|
I need some context here. It's a water cycle/weather diagram but mixing of species... something about airborne pathogens?
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 20, 2021 01:26 |
|
|
Organic compounds in Titan's atmosphere.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
Outrail posted:I need some context here. It's a water cycle/weather diagram but mixing of species... something about airborne pathogens?
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
Somebody get a screenshot of the poll results Rachel Maddow just showed, loving awful
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 01:45
|
|
|
CharlieWhiskey posted:This is a great diagram of how my exgirlfriend acheived orgasm. Sorry about your lack of residual circulation
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2016 05:13
|
|
|
 apparently "it's about regional development in health, education, HDI and GNI."
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
quite stretched out posted:
Alright, so it's hard to represent four types of data in one graph, and granted, this is a very creative way of doing it, but it's so unscientific that there's no point in making it. Where does the trunk end and the branches begin? Do the branches count as the trunk or the leaves? Why use such a tiny color spectrum? Leaves turn red too, I can see color pretty well but I can barely tell the difference between any of the continents/years. And disregarding all that, we can't see any goddamn numbers. This isn't a pie chart where ratios are inferred. gently caress this poo poo. Do it well or don't do it at all. edit: if there was a starker contrast between points it would be more excusable
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 04:43
|
|
|
It's perfectly obfuscating, the only thing you can tell is that the weird index trees have all grown in the last 25 years & Europe had a head start in the trunk area, which is so obvious it's idiotic to even mention. There's no way to compare anything. You'd think it was on purpose, really.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
Why are Europe and Central Asia grouped? Those are very different places. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Why are Europe and Central Asia grouped? Well British Empire, India & so forth, totally the same, I somehow missed that holy what in the name
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Why are Europe and Central Asia grouped? Probably to include Russia with Europe.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Those are very different places. Commonwealth of Independent States, i.e. grouping Western Europe with the former Soviet block.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 09:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 11:54
|
|
|
Powered Descent posted:
Their votes count for 9% more.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 12:01
|
|
|
Idaho: Slightly Better Than DC and Nevada
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 14:59
|
|
|
States well known for no one ever wanting to move there: New York 
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
NYC does the whole 'chew you up and spit you out' thing pretty effectively.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:13
|
|
|
pik_d posted:States well known for no one ever wanting to move there: New York Well sure. Nobody wants to live there. There's too many people.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:13
|
|
|
Those two sides of the graph have an overlapping population though so of course the numbers are relationally inverse. The population born in the state is a static number. The current population is both people born in state and people moving to the state. As natural born people emigrate, the percentage of people that moved to the state goes up, even if no new people are moving there. The graph makes it seem like natural born Nevadans are fleeing a state overrun by state immigration, but the immigration percentage could just be inflated by people fleeing the heat or politics or any other reason to leave Nevada.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 15:47
|
|
|
Also it doesn't take into account immigrants from outside the US.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 16:01
|
|
|
Ignite Memories posted:NYC does the whole 'chew you up and spit you out' thing pretty effectively. New York State generally has a problem of educating people relatively well and then not having jobs for them to work in post graduation, leading them to leave to Texas, California, etc. Just ask most State legislators. The solution, of course, is to reduce the quality of education so it all evens out.  Of course, there's also this: Pakled posted:Also it doesn't take into account immigrants from outside the US.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
Ignite Memories posted:NYC does the whole 'chew you up and spit you out' thing pretty effectively. You are not wrong. I plan to move back to Ohio at the end of the year lest I end up living under one of many of the Hudson's lovely bridges 
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
there was no other info around this chart
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 11:46
|
|
|
Selklubber posted:there was no other info around this chart 
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 12:57
|
|
|
I'm prepared to feel dumb about this, but shouldn't that state graph have each state add up to 100% anyway? Any resident of any state either was or was not born there and yet no state is a rounding error from it. Basically I really don't know how 86% of a population was born elsewhere but also half of that same population was born in Nevada and still there. I could see foreign immigration making up a difference if 100% wasn't reached but this poll accounts for 133% of Nevada's population somehow.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
The first column is a percentage of people currently living in the state. The second column is a percentage of people originally born in the state.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
Sighence posted:I'm prepared to feel dumb about this, but shouldn't that state graph have each state add up to 100% anyway? Any resident of any state either was or was not born there and yet no state is a rounding error from it. 14 parts were born in state. However, those 14 parts were part of a generation that totalled 29 parts. 15 parts moved away. If they were still there, the state would be made up of 115 parts and the percentage of out-of-staters would decrease.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 18:18
|
|
|
That makes way more sense, thanks. The wording on the right half in regards to the wording of the left half should have been a clue. Still an awful way of displaying that info. If only there was a thread for those
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
I was just looking for a nicely labelled image of the Mandelbrot set What the
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 12:38
|
|
|
Ahhh, good old mental illness.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 13:35
|
|
|
Gorilla Salad posted:Ahhh, good old mental illness. Nope. MBA.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
To be fair, I've always considered that stuff the hallmark of a disturbed mind. Let's hold an idea shower to get a helicopter view and square this circle so we can shift the paradigms without cascading nonrelevant information into our blue sky thought space and see if we can't make the new quo wash its own face.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
Gorilla Salad posted:To be fair, I've always considered that stuff the hallmark of a disturbed mind. See? Sounds like a mid-to-upper management proposal!
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
Finally, I have a place to show off this 10 year old screenshot! If you ever work for a giant corporation, you'll occasionally have to do these nonsensical online training things. It's always filled with graphs like these. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
$bn/Fraud If the x axis was labeled 'Cases of fraud' or was something like 2001 to 2015 it'd make sense.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
The more fraud, the more billions of dollars (are lost?). It makes perfect sense in its own retarded way.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
I like the extra touch that it's not just a straight line. That's how you know it's real data.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
It's hard to freehand with a mouse in MS paint.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
Is the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners even a legitimate organization
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 20, 2021 01:26 |
|
|
Phlegmish posted:Is the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners even a legitimate organization Send me $500 to get your certification and you, too, will be able to answer this question.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 06:28
|
|
