awful programming: post .net clarity strikes again

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Scary Hauntings/Spectral Crap > YOSPOS > awful programming: post .net clarity strikes again

«‹›1161 »

FlapYoJacks: Feb 12, 2009; by vyelkin
(and can't post for 31 days!)

Peeny Cheez posted:

code:

grep -vxF a.txt b.txt > ur_mom.txt

code:

grep -vxF d.txt p.txt > ur_mom.txt

# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:37

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Oct 13, 2024 15:23

Ellie Crabcakes: Feb 1, 2008; Stop emailing my boyfriend Gay Crungus

Bloody posted:

i think doing the dumb thing in c# was effectively faster for my doesnt know a unix brain but i am not surprised that it is a trivial grep

It's not the worst solution but as the files get larger it'll get poopy.

Also I forgot to put the '-f' in the example. I belong here.

Ellie Crabcakes fucked around with this message at 20:48 on Jul 26, 2018

# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:45

gonadic io: Feb 16, 2011; >>=

Peeny Cheez posted:

It's not the worst solution but as the files get larger it'll get poopy.

Also I forgot to put the '-f' in the example. I belong here.

Yeah I mean for large sets you'd want to set it up properly with a hash set and for Big Data you'd do, uh, a series of smaller hash set checks applied in parallel?

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:02

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

Jowj posted:

ah I miss-typed. I said "why my new lines aren't triggering" and i meant my new lines of code, rather than literal new lines.

but, lol no its a loving mess. it prints out a txt file but doesn't do any standardization its a travesty.
code:
Processing server group: test

    Processing Time:
         Start: 7/26/2018 4:02:26 PM
          Stop: 7/26/2018 4:05:27 PM
       Runtime: 00 00:03:00 day(s) hr:min:sec
those are all staticly created newlines and spacing printed out. its a disgusting mess. if I had more time I would look into using an actual logging library, and making sure the application printed everything in date severity message. there are literally no time stamps other than start/stop of scan.

edit:

oh my god they are using a mix of line terminators gently caress, sometimes \n sometimes \r\n i am flabbergasted. this is windows only too.

how do you mean lines of code not triggering? if its breakpoints not being hit make sure you're in debug mode instead of release mode. release mode optimizes your code and deletes statements that it doesn't like so if you have debugging garbage it will just skip over it.

also lol good luck. if you can swing it, switching the logging to nlog or some other logging lib would absolutely be the best way to fix this.

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:11

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

TheCog posted:

At the risk of sounding ignorant, what is a p-lang?

perl, python, php, ruby, etc... bad Linux languages

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:12

Bloody: Mar 3, 2013

Peeny Cheez posted:

It's not the worst solution but as the files get larger it'll get poopy

yeah for sure. the problem space is limited to four text files each a hundred lines long that I wanted to gently caress around with earlier today so I feel good

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:22

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

the best is probably opening 2 input filestreams, 1 output filestream, and then doing copyto with an appropriate buffersize

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:24

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

TheCog posted:

At the risk of sounding ignorant, what is a p-lang?

also you�re not ignorant it�s yospos slang

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:24

gonadic io: Feb 16, 2011; >>=

Bloody posted:

yeah for sure. the problem space is limited to four text files each a hundred lines long that I wanted to gently caress around with earlier today so I feel good

are you sure the lines you're matching will be exactly identical? better spend 6 months adding a machine learning solution imo

# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:28

Doom Mathematic: Sep 2, 2008

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

also you�re not ignorant it�s yospos slang

It is? I thought it was like a mildly well-known industry term. That's how I use it at work anyway.

# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:18

mystes: May 31, 2006

Doom Mathematic posted:

It is? I thought it was like a mildly well-known industry term. That's how I use it at work anyway.

Well, keep working at it and maybe it will be!

# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:21

Bloody: Mar 3, 2013

gonadic io posted:

are you sure the lines you're matching will be exactly identical? better spend 6 months adding a machine learning solution imo

it doesnt take nearly 6 months to include a levenshtein library and pick an arbitrary threshold

# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:23

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

Doom Mathematic posted:

It is? I thought it was like a mildly well-known industry term. That's how I use it at work anyway.

I think people instinctively know what you mean from context.

# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:25

Shaggar: Apr 26, 2006

"we need to teach the interns how to code because they only know p-langs"
"the last idiot who worked here wrote it in some p-lang so we rewrote it in c#"

# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:26

mystes: May 31, 2006

Anyway it should be real term.

I'll go make the "The pee lang is real!" hats.

# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:47

VikingofRock: Aug 24, 2008

Corla Plankun posted:

can you change the doc to match the svg instead?

Nah, it's gotta match the journal template.

Honestly, remaking the flowchart in a separate doc in latex is not such a hassle, and it'll come in handy anyways as I work this into my thesis (which I am writing concurrently). I just wanted to vent a little bit because, as previously stated, "latex makes me so goddamn unreasonably mad" with how brittle it is. Thanks everyone for listening to my venting and for the suggestions.

# ? Jul 27, 2018 00:04

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

rats (get it, cats in rust) update: we got kleisli

code:

    #[test]
    fn test_compose_and_map() {
        let parse = kleisli::apply(|s: &str| s.parse::<i32>().map_err(|_| "parse error").lift());

        let reciprocal = kleisli::apply(|i: i32| {
            if i != 0 {
                Ok(1.0 / i as f32)
            } else {
                Err("divide by 0")
            }.lift()
        });

        let parse_and_recriprocal = reciprocal.compose(parse);

        assert_eq!(parse_and_recriprocal.run("123").unlift(), Ok(0.008130081));

        assert_eq!(
            parse_and_recriprocal.run("yospos").unlift(),
            Err("parse error")
        );

        let doubled = parse_and_recriprocal.map(|f| f * 2 as f32);
        assert_eq!(doubled.run("123").unlift(), Ok(0.016260162));
        assert_eq!(doubled.run("0").unlift(), Err("divide by 0"));
    }

if you're interested in a better explanation of kleisli than i can provide, check it: https://typelevel.org/cats/datatypes/kleisli.html

this was tricky to implement. (sorry, i know this is useless without explanation, i'm working on it).

code:

pub struct Compose<A, K1, K2> {
    k1: K1,
    k2: K2,
    marker: PhantomData<*const A>,
}

impl<'a, F, A, B, C, K1, K2, Z, G> KleisliT<'a, F, C, B, Z, G> for Compose<A, K1, K2>
where
    A: 'a,
    B: 'a,
    F: Monad<'a, F, Z, G> + 'static,
    K1: KleisliT<'a, F, A, B, Z, G>,
    K2: KleisliT<'a, F, C, A, Z, G>,
{
    fn run(&self, a: C) -> Lifted<'a, F, B, Z, G> {
        F::flat_map(self.k2.run(a), |a| self.k1.run(a))
    }
}

`Z` and `G` are unfortunate: Since we want to support HKTs of more than one type parameter, we have to pass them around everywhere when they're not being operated on. however, aside from the explosion of type parameters, it works totally fine, but I've chosen to stop at 3 parameters (or 2 parameters and another HKT for rank N types!).

side note, I wish rust would let me do this:

code:

pub struct Foo<'a,A,B,C> where A+B+C: 'a

If I want to constrain a bunch of type parameters to the same trait or lifetime bound, i should be able to do so as above. I'm going to do a little research and maybe write an RFC. unless that syntax is reserved for some other use, i cant imagine objections as it reduces a lot of syntactic noise, which is a big problem for rust.

also: i still really don't get lifetimes, and this is tied up in my complete lack of understanding around how memory works. really looking forward to digging into c/c++ because rust isn't really helping with my intuition here.

also also: translating a well-documented library from one language to another is a really useful exercise for learning.

DONT THREAD ON ME fucked around with this message at 00:23 on Jul 27, 2018

# ? Jul 27, 2018 00:14

redleader: Aug 18, 2005; Engage according to operational parameters

uh, this is the terrible programmers thread. i think you're looking for the good programmers thread. easy mistake to make

# ? Jul 27, 2018 02:01

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

there's nothing good about it. it's a monstrosity. i feel nothing but shame.

# ? Jul 27, 2018 02:02

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

for real though, i'm just reading the cats source code and re-implementing it as well as i can in rust. i love it but it's definitely not good.

thanks though

# ? Jul 27, 2018 02:27

mystes: May 31, 2006

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

rats (get it, cats in rust)

I don't know, there's got to be a dumber rust/cats pun out there somewhere. Feral?

# ? Jul 27, 2018 03:35

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

i just happen to like rats a lot.

also i had a sweet tooth tonight, so check out this sweet sweet syntactic sugar:

code:

/// Lifts a funtion Fn(A) -> L into a Kleisli where L implement Lift
pub fn lift<'a, F, A, B, Z, G, L>(run: impl Fn(A) -> L + 'a) -> impl Kleisli<'a, F, A, B, Z, G>
where
    L: Lift<'a, F, B, Z, G> + 'a,
    F: 'static,
    G: 'static,
    B: 'a,
    Z: 'a,
{
    self::run(move |a| run(a).lift())
}

/// Evaluate the Kleisli with A, and unlift the resulting Lifted
fn runlift(&self, a: A) -> <Lifted<'a, F, B, Z, G> as Unlift<F>>::Out
    where
    Lifted<'a, F, B, Z, G>: Unlift<F>,
    {
        Kleisli::<_, _, _, _, _>::run(self, a).unlift()
    }

    // and now the earlier example works without having to explicitly lift and unlift everything:  
    // (ok it's still explicit but a lot nicer)
    #[test]
    fn test_compose_and_map() {
        let parse = kleisli::lift(|s: &str| s.parse::<i32>().map_err(|_| "parse error"));

        let reciprocal = kleisli::lift(|i: i32| {
            if i != 0 {
                Ok(1.0 / i as f32)
            } else {
                Err("divide by 0")
            }
        });

        let parse_and_recriprocal = reciprocal.compose(parse);

        assert_eq!(parse_and_recriprocal.runlift("123"), Ok(0.008130081));

        assert_eq!(parse_and_recriprocal.runlift("yospos"), Err("parse error"));

        let doubled = parse_and_recriprocal.map(|f| f * 2 as f32);
        assert_eq!(doubled.runlift("123"), Ok(0.016260162));
        assert_eq!(doubled.runlift("0"), Err("divide by 0"));
    }

# ? Jul 27, 2018 03:50

Luigi Thirty: Apr 30, 2006; Emergency confection port.

MFC is real bad lmao

I will stick with C calls

# ? Jul 27, 2018 05:25

tinaun: Jun 9, 2011; tell me...

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

side note, I wish rust would let me do this:
code:
pub struct Foo<'a,A,B,C> where A+B+C: 'a
If I want to constrain a bunch of type parameters to the same trait or lifetime bound, i should be able to do so as above. I'm going to do a little research and maybe write an RFC. unless that syntax is reserved for some other use, i cant imagine objections as it reduces a lot of syntactic noise, which is a big problem for rust.

male shoegaze i think the inferred outlives rfc and the implied bounds rfc would help you out here and cover most of what you want. (it won't hurt to submit your rfc though, it doesn't seem like that large of an addition). there's also an ancient rfc about lifetime elision in impl headers that was accepted pre 1.0 and only now getting around to being implemented.

once these are implemented you wouldn't need to copy your lifetime requirements on every function and impl block that acts on the same types and it would reduce a lot of noise.

tinaun fucked around with this message at 06:12 on Jul 27, 2018

# ? Jul 27, 2018 06:08

gonadic io: Feb 16, 2011; >>=

mystes posted:

I don't know, there's got to be a dumber rust/cats pun out there somewhere. Feral?

Rascall

# ? Jul 27, 2018 07:46

eschaton: Mar 7, 2007; Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?

TheCog posted:

At the risk of sounding ignorant, what is a p-lang?

I don�t know, what�s a p-lang with you?

# ? Jul 27, 2018 08:26

champagne posting: Apr 5, 2006; YOU ARE A BRAIN
IN A BUNKER

eschaton posted:

I don�t know, what�s a p-lang with you?

pos-lang

# ? Jul 27, 2018 08:33

Ellie Crabcakes: Feb 1, 2008; Stop emailing my boyfriend Gay Crungus

eschaton posted:

I don�t know, what�s a p-lang with you?

You Dane Cook motherfucker

# ? Jul 27, 2018 08:53

Ellie Crabcakes: Feb 1, 2008; Stop emailing my boyfriend Gay Crungus

Luigi Thirty posted:

MFC is real bad lmao

I will stick with C calls

Have you tried Cw MC Calls?

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:06

vanity slug: Jul 20, 2010

TheCog posted:

At the risk of sounding ignorant, what is a p-lang?

p-lang is stored in the balls

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:18

Powerful Two-Hander: Mar 10, 2004; Mods please change my name to "Tooter Skeleton" TIA.

MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

i just happen to like rats a lot.

also i had a sweet tooth tonight, so check out this sweet sweet syntactic sugar:

code:

/// Lifts a funtion Fn(A) -> L into a Kleisli where L implement Lift
pub fn lift<'a, F, A, B, Z, G, L>(run: impl Fn(A) -> L + 'a) -> impl Kleisli<'a, F, A, B, Z, G>
where
    L: Lift<'a, F, B, Z, G> + 'a,
    F: 'static,
    G: 'static,
    B: 'a,
    Z: 'a,
{
    self::run(move |a| run(a).lift())
}

/// Evaluate the Kleisli with A, and unlift the resulting Lifted
fn runlift(&self, a: A) -> <Lifted<'a, F, B, Z, G> as Unlift<F>>::Out
    where
    Lifted<'a, F, B, Z, G>: Unlift<F>,
    {
        Kleisli::<_, _, _, _, _>::run(self, a).unlift()
    }

    // and now the earlier example works without having to explicitly lift and unlift everything:  
    // (ok it's still explicit but a lot nicer)
    #[test]
    fn test_compose_and_map() {
        let parse = kleisli::lift(|s: &str| s.parse::<i32>().map_err(|_| "parse error"));

        let reciprocal = kleisli::lift(|i: i32| {
            if i != 0 {
                Ok(1.0 / i as f32)
            } else {
                Err("divide by 0")
            }
        });

        let parse_and_recriprocal = reciprocal.compose(parse);

        assert_eq!(parse_and_recriprocal.runlift("123"), Ok(0.008130081));

        assert_eq!(parse_and_recriprocal.runlift("yospos"), Err("parse error"));

        let doubled = parse_and_recriprocal.map(|f| f * 2 as f32);
        assert_eq!(doubled.runlift("123"), Ok(0.016260162));
        assert_eq!(doubled.runlift("0"), Err("divide by 0"));
    }

what the gently caress sort of moon language is this

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:20

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

cjs: if only our programmers had some means to work around the problem of excel�s xirr formula not being included in php standard library

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:23

gonadic io: Feb 16, 2011; >>=

Powerful Two-Hander posted:

what the gently caress sort of moon language is this

It started as rust, which has syntax not dissimilar from c++. It is now something very different however

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:31

Ellie Crabcakes: Feb 1, 2008; Stop emailing my boyfriend Gay Crungus

Powerful Two-Hander posted:

what the gently caress sort of moon language is this

Male Shoegaze has drunk deeply of the FP Kool-Aide

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:35

eschaton: Mar 7, 2007; Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?

does rust let you declare your own operators, using Unicode too?

because if not, there�s a project for shoegaze

get all APL up in here

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:37

eschaton: Mar 7, 2007; Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?

the FP people need more APL in their lives

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:37

gonadic io: Feb 16, 2011; >>=

eschaton posted:

does rust let you declare your own operators, using Unicode too?

because if not, there�s a project for shoegaze

get all APL up in here

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/818

quote:

I'm closing this RFC as most people seem to be aganist this idea. I admit that in general the usefulness of this feature is limited. I was writing parser combinators which is one of the few times custom operators could be useful.

# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:52

jony neuemonic: Nov 13, 2009

eschaton posted:

the FP people need more APL in their lives

as do we all.

# ? Jul 27, 2018 11:06

Luigi Thirty: Apr 30, 2006; Emergency confection port.

Peeny Cheez posted:

Have you tried Cw MC Calls?

booooooo

# ? Jul 27, 2018 12:24

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Oct 13, 2024 15:23

DONT THREAD ON ME: Oct 1, 2002; by Nyc_Tattoo; Floss Finder

tinaun posted:

male shoegaze i think the inferred outlives rfc and the implied bounds rfc would help you out here and cover most of what you want. (it won't hurt to submit your rfc though, it doesn't seem like that large of an addition). there's also an ancient rfc about lifetime elision in impl headers that was accepted pre 1.0 and only now getting around to being implemented.

once these are implemented you wouldn't need to copy your lifetime requirements on every function and impl block that acts on the same types and it would reduce a lot of noise.

oooh yeah these would help a lot. as you said though, my suggestion seems harmless so i might give it a shot just for fun.

completely unrelated question because i'm pretty sure i saw your name on the futures 0.3 pr: my "lifting" works fine with futures 0.1 and futures 0.2, but sadly doesn't work with the new stdlib futures in nightly because they aren't object safe as they're using arbitrary self types. Do you have any idea if there are plans to lift the restrictions on object safety to allow arbitrary self types or if some other workaround is planned? I really want to put these futures in a box. nm i just googled it and yes: they're working on it.

eschaton posted:

does rust let you declare your own operators, using Unicode too?

because if not, there’s a project for shoegaze

get all APL up in here

oh man as someone who has experienced scala first hand: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. the only good custom scala operator i've encountered is `===`, which is good because the builtin equals is very bad. as much as i'm enjoying FP concepts i really don't like operator soup.

otoh, adding custom operators would be in keeping with my previous terrible programming language contribution: adding nested ternary expressions to Crystal.

Peeny Cheez posted:

Male Shoegaze has drunk deeply of the FP Kool-Aide

i know you're just poking fun but let me just state that I am not an FP zealot. It's really fun and it's making my brain grow and I'll definitely continue to apply a lot of these concepts to other things, but I don't think it's the best/only way to program. I just came off a year at a scala shop and I didn't get to explore these concepts as much as I wanted so here I am.

Powerful Two-Hander posted:

what the gently caress sort of moon language is this

it's good

# ? Jul 27, 2018 12:46

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Scary Hauntings/Spectral Crap > YOSPOS > awful programming: post .net clarity strikes again

«‹›1161 »