|
Nomnom Cookie posted:i went digging through the article and all i could find was an assertion that sometimes you need to be able to handle garbage filenames that can't be represented by a unicode string. why? who knows. maybe because they enjoy eating garbage. that sounds like something a mercurial user would enjoy posix says that filenames are just arbitrary strings of bytes as a garbage way of "supporting" systems that predate utf-8 and also don't store what encoding the filenames are encoded with anywhere. for some reason this makes linux users think that they actually should create files with names that are just arbitrary bytes and not utf-8.
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Dec 6, 2025 00:59 |
|
TheFluff posted:standards compliant unicode casefolding is loving hilarious in general, try running property-based testing on something that casefolds and compares for equality and weep at all the bugs you'll find - the turkish dotless i is just the beginning, there's a lot more exciting stuff to be found try passing the result around various filesystems then
|
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:posix says that filenames are just arbitrary strings of bytes as a garbage way of "supporting" systems that predate utf-8 and also don't store what encoding the filenames are encoded with anywhere. for some reason this makes linux users think that they actually should create files with names that are just arbitrary bytes and not utf-8. https://dwheeler.com/essays/fixing-unix-linux-filenames.html its a mess edit disclaimer i dont agree or disagree with any of that time cube rear end website's opinions
|
|
|
|
Penisface posted:thanks, thread, for teaching me that i in fact did NOT know how to compare strings properly imo just do the float approach and gleefully point out to the user that 0.2 != 0.200000000001. gently caress you user.
|
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:should have stuck with ascii even if, being shaggar, you do not see the point of supporting other languages, ascii is not even sufficient to represent english as written by americans even windows-1252 doesn’t get there
|
|
|
|
In 2019, "English as written by Americans" includes emoji.
|
|
|
|
Ok, so somebody else's terrible code I took inspiration from:![]() I've seen people do this all in the GLSL shader, impressive. I do not understand any of it, most of that being because the code is really terrible.
|
|
|
|
you should make the text decals on the fabric imo
|
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:even if, being shaggar, you do not see the point of supporting other languages, ascii is not even sufficient to represent english as written by americans what is it missing?
|
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:what is it missing? 🍆
|
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:what is it missing? ʃhaggar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:what is it missing? 🚲
|
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:you should make the text decals on the fabric imo Not quite as legible, ![]() (edit) forgot links: 1080p MrMoo fucked around with this message at 23:57 on Jan 14, 2020 |
|
|
|
It looks a lot better though
|
|
|
|
Phobeste posted:it's all awful i guess is my point computers.txt
|
|
|
|
abigserve posted:A lot of poo poo that goes wrong in cloud and containerization is caused by people trying to re-invent networking fundamentals and crashing into the realization that you cant really gently caress with layer 3. this is why i don't think i could be an infrastructure person. networking is a whole different skillset that i have no idea how to learn and internalize. computers have addresses? and packets get sent to them or maybe not sent to them?
|
|
|
|
smoke, sort of,![]() idk, that's all I can think of to play about with. Enjoy! MrMoo fucked around with this message at 01:42 on Jan 15, 2020 |
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:Not quite as legible, hell yeah! that looks even better than i thought it would
|
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:posix says that filenames are just arbitrary strings of bytes as a garbage way of "supporting" systems that predate utf-8 and also don't store what encoding the filenames are encoded with anywhere. for some reason this makes linux users think that they actually should create files with names that are just arbitrary bytes and not utf-8. the tendency to cleverness is latent in all computer touchers and must be ruthlessly suppressed whenever it is encountered
|
|
|
|
abigserve posted:A lot of poo poo that goes wrong in cloud and containerization is caused by people trying to re-invent networking fundamentals and crashing into the realization that you cant really gently caress with layer 3. give every container an ipv6 address change my mind
|
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:posix says that filenames are just arbitrary strings of bytes as a garbage way of "supporting" systems that predate utf-8 and also don't store what encoding the filenames are encoded with anywhere. for some reason this makes linux users think that they actually should create files with names that are just arbitrary bytes and not utf-8. What is a file? [flings his wine glass aside] A miserable little string of bytes!
|
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:posix says that filenames are just arbitrary strings of bytes as a garbage way of "supporting" systems that predate utf-8 and also don't store what encoding the filenames are encoded with anywhere. for some reason this makes linux users think that they actually should create files with names that are just arbitrary bytes and not utf-8. You'd at least have to have the ability to open/read from those arbitrary byte files, at which point you've already opened Pandora's box and gently caress it might as well be able to create and write to them.
|
|
|
|
files are better off deleted
|
|
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:files are better off deleted code is better off deleted
|
|
|
|
i like to sometimes delete code, as a treat
|
|
|
|
Same but my posts
|
|
|
|
dick traceroute posted:Same but my posts a treat for all!
|
|
|
|
my stepdads beer posted:give every container an ipv6 address change my mind well it's not really that bad of a concept, a lot of issues stem from scale problems where NAT is mandatory and when nat is mandatory other problems happen
|
|
|
|
i don't understand how to ipv6 but i know ipv4 pretty well and i am opposed to any form of change that might force me to learn new things, thank you for being considerate
|
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:i don't understand how to ipv6 but i know ipv4 pretty well and i am opposed to any form of change that might force me to learn new things, thank you for being considerate spoken like a coal scientist
|
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:i don't understand how to ipv6 but i know ipv4 pretty well and i am opposed to any form of change that might force me to learn new things, thank you for being considerate
|
|
|
|
just hear me out fellas, what if we gave every process its own IP
|
|
|
|
Ploft-shell crab posted:just hear me out fellas, what if we gave every process its own IP Ipv6, why not
|
|
|
|
Who needs uuids when you have ipv6 addresses.
|
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:spoken like a coal scientist weren't they supposed to be learning to code by now?
|
|
|
|
Ploft-shell crab posted:just hear me out fellas, what if we gave every process its own IP yes we can get rid of ports
|
|
|
|
Ploft-shell crab posted:just hear me out fellas, what if we gave every process its own IP files too
|
|
|
|
stop reminding me that gcp still doesn't properly support ipv6 loving bullshit, that
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Dec 6, 2025 00:59 |
|
If Your Job Posting Asks for a Rockstar Candidate, Don’t Get All Pissy When I Show up Coked out of My Mind and Trash the Place https://thehardtimes.net/blog/if-yo...rash-the-place/
|
|
|









































