|
Condiv posted:what's wrong with the windows store? apart from everything normal people need for getting work done not being on windows store, it's a really good thing and i'm glad it finally exists
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2023 10:20 |
|
|
sure whatever selinux poo poo i dont care. my password is 1 and i set up sudo nopasswd anyway. who cares
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 13:46
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:sure whatever selinux poo poo i dont care. my password is 1 and i set up sudo nopasswd anyway. who cares quoting for shame
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 14:52
|
|
|
spent sunday learning more selinux and have 4 pages of notes but I still can't write a basic policy 
b0red fucked around with this message at 15:46 on Sep 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 15:30
|
|
|
b0red posted:spent sunday learning more selinux and have 4 pages of notes but I still can't write a basic policy it's less important to write policy than to be able to troubleshoot policy rhel/cent/fedora come with a ton of prewritten policy, but it often takes tweaking to make a policy work for your specific application (e.g. adapting pre-existing tomcat policy to suit your jetty-based app)
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 15:57
|
|
|
arch has basically no manpower behind it and they dont have anybody who can maintain selinux support to an acceptable standard right now be the change you want to see in the world
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 15:57
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:it's less important to write policy than to be able to troubleshoot policy Yeah I don't seem to really have a problem adapting the system to work with generic applications like databases & web servers. I'm just hoping to eventually get to the point where I can write some policies for my companies product. So far I've started by trying to write a policy for tranmission daemon and it's web gui. P interesting stuff
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
loving LOL if you care about selinux on your personal computer
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
the only reason to use Linux at home is to learn stuff for work so selinux is essential
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
i got nginx/hhvm to work and figured out how to fix my permissions and make them stop double-gzipping my pages, all without disabling selinux 
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 06:48
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:i got nginx/hhvm to work and figured out how to fix my permissions and make them stop double-gzipping my pages, all without disabling selinux granny compressing
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
what SELinux is preventing google-chrome-s from create access on the file 63. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that google-chrome-s should be allowed create access on the 63 file by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # ausearch -c 'google-chrome-s' --raw | audit2allow -M my-googlechromes # semodule -X 300 -i my-googlechromes.pp This pops up every time I start chrome but it doesn't seem to do anything. Same with printing. What SELinux doing?
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 03:34
|
|
|
apparently a bug, selinux used to only check if a program had permission to create a file if the file did not exist, and at some point they flipped it to always be checked. chrome is trying to open some file in /proc which it knows exists, but has O_CREAT in there anyway, which selinux beats it over the head about despite it having no effect
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 14:37
|
|
|
bssoil posted:what Welcome to hell
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
https://github.com/gfredericks/quinedb posted:QuineDB consists of the quinedb script in this repository. It is written in Bash and requires Bash 4.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
Oh God what lmao
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:Oh God what lmao quote:If your data and the database code are not stored in the same place, you risk losing track of one, making the other useless.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 03:05
|
|
|
If your database can't print its own source code, can you really trust it? wise words
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 04:22
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:Oh God what lmao I'm not sure you've been paying attention
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
any reason i shouldn't use fedora as a home server? we're using centos servers at work now and i'll be doing work with them so i'm thinking of using it at home. i currently use debian test so that i get more frequent package updates. can i similarly regard fedora server as a more up-to-date centos? or can i configure centos to do that too? thanks pals
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 05:51
|
|
|
gabensraum posted:any reason i shouldn't use fedora as a home server? we're using centos servers at work now and i'll be doing work with them so i'm thinking of using it at home. does the installer work correctly now?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:does the installer work correctly now? that's a red flag, then
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 06:37
|
|
|
atomic thumbs had a very hard time installing Fedora for some reason
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:atomic thumbs had a very hard time installing Fedora for some reason a very specific reason: if it couldn't connect to the internet, it installed fedora without a working package management system or most of the packages the os needed to actually function
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 07:07
|
|
|
The installer works absolutely fine for me
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 07:15
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:The installer works absolutely fine for me i can't even remember what I was doing, but it was some edge case due to me only having wifi with a captive login portal. it would try to hit the internet through that and give up completely
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 07:22
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:i can't even remember what I was doing, but it was some edge case due to me only having wifi with a captive login portal. it would try to hit the internet through that and give up completely ah right yeah, those suck. i don't think the windows installer can deal with that either
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 07:26
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:ah right yeah, those suck. it works fine edit: and by "give up completely" I mean it would pretend to install linux but install broken linux instead.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 07:59
|
|
|
Does anyone still use Gentoo? I took a look at Arch, and thought if I want to gently caress around at that level, I might as well skip straight to Gentoo. Or *BSD.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 08:01
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:Does anyone still use Gentoo? I took a look at Arch, and thought if I want to gently caress around at that level, I might as well skip straight to Gentoo. Or *BSD. No
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 08:08
|
|
|
Arch is basically gentoo, but without having to wait 43 hours because your mail client needs updating.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 08:09
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:Does anyone still use Gentoo? I took a look at Arch, and thought if I want to gently caress around at that level, I might as well skip straight to Gentoo. Or *BSD. Nah, Arch is like a spiritual successor to Gentoo and much better at being gentoo than gentoo ever was.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 08:09
|
|
|
yes, gentoo is still alive, and yes, it is the best. install it now. and as I said to VikingofRock, you can also use selinux if you want.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 10:59
|
|
|
why install arch when you can install gentoo. why go for second best.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 10:59
|
|
|
just remember to select a systemd profile and set init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd in bootargs. openrc... it was the best when there only was systemv-style inits around, but not anymore.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 11:01
|
|
|
gabensraum posted:any reason i shouldn't use fedora as a home server? we're using centos servers at work now and i'll be doing work with them so i'm thinking of using it at home. yeah it's basically up to date centos congrats on moving on from debian for servers
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 11:41
|
|
|
fedora and centos/rhel are ftw arch is also acceptable these are the three good linux
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 13:19
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:edit: and by "give up completely" I mean it would pretend to install linux but install broken linux instead. "i'm now downloading the kde package" "hmm, '<html><head><title>Please login', seems like a legit package file to me"
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 13:42
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:Does anyone still use Gentoo? I took a look at Arch, and thought if I want to gently caress around at that level, I might as well skip straight to Gentoo. Or *BSD. I use it to mess around with. Unless you have a specific use case for a *BSD, messing around with one of them tends to be a bit closer to classic unix and there is less for them than there is linux. Some of the package managers build from source, so they're more like Gentoo in that regard, and some others just have horrendously poor documentation or really narrow benefits. That said I've had better luck getting BSDs to work on older or more limited hardware with much less work than trying to build a linux system specifically for it, so really both are worth trying out to some degree.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2023 10:20 |
|
|
mike12345 posted:Does anyone still use Gentoo? I took a look at Arch, and thought if I want to gently caress around at that level, I might as well skip straight to Gentoo. Or *BSD. i think the point of gentoo is to install it, not to use it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2016 01:00
|
|