plan on making a bomb?

As well as medical and research purposes, the more highly enriched the uranium is, the more compact reactor fuel can be. Fast neutron reactors (which use >20%) offer the possibility of closing the fuel cycle by breeding your own plutonium (though that's hella difficult), and naval reactors use 50-90% because space is at a premium.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

Senjuro posted:

I see. So is there a certain percent that one can confidently say that anything above it has no other use expect for weapons?

There are research reactors that used highly-enriched uranium, though this is really unpopular now for non-proliferation reasons, and I think most of them have been converted to use low-enriched uranium. In theory you could make a really lovely A-bomb with just 20% enriched uranium, but in reality it's more like 80%.

Petey
Nov 25, 2005

For who knows what is good for a person in life, during the few and meaningless days they pass through like a shadow? Who can tell them what will happen under the sun after they are gone?
Can/should someone make a new thread about this? It seems like a big enough deal, right?

Xandu
Feb 19, 2006


It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am.
About Iran? Yes, please.

Muffiner
Sep 16, 2009
Yara Sabri, a Syrian actress has been using her Facebook page to disseminate information about regime detainees. Here are some of the posts:

1
Please spread:
There is a person known as Abu Aldeeb, real name unknown from Ma'arat alNumaan who has been detained for 25 years in Military Branch 215. Accused of being a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

No other information because he's been in solitary confinement.

Please disseminate so that someone who recognizes the name can know he is still alive.

2
Please spread:
Faten Abdulrahman from Douma a PhD in Nuclear Physics
She was in the Air Force Mukhabarat Branch but was transferred to Military Branch 215, she was in solitary confinement for 60 days.
She was injected with syringes, nobody knows what they are but they caused constant bleeding.
She was taken to the branch behind the Officer's Club.
Last seen two months ago in Military Branch 215.

Please help us spread this information.

3
Please spread:

From someone recently released:

The Guys were in the National Security Branch in Kafar Souseh last seen 3/6/2013:

Muhannad Soufani
Economics student, resident of Kudsayah accused of humanitarian relief.. Taken from his job at a bookstore he also works as a teacher at an institute.

Abdulrahman alBoushi
Economics student resident of Barzeh taken while doing an exam at university
Accused of trying to blow up the Faculty of Economics, he has admitted to doing so on camera while under threat. Last time I saw him he had a serious chest injury as a result of a foot strike and he had to be transferred to hospital after a while.

Khalid alKurdi
Economics student specializing in management, has a kidney disease and in constant need of water but is not receiving adequate quantities (a cup a day)

Please help us spread this
Thank you

4
#ohfreedom
Bashar Sirri Nakrour
Arrested by the Blue Ifrits (a Syrian saying, in this case it refers to the Mukhabarat) 5 months ago as he was leaving a regime sponsored National Reconciliation Council meeting of which he is a member in Homs
Since then we haven't heard anything of him

Guys..
Whoever was inside [prison, arrested by the Mukhabarat] and has been safely released please tell us if you know anything about him..

Thank You

Paul MaudDib
May 2, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE

Senjuro posted:

I see. So is there a certain percent that one can confidently say that anything above it has no other use expect for weapons?

No, there's no level of enrichment that has no use except for weapons. Different levels of enrichment allow different neutron flux and all that fun stuff, so it's all about what you're trying to do with it.

When we originally built the Tehran Research Reactor for generating medical and industrial radioisotopes, it ran on pure 100% enriched (weapons-grade) uranium. They rebuilt it to run on 20% low-enriched uranium. 20% is still LEU, but more than 20% is generally considered weapons-grade where the primary use is weapons.

quote:

After the 1979 revolution, Iran was no longer able to procure replacement fuel from the United States or Europe. In 1987, the AEOI paid Argentina’s Applied Research Institute (INVAP) $5.5 million to convert the reactor’s fuel from 93 percent enriched uranium to slightly less than 20 percent enriched uranium, just below the cutoff for highly enriched uranium (HEU). (A timeline of the fuel requirements for the Tehran Research Reactor can be found here: Argentine Low-Enriched Uranium at the Tehran Research Reactor) The reactor has been operating with LEU fuel since 1993.
http://www.isisnucleariran.org/sites/facilities/tehran-research-reactor-trr/

Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Nov 24, 2013

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009

This is an interesting article on Russian "contractors" (basically a Russian Blackwater) operating in Syria and utterly failing.
http://spioenkop.blogspot.gr/2013/11/russian-contractors-in-syria_16.html

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Charliegrs posted:

This is an interesting article on Russian "contractors" (basically a Russian Blackwater) operating in Syria and utterly failing.
http://spioenkop.blogspot.gr/2013/11/russian-contractors-in-syria_16.html

The Interpreter has more information on that
St. Petersburg Sends Contractors to Syria
The Last Battle of the “Slavonic Corps”

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

It's at least really clear now why Obama was doing everything he could not to bomb Syria. So much for Russia's amazing diplomatic skills.

Pimpmust
Oct 1, 2008

That read really bizarre. But hey, hiring a bunch of mercenaries seems pretty cheap :psyduck:

(Well, bottom of the barrel...)

Tempora Mutantur
Feb 22, 2005


There's some quality photo editing on that second article. I'm sure that one dude's face didn't really need to be blurred like the others.

BattleMaster
Aug 14, 2000

eSports Chaebol posted:

They can use 20% enriched uranium in their research reactor we helped them build (or their new one in Arak which will probably be operational next year) to produce isotopes for medical and industrial uses, though they could also produce plutonium with it.

Plutonium-239 is created in any reactor fueled by uranium (except for a hypothetical reactor that uses incredibly high enrichments, as it wouldn't have any uranium-238 to convert into plutonium-239). The process of removing plutonium-239 from fuel waste is identical regardless of what level of enrichment is used. However, different reactors are better or worse at this for various reasons. Some reactor designs are a real hassle to remove fuel from, while CANDUs can have fuel removed during operation but eat up a lot of the plutonium by nature of their design.

You can also manufacture plutonium-239 using a reactor that uses any type of fuel by using it to irradiate depleted uranium with thermalized neutrons. The reactor would have to be designed with a channel that the depleted uranium can be inserted into, though, you can't just do it with any random reactor. This method is more likely to produce very good quality weapons material because if it's done right you don't have to deal with the issues mentioned above as well as having to remove all sorts of crap like fission products and unused uranium-235 from it, just the unused uranium-238.

So it's very hard to tell whether someone is making weapons-grade plutonium just by looking at what enrichment of fuel they're using. It could be that the new reactor is very small, or is just poo poo and can't maintain a reaction with lower enrichments.

BattleMaster fucked around with this message at 22:40 on Nov 24, 2013

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Pimpmust posted:

That read really bizarre. But hey, hiring a bunch of mercenaries seems pretty cheap :psyduck:

(Well, bottom of the barrel...)

They did the same thing during the Chechen wars, and the mercenaries were the only ones Chechen fighters had to worry about. Russian soldiers were piss drunk and lazy as a whole. Some of the mercenaries would fight on even missing appendages. The understanding I got from an interview with some Chechens was that it was far more rewarding to kill a mercenary and take his head than it was to kill a soldier. Speaking of which, I bet there is a line of buses stacked up at the Chechen border headed to Syria right about now.

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Brown Moses posted:

It's at least really clear now why Obama was doing everything he could not to bomb Syria. So much for Russia's amazing diplomatic skills.

Sorry if I'm being dumb, if so feel free to make fun of me, but I don't follow. I see Russian totally-not-mercenaries being sent to ostensibly defend regime resources. Through a combination of fuckups on their part and getting comically dicked by the regime (I like the part where they were promised tanks and BMPs but got poo poo that wouldn't even go, so they had to move out in guntrucks) they accomplish basically gently caress-all, and then as icing get captured by opposition forces. Is the takeaway that Obama was letting Russia throw money in a hole, that Obama didn't want to blow up Russian operatives, that Obama was waiting for this to blow up in Russia's face, or what?

Paul MaudDib
May 2, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE

S.T.C.A. posted:

There's some quality photo editing on that second article. I'm sure that one dude's face didn't really need to be blurred like the others.

Not only that, they blurred it in the body but left it clear in the header :psyduck:


Blue Footed Booby posted:

Sorry if I'm being dumb, if so feel free to make fun of me, but I don't follow.

Yeah, I also don't see how this connects to Obama. They got the dicking over of the century for sure. I bet it'll make a good movie, A Bridge Too Far: 2013.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Blue Footed Booby posted:

Sorry if I'm being dumb, if so feel free to make fun of me, but I don't follow. I see Russian totally-not-mercenaries being sent to ostensibly defend regime resources. Through a combination of fuckups on their part and getting comically dicked by the regime (I like the part where they were promised tanks and BMPs but got poo poo that wouldn't even go, so they had to move out in guntrucks) they accomplish basically gently caress-all, and then as icing get captured by opposition forces. Is the takeaway that Obama was letting Russia throw money in a hole, that Obama didn't want to blow up Russian operatives, that Obama was waiting for this to blow up in Russia's face, or what?

Russia and the US came to a deal over the regimes chemical weapons stockpile, and based on the circumstances, a lot of the stories were saying that Kerry got worked over and that Russia derailed the US military industrial complex, etc etc. Like they were good guys and proponents of peace who stopped the violence. Of course, they've been funding the regimes weapons, and this whole PMC nonsense all along, so those stories were really stupid. That's what he was getting at I think.

Edit: Also that Russia probably would have been a little bit more upset in the event of an American intervention if their guys were on the ground.

Volkerball fucked around with this message at 01:42 on Nov 25, 2013

Young Freud
Nov 25, 2006

I'm thinking what Brown Moses said was that Obama was holding off bombing Syria because he didn't want to antagonize the Iranians, who already feel threatened by losing Syria to the Sunni alliance of Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Obama needed something to make the agreement go down smoother.

It has nothing to do with Russian mercenaries.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The Middle East: How did you take BM's not 100% clear post?

Miltank
Dec 27, 2009

by XyloJW


It is pretty clear that the Iranians are the ones who bought off the U.S. Iran gave a better deal to the states in in order to prevent imperialist intervention!

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
Bassem Youssef is negotiating with Deutsche-Welle in regards to hosting al-Bernameg on their arabic channel.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

quote:

Libya army in Benghazi clashes with Ansar al-Sharia

At least five people have been killed in clashes between the Libyan army and an Islamist militia in the restive city of Benghazi, officials say.

Gunfire could be heard from the early hours of the morning and smoke was seen rising in part of the city.

Casualties were reported among both the army and Ansar al-Sharia, an armed Islamist group suspected of killing US ambassador Christopher Stevens in 2012.

The government has struggled to contain militias in control of parts of Libya.

Ten days ago, Prime Minister Ali Zeidan called on all militias to leave the capital, Tripoli, after fatal clashes between militiamen and protesters.

The militias took part in the uprising that led to the fall of Col Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 but have been told by the interim government to disband or join the army by the end of the year.

Reports from Libya's second city early on Monday spoke of explosions and gunfire in the Fwaihat area.

I'm also seeing reports that the military has warned any militias attempting to travel to Benghazi to help Ansar al-Sharia will be bombed.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

quote:

The United Nations has said it has brokered an agreement for Syrian government and opposition negotiators to meet for talks in January, the first such meeting since the start of the country's 32-month-old war.



The organisation's secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, said on Monday that the conference, to be held in Geneva on January 22, was "a mission of hope" to end the civil war.

But he stressed to both sides that the aiming of the meeting will be to carry out a declaration adopted by the major powers in June 2012 calling for a transitional government.

However Laui Safi, a spokesman for the opposition Syrian National Coalition, told Al Jazeera the group would only go if the government agreed to three preconditions: the release of prisoners, relief for besieged towns, and that Assad has no part in the new transitional government.

Al Jazeera's Anita McNaught said the opposition would insist prisoners are released and sieges ended before the conference ever takes place. The creation of a transitional government, minus Assad, would also have to run in parallel to the meeting itself.

The SNC has previously said it would also have to gain the support of the rebel brigades on the ground, including al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, before it began peace talks.

Sounds like there might be something encouraging about this, but doubtless, the Islamic Front and the Syrian Islamic Front aren't going to be held to any terms drawn up by negotations between the regime and the SNC.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

Did I?
Grimey Drawer

Brown Moses posted:

I'm also seeing reports that the military has warned any militias attempting to travel to Benghazi to help Ansar al-Sharia will be bombed.

So that's what that report in the news today was about :

At least seven dead, military governor of Benghazi orders mobilization.

Muffiner
Sep 16, 2009

Volkerball posted:

Sounds like there might be something encouraging about this, but doubtless, the Islamic Front and the Syrian Islamic Front aren't going to be held to any terms drawn up by negotations between the regime and the SNC.

How about we actually form up a SomethingAwful.com delegation and go there as well?
We're just about as relevant to Syria as the SNC, at this point.

Constant Hamprince
Oct 24, 2010

by exmarx
College Slice

Muffiner posted:

How about we actually form up a SomethingAwful.com delegation and go there as well?
We're just about as relevant to Syria as the SNC, at this point.

If you consider BM you're probably right, actually.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Muffiner posted:

How about we actually form up a SomethingAwful.com delegation and go there as well?
We're just about as relevant to Syria as the SNC, at this point.

We have one, but all the seats are filled up with redditors for some reason. :shrug:

Volkerball fucked around with this message at 14:11 on Nov 25, 2013

gimpfarfar
Jan 25, 2006

It's time to play Spot the Looney!
Well, it's time to add two more journalists to the list of those kidnapped in Syria. This time it's two Swedish journalists that were kidnapped on Saturday, according to Swedish media and their relatives. No info on what group, or which side, that carried out the kidnapping. It's all over Swedish media at the moment - the first time Syria has been on the headlines for months, pretty much.

Google translated source here:

http://translate.google.com/transla...rien%2F&act=url


Edit:
Some more info from various Swedish media states that they were headed out of the country but disappeared close to the Lebanese border. Both are veterans in their field, and have been previously been awarded for their coverage of the Syrian conflict.

gimpfarfar fucked around with this message at 18:00 on Nov 25, 2013

Muffiner
Sep 16, 2009
The battle to watch right now is that developing in Kalamoon. Over the last few days, the regime has overrun Qara after bombarding it with FROG missiles. Four members of Hezbullah were killed in the orchards around Deirateiyah, and Nabk has downed a Mig that according to local media was bombarding the area with barrels, which is peculiar. This morning the regime conducted 20 air raids on the town, and fighting is expected to intensify after people evacuate for Damascus and other 'safe' towns. Expect the whole area to blow up in anticipation of Geneva 2, as both sides try and consolidate their power. I expect the big battles to happen in Yabroud and Rankous, as they are where the opposition holds very defendable positions.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Video of the week, a bunch of young kids in Damascus narrowly escape being killed by an explosion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OKIJ6h9-Kc

Via @troublejee

Residents of Ghouta slaughter a lion from a local zoo for food

Very :nms: and :nws: ISIS cuts the heads off three Hezbollah fighters in Eastern Ghouta - Pro-Hezbollah Facebook pages are talking like these are genuine Hezbollah fighters.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

A very good piece from OSIMINT looking at the late-Summer offensive in Damascus, using footage from ANNA News as a source of intelligence, great analysis http://osimint.com/2013/11/24/assads-late-summer-damascus-counter-offensive/

Pimpmust
Oct 1, 2008

No news on the kindapped Swedish Journalists other that nobody seems to have any clue what's happened.

Around 60 other journalists have disappeared and 110 been killed, making it the most dangerous place to be a journalist according to Reporters without borders.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Nothing more on those journalists, although in my experience the release of information is pretty controlled. There's actually been kidnapped journalists who haven't been reported on because it might endanger them and other journalists, so you don't always hear about every kidnapping. I know at least one major news organisation had their entire team kidnapped and released, and it was never reported to the public.

The excellent New Yorker video about my work tracking the munitions used in the August 21st Sarin attack is now on YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eklJbS4Iv7I

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Seems ISIS rolled into Atareb near Aleppo, captured members of the opposition group Ghuraba al-Sham, who have been repeatedly accused of being looters and even working for Assad, and executed them, including their leader Hasan Jazra (who they hung upside down), before throwing the bodies on a pile of trash.

  • Locked thread