|
128% of Americans have tried pot. Seems low.
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 18, 2021 08:17 |
|
|
Nah its actually a histogram that represents the amount of people having tried pot for 3 different time points. But for some reason it dressed up as a pie chart.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
I like how at first glance it seems to say 51% of Americans smoked pot today 
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:I like how at first glance it seems to say 51% of Americans smoked pot today That was my first read, I loved it
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:I like how at first glance it seems to say 51% of Americans smoked pot today The world would be a better place if that was true. Edit: Or not if some of that 51% were missile silo officers and got paranoid.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
What that graph actually says is that people feel way more comfortable admitting they've tried pot nowadays
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
Travis343 posted:What that graph actually says is that people feel way more comfortable admitting they've tried pot nowadays As more states legalize it I'm sure the 51% will grow to a truer number. There's no way 8% more people polled tried it in the last year to account for the jump. You're absolutely right that comfort levels have grown by 8% instead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
As an astronomy major, I'm silently screaming to 911 operator.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
I have deduced that wormholes are considered centaurs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
 ftfy
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
Except for Centaurs being split up, I think I kinda like this in a weird way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
That reminded me of this  A 7-way Venn Diagram.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
 Eleven-way Venn diagram, from this paper.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
...Why do people even do Venn diagrams with that many variables?
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
Well the way the Newrose is presented I don't think they actually expect people to use it, it's just a proof of concept.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
 These scientists knew exactly what they were doing, in “The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants”
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 06:17
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Eleven-way Venn diagram, from this paper.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 08:15
|
|
|
      twoday has a new favorite as of 08:58 on Apr 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 08:43
|
|
|
kalstrams posted:As an astronomy major, I'm silently screaming to 911 operator. It's better than what we used to have.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 11:42
|
|
|
Thank goodness they simplified it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
Iron Chef Nex posted:It's better than what we used to have.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
As told by the prophet George Costanza- Twix is the only candy with the cookie-crunch.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
??? Skittles
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Picnic Princess posted:??? Skittles Would it not intersect with the Candy Coating circle?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:
There's always money in the banana diagram
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
XBenedict posted:Thank goodness they simplified it. Well, they do have to completely redraw it at least once a day.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
Finally we have empirical evidence that Take 5 is the superior candy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
We need to invent a new form of math to explain a candy with a candy coating and a sugar filling. This new math may also help prove the existence of mambos/ starbursts. Gummi candy remains unprovable.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
I'm currently doing my Master's thesis on trying to figure out why it's hard n' fruity Now, but soft n' chewy Later.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
agreed @ skittles
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2016 03:57
|
|
|
C.P.A.N. posted:Finally we have empirical evidence that Take 5 is the superior candy. take 5 is a testament to man's hubris and desire to want all things at once
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
I'd like to propose the hypothetical existence of a candy containing white fudge, caramel, and nougat, but no nuts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2016 05:15
|
|
|
StandardVC10 posted:I'd like to propose the hypothetical existence of a candy containing white fudge, caramel, and nougat, but no nuts. You're meddling with candyforms that are beyond the grasp of human science. You fool, your hubris will doom us all!
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2016 05:27
|
|
|
Edit: read graph wrong.
DrBouvenstein has a new favorite as of 20:34 on May 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
DrBouvenstein posted:Edit: read graph wrong. That's the point of this thread, actually. 
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
Not pictured: the price of gas twenty minutes into the future.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 18, 2021 08:17 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 01:59
|
|
