|
we could just kill them
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 14, 2025 05:53 |
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:we could just kill them But then you've got millions of creepy dudes amped up about having killed a guy once hanging around for your entire life
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:02
|
|
|
Looks like meat's back on the menu boysquote:
https://www.facebook.com/duggarfamilyofficial/posts/661985230601796
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:07
|
|
|
Zombies' Downfall posted:There's no right answer wrt "shaming the desire", because while it's true that shaming people like that probably just drives them further into weird circlejerk NAMBLA "us against the normies" poo poo it's also probably true that not shaming them could normalize it (it's just a sexual orientation, after all, like any other!) i thinks its pretty clear cut that you should shame the desire because it is hosed up and wrong but not the individual because a person has no control over their sexual orientation. but i guess actually making that distinction is harder than it sounds
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:10
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Looks like meat's back on the menu boys fox news welfare
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Looks like meat's back on the menu boys i'm anthrax and public enemy on the stage saying TURN IT UP BRING THE NOISE
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
babypolis posted:i thinks its pretty clear cut that you should shame the desire because it is hosed up and wrong but not the individual because a person has no control over their sexual orientation. but i guess actually making that distinction is harder than it sounds ah, yes, hate the sin, not the sinner
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
babypolis posted:i thinks its pretty clear cut that you should shame the desire because it is hosed up and wrong but not the individual because a person has no control over their sexual orientation. but i guess actually making that distinction is harder than it sounds You should shame the idea doing anything based on the desire, not the desire itself. The desire itself is not harming anyone; the person who chooses to gently caress a child or view child pornography is the one doing or contributing to the harm. Wanting to kill someone is not a crime, it's actually trying and/or succeeding that's the crime. EDIT: Obviously, it's not the issue here, because Josh Duggar very much did act on his desire, which makes him a huge loving piece of poo poo and a criminal.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:24
|
|
|
Wanting to rape a baby is not enough to leave any babies raped As long as we don't have any of that, we can get by if god exists he hates us
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
do not sexually touch a child. don't sexually touch an adult either unless you have their permission.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:34
|
|
|
Mr. Pumroy posted:do not sexually touch a child. don't sexually touch an adult either unless you have their permission.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
Code Jockey posted:Tabernacle Jim has a wrong face
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
Jimidiah Bobacious
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:09
|
|
|
Just lol if they manage to get the show back Jimmy Bobadopolous
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:31
|
|
|
Mr. Pumroy posted:do not sexually touch a child. don't sexually touch an adult either unless you have their permission. ugh these rules are too hard to follow
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:38
|
|
|
That's a seriously immodest dress and I bet Dad picked it for her. In this culture, you're supposed to look pleasing to the patriarch, regardless of relation. So it's telling it's an open backed, with no bra, spaghetti strap dress.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:ugh these rules are too hard to follow and where is god in these rules?
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
I like how these pro incest/child abuse types are always trollish looking white dudes. Like you would think there's a male model looking type out there diddling kids, but nope it's always some basic ugly trash.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
Lucy Heartfilia posted:and where is god in these rules? yeah where is there any mention of god being mad at me? i can't follow a law if the law just says i cant do something because it will harm somebody else!
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:48
|
|
|
babypolis posted:
lol if you believe this. I'm sure Josh Bob wouldn't have molested his sisters if people were more accepting of pedos 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:50
|
|
|
how are there so many posts about this. what could there possibly be said besides that its bad
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 16:59
|
|
|
there's a lot of bad stuff here to call bad
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:02
|
|
|
Davincie posted:how are there so many posts about this. what could there possibly be said besides that its bad Jim Bob
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
I still want to know why Jim Bob and the family didn't take Josh out and execute him, as they had earlier said should be done to child molesters. Time's wasting, JimmyBob.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:06
|
|
|
Davincie posted:how are there so many posts about this. what could there possibly be said besides that its bad 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
staberind posted:Sorry, I had to jom bob No, I'm trying to rock the boat. I'm trying to respond in the way consistent with the "culture of the board". Apparently, I have to be an rear end in a top hat to finish my "hazing process"? And whining and feeling victimized is fine if you are a veteran victimized by noobs? All I'm saying is that I wish people wouldn't essentially bully new commenters who appear to be trying politely to join in the conversation. I'm not defending gross violations of board rules or attacking mods. But someone who was berated for saying she thinks that Ben may have stopped following Derick on twitter got attacked for like a page and accused of deliberately stirring poo poo and making up rumors and not reading every thread ever on the site. And I think its a fair point that a new commenter made that if all these people are not seeing the rules than maybe their could possibly be a better way to advertise them instead of jumping into "attack X person for making suggestions mode". Just saying that I think we could all tone it down a bit and that if that person wasn't new someone would have prob just corrected them but no its "POOR ME!!! MY FREE JINGER IS BEING RUINED BY NEW PEOPLE!!!! WAHHHH!!!!!" /Rant. Did I do that right? Is that how board culture works?
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:09
|
|
|
Jim Bob i m B o b
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Looks like meat's back on the menu boys Can't wait to hear about how Josh is the real victim here and it's all because of the liberal media
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 17:56
|
|
|
book 8: the molestation accusation
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:16
|
|
|
duggmentars
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:18
|
|
|
ElwoodCuse posted:Can't wait to hear about how Josh is the real victim here and it's all because of the liberal media I'd almost be willing to bet real money that the interview immediately turns into a "War on Religion" monologue.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
Duggmented Reality GlassesTM Female wearer mode - applies 6 additional layers of clothing on passing harlots Male wearer mode - 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
What words will we hear the most in the interview? I'm going to say: repented, forgiveness and grace
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:No, I'm trying to rock the boat. I'm trying to respond in the way consistent with the "culture of the board". Apparently, I have to be an rear end in a top hat to finish my "hazing process"? And whining and feeling victimized is fine if you are a veteran victimized by noobs? Jism Pop. What? for a '14 you fit into goonshire fine, I don't know what that's about. Is there some background I am missing? I mean, if this is a typical "gently caress goonz erryday" effortpost, that's coo.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:What words will we hear the most in the interview? God. Support. Family.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:Looks like meat's back on the menu boys Nicole Wall He touched them inappropriately not rape! Know your facts before you speak ! 9 · 3 hrs E: fb post there
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
STONE THROWERS DONT CANCEL MY FAVORITE TV SHOW, WHO CARES HWHAT JOSH DID 12 YEARS AGO 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
Jim bob. So what?
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
Jiminy Bobbit
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 14, 2025 05:53 |
|
|
staberind posted:Jism Pop. its from the freejill website but thanks 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2015 18:57
|
|