New around here? Register your SA Forums Account here!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $10! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills alone, and since we don't believe in shady internet advertising, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Is there anywhere a concise summary of the war in Syria? I didn't pay much attention to who controlled what and when until fairly recently, leaving a lot of years in the dark for me.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Count Roland posted:

Is there anywhere a concise summary of the war in Syria? I didn't pay much attention to who controlled what and when until fairly recently, leaving a lot of years in the dark for me.

Our allies are fighting our allies while our enemies are helping our enemies; and in the middle of all that, the civilians suffer and die by the thousands.

thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth
Lol at describing the battle for Aleppo city as stagnant. The Syrian govt forces were effectively besieged by Al Nusra on 2 separate occasions only for the tables to turn and Al Nusra to be besieged leading to the end of the battle. Yeah im sure the Syrian govt only had a token force fighting for the largest city in Syria... :jerkbag:

thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth

Volkerball posted:

^^^^^ Yeah, the original offensive that set up the front lines in Aleppo that held for years was primarily run by a group called Liwa al-Tawheed and their leader Haji Mara. They weren't jihadists by any stretch. The regime managed to take him out with a targeted assassination, but Omar al-Shishani and his family were living comfortably in the Aleppo countryside while he was in charge of the ISIS offensive there.

Oh really? 🤔 Let's just do a quick wiki on this noble group that were just trying to liberate Aleppo city.

quote:

The al-Tawhid Brigade was formed in 2012.[16][17] Reportedly backed by Qatar,[18] al-Tawhid was considered one of the biggest groups in northern Syria, dominating much of the insurgency around Aleppo.[17]

Affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood,[6][9] in late 2013 it co-signed a joint statement calling for Sharia law and rejecting the authority of the Syrian National Coalition.[19]

What true and noble warriors fighting for the Syrian people :jerkbag:

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

thatfatkid posted:

Lol at describing the battle for Aleppo city as stagnant. The Syrian govt forces were effectively besieged by Al Nusra on 2 separate occasions only for the tables to turn and Al Nusra to be besieged leading to the end of the battle. Yeah im sure the Syrian govt only had a token force fighting for the largest city in Syria... :jerkbag:

"Effectively besieged" lmao.

thatfatkid posted:

Oh really? 🤔 Let's just do a quick wiki on this noble group that were just trying to liberate Aleppo city.


What true and noble warriors fighting for the Syrian people :jerkbag:

Not the Muslim Brotherhood! :ohdear:

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

Volkerball posted:

Not the Muslim Brotherhood! :ohdear:

The call for sharia law is more damning. Do you have any information or know of any articles that could give broader insight?

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Brother Friendship posted:

The call for sharia law is more damning. Do you have any information or know of any articles that could give broader insight?

It's really not. There's a lot of political Islamist parties that call for sharia law without being terrorists. The Muslim Brotherhood being one of those. It's a symbol for regressive conservative ideology in that case, but as part of a multi-party democracy, it beats the hell out of a despotic police state.

Anyways, VICE embedded with liwa al-tawheed back before Haji Mara died, and he's featured in their video report.

https://youtu.be/7CeP81s1KdM

Haji Mara is an alias for Abdul Qader Saleh, who was a lawyer or some poo poo in Syria before the war kicked off. As fighting intensified and Nusra became more prominent, he made it a rule that only native born Syrians could join al-Tawheed, as a rejection of the up and coming pipeline that was empowering Nusra relative to the FSA, and changing the identity of the revolution. His groups legacy was the fighting in Aleppo in 2013, in which they were at the forefront of probably the most successful period of the war for the rebel cause. Those gains resulted in an increased Iranian and Hezbollah presence in Syria, so when Saleh was assassinated, things turned around. He's still remembered as a hero of the revolution and a reminder of when things were better. He's probably 2nd to Abdel Basset Saroot when it comes to men who were the face of the revolution. He's on the revolution mural in Kafranbel.



To his right is Mashaal Tammo.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

Saying the Muslim brotherhood shouldn't be part of a multiparty democracy is like saying that Americans shouldn't be allowed democracy because then they'll have the GOP as one of their largest parties, it's insane, all people and all democracies have conservative kooks in their elections and parliaments.

thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth
Sharia law: Cool and good.

I didn't realise totally not jihadist militias were such fans of implementing Sharia law.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012
The problem with the Muslim Brotherhood is that they don't want a multiparty democracy. They want a Muslim Brotherhood democracy.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

Darkman Fanpage posted:

The problem with the Muslim Brotherhood is that they don't want a multiparty democracy. They want a Muslim Brotherhood democracy.

except you know the fact that they've campaigned multi-party elections at every opportunity and were either violently put down for it like in egypt or sieged like in Palestine and that they're capable of forming joint coalition governments like in Tunisia.

You can criticize them for their skeeviness and sleaziness and conservative outlooks all you want, but they're a far sight preferable to have in a body politic rather than the black hole of total fascism that's scourges the arab world.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

thatfatkid posted:

Sharia law: Cool and good.

I didn't realise totally not jihadist militias were such fans of implementing Sharia law.

Yeah, a lot of poo poo goes over your head.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

Volkerball posted:

Yeah, a lot of poo poo goes over your head.

a bashar supporter is a stupid retard?! why I never!

thatfatkid
Feb 20, 2011

by Azathoth
Attempting to implement Sharia law and literally fighting in a coalition with Al Qaeda: Cool and good. Totally not something a jihadist militia would do.

Gen. Ripper
Jan 12, 2013


Al-Saqr posted:

Saying the Muslim brotherhood shouldn't be part of a multiparty democracy is like saying that Americans shouldn't be allowed democracy because then they'll have the GOP as one of their largest parties
The Republican Party nominated and elected Donald Trump. You are not making a convincing argument in favor of democracy here.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Gen. Ripper posted:

The Republican Party nominated and elected Donald Trump. You are not making a convincing argument in favor of democracy here.

Yeah if only we had Assad instead.

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"
Should I support the avowedly socialist PYD or the right-wing capitalist Muslim Brotherhood?

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

To be fair, letting the rebel groups kill each other was a smart strategy and it clearly paid off. Don't interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.

It was in Assad's best interests to let the rebel manpower get sapped by inter-rebel conflict and ISIS wasn't an existential threat to any of his core territories in the west. It was also in ISIS' best interests to avoid provoking the regime too much during the period where ISIS was crushing & consolidating all the smaller groups out west. It made strategic sense to both of them to minimize fighting until their shared enemies had been destroyed.

Just like it makes strategic sense to let the PYD crush ISIS now and just roll them up in a few years when the US betrays them.

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

Panzeh posted:

Should I support the avowedly socialist PYD or the right-wing capitalist Muslim Brotherhood?

As a dedicated socialist, I'm begging you, please stop posting in this thread.

Disinterested
Jun 29, 2011

You look like you're still raking it in. Still killing 'em?
People ITT are holding up a view that is shared by the most vile and debased dictators and the most right wing forces around the globe - that the Muslim Brotherhood is equivalent to Al Qaeda.

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
I'm afraid my knowledge of the Muslim Brotherhood mostly extends to a video of one of its leaders arguing against a mandated headscarf policy that a rival group/leader was trying to enforce - during a presentation around the 50s. One of the crowd shouted 'Make him wear one' which caused a few chuckles.

They certainly seem progressive and good-humoured in the video, but it's been 70 odd years since then.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
Some drone footage of Mosul.

https://twitter.com/JonSnowPasha/status/884987366317989894

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:


This is what Raqqa will look like once we're done with it.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
I've read the ISF crack units that took part in Mosul suffered 40% casualties on average. Mosul may have been secured, but at the loss of what seems to be a disintegration of Iraq's military backbone. Hopefully this won't lead to another round of anarchy.

https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/news/2017/7/10/iraqs-elite-forces-suffered-devastating-losses-in-mosul-battle

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

Duckbag posted:

As a dedicated socialist, I'm begging you, please stop posting in this thread.

Why? Tired of differing perspectives on the Syrian Civil War?

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
Because your gimmick is really tedious and played out.

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

steinrokkan posted:

Because your gimmick is really tedious and played out.

More played out than the 'Assad did nothing wrong' or 'The glorious Syrian Revolution derailed by the US not being their airforce' gimmicks?

Just because I don't find the discussions of sarin gas to be particularly compelling doesn't mean I don't want them to happen. It's an internet thread, there's plenty of space for many discussions.

Zudgemud
Mar 1, 2009
Grimey Drawer

Panzeh posted:

More played out than the 'Assad did nothing wrong' or 'The glorious Syrian Revolution derailed by the US not being their airforce' gimmicks?

Just because I don't find the discussions of sarin gas to be particularly compelling doesn't mean I don't want them to happen. It's an internet thread, there's plenty of space for many discussions.

You never discuss though, you just poo poo post. If you truly wanted to support their cause you would take effort to not look like a gimmick posting troll at every opportunity you find.

Kekekela
Oct 28, 2004

Good lord, how do you even start to fix something like that?

Zudgemud
Mar 1, 2009
Grimey Drawer

Kekekela posted:

Good lord, how do you even start to fix something like that?

Clean away the massive amount of rubble and hope for a Marshall plan to finance the colossal cost of rebuilding.

Descar
Apr 19, 2010

Darkman Fanpage posted:

The problem with the Muslim Brotherhood is that they don't want a multiparty democracy. They want a Muslim Brotherhood democracy.

They probably want go into turkey democracy direction once they get power. The best kind of democracy's! At least they get rid of the despotic police state. right? Right??

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

Panzeh posted:

Why? Tired of differing perspectives on the Syrian Civil War?

No, because ideology is a form of false consciousness and blinds the masses to the truth of class struggle. A true Marxist would focus on material circumstances, but all I've ever heard you do is spout slogans.

Being a socialist isn't about shouting "hooray socialism!" It takes hard work and careful thought and a dedication to seeing the world for what it is, not for what people say it is. Even if those people call themselves socialists.

I love the idea of Democratic Confederalism, but the PKK reeks of vanguardism. All that talk about freedom will come to nothing if all it is is talk. If we want real socialism and real democracy in North Syria, we can't just promote "the party" we have to challenge it, because class struggle isn't about money, it's about power and a state where one class is allowed to gather all the power for itself can never be socialist, even (perhaps especially) if the powerful class believe themselves to be the most socialist of all. What they need right now isn't cheerleading, it's healthy dissent.

As for the rest of the opposition, just because someone doesn't put "socialist" on their business card doesn't make them an enemy of the people. That way lies madness. Dedicated socialists will always be outnumbered by people who are just trying to get by, but the material dialectic doesn't care. Materialism is about seeing beyond the ideologies that divide us and finding common cause with the oppressed everywhere.

The leadership of Ahrar and Jaysh and the FSA may be infested with blind ideologues and aspiring warlords, but the people under them are fighting for most of the same things the YPG are -- freedom, self-determination, survival. Hell, even a lot of "Assadians" are just trying to survive in a world gone crazy.

By all means, denounce them when they hurt people, oppress people, or make the war a little worse for everyone involved. Get cynical and tactical and mean. Rant and rave to high heaven about whatever pisses you off. Make Saqr and Volkerball look calm by comparison. Go nuts. Just make sure it's about something more real, something more nuanced, something more material than who says they're a socialist and who doesn't.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
I always assumed looking at his name, avatar, and posting style, that he was a Wehrboo that wanted to take the piss out of lefties by basically same thing the same thing for months on end about the Kurds. I guess it takes some dedication and/or extreme anger.

As for the YPG itself, they are probably still the less objectionable faction but have their own ethnic and authoritarian hangups.

(Btw, we will see how the regime and the YPG work out. Assad still has a problem with Turkey, and the YPG provides a very useful buffer zone between regime-held territory and rebel units backed by the Turks.)

Ardennes fucked around with this message at 12:50 on Jul 12, 2017

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Duckbag posted:

... ideology is a form of false consciousness and blinds the masses to the truth of class struggle...

:raise:

vvv Fair enough. That statement just made me giggle.

Blue Footed Booby fucked around with this message at 12:57 on Jul 12, 2017

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007


I thought maybe I should put it in a language he'd understand. Or expose him as a fraud. Either way.

The tl;dr version is "real socialists do more than just post about how great socialism is."

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)
I like the part where you were against vanguardism, but still think socialists who don't understand the jargon of Marx's critique are frauds.

Runaktla
Feb 21, 2007

by Hand Knit

Kekekela posted:

Good lord, how do you even start to fix something like that?
I thought Kobane was in that horrible a shape and it seems like it was fixed, somewhat, already.

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001
If anyone is ever in Toronto, the Aga Khan museum has been hosting a number of exhibits on Syria. The latest one "Syrian Symphony: New Compositions in Sight and Sound" includes drone footage of Palmyra days after being liberated. It's both amazing and terribly sad. The museum itself is definitely worth a visit as well.

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

WhiskeyWhiskers posted:

I like the part where you were against vanguardism, but still think socialists who don't understand the jargon of Marx's critique are frauds.

Lmao

Are you saying you think Panzeh is really a socialist?

Duckbox fucked around with this message at 13:38 on Jul 12, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)

Duckbag posted:

Lmao

Are you saying you think Panzeh is really a socialist?

No idea. Probably. Just bad at posting.

e:Wasn't really about Panzeh though, more just how we still talk as if we're literally in the 19th century, and maybe it's not that important to know what dialectic materialism is if you're not a Marxist theorist and just a socialist.

WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 13:50 on Jul 12, 2017

  • Locked thread