|
I enjoy the non click bait huff psot
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 07:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 12:25 |
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:I want the meta version where you place this chart on itself. The Wall Street Journal.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 07:44
|
|
|
Was it WSJ that gave us that chart of 4 families bitching about some tax rate increases that would minimally affect them? The one that gave us the HENRY gif.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 08:13
|
|
|
Oh god I remember that one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 08:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 09:02
|
|
|
Also, take a look at who's earning the least.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 09:04
|
|
|
I don't think I buy the single parent making more than the single working woman. Or, y'know, anything else there. But that's what's jumping out at me on this review of it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 09:25
|
|
|
Is it just me or is that first one aping Lange’s Migrant Mother?
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 09:36
|
|
|
Sentence: Death by Guillotine.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 09:45
|
|
|
No ring.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 10:21
|
|
|
Agents are GO! posted:No ring. The ring is Fox News.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
This image makes me irrationally angry every time I see it
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
goose willis posted:This image makes me irrationally angry every time I see it This is the first time I've seen it and I'm angry. I'm not sure it's an irrational anger though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
goose willis posted:This image makes me irrationally angry every time I see it It's perfectly rational to be angry at this image, it's symbolic violence at work. (but still reputable)
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 14:33
|
|
|
x420ReDdIT_Br0nYx posted:It's perfectly rational to be angry at this image, it's symbolic violence at work. If I remember correctly, the artist was not told what the art was for, and was pretty pissed off when they found out. So yes, Death by Guillotine.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
Anyone have a link to the original article? I'm failing at Google, but I'd love to see the original context. v v v Thanks 
Captain Hygiene has a new favorite as of 18:06 on Dec 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:00
|
|
|
Captain Hygiene posted:Anyone have a link to the original article? I'm failing at Google, but I'd love to see the original context. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323689604578220132665726040
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
I've seen that image many times over the years and still don't understand how a single person is supposed to survive on a measly $230,000
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
I feel like they might as well have just printed "Taxes make children sad" in big font.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:19
|
|
|
The WSJ is just an edited blog at this point and you can find looney toons from both side of the spectrum on there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
Aside from the nutso placement of the WSJ, that chart otherwise seems fine, although to be fair I don't recognize at least a handful of those outlets.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
foobardog posted:If I remember correctly, the artist was not told what the art was for, and was pretty pissed off when they found out. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:I've seen that image many times over the years and still don't understand how a single person is supposed to survive on a measly $230,000 2/5 Try harder.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
 quote:Red = critical severity bugs; orange = high; blue = medium; and black = low. The X axis is total number of security bugs; the Y axis shows the [Linux] kernel version. So, the height of the bar shows how long that bug was present.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 06:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
_reciprocity_laws_by_state_in_the_US_as_of_17_December_2011.jpg)
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 18:52
|
|
|
That QR code doesn't work.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Pokemon's type system has gotten inscrutable. Edit: really though, that's actually a really handy chart for anyone who wants to carry concealed while traveling. Go down the left to find the state where you got your permit, then slide right to the column for the state you're headed to or passing through. Green means good to go, yellow means look up the particular state's law, red means where the hell did you get that banana. Blue Footed Booby has a new favorite as of 19:43 on Dec 15, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:Pokemon's type system has gotten inscrutable. Vermont, Illinois and DC resist everything, wtf 
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
So Vermont doesn't issue CCW permits, but honors them from every other state?  e: And South Dakota doesn't honor its own permits?
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Lord Hydronium posted:So Vermont doesn't issue CCW permits, but honors them from every other state? The chart is about reciprocity, ie permits valid because of a reciprocity statute, which doesn't include things that are valid because they were issued there. Other states have their own box empty too. Edit: wait, but not all of them do. What the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
Lord Hydronium posted:So Vermont doesn't issue CCW permits, but honors them from every other state? Vermont doesn't issue CCW permits because Vermont doesn't even require a CCW -- it's not that Vermont is so strict on guns that they won't issue a CCW, and yet paradoxically they honor other states; it's that Vermont is so unrestricted when it comes to guns that they let everybody concealed carry without requiring a permit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
Lord Hydronium posted:So Vermont doesn't issue CCW permits, but honors them from every other state? Vermont doesn't have many firearms laws above and beyond what the Federal government requires. It's unrestricted carry (except schools and courthouses). Carry openly, carry concealed, doesn't matter, you don't need a permit from it. So they 'honor' permits from other states in the sense that if you have a permit from another state, you can carry a gun in Vermont. But if you don't have a permit from another state, you can still carry a gun in Vermont. A number of other states are similar, but some still issue permits for whatever reason. Arizona, for example, used to be a shall-issue state, then they removed the requirement to get a permit, but you can still get a permit if you want because then reciprocity agreements mean you can carry in other states that honor Arizona permits.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
That's orange, not red, right? Or are my eyes hosed up? I'm a pedantic rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
Outrail posted:That's orange, not red, right? Or are my eyes hosed up? There's a small amount of red on the far left of the graph.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
Outrail posted:That's orange, not red, right? Or are my eyes hosed up? There's both orange and red in there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
So yes, your eyes are hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:21
|
|
|
Assuming I'm understanding this graph right, each vertical entry represents a bug. Besides the value of the x-axis not being particularly relevant, what's so bad about it? Seems like a good way to visualize how long bugs were around.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 12:25 |
|
|
InediblePenguin posted:Vermont doesn't issue CCW permits because Vermont doesn't even require a CCW -- it's not that Vermont is so strict on guns that they won't issue a CCW, and yet paradoxically they honor other states; it's that Vermont is so unrestricted when it comes to guns that they let everybody concealed carry without requiring a permit. Phanatic posted:Vermont doesn't have many firearms laws above and beyond what the Federal government requires. It's unrestricted carry (except schools and courthouses). Carry openly, carry concealed, doesn't matter, you don't need a permit from it. So they 'honor' permits from other states in the sense that if you have a permit from another state, you can carry a gun in Vermont. But if you don't have a permit from another state, you can still carry a gun in Vermont. Still confused about South Dakota, though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2016 21:31
|
|