|
there's a vs 2019 now???? i just got approval to move projects to 2017!
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 18:58 |
|
|
# ? Dec 5, 2024 16:18 |
|
HoboMan posted:there's a vs 2019 now???? apparently there's jvm versions after 7 too
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 19:00 |
|
HoboMan posted:there's a vs 2019 now???? they've added more dumb poo poo to almost every context menu in the entire application, it's great
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 19:08 |
|
galenanorth posted:If I can't find anything, I could launch my business anyway even though I can't get a Home Occupation License and see if I can make enough money to move out are you able to get a PO Box or a coworking space? also did u try "well im technically doing all the business online, so"
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 19:30 |
|
redux is great. what are the issues people have with it? the connecting react to redux part is kinda clunky but the tooling and testing benefits make it worth it imo
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 21:06 |
|
Xarn posted:ctps: My job position was just renamed from "Software engineer" to "Researcher" busted for copying all your code off stack overflow
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 23:06 |
|
HoboMan posted:there's a vs 2019 now???? it’s not like the project files are any different
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 23:17 |
|
god i love tom7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TFDG-y-EHs
|
# ? Apr 4, 2019 23:37 |
|
akadajet posted:yeah. it does state management and pumps up your slocs been laughing at this for a few hours now. wanna see some framework earnestly boast about pumping up slocs
|
# ? Apr 5, 2019 00:45 |
|
typescript tools javascript as much as javascript itself can be tooled. who here can describe the differences between the various options for '--module' or hell '--esModuleInterop' and what pitfalls they present with interop between projects that use different settings for it
|
# ? Apr 5, 2019 04:43 |
|
HoboMan posted:yeah i am also a v terrible javascript programmer, but i got the sense that adding redux wasn't really doing anything except adding a bunch of boilerplate that makes my code hard to read i think the idea is that redux forces you to write that state machine, rather than leave your ui state scattered to the four winds over your entire app, with all the pros and cons inherent in that architecture i don't know if it's a good or a bad thing overall, but having dealt with jquery spaghetti in the past, forcing your devs to adopt a common model seems like a good start
|
# ? Apr 5, 2019 05:07 |
|
I think a lot more things make sense when you have to work on programs with other people Other people are the worst
|
# ? Apr 5, 2019 07:04 |
|
All this talk about front-end frameworks and nobody's mentioned Oracle JET? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=976h4WsBbuE - It's built on Knockout!
|
# ? Apr 5, 2019 10:06 |
|
ah, Knockout! I've built the mapping plugin for that. It was terrible but i still think it was the best thing available at that point in time (arguably better than all the 'let's just do a diff' approaches that happened afterwards)
|
# ? Apr 5, 2019 11:00 |
|
anything built on javascript is bad and people who use those things are also bad.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:15 |
|
i have a weird/dumb idea that i was hoping to get some thoughts on. i wrote a task runner in python that takes user supplies code, generates a context, and executes the code in that context. the task running code is kind of janky and, because it's python and the gil exists i've had to resort to using multithreading to get semi-decent performance with the trade-off that the process boundary is extremely brittle. i was thinking about rewriting the task runner code in go and somehow using ffi to execute the python code. from reading it looks like i'll have to use the c import and write a c bridge to handle the ffi but there's also a bit of the runner code that does some code validation and it'd be cool to port that to go as well am i being stupid here? are there better options?
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:28 |
|
Yeah, use C++ OP
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:31 |
|
i haven't written a line of c++ since high school
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:33 |
|
rat bert is about to recommend using boost python. as a knowledgeable bystander I can tell you: you’re allowed to murder him preemptively
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:55 |
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i have a weird/dumb idea that i was hoping to get some thoughts on. Rust genuinely has some pretty good python integration: https://github.com/dgrunwald/rust-cpython looks like you can do code:
gonadic io fucked around with this message at 23:00 on Apr 6, 2019 |
# ? Apr 6, 2019 22:56 |
|
does rust have an aws sdk? cause that's the other piece of the puzzle i'd love to use rust if i could
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:01 |
|
Blinkz0rz posted:does rust have an aws sdk? cause that's the other piece of the puzzle Seems so? https://github.com/rusoto/rusoto I've not used it but it got endorsed on the AWS blog if that holds any weight: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/rustconf-2018/
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:07 |
|
I'm doing my first async http server/client/db thing in rust and am finding it pretty painful honestly: https://github.com/djmcgill/de-list-server just the process of getting used to the hyper/tokio setup, and it doesn't help that the library I proofed out the sync stuff in hasn't updated it's async interface in a while so i'm having to reimplement it. i'll probably end up contributing my changes back as a pr i think but it's annoying to have to do e: also i should have just used an error library (or just ignore all errors) from the beginning instead of ending up with poo poo like Box<(dyn std::error::Error + Send + Sync) in a bunch of places gonadic io fucked around with this message at 23:33 on Apr 6, 2019 |
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:09 |
|
yeah trying to use the first generation of async libs that were developed around tokio-core is really really painful now
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:34 |
|
Phobeste posted:rat bert is about to recommend using boost python. as a knowledgeable bystander I can tell you: you’re allowed to murder him preemptively woah woah woah. calm down! I’m not a sadist! You could use pybind instead.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:35 |
|
tinaun posted:yeah trying to use the first generation of async libs that were developed around tokio-core is really really painful now if i'm reimplementing it myself i might just jump to 0.3 onwards since why not e: because none of the web frameworks seem to have updated presumably due to stability issues gonadic io fucked around with this message at 23:45 on Apr 6, 2019 |
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:37 |
|
the only web framework on 0.3 at the moment is tide, which is pretty cool but still super early hopefully with the impending stabilization of futures things will start moving towards working better on stable. its always been a bit of a catch 22 since you need to test libraries before you stabilize them, but people are hesitant to work with libs that aren't stable yet, especially when that means having to move from stable rustc to a nightly build. (thats why stuff like romio exists, since tokio doesn't want to make a official release that requires nightly)
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:52 |
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i have a weird/dumb idea that i was hoping to get some thoughts on. What's the context here? Why did you write performance critical code in a plang? Does network io dominate? If not, what dominates?
|
# ? Apr 6, 2019 23:56 |
|
it's not performance critical but it is bottlenecked by python's gil if i use threads and lots of very specific data handling and sanitization when dealing with passing values across the process boundary if i use multiprocess i'd love to work with something that's a) statically typed, b) performant, and c) doesn't have the same annoying considerations around parallelizing execution
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 00:44 |
|
Modern C++ is quite good and meets all of one points.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 00:45 |
|
also the rest of my lovely team only really knows python so it ended up being python but it takes loving forever to run these tasks
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 00:45 |
|
ratbert90 posted:Modern C++ is quite good and meets all of one points. i came in asking this question thinking i was the terrible programmer but maybe it's u?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 00:46 |
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i came in asking this question thinking i was the terrible programmer but maybe it's u? all programmers are terrible fact
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 00:53 |
|
Blinkz0rz posted:i haven't written a line of c++ since high school who the hell's high school had programming courses
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 03:02 |
|
am I the only one who reads python's lock as "ol' gil" whenever I read it
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 03:18 |
|
Beamed posted:who the hell's high school had programming courses mine
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 03:23 |
|
same. I had pascal (lol) and c++
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 03:23 |
|
hello fellow 1998-1999 high schools student
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 03:34 |
|
Beamed posted:who the hell's high school had programming courses we got BASIC and vb6. quality stuff.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 07:32 |
|
|
# ? Dec 5, 2024 16:18 |
|
our high school "programming" course was 90% html (using dreamweaver) and 10% "here's how to use php as a templating language"
|
# ? Apr 7, 2019 08:00 |