(Thread IKs:
Nuns with Guns)
|
I haven't been here nearly long enough to know this: why are there thread tags that literally just get you banned if you post a thread using them? Like, what's the purpose of them existing. I get that there's a warning and I'm not stupid enough and I don't post enough, no way it'll ever come up for me on multiple fronts, but what gives?
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 14, 2025 00:31 |
|
DACK FAYDEN posted:I haven't been here nearly long enough to know this: why are there thread tags that literally just get you banned if you post a thread using them? Like, what's the purpose of them existing. I get that there's a warning and I'm not stupid enough and I don't post enough, no way it'll ever come up for me on multiple fronts, but what gives? The first two are for mods, the third is what it says on the tin. Also it's funny when it happens, what more reason do you really need than that?
|
![]() |
|
Regy Rusty posted:Also it's funny when it happens, what more reason do you really need than that? ![]()
|
![]() |
|
DACK FAYDEN posted:I haven't been here nearly long enough to know this: why are there thread tags that literally just get you banned if you post a thread using them? Like, what's the purpose of them existing. I get that there's a warning and I'm not stupid enough and I don't post enough, no way it'll ever come up for me on multiple fronts, but what gives? To make sure you read and remember all the warnings. Like Van Halen’s brown M&Ms.
|
![]() |
|
Yeah my understanding was, it was to reserve certain tags for mod-only announcements and in v1 of the forums they probably didn't have a way of restricting those tags to just mods and up, so they made the rule. Back then you had to report it before they got banned, so they were popular tags for banme threads. Then much later radium (lol) added the autoban feature and using those tags just automatically triggers it now along with gassing the thread, which is much less fun imo
|
![]() |
|
Son of Thunderbeast posted:Yeah my understanding was, it was to reserve certain tags for mod-only announcements and in v1 of the forums they probably didn't have a way of restricting those tags to just mods and up, so they made the rule. Back then you had to report it before they got banned, so they were popular tags for banme threads. Ehhh losing all the "in b4 ban" posts wasn't that big of a deal in my opinion.
|
![]() |
|
Scaramouche posted:Ehhh losing all the "in b4 ban" posts wasn't that big of a deal in my opinion. Qqqqqqqq qqq qqq qqqq. Qq qqqq qqqqq qqq
|
![]() |
|
Just man up and spam goatse in as many threads as you can before getting banned like a normal person.
|
![]() |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:Just man up and spam goatse in as many threads as you can before getting banned like a normal person. Donkey dick is another popular choice.
|
![]() |
|
Partly as a reliable self-banning feature, partly as idiot bait.
|
![]() |
|
Solice Kirsk posted:What are three things that never get laid. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
In the r/relationships thread people are always referencing some concept called "Pete", what does that mean and where does it come from?
|
![]() |
|
The Time Dissolver posted:In the r/relationships thread people are always referencing some concept called "Pete", what does that mean and where does it come from? The story in question: Me [25 F] with my boyfriend [30 M] of 6 months - we broke up after I booked tickets to go on a trip with an ex from ancient history, who is more of a best-friend quote:Did I screw up?
|
![]() |
|
Hahahaha! Pete rules.
|
![]() |
|
drat look at Pete, pretty much being a textbook example of the "Gallant" in the Goofus and Gallant type examples in the breakup megathread OP...
|
![]() |
|
I hope Pete finds love eventually.
|
![]() |
|
Regy Rusty posted:The first two are for mods, the third is what it says on the tin. Does anyone else remember back when Radium was still active and he gave a metrics report on browser/OS activity on the SA forums and he said “There was one person using WebTV but I just banned that dude because Wtf man...”
|
![]() |
|
super sweet best pal posted:I hope Pete finds love eventually. Even with all those signs that he is a potential abuser, such as not wanting his girlfriend to go on a vacation to a city literally built around sex and drugs with an ex?
|
![]() |
|
super sweet best pal posted:I hope Pete finds love eventually. I hope he’s pals with the other r/relationships superstar, beastmaster with the pet hawk (I think?)
|
![]() |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:The giant panda is a carnivore that decided meat was just too much hassle and started eating bamboo instead. I was curious so I looked them up on Wikipedia and found this gem: 'Giant Panda' on Wikipedia posted:Its ability to digest cellulose is ascribed to the microbes in its gut. Pandas are born with sterile intestines, and require bacteria obtained from their mother's feces to digest vegetation.
|
![]() |
|
Koalas do something similar.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |
|
Bobby Digital posted:I hope he’s pals with the other r/relationships superstar, beastmaster with the pet hawk (I think?) It wasn’t a pet. It just was a friend. Also Dog-cape dude is awesome.
|
![]() |
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:It wasn’t a pet. It just was a friend. Also Dog-cape dude is awesome. agreed. and "what would pete do" is an awesome mantra for being a ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Pete reads like "the liberal professor" copy pastes except from the owned person's POV imo
|
![]() |
|
Stay strong Pete!
|
![]() |
|
Ariong posted:Reported for mod sass. sorry i'm late
|
![]() |
|
LingcodKilla posted:Stay strong Pete! ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Danaru posted:The story in question: Pete loving owns.
|
![]() |
|
Danaru posted:The story in question: ![]() Edit: the best part of this story is that if it were from Pete's perspective not a single loving person would believe it. Yawgmoth fucked around with this message at 22:52 on Feb 12, 2018 |
![]() |
|
Yawgmoth posted:
basically all of this, yeah
|
![]() |
|
m2pt5 posted:I was curious so I looked them up on Wikipedia and found this gem: Hate to break it to you but humans work the same way. We have gut microbes too (though obviously not to digest wood) and we don't have them until after birth. Its why babies come out facing backwards and why child birth puts strains on the GI tract. Your mother's first and best gift to you was a big ole fart in the face to inoculate you with those primo bacteria. ![]() It's also one of the benefits of 'volunteer baby cuddlers' who now work in many hospitals. Babies who were delivered via c-section don't get the same benefit and if they don't receive that human (germ filled) contact they can die real suddenly. So grandmas/grandpas now volunteer to cuddle and hold newborns which actually has a hugely impactful health benefit! Neat! Agent355 fucked around with this message at 16:59 on Feb 14, 2018 |
![]() |
|
So what you're saying is I should disregard the anti-bacterial dispensers in hospitals when I go to the nursery.
|
![]() |
|
Bacteria that you pick up from the environment is not the same bacteria that lives in our intestine.
|
![]() |
|
Rubbing your taint all over a child is a non-starter. Can’t they just take swabs from the motheres vagina instead?
|
![]() |
|
LingcodKilla posted:Rubbing your taint all over a child is a non-starter. Can’t they just take swabs from the motheres vagina instead? Please direct all child-related butt-stuff to BYOB
|
![]() |
|
Agent355 posted:Bacteria that you pick up from the environment is not the same bacteria that lives in our intestine. Except in San Francisco.
|
![]() |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:Except in San Francisco. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
syscall girl posted:Please direct all child-related butt-stuff to BYOB I think that's more of an ADTRW post honestly.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 14, 2025 00:31 |
|
Is there a slightly bigger (and higher res) version of ![]()
|
![]() |