|
Toast Museum posted:
Which is why I need Menu Editor. Here are 6 right click scenarios in my browser: 
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 14:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 21, 2021 18:18 |
|
|
Yeah, but you're missing the search google for "whatever" option.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 14:55
|
|
|
Biodome posted:Yeah, but you're missing the search google for "whatever" option. Best right click menu option ever.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 15:10
|
|
|
HalloKitty posted:Best right click menu option ever. Best part: It's not even "search Google". It's "search using whatever engine you have picked in your search bar at this moment." Which is usually Google, yes, but could be Amazon, Wikipedia, etc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 15:14
|
|
|
Biodome posted:Yeah, but you're missing the search google for "whatever" option.  Copying text to the search bar is a tiny bit of mouse movement and one click extra, if it absolutely has to be done with the mouse. I generally just type what I search for in the search bar, because what I'm looking for is not on the page I'm looking at, or the search query needs editing anyway. CTRL+K with typing is faster most of the times, it doesn't require the dexterity needed to select the exact text that may or may not be part of (the descriptive label of) a link you don't intend to click, be at the beginning of invisible but illogically ordered page layout elements etc. And it's one single procedure for every search, so it's an easy habit. Anyway, the addon allows you to enable or disable and order all available options, so if you want a Search Google option, you can certainly have it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 15:36
|
|
|
Golbez posted:Best part: It's not even "search Google". It's "search using whatever engine you have picked in your search bar at this moment." Which is usually Google, yes, but could be Amazon, Wikipedia, etc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 16:23
|
|
|
Disgustipated posted:If you think that's awesome, check this out: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fi...context-search/ I used to use DictionarySearch to add custom searches in the context menu
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 16:46
|
|
|
Disgustipated posted:If you think that's awesome, check this out: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fi...context-search/ Right-Down gesture with Firegestures 
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2012 19:33
|
|
|
Firefox 11 came out today, here are the release notes: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/11.0/releasenotes/ Download: http://download.mozilla.org/?produc...=win&lang=en-US
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 00:58
|
|
|
For those who've been using the non-release channels, how much (if any) increase in responsiveness have you noticed on SPDY-friendly websites?
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 02:04
|
|
|
So now that Sync works for addons, are they going to completely poo poo when I update and sync Firefox on different computers? I like the idea of addon settings being synced, but I'm not keen on it happening without my discretion. Is there any way to customize the addon-syncing? The reason is because I'm syncing between three different operating systems with different addons. One of which (Linux Mint) has a number of Ubuntu-specific addons that I don't want/need on my other systems.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 02:18
|
|
|
The Dark One posted:For those who've been using the non-release channels, how much (if any) increase in responsiveness have you noticed on SPDY-friendly websites? I don't have any first-hand experience, but the Security Now podcast covered SPDY in their latest episode if you're interested. http://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm quote:And I'll give you a benchmark which I also cover at the end of this explanation: They've got it running so that the average of the top 25 websites load in one-third the time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 03:14
|
|
|
So I'm guessing I can remove this Siphon add-on syncer extension then? Hopefully it is the case that add-on settings are synced so that any new mouse gestures or auto-fill forms I put in only need to be set up once!
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 08:59
|
|
|
Question Mark Mound posted:So I'm guessing I can remove this Siphon add-on syncer extension then? Extension settings don't get synced, just the extensions themselves.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 12:26
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 14:28
|
|
|
WattsvilleBlues posted:Extension settings don't get synced, just the extensions themselves. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 17:06
|
|
|
Anyone know an add-on that hides all menu/tool-bars, and just gives you the window frame and the web page? In windowed mode, respectively.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 20:03
|
|
|
midnightclimax posted:Anyone know an add-on that hides all menu/tool-bars, and just gives you the window frame and the web page? In windowed mode, respectively.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 20:24
|
|
|
Tunga posted:I'm not on my computer right now to check but doesn't F11 do this? Nope, that's just the full-screen mode. Basically I'd like the full-screen mode windowed. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 20:28
|
|
|
How do I make FF11 go back to displaying single image files the way the older versions worked (image in top left corner, white background)? I'm not digging the centered screen stuff.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 21:15
|
|
|
lokk posted:How do I make FF11 go back to displaying single image files the way the older versions worked (image in top left corner, white background)? I'm not digging the centered screen stuff. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fi...lt-image-style/
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 21:46
|
|
|
butts! posted:Just found out about this... might have to switch from Chrome to FF now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 22:02
|
|
|
Standish posted:https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fi...lt-image-style/ Isn't there something you can do in about :config to do it, rather than installing an extension?
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 22:04
|
|
|
butts! posted:SO loving COOL
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 22:24
|
|
|
butts! posted:Apparently the internet is some kind of hearty but extremely trippy layered cake: 
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 22:34
|
|
|
butts! posted:
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 22:54
|
|
|
Right-click anywhere, select "inspect element", and then the bottom of the screen will have a '3D' button. Press that poo poo. I literally have no idea what any of it means, but it's incredible.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 23:02
|
|
|
Tunga posted:What is this and how do I do it? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fi...ilt/?src=search
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2012 23:38
|
|
|
HalloKitty posted:https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fi...ilt/?src=search You don't need an add-on. This is built into FF 11. However, it looks like the add-on offers quite a bit of extra functionality/analysis.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 00:56
|
|
|
YggiDee posted:Right-click anywhere, select "inspect element", and then the bottom of the screen will have a '3D' button. Press that poo poo. I literally have no idea what any of it means, but it's incredible.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 01:10
|
|
|
Fangs404 posted:You don't need an add-on. This is built into FF 11. However, it looks like the add-on offers quite a bit of extra functionality/analysis. Ah, I'm still on 10, so that'd explain it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 11:00
|
|
|
Fangs404 posted:You don't need an add-on. This is built into FF 11. However, it looks like the add-on offers quite a bit of extra functionality/analysis. Are you sure? I just upgraded to Firefox 11, and I don't see that anywhere. Here's what I see after clicking Inspect Element:  Where am I missing a 3D button?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 13:29
|
|
|
I'm not sure if any developers will find the 3D mode actually helpful. You can even spin the page around and see everything in reverse. I will not deny it's really cool, but why did they spend the time on this instead of a built-in javascript debugger?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 13:43
|
|
|
VerySolidSnake posted:I'm not sure if any developers will find the 3D mode actually helpful. You can even spin the page around and see everything in reverse. I will not deny it's really cool, but why did they spend the time on this instead of a built-in javascript debugger? There's actually been a pretty strong push to "flatten" web design, in that you should be doing your best to lessen specificity to make your site design more modular, and therefore easier to maintain. This is actually a pretty good way to check and see what parts of the site need attention. Plus, it just looks cool.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 13:56
|
|
|
I'm enjoying the cat drugs, and actually it has educated me about our own site. For example, most other professional sites you'll see just layer upon layer of blue DIVs. Ours? Four nested red tables, all four taking up nearly the entire page. :facepalm:
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 13:58
|
|
|
thrawn527 posted:Are you sure? I just upgraded to Firefox 11, and I don't see that anywhere. Here's what I see after clicking Inspect Element: If you go to about :support and scroll to the bottom what's it have in the Graphics section?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 14:11
|
|
|
Disgustipated posted:Should be at the bottom right, with HTML and Style. Ah, it says a lot of things, but what stands out is "WebGL Renderer: false". I'm assuming I would need that? And that it's a graphics card thing that can't be enabled or anything? I'm not surprised, this being a work computer and not a gaming machine or anything. I'll try when I get home to see if I have it there. thrawn527 fucked around with this message at 14:24 on Mar 15, 2012 |
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 14:15
|
|
|
Golbez posted:I'm enjoying the cat drugs, and actually it has educated me about our own site. For example, most other professional sites you'll see just layer upon layer of blue DIVs. Ours? Four nested red tables, all four taking up nearly the entire page. :facepalm: Had a similar experience. Our current (and new, I should add) helpdesk system is a clusterfuck of tables on tables with tables inside tables with single cell tables inside that, and so on. It looks like a factory block. Want to see it? No? Tough; here it is: 
HalloKitty fucked around with this message at 14:33 on Mar 15, 2012 |
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 14:28
|
|
|
What I like about that is the random couple of divs in the middle. In fact, my favorite part about this is the colorcoding that lets me easily see where the divs and tables are. Also how it shifts from tables only, to tables nested in divs. So, on a modern PC, would we really gain any performance by streamlining these pages? Or is it simply a matter of making it more maintainable in general, getting away from the horror of nested tables?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 14:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 21, 2021 18:18 |
|
|
I don't see the 3d button either, and I have 11.0.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2012 14:51
|
|