|
e: n/m
JawnV6 fucked around with this message at 08:53 on Apr 9, 2014 |
# ? Apr 9, 2014 07:25 |
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2024 06:42 |
|
Forums Barber posted:I do think that if Eripsa took on a project of writing a short story of what it might be like under StrangeCoin, and engaged other people who write science fiction, that the feedback he would get, while still maybe being a little stronger than he might like (particularly about parsimony, holy poo poo), but I think that he might be able to process it better because maybe he wouldn't perceive it as particularly the same type of personal attack. I don't know, because I've never encounted anyone else like Eripsa. Oh, he actually has started writing a short story on his Attention Economy if you check back to the goldmined thread. Hes about three chapters in. It'll give you a flare for the sort of world-building he's capable of as a writer of fantasy. Not really my sort of genre these days, so admittedly I'm not a great judge of its excellence.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 07:55 |
|
Yiggy posted:Oh, he actually has started writing a short story on his Attention Economy if you check back to the goldmined thread. Hes about three chapters in. It'll give you a flare for the sort of world-building he's capable of as a writer of fantasy. Not really my sort of genre these days, so admittedly I'm not a great judge of its excellence. I haven't read it, but art would be a better place for his ideas. He's in love with language, the only thing that attracts him to science is probably its status.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 08:53 |
|
midnightclimax posted:I haven't read it, but art would be a better place for his ideas. He's in love with language, the only thing that attracts him to science is probably its status. Part 1 of the story.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 09:01 |
|
Strangecoin started as an attempt at a sci fi sort called "Current".quote:1a The story was planned to be sorry snippets from the future contrasted with facts about the development of electromagnetic theory. I stopped the project because I'm not good with writing or f fiction, and would rather talk theory than character.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 09:53 |
|
Cool, I've always wanted lower rent Neal Stephenson.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 10:32 |
|
Jesus Christ he is quoting his own world salad.....
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 10:41 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Strangecoin started as an attempt at a sci fi sort called "Current". You aren't good with talking about theory, either, so just give up.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 12:19 |
|
From page 33 to page 34, Eripsa actually turned the tables and started schooling community college dropouts like Sedan Chair and Who What Now on epistemology, but tripped over Feyerabend on the way there and negated the existence of observation while trying to talk about paradigms. Best two pages of the thread. Eripsa, I am not sure you have the schooling you claim to have, but I do believe you may be somewhat mentally ill. I am not even sure why you're allowed to post from another user's account. I thought account sharing was prohibited. Take a break from the forums and just seek help. You'll be much happier in the long run. Judakel fucked around with this message at 12:23 on Apr 9, 2014 |
# ? Apr 9, 2014 12:19 |
|
put your dick back in your pants, jesus
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 12:22 |
|
TBF the standard 'scientific method' is actually not a very good description of how science operates in practice.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 12:29 |
|
Judakel posted:From page 33 to page 34, Eripsa actually turned the tables and started schooling community college dropouts like Sedan Chair and Who What Now on epistemology, but tripped over Feyerabend on the way there and negated the existence of observation while trying to talk about paradigms. Best two pages of the thread. No one else uses this account. Taking the mental health advice of this thread would be silly.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 13:22 |
|
RealityApologist posted:No one else uses this account. Taking the mental health advice of this thread would be silly. Yeah, why take really good and helpful advice when you could just flail around like an intellectual idiot?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 13:53 |
|
RealityApologist posted:No one else uses this account. Taking the mental health advice of this thread would be silly. You have crazy eyes and seem desperate to come up with the next grand idea for something or the other. Here's a tip: Start small. Also, I distinctly remember someone saying that RealityApologist was their account during the Google Hangout introductions. I guess it is your's now.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 13:55 |
|
Eprisa, I have a legitimate question that will actually lessen the amount of trolling you're getting: "What would it take for you to abandon StrangeCoin"? Can we prove to you that it won't work? Can we demonstrate conclusively that it will objectively harm the poorest classes? Can we show without a doubt that it will collapse society into a Mad Max post-apocalyptic world? What's your threshold for "Ok, this idea was bad, let's start anew"?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 14:34 |
|
eXXon posted:I don't know about you but if I was in strangecoinland I would try to figure out how to maximize my income (and close friends/family). Well honestly I don't know what I'd do there, because the mechanics of economic and social, well, everything are so different than what exists in the world of simple money. Imposing strangecoin on the real world, as has been discussed endlessly, would be insanely difficult. Therefore, to me it's much easier to think about a world that spent 5000 years evolving to the strangecoin situation. Not that that's easy in absolute terms, just easier than imagining how to retrain humanity to think so differently. The whole thread would have been different if the story fragment had been the OP.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 14:49 |
|
emfive posted:Therefore, to me it's much easier to think about a world that spent 5000 years evolving to the strangecoin situation. Think of a smoking crater, then. RealityApologist posted:The shot from the bouncer's powerful scanner excited (and therefore made momentarily visible) the growing field of red lights growing around at the physical confrontation between Paulie and Monica, who appeared to have decided to abandon all pretense of public composure and invest fully in a spontaneous public performance of their argumentative dance. It was a routine they both knew by heart and had improvised together so many times as a private ritual that they fell instantly back into the rhythms for their newly acquired public audience with all the grace of dancers at the height of their craft. This had the effect of turning the cameras and microphones and array of sensors that were now capturing this performance into an exercise in documentary and voyeurism and surveillance and couples therapy and anthropology simultaneously. Every data point captured in association with this event will be integrated online and processed for identity and criminal or creative activity so that merits and demerits can be distributed to the participants accordingly. And unless you're sure you come out looking great, you generally want to be as far away from those redistribution events as possible, because they always seem to gently caress over someone. Never mind the quality of the writing, all of these stories sound like different flavours of dystopian hell. I liked the one about the store run by a 5th-generation search engine that somehow can't seem to keep enough non-perishable goods in stock, failing at a problem that most retailers probably solved before the advent of computers. Who uses three tubes of toothpaste per month anyways?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:25 |
|
Honestly, RA, have you ever considered going to a counselor just for a session or two to see what they have to say? You don't strike me as having any sort of specific mental issues, but some of the things you say and do raise a few red flags that make me think you have some issues that need to be sorted out. Not wanting to admit you're ever wrong is a big one, but there's also stuff like conflating criticism of your ideas with criticism of you. You're an academic, of course, so I'm sure I don't have to tell you that there's anything wrong with seeking mental health.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:29 |
|
Wanamingo posted:Not wanting to admit you're ever wrong is a big one, but there's also stuff like conflating criticism of your ideas with criticism of you. Lol the amount of projection in this thread is ridiculous.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:36 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Lol the amount of projection in this thread is ridiculous. Who here has conflated criticism of their ideas with criticism of themselves, other than you? And again, instead of asserting it, actually point out where it occurred, cite it.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:38 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Lol the amount of projection in this thread is ridiculous. Name one person that has made claims on the scale you have. Just one.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:41 |
|
Who What Now posted:Eprisa, I have a legitimate question that will actually lessen the amount of trolling you're getting: "What would it take for you to abandon StrangeCoin"? For strangecoin, it would be enough to finish the spec and simulator, and testing enough configurations to determine that there are no stable configurations for the network. Attention Economy would be a little harder, it's a little like you're asking Marx what it would take to abandon communism. For me, AE is an organizing framework for discussing digital philosophy in practice. I think it will require waiting 20-30 years to see what actually develops to to fill the socioeconomic of roles I'm describing. Then we can talk about how reality diverged from the theory.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:47 |
|
Obdicut posted:Who here has conflated criticism of their ideas with criticism of themselves, other than you? And again, instead of asserting it, actually point out where it occurred, cite it. Sigh. You are all conflating criticism of me with criticism of my ideas, and attributing the mistake to me. You are all pretty loving dense sometimes, too.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:49 |
|
Judakel posted:You have crazy eyes and seem desperate to come up with the next grand idea for something or the other. Here's a tip: Start small. Dude you're just being mean. Eripsa threw me with how normal he looks. (How he sounds, ehhh...) quote:Also, I distinctly remember someone saying that RealityApologist was their account during the Google Hangout introductions. I guess it is your's now. That was him you smoker. I guess it's hard to tell all those "community college dropouts" apart? Wanamingo posted:You're an academic, of course He really isn't.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:53 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Sigh. You are all conflating criticism of me with criticism of my ideas, and attributing the mistake to me. But your ideas, on their own, apart from you, have gotten tons and tons of criticism. The main thrust of the thread has always been looking at your ideas. This is just a demonstrably false thing. I mean, unless you're interpreting "You shouldn't write about economics if you don't actually know the first thing about economics" as a criticism of you. RealityApologist posted:Attention Economy would be a little harder, it's a little like you're asking Marx what it would take to abandon communism. For me, AE is an organizing framework for discussing digital philosophy in practice. I think it will require waiting 20-30 years to see what actually develops to to fill the socioeconomic of roles I'm describing. Then we can talk about how reality diverged from the theory. You aren't Marx. Marx is incredibly clear, he starts small and then extrapolates meaningfully, and most of all, his observations and arguments match up with human nature, whereas yours depart wildly from it. Furthermore, Marx didn't just do 'communism', communism was a result of his critique of capitalism; even without 'communism', Marx achieved towering things. Your 'attention economy' is a very nebulous, un-worked-out mess that doesn't even define what 'attention' is, nor how you can interpret it meaningfully. It is not an organizational framework. we could wait 20 to 30 years and nothing would change, people would say "Wait, how are you measuring attention?" and "How do you jump from 'people are paying attention to this' to 'the solution for that problem is this'?" The problems it has are fundamental, because you haven't approached it with the slightest hint of rigor.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 15:58 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Sigh. You are all conflating criticism of me with criticism of my ideas, and attributing the mistake to me. There have been personal attacks against you, probably some even from me, but in the bulk of this and in the bulk of all your other threads, the criticisms have been nothing but legitimate. Somebody earlier in the thread, I forget who, said that you used to be completely different a few years back, before all the OWS stuff. If they were right, then that's really sort of worrying.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:16 |
|
SedanChair posted:That was him you smoker. I guess it's hard to tell all those "community college dropouts" apart? Actually, for once Judakel isn't shitposting. I figured out a few threads back that Eripsa must have inherited the account, as http://realityapologist.com/ redirects to a certain co-conspirator...
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:17 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Sigh. You are all conflating criticism of me with criticism of my ideas, and attributing the mistake to me. We've critiqued your ideas ad nauseum in the two previous 50+ page threads. When you make a third, repeating the same ideas, with the same mistakes, people are naturally going to also start explaining that when you're completely unable to learn, respond to criticism and adapt your ideas, there's more fundamental problems at work. This thread does not exist in a vacuum. People took the time to deconstruct your ideas before, give you the benefit of the doubt, and you responded with your typical word salad, handwaving, and everything else rather than engage the arguments, improve your ideas, or really do anything. The question posed above - what would it take to falsify Strangecoin, essentially - is a good one. The answer, clearly, is that to you it's simply not possible. There are no arguments, facts, or reality that would change your belief. Because people have broken it so many times in countless posts, and this is the result. evilweasel fucked around with this message at 16:21 on Apr 9, 2014 |
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:19 |
|
Slanderer posted:Actually, for once Judakel isn't shitposting. I figured out a few threads back that Eripsa must have inherited the account, as http://realityapologist.com/ redirects to a certain co-conspirator... Uh yeah Drwhatshisface said that he gave his RA account to Eripsa and got himself a new one.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:26 |
|
Obdicut posted:Your 'attention economy' is a very nebulous, un-worked-out mess that doesn't even define what 'attention' is, nor how you can interpret it meaningfully. It is not an organizational framework. we could wait 20 to 30 years and nothing would change, people would say "Wait, how are you measuring attention?" and "How do you jump from 'people are payassholinntion to this' to 'the solution for that problem is this'?" The problems it has are fundamental, because you haven't approached it with the slightest hint of rigor. I never suggested I had the comprehensive knowledge necessary to cover the scope of the topic, and I've eaten crow several times in this thread to humble myself, admit mistakes, address criticism, respond to questions, and so on. Some of the confusion in this thread is my fault, but you all (and you in particular) have contributed more than a little confusiona and chaos in this thread. You have done your damnedest to hurl insults, hostile interpretation, and deliberate caricature, all while questioning my mental health, credentials, and professional competence. The precarious rhetorical situation that results is not generated by me alone. If anything, i'm the one keeping us on track and moving the thread forward. For this work I get only your intellectual bullying. Bullying is not evidence of rhetorical flaws, and I'm confident enough in my intellectual abilities (and a mature enough adult) to recognize the difference and let the mere insults slide off. Just to indicate the kind of blatant lies I have to deal with in this thread, you claim I've not demonstrated a hint of rigor with the idea. Despite the very narrow, technical focus of the proposal in the op and the many lengthy discussions in this thread over specific implementations in code and mathematical equations. I'm not saying I've solved all the problems or even completed the formulation, but I've obviously shown "hints of the rigor", and it's just bullshit disinformation to suggest otherwise. It serves nothing but to feed the thread's existing impression of me by adding some vitriolic outage, while at the same time obscuring any actual discussion of the work I and others have continued to this thread. You are a bully, and I don't feel that my positions ate threatened by your bullshit posting in this thread. That's not egomania or being oblivious to criticism, that's just not letting assholes win arguments by being assholes.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:32 |
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is what I'm talking about. You "say" you've eaten crow, but you have changed literally nothing in your proposal. Even when you "threw everything away" you still kept the whole proposal and tried to rewrite it for the countless time. You keep finding the same criticisms over and over, Eprisa, and you assume that must make us bullies. We aren't bullies, and not a single person is bullying you. Even your most vocal opponents, me, SedanChair, Obdicut, CaptainMaclain, none of us wish you actual harm. We just want you to see past your own ego; your ego which has by far done more to work against your own proposals than any other poster. RealityApologist posted:For strangecoin, it would be enough to finish the spec and simulator, and testing enough configurations to determine that there are no stable configurations for the network. Jawn already did a spec and simulator, and tested it, and there was not a stable configuration. And you're saying that we literally have to implement AE in real life, and then watch it crash and burn in real life before you will even consider that it has major, fundamental flaws. So, in short, you're unreasonable on both accounts. Who What Now fucked around with this message at 16:39 on Apr 9, 2014 |
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:35 |
|
Just to indicate the kind of blatant lies I have to deal with in this thread, you claim I've not demonstrated a hint of rigor with the idea. Despite the very narrow, technical focus of the proposal in the op and the many lengthy discussions in this thread over specific implementations in code and mathematical equations.[/quote] But you didn't approach the code or equations rigorously, and in fact have been called out on that repeatedly. And anyway, I was talking about your attention economy idea, not strangecoin. quote:
No matter how much you call me a moron, bully, rear end in a top hat, or anything else, I'm not going to give a poo poo. I'm perfectly confident in the ability of the vast majority of the people who are not you to read the thread and see that, overwhelmingly, it's the gaping, obvious flaws in your methods, ideas, and approach that are being criticized and not you, and that when you are criticized it's for your inability to admit these problems and your attempts to push the blame for the mess of your ideas onto the negativity of others.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:36 |
|
RA, do you think that every single person in this thread save for BernieLomax is out to get you or something?
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:43 |
|
Who What Now posted:Jawn already did a spec and simulator, and tested it, and there was not a stable configuration The spec and simulator are not complete and have not been subjected to anything near the testing to conclusively establish this. It is ridiculous to suggest it has, and it's perfectly reasonable to want to carry out the testing before abandoning the idea. I'm not saying there haven't been good criticisms, but they mostly take the form of these kinds of exaggerated claims that can't be reasonably engaged. The simulator had not been sufficiently tested, and it is perfectly reasonable to hold out for such testing to be finished.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:43 |
|
RealityApologist posted:For strangecoin, it would be enough to finish the spec and simulator, and testing enough configurations to determine that there are no stable configurations for the network. RealityApologist posted:I'm writing a new proposal, from scratch, with my notes on the procedure I wrote up earlier, I'm still waiting on this complete spec rewrite. So if you get bored writing thousands of words about biological MHC smells and want to get back on topic let me know. I'm only seeing two~three on-topic posts from you, one explaining how a minor step in the old writeup didn't actually pull coins from the air and a few places where you assert higher-level behavior without minding the details.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:45 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Just to indicate the kind of blatant lies I have to deal with in this thread, you claim I've not demonstrated a hint of rigor with the idea. That's not a lie! quote:Despite the very narrow, technical focus of the proposal in the op This is a lie. quote:I've obviously shown "hints of the rigor" And this! This is also a lie. Here's another lie: RealityApologist posted:I denied repeatedly that the idea is novel Because: RealityApologist posted:Traditional economics is like alchemy, and I'm like one of the early chemists before the periodic table or anything else was developed but who has a pretty good sense that alchemy is just bad methodology and that there's an alternative science just around the corner. Which is a lie for more than one reason! The other reason is this: RealityApologist posted:I know I should learn econ, but I used to think your thinking was too disordered to produce lies. But these are lies.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:46 |
|
RealityApologist posted:Despite the very narrow, technical focus of the proposal in the op ... I'm not saying I've even completed the formulation lol Why don't you finish it then, you lazy rear end? How many times did I ask you to formulate inhibition in a way that it makes any sense at all? I pointed out that inhibiting expenses does nothing but take money from TUA. Your solution to this was to say wellllll I guess I'd put limits on it and then people would ostracize anyone who took too much. No ideas whatsoever on how that would be implemented or why. I asked you why anyone would consent to having their income inhibited and all you could suggest was as legal punishment by coercion. Several people pointed out that this is a terrible idea and you walked away from the debate. I suggested starting with just one of the nonsensical transaction types, demonstrating its use clearly and working from there and you ignored it. The only substantive 'work' you put into this was giving one example of a transaction, which demonstrated two obvious points: 1. that it's much more complicated than a simple payment, despite setting a very shallow depth limit of one link away from each node to avoid recursion, and 2. that is serves no useful purpose that you could be bothered to explain.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:48 |
|
Wanamingo posted:Somebody earlier in the thread, I forget who, said that you used to be completely different a few years back, before all the OWS stuff. If they were right, then that's really sort of worrying. Years ago, hell, you can see the mood swings throughout the thread (sometimes on the same page)
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:48 |
|
RealityApologist posted:I never suggested I had the comprehensive knowledge necessary to cover the scope of the topic, and I've eaten crow several times in this thread to humble myself, admit mistakes, address criticism, respond to questions, and so on. I'd like some examples of this. Link me to a few specific posts where you've admitted to being wrong, eaten crow, addressed criticisms, or whatever. Literally the only instance I've seen of any of that was this post right here where you admitted to making a typo in your technical specs. It's a big thread, I'm sure you'll be able to dig up a few good examples for me.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:53 |
|
|
# ? Oct 8, 2024 06:42 |
|
Wanamingo posted:RA, do you think that every single person in this thread save for BernieLomax is out to get you or something? Not at all. But I think most of you are groupthink idiots who haven't demonstrated a basic comprehension of anything going on in this thread, and whose only interest is getting out shots in where you can. It forms the constant background of hostility which fields people like obdicut can launch their more obsessive concern for my identity and existence. I appreciate BernieLomax for coming to my defense on the bullying, but as he said I'm mostly left to defend the content of my ideas myself. I think the most objectively helpful parts of the thread are when others clarify confusions expressed in the thread, or link discussions to similar ones in previous threads, or work through various dystopian possibilities with the proposal, and in general When other people contribite to the development and systematization of the idea. People raise criticisms, but often via deliberately hostile misreadings of my posts, so it's hard for me to get a sense of what I've actually conveyed and what distortions are being caused by the thread. So when GulMadred or Adar give not just criticism but interpretation, it's unbelievably helpful. Amateur psychoanalysis is, you might expect, not particularly productive.
|
# ? Apr 9, 2014 16:55 |