|
Yeah, I'm fine with it. 2/1/1? no lynch is the only chance to win. 3/1? town doesnt lose anything by it. Two of yall around to do this?
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 13:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Feb 6, 2023 07:15 |
|
|
Like this? ##vote NoLynch
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
That showed up in the vote count as "lynch no one" so I guess so. ##vote NoLynch
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 16:44
|
|
|
##vote NoLynch
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 16:54
|
|
|
Asiina is out all day and wasn't smart enough to bring along a lunch. This is very bad form and skipping meals is quite bad for you. She feels ashamed and hungry. Nobody died D4. It is now N4. Actions please.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
Asiina had to stay on campus really late to write a paper and there was no food there either so she continued to not eat. This is seriously a bad thing guys. Asiina is going to eventually need to eat something! Nobody died N4. It is now D5. Deadline will be Monday at 11pm.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 5 Not Voting (4): chaoslord, Kashuno, Mithross, RoydrowsyWith 4 alive, it's 3 votes to lynch. The current deadline is July 27th, 2015 at 11 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 2 days, 6 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
I'm just confused now. Or maybe there was just one scum, because the moral of the story is Asiina is good with her restrictive diet, and thus doesn't have bad food around. Now we just have to sit around and wait for Asiina to kill and devour us all. We're just all a part of her evil game.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
At this rate, Asiina is going to starve 
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
So no kill leads me to believe it's 3/1 not 2/1/1, because the likelihood of both sk and scum holding their kill is pretty low. I don't think much is going to come from an extended d5 that didn't come from d4 so here we go I hope Somber's last words pull through ##vote roy
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 21:14
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:So no kill leads me to believe it's 3/1 not 2/1/1, because the likelihood of both sk and scum holding their kill is pretty low. I don't think much is going to come from an extended d5 that didn't come from d4 so here we go I hope Somber's last words pull through I was willing to land there yesterday, still willing to vote today. I'm going to let chaoslord and roy chime in before I vote at all, though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
Mithross posted:I was willing to land there yesterday, still willing to vote today. I'm going to let chaoslord and roy chime in before I vote at all, though. A vote for me is a vote to lose. I think Mithross is the best bet for scum. At this time it seems like we are the only two options for somebody who is going to get lynched. Which means it is up to kashuno and chairs at this point to decide what they want to do. Either you three vote to kill me and lose, Or we three vote to kill Mithross and, hopefully win. The double kill is confusing, a town with a one shot should have claimed at this point.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 22:12
|
|
|
Here is a odd thought. Why not kill at night? If I was scum at this point, id take out the most trusted person at this point, which is chaos. The three of us would be left pointing fingers all over the place and you would just need two votes to sack the third. Is there a chance it could be chaos? If chaos was scum, he could'nt kill himself. If chaos wasn't killed, we would all wonder, "why wasn't chaos killed?"
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:Here is a odd thought. Why not kill at night? The extra kill confuses me. I'd think that there was somebody with one shot powers, but nobody flipped that way. If one of us had a one shot, claiming it would have been necessary to win at this point.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 22:17
|
|
|
I don't know if the chaos theory would work when you consider the double kill, unless they were godfather with a one shot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
What about possibility of scum who kills when visited? Maybe they opted not to kill, madman investigated them? Perhaps sombrero went the same way as watcher? Granted they were suspicious of me... So floating that theory doesn't help my case much... I am on phone... Could they have watched somebody else, gotten walked for it? And king was the scum kill? Who was king looking at?
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 22:56
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:Here is a odd thought. Why not kill at night? The obvious reason not to kill is because now you are asking yourself this question. If I am dead and get confirmed that gives you more to work with because you know my posts were legit townie posts. Leaving me alive keeps that seed of doubt.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 22:58
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:The obvious reason not to kill is because now you are asking yourself this question. If I am dead and get confirmed that gives you more to work with because you know my posts were legit townie posts. Leaving me alive keeps that seed of doubt. In addition, scum doesn't need to kill at this point. They can wait us out as long as they want; killing someone only puts them in a worse position.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2015 23:03
|
|
|
##vote Roy
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 11:59
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:##vote Roy ##vote Mithross Most likely chaos just threw the game away, but it's worth a shot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 12:46
|
|
|
GG suspicuons stem from asking about flavor, but the JakeP flip suggest that cover stories were given. Why bother asking if they knew it wouldn't amount to anything? Meanwhile, what have I done?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 12:48
|
|
|
Seriously, what is the case against me? If it's gut... You might want to rethink it. Consider this. Who in the game has contributed more substantive information? Mithross has done pretty much no work, and even now has to do no work.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 12:52
|
|
|
I have to go with my gut: I don't have strong reads on anyone, so I'm going to go with my feels. ##vote Kashuno
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 5 Roydrowsy (2): Kashuno, chaoslord Mithross (1): Roydrowsy Kashuno (1): Mithross Not Voting (0): With 4 alive, it's 3 votes to lynch. The current deadline is July 27th, 2015 at 11 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 day, 8 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
Mithross posted:I have to go with my gut: I don't have strong reads on anyone, so I'm going to go with my feels. Even though this a vote for me this definitely solidifies you as town for me. If you were scum you could have just ended there. Gonna stick with Roy based on that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
This is going nowhere.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
It really isn't.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
##vote Kashuno
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:##vote Kashuno Why?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:13
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:Why? Because who else am I supposed to vote? Mithross could have hammered you and didn't. Scum knows they win with a hammer and takes it. Same with SK (if there is one). What would posses scum to balk at the chance to win? He's town. With him being unwilling to vote you, that means you can't be voted, either, unless you're going to self vote, and I'm not voting for myself, so that leaves Kashuno.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
Well I'm thoroughly confused at this point. ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:Because who else am I supposed to vote? Mithross could have hammered you and didn't. Scum knows they win with a hammer and takes it. Same with SK (if there is one). What would posses scum to balk at the chance to win? He's town. With him being unwilling to vote you, that means you can't be voted, either, unless you're going to self vote, and I'm not voting for myself, so that leaves Kashuno. ##unvote I think we've all gone insane, now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:18
|
|
|
Roy doesn't seem willing to vote kashuno. Chaos seems willing to vote either way. Kashuno... I don't know? My gut says Kashuno, but I'll vote Roy if that's still what the two of you think is best. I don't think we're going to solve this in any meaningful way. We've all gone over the thread a bunch of times.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:20
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:Because who else am I supposed to vote? Mithross could have hammered you and didn't. Scum knows they win with a hammer and takes it. Same with SK (if there is one). What would posses scum to balk at the chance to win? He's town. With him being unwilling to vote you, that means you can't be voted, either, unless you're going to self vote, and I'm not voting for myself, so that leaves Kashuno. I wasn't going to self vote. I have no intention of deliberately throwing the game away.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:20
|
|
|
If I was scum why would I have pushed for a no lynch d4 to try and give town the lay of the land? The momentum was there to take Roy d4.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
Roydrowsy posted:I wasn't going to self vote. I have no intention of deliberately throwing the game away. Which is fine, I agree with that line of thinking, but that means the only person I could have voted was Kashuno
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
Mithross posted:Roy doesn't seem willing to vote kashuno. I am not against voting kash, but I am not just going to throw a hammer out of the blue either. At this point, mith and I have both had chances to throw the hammer and didn't... Which makes a case for kashuno.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:27
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:If I was scum why would I have pushed for a no lynch d4 to try and give town the lay of the land? The momentum was there to take Roy d4. Same could be said for anybody.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Feb 6, 2023 07:15 |
|
|
##vote Kashuno I'm in. Either we nailed it, or we didn't. Nothing new will be revealed at this point.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 22:31
|
|